Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 34
1.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 12: e48756, 2024 Apr 22.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648103

BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Secondary prevention is essential, as it reduces the risk of further coronary events. Mobile health (mHealth) technology could become a useful tool to improve lifestyles. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an mHealth intervention on people with coronary heart disease who received percutaneous coronary intervention. Improvements in lifestyle regarding diet, physical activity, and smoking; level of knowledge of a healthy lifestyle and the control of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs); and therapeutic adherence and quality of life were analyzed. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial with a parallel group design assigned 1:1 to either an intervention involving a smartphone app (mHealth group) or to standard health care (control group). The app was used for setting aims, the self-monitoring of lifestyle and CVRFs using measurements and records, educating people with access to information on their screens about healthy lifestyles and adhering to treatment, and giving motivation through feedback about achievements and aspects to improve. Both groups were assessed after 9 months. The primary outcome variables were adherence to the Mediterranean diet, frequency of food consumed, patient-reported physical activity, smoking, knowledge of healthy lifestyles and the control of CVRFs, adherence to treatment, quality of life, well-being, and satisfaction. RESULTS: The study analyzed 128 patients, 67 in the mHealth group and 61 in the control group; most were male (92/128, 71.9%), with a mean age of 59.49 (SD 8.97) years. Significant improvements were observed in the mHealth group compared with the control group regarding adherence to the Mediterranean diet (mean 11.83, SD 1.74 points vs mean 10.14, SD 2.02 points; P<.001), frequency of food consumption, patient-reported physical activity (mean 619.14, SD 318.21 min/week vs mean 471.70, SD 261.43 min/week; P=.007), giving up smoking (25/67, 75% vs 11/61, 42%; P=.01), level of knowledge of healthy lifestyles and the control of CVRFs (mean 118.70, SD 2.65 points vs mean 111.25, SD 9.05 points; P<.001), and the physical component of the quality of life 12-item Short Form survey (SF-12; mean 45.80, SD 10.79 points vs mean 41.40, SD 10.78 points; P=.02). Overall satisfaction was higher in the mHealth group (mean 48.22, SD 3.89 vs mean 46.00, SD 4.82 points; P=.002) and app satisfaction and usability were high (mean 44.38, SD 6.18 out of 50 points and mean 95.22, SD 7.37 out of 100). CONCLUSIONS: The EVITE app was effective in improving the lifestyle of patients in terms of adherence to the Mediterranean diet, frequency of healthy food consumption, physical activity, giving up smoking, knowledge of healthy lifestyles and controlling CVRFs, quality of life, and overall satisfaction. The app satisfaction and usability were excellent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04118504; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04118504.


Mobile Applications , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Mobile Applications/standards , Mobile Applications/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Quality of Life/psychology , Coronary Disease/psychology , Coronary Disease/prevention & control , Life Style , Telemedicine/methods , Telemedicine/standards , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data
2.
Digit Health ; 10: 20552076241234474, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38510574

Background: Coronary disease is the main cause of death around the world. mHealth technology is considered attractive and promising to promote behavioural changes aimed at healthy lifestyle habits among coronary patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of an mHealth intervention regarding improved results in secondary prevention in patients after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or angina in terms of lifestyle, clinical variables and therapeutic compliance. Methods: Randomised clinical trial with 300 patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implant. They will be assigned to either the mHealth group, subject to a self-monitored educational intervention involving an internet application installed on their mobile phone or tablet, or to a control group receiving standard healthcare (150 patients in each arm). The primary outcome variables will be adherence to the Mediterranean diet, physical activity, smoking, therapeutic compliance, knowledge acquired, user-friendliness and satisfaction with the application. Measurements of blood pressure, heart rate, body weight, waist circumference (WC) and the 6-min walk test will be taken. Furthermore, the blood lipid profile, glucose and HbA1c will be evaluated. Clinical interview will be conducted, and validated questionnaires completed. The primary quantitative results will be compared using an analysis of covariance adjusted for age and sex. A multivariate analysis will be performed to examine the association of the intervention with lifestyle habits, the control of cardiovascular risk factors (CDRFs) and the results after the hospital discharge (major adverse events, treatment compliance and lifestyle). Conclusions: The study will provide evidence about the effectiveness of an mHealth intervention at improving the lifestyle of the participants and could be offered to patients with coronary disease to complement existing services. Trial registration: NCT05247606. [https://ClinicalTrials.gov]. 21/02/2022.

3.
JACC Case Rep ; 29(5): 102235, 2024 Mar 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38464807

A 70-year-old woman consulted us for dyspnea. Echocardiography revealed moderate aortic regurgitation secondary to ascending aorta dilatation. Study was completed with aortic angiography computed tomography, showing stenosis and dissection of several visceral arteries. There were no abnormal inflammatory or autoimmune markers, nor fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography uptake. Segmental arterial mediolysis was diagnosed.

4.
Am J Cardiol ; 214: 109-114, 2024 Mar 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38232809

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) induces an alteration in hemodynamic conditions that are responsible for coronary microvasculature impairment. Relief of AS by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is expected to improve the coronary artery hemodynamic. We aimed to assess the midterm effects of TAVI in coronary flow reserve (CFR) and myocardial resistance reserve (MRR) by a continuous intracoronary thermodilution technique. At-rest and hyperemic coronary flow was measured by a continuous thermodilution technique in 23 patients with AS and compared with that in 17 matched controls, and repeated 6 ± 3 months after TAVI in 11 of the patients with AS. In patients with AS, absolute coronary flow at rest was significantly greater, and absolute resistance at rest was significantly less, than in controls (p <0.01 for both), causing less CFR and MRR (1.73 ± 0.4 vs 2.85 ± 1.1, p <0.01 and 1.95 ± 0.4 vs 3.22 ± 1.4, p <0.01, respectively). TAVI implantation yielded a significant 35% increase in CFR (p >0.01) and a 39% increase in MRR (p <0.01) driven by absolute coronary flow at rest reduction (p = 0.03). In patients with AS, CFR and MRR determined by continuous thermodilution are significantly impaired. At 6-month follow-up, TAVI improves these indexes and partially relieves the pathophysiologic alterations, leading to a partial restoration of CFR and MRR.


Aortic Valve Stenosis , Coronary Stenosis , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Coronary Circulation/physiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Hemodynamics , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery
5.
Europace ; 25(11)2023 11 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37961921

AIMS: The aim of our study was to analyse the response to short-coupled atrial extrastimuli to identify areas of hidden slow conduction (HSC) and their relationship with the atrial fibrillation (AF) phenotype. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF and persistent AF (10:10) underwent the first pulmonary vein isolation procedure. Triple short-coupled extrastimuli were delivered in sinus rhythm (SR), and the evoked response was analysed: sites exhibiting double or highly fragmented electrograms (EGM) were defined as positive for HSC (HSC+). The delta of the duration of the bipolar EGM was analysed, and bipolar EGM duration maps were built. High-density maps were acquired using a multipolar catheter during AF, SR, and paced rhythm. Spatial co-localization of HSC+ and complex fractionated atrial EGMs (CFAE) during AF was evaluated. Persistent AF showed a higher number and percentage of HSC+ than paroxysmal AF (13.9% vs. 3.3%, P < 0.001). The delta of EGM duration was 53 ± 22 ms for HSC+ compared with 13 ± 11 (10) ms in sites with negative HSC (HSC-) (P < 0.001). The number and density of HSC+ were lower than CFAE during AF (19 vs. 56 per map, P < 0.001). The reproducibility and distribution of HSC+ in repeated maps were superior to CFAE (P = 0.19 vs. P < 0.001). Sites with negative and positive responses showed a similar bipolar voltage in the preceding sinus beat (1.65 ± 1.34 and 1.48 ± 1.47 mV, P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: Functional mapping identifies more discrete and reproducible abnormal substrates than mapping during AF. The HSC+ sites in response to triple extrastimuli are more frequent in persistent AF than in paroxysmal AF.


Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Reproducibility of Results , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac/methods , Heart Rate , Heart Atria
6.
J Clin Med ; 12(8)2023 Apr 21.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37109365

Our aim was to determine the prognostic impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) on heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) mortality and readmissions. From a prospective multicenter registry that included 1831 patients hospitalized due to heart failure, 583 had a left ventricular ejection fraction of <40%. In total, 266 patients (45.6%) had coronary artery disease as main etiology and 137 (23.5%) had idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and they are the focus of this study. Significant differences were found in Charlson index (CAD 4.4 ± 2.8, idiopathic DCM 2.9 ± 2.4, p < 0.001), and in the number of previous hospitalizations (1.1 ± 1, 0.8 ± 1.2, respectively, p = 0.015). One-year mortality was similar in the two groups: idiopathic DCM (hazard ratio [HR] = 1), CAD (HR 1.50; 95% CI 0.83-2.70, p = 0.182). Mortality/readmissions were also comparable: CAD (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.64-1.41, p = 0.81). Patients with idiopathic DCM had a higher probability of receiving a heart transplant than those with CAD (HR 4.6; 95% CI 1.4-13.4, p = 0.012). The prognosis of HFrEF is similar in patients with CAD etiology and in those with idiopathic DCM. Patients with idiopathic DCM were more prone to receive heart transplant.

7.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 10(12): e39593, 2022 12 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36459396

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease is the main cause of death and loss of disability-adjusted life years worldwide. Information and communication technology has become an important part of health care systems, including the innovative cardiac rehabilitation services through mobile phone and mobile health (mHealth) interventions. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to determine the effectiveness of different kinds of mHealth programs in changing lifestyle behavior, promoting adherence to treatment, and controlling modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and psychosocial outcomes in patients who have experienced a coronary event. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A thorough search of the following biomedical databases was conducted: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SciELO, CINAHL, Scopus, The Clinical Trial, and Cochrane. Articles that were randomized clinical trials that involved an intervention consisting of an mHealth program using a mobile app in patients after a coronary event were included. The articles analyzed some of the following variables as outcome variables: changes in lifestyle behavior, cardiovascular risk factors, and anthropometric and psychosocial variables. A meta-analysis of the variables studied was performed with the Cochrane tool. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool; the quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool; and heterogeneity was measured using the I2 test. RESULTS: A total of 23 articles were included in the review, and 20 (87%) were included in the meta-analysis, with a total sample size of 4535 patients. Exercise capacity measured using the 6-minute walk test (mean difference=21.64, 95% CI 12.72-30.55; P<.001), physical activity (standardized mean difference [SMD]=0.42, 95% CI 0.04-0.81; P=.03), and adherence to treatment (risk difference=0.19, 95% CI 0.11-0.28; P<.001) were significantly superior in the mHealth group. Furthermore, both the physical and mental dimensions of quality of life were better in the mHealth group (SMD=0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.44; P=.004 and SMD=0.27, 95% CI 0.06-0.47; P=.01, respectively). In addition, hospital readmissions for all causes and cardiovascular causes were statistically higher in the control group than in the mHealth group (SMD=-0.03, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.00; P=.04 vs SMD=-0.04, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.00; P=.05). CONCLUSIONS: mHealth technology has a positive effect on patients who have experienced a coronary event in terms of their exercise capacity, physical activity, adherence to medication, and physical and mental quality of life, as well as readmissions for all causes and cardiovascular causes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42022299931; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=299931.


Cardiovascular Diseases , Telemedicine , Humans , Quality of Life , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Life Style , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
8.
Coron Artery Dis ; 33(6): 433-439, 2022 09 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35811572

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed conflicting results regarding the contribution of coronary collateral circulation (CCC) to myocardial perfusion and function in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI). In the primary angioplasty era, the role of CCC in these studies may have been influenced by the effect of early reperfusion. The true impact of CCC could be clarified by studying its effect on nonreperfused patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of CCC on myocardial viability of late presentation MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2019, we included 167 patients with a late presentation MI who had a complete angiographic occlusion in a major coronary artery in which myocardial viability of the culprit territory was assessed. Patients were divided according to the presence of angiographic early recruited CCC (ERCC) (Rentrop 2-3) or poor CCC (PCC) (Rentrop 0-1). A lower left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) at discharge (54.2 ± 9 vs. 47.9 ± 12; <0.01) and a more severe left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in the culprit territory were observed in PCC patients. The presence of ERCC was the main independent predictor of myocardial viability in late presentation MI (hazard ratio, 4.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-10.6; P < 0.001). At follow-up, wall motion score increased significantly (2.05 ± 0.16; P = 0.02) in patients with ERCC but not in PCC patients (0.07 ± 0.16; P = 0.4), and LVEF improvement was significantly higher in ERCC than in PCC patients (9.7 ± 2.6 vs. 3.8 ± 4.2; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The presence of ERCC was the main independent predictor of myocardial viability in late presentation MI.


Coronary Circulation , Myocardial Infarction , Collateral Circulation , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Ventricular Function, Left
9.
J Clin Med ; 11(10)2022 May 14.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35628900

BACKGROUND: It is important for health professionals to have tools available to assess patients' knowledge of lifestyle and cardiovascular risk factors after they have suffered a coronary event and determine whether educational interventions are effective. This study aims to design and validate a scale to evaluate this knowledge. METHODS: Four-phase instrument design: (A) Conceptual review. (B) Review by experts. (C) Pilot test-retest. (D) Psychometric validation of the final version of the questionnaire with 24 items. A panel of experts performed the content validity. The reliability of the scale was measured using Cronbach's alpha score and criterion validity was evaluated by comparing the total scores for knowledge obtained by the participants among the three education level groups. The construct and dimensional structure validity were assessed using exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: A total of 143 people participated, 30 in the pilot study and 113 (68% male, 60.2 ± 9 years) in the psychometric validation of version 3 of the scale. A Cronbach's alpha score of 0.887 was reached for this version. The factor analysis showed that the items were distributed into five factors that explained 57% of the variance. Significant differences were observed in the level of knowledge among the patients of the three levels of education (low, moderate and high) (99.20 ± 11.93, 105.92 ± 7.85, 109.78 ± 8.76 points, p = 0.003), as there was a negative correlation between age and knowledge level (r = -0.213, p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The scale presents psychometric properties that are evidence of its reliability and validity. The relationship demonstrated between the level of knowledge and age, sex and level of education shows the importance of emphasizing educational interventions for elderly people and those with a lower level of education.

10.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 9: 861651, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35463785

Introduction: Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is an inflammatory marker associated with the development and progression of heart failure (HF). A close relationship between Gal-3 levels and renal function has been observed, but data on their interaction in patients with acute HF (AHF) are scarce. We aim to assess the prognostic relationship between renal function and Gal-3 during an AHF episode. Materials and Methods: This is an observational, prospective, multicenter registry of patients hospitalized for AHF. Patients were divided into two groups according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): preserved renal function (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and renal dysfunction (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between Gal-3 and 12-month mortality. Results: We included 1,201 patients in whom Gal-3 values were assessed at admission. The median value of Gal-3 in our population was 23.2 ng/mL (17.3-32.1). Gal-3 showed a negative correlation with eGFR (rho = -0.51; p < 0.001). Gal-3 concentrations were associated with higher mortality risk in the multivariate analysis after adjusting for eGFR and other prognostic variables [HR = 1.010 (95%-CI: 1.001-1.018); p = 0.038]. However, the prognostic value of Gal-3 was restricted to patients with renal dysfunction [HR = 1.010 (95%-CI: 1.001-1.019), p = 0.033] with optimal cutoff point of 31.5 ng/mL, with no prognostic value in the group with preserved renal function [HR = 0.990 (95%-CI: 0.964-1.017); p = 0.472]. Conclusions: Gal-3 is a marker of high mortality in patients with acute HF and renal dysfunction. Renal function influences the prognostic value of Gal-3 levels, which should be adjusted by eGFR for a correct interpretation.

12.
Clin Res Cardiol ; 111(4): 368-379, 2022 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33070219

BACKGROUND: Available information about prognostic implications of potassium levels alteration in the setting of acute heart failure (AHF) is scarce. OBJECTIVES: We aim to describe the prevalence of dyskalemia (hypo or hyperkalemia), its dynamic changes during AHF-hospitalization, and its long-term clinical impact after hospitalization. METHODS: We analyzed 1779 patients hospitalized with AHF who were included in the REDINSCOR II registry. Patients were classified in three groups, according to potassium levels both on admission and discharge: hypokalemia (potassium < 3.5 mEq/L), normokalemia (potassium = 3.5-5.0 mEq/L and, hyperkalemia (potassium > 5 mEq/L). RESULTS: The prevalence of hypokalemia and hyperkalemia on admission was 8.2 and 4.6%, respectively, and 6.4 and 2.7% at discharge. Hyperkalemia on admission was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (OR = 2.32 [95% CI: 1.04-5.21] p = 0.045). Among patients with hypokalemia on admission, 79% had normalized potassium levels at discharge. In the case of patients with hyperkalemia on admission, 89% normalized kalemia before discharge. In multivariate Cox regression, dyskalemia was associated with higher 12-month mortality, (HR = 1.48 [95% CI, 1.12-1.96], p = 0.005). Among all patterns of dyskalemia persistent hypokalemia (HR = 3.17 [95% CI: 1.71-5.88]; p < 0.001), and transient hyperkalemia (HR = 1.75 [95% CI: 1.07-2.86]; p = 0.023) were related to reduced 12-month survival. CONCLUSIONS: Potassium levels alterations are frequent and show a dynamic behavior during AHF admission. Hyperkalemia on admission is an independent predictor of higher in-hospital mortality. Furthermore, persistent hypokalemia and transient hyperkalemia on admission are independent predictors of 12-month mortality.


Heart Failure , Hyperkalemia , Hypokalemia , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Hospitalization , Humans , Hyperkalemia/complications , Hyperkalemia/epidemiology , Hypokalemia/complications , Hypokalemia/epidemiology , Potassium
13.
Nutrients ; 13(6)2021 May 27.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34071782

Coronary heart disease is one of the main causes of morbimortality around the world. Patients that survive a coronary event suffer a high risk of readmission, relapse and mortality, attributed to the sub-optimal control of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), which highlights the need to improve secondary prevention strategies aimed at improving their lifestyle and adherence to treatment. Through a randomized controlled clinical trial, this study aims to evaluate the effect of an intervention involving an online health application supported by a mobile telephone or tablet (mHealth) on lifestyle (diet, physical activity, and tobacco consumption) and treatment adherence among people with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention. The sample will comprise 240 subjects (120 in each arm: intervention and usual care). They are assessed immediately and nine months after their hospital discharge about sociodemographic, clinical, CVRF, lifestyle, and treatment adherence characteristics. The educative intervention, involving a follow-up and self-monitoring, will be performed using an online mHealth tool consisting of an application for mobile phones and tablets. The quantitative primary outcomes from the two groups will be compared using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for age and gender. A multivariate analysis will be performed to examine the association of the intervention with lifestyle habits, the control of CVRFs, and outcomes after discharge in terms of the use of health services, emergency visits, cardiovascular events and readmissions.


Coronary Disease , Mobile Applications , Secondary Prevention/methods , Telemedicine/methods , Cell Phone , Coronary Disease/prevention & control , Coronary Disease/therapy , Humans , Internet , Life Style , Text Messaging , Treatment Adherence and Compliance
14.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 98(4): E523-E530, 2021 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33979479

BACKGROUND: The use of ionizing radiation during cardiac catheterization interventions adversely impacts the medical staff. Traditional radiation protection equipment is only partially effective. The Cathpax® radiation protection cabin (RPC) has proven to significantly reduce radiation exposure in electrophysiological and neuroradiology interventions. Our objective was to analyze whether the Cathpax® RPC reduces radiation dose in coronary and cardiac structural interventions in unselected real-world procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this nonrandomized all-comers prospective study, 119 consecutive cardiac interventional procedures were alternatively divided into two groups: the RPC group (n = 59) and the non-RPC group (n = 60). No significant changes in the characteristics of patients and procedures, average contrast volume, air kerma (AK), dose area-product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time between both groups were apparent. In the RPC group, the first-operator relative radiation exposure was reduced by 78% at the chest and by 70% at the wrist. This effect was consistent during different types of procedures including complex percutaneous interventions and structural procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates, for the first time, that the Cathpax® cabin significantly and efficiently reduces relative operator radiation exposure during different types of interventional procedures, confirming its feasibility in a real-world setting.


Cardiology , Occupational Exposure , Radiation Exposure , Radiation Protection , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
15.
J Clin Med ; 10(8)2021 Apr 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33921155

Coronary heart disease is common in heart failure (HF). Our aim was to determine the impact of ischemic etiology on prognosis among men and women with HF. This study is a prospective national multicenter registry. The primary endpoint was 12-month mortality. Patients with HF and ischemic heart disease were stratified according to sex. A total of 1830 patients were enrolled of which 756 (41.3%) were women. Ischemic etiology was more common in men (446 (41.6%)) than in women (167 (22.2%)). Among patients with ischemic HF, diabetes was more frequent in women than in men. Ischemic etiology was not associated with higher mortality risk, and this was true for women (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.51, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.98-2.32; p = 0.61) and men (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.81-1.61; p = 0.46), p-value for interaction: 0.067. Mortality/readmission risk in ischemic HF increased in men with previous readmissions (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.29; p = 0.022), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR1.20, 95% CI 1.02-1.41; p = 0.026) and in women with diabetes (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.05-4.47; p = 0.035). Ischemic etiology was not associated with mortality in HF patients. In ischemic HF, the variables associated with a poor prognosis were diabetes in women and previous readmissions and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in men.

16.
Am J Cardiol ; 141: 31-37, 2021 02 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33220317

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is a well-validated flow-based physiological parameter that has shown value in clinical risk stratification. CFR can be invasively assessed, classically by Doppler and, more recently, by thermodilution with saline boluses (CFRthermo-bolus). Alternatively, continuous thermodilution is a novel operator-independent, highly-reproducible technique to invasively quantify maximum absolute coronary flow (AF). This study aimed to assess the feasibility of this method to quantify resting AF and to determine CFR (CFRThermo-infusion) as compared with CFRthermo-bolus. Sixty-two consecutive patients with suspicion of coronary disease and absence of significant epicardial lesions were prospectively investigated. AF at maximal hyperemia (20 mL/min) and at lower infusion rates (6-8-10-12 mL/min) were systematically measured using a dedicated catheter and a temperature/pressure guidewire. The absence of baseline Pd/Pa decrease at 6 (0.15 ± 0.2%), 8 (0.17 ± 0.18%) and 10 mL/min (0.2 ± 0.12%) demonstrated absence of hyperemia at ≤10 mL/min (all p = NS). However, at 12 mL/min hyperemia was confirmed by a significant decrease in Pd/Pa (1.3 ± 1.5%, p <0.01) and increase in AF from 10 mL/min to 12 mL/min (31.4 ± 28.1 mL, p <0.05). All curve tracings at 10 mL/min (129/129, 100%) were adequate versus only (7/15, 53%) and (15/18, 17%) at 6 mL/min, and 8 mL/min, respectively, and this infusion-rate was considered to determine resting-AF. CFRThermo-infusion was determined as the ratio of hyperemic-AF (20 mL/min) by resting-AF (10 mL/min). Mean CFRThermo-infusion was 2.56 ± 0.9 and CFRthermo-bolus 2.49 ± 1. Both parameters showed a good correlation (r = 0.76; p <0.001) and intraclass agreement (ICC = 0.76; p <0.001).The continuous thermodilution method enables to quantify resting-AF providing a novel clinical tool to determine CRF. CFRThermo-infusion shows a good correlation with CFRthermo-bolus..


Coronary Circulation , Coronary Vessels/physiopathology , Hyperemia/physiopathology , Microcirculation , Microvessels , Thermodilution/methods , Aged , Cardiac Catheterization , Coronary Angiography , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proof of Concept Study , Reproducibility of Results , Saline Solution
17.
Minerva Cardiol Angiol ; 69(4): 449-457, 2021 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33258564

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the "gold standard" for assessing the physiological significance of coronary disease. In the last decade, several alternative adenosine-free indexes have been proposed in order to facilitate the dissemination of the functional evaluation of coronary stenosis. Our aim was to investigate whether radiographic contrast plus intracoronary nitroglycerin (cFFR-NTG) can predict functional assessment of coronary stenosis offering superior diagnostic agreement with FFR compared to non-hyperemic indexes and contrast mediated FFR (cFFR). METHODS: Three hundred twenty-nine lesions evaluated with pressure wire in 266 patients were prospectively included in this multicenter study. RESULTS: The ROC curves for cFFR-NTG using an FFR≤0.80 showed a higher accuracy in predicting FFR (AUC=0.97) than resting Pd/Pa (AUC=0.90, P<0.01) and cFFR (AUC=0.93.5, P<0.01). A significant (P<0.01) strong correlation was found between FFR and the four analyzed indexes: Pd/Pa (r=0.78); iFR/RFR (r=0.73); cFFR(r=0.89) and cFFR-NTG (r=0.93). cFFR-NTG showed the closest agreement at Bland-Altman analysis. The cFFR-NTG cut off value >0.84 showed the highest negative predictive value (88%), specificity (91%), sensitivity (94%) and accuracy (92%) of the studied indexes. CONCLUSIONS: Submaximal hyperemic adenosine-free indexes are an efficient alternative to adenosine for the physiological assessment of epicardial coronary disease. The most accurate index in predicting the functional significance of coronary stenosis using FFR as reference was cFFR-NTG.


Coronary Artery Disease , Coronary Stenosis , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Coronary Stenosis/diagnosis , Glycerol , Humans , Prospective Studies
18.
Curr Cardiol Rev ; 17(3): 294-305, 2021.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32811401

Current European guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes recommend the use of low-dose aspirin (or clopidogrel if intolerance or contraindication occurs) throughout life. However, as the risk of recurrent vascular events is high, particularly in some patients (i.e. diffuse multivessel coronary artery disease, diabetes, recurrent myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, or chronic kidney disease,…), these guidelines also consider that in those patients at moderate or high risk of ischemic events, but without a high bleeding risk, dual antithrombotic therapy should be considered. According to these guidelines, treatment options for dual antithrombotic therapy in combination with aspirin may include clopidogrel 75 mg/daily, prasugrel 10 mg/daily, ticagrelor 60 mg bid or rivaroxaban 2.5 mg bid. Remarkably, despite the results of the clinical trials that sustain these recommendations clearly diverge, guidelines do not differentiate between them. However, although all these drugs have demonstrated a significant reduction in major cardiovascular events in patients with stable atherosclerotic disease, only the addition of rivaroxaban has been associated with a reduction in cardiovascular and overall mortality in the secondary analysis. This may be related to the fact that the activation of platelets and factor X plays a key role in the development of atherothrombosis, and, consequently, both targets should be considered for the appropriate management of these patients.


Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Chronic Disease , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Syndrome
19.
Rev. esp. cardiol. Supl. (Ed. impresa) ; 20(supl.A): 21-29, ene. 2020. tab, graf
Article Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-197028

La fibrilación auricular aumenta de manera marcada el riesgo de ictus isquémico. A pesar de que los antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK) reducen ese riesgo, tienen una eficacia limitada y numerosos inconvenientes que han hecho que durante años hubiese una proporción importante de pacientes con fibrilación auricular no anticoagulados. En cambio, no solo los ensayos clínicos, sino también los estudios en práctica clínica real y últimamente los estudios poblacionales, han demostrado que los anticoagulantes orales de acción directa (ACOD) tienen más eficacia y seguridad y un mejor beneficio clínico neto que los AVK. De hecho, en las regiones donde la prescripción de ACOD es mayor, está disminuyendo la incidencia de ictus isquémico, además de los costes generales asociados con la fibrilación auricular. A pesar de que en los últimos años ha aumentado la prescripción de ACOD, España es de los países con menores tasas de prescripción de toda Europa, lo que podría asociarse con mayores tasas de ictus isquémico. A pesar de que todas las guías posicionan los ACOD como de primera elección frente a los AVK para los pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular, en España, debido a las restricciones impuestas por el informe de posicionamiento terapéutico, con necesidad de visado, y también por la inercia terapéutica, es mayor la prescripción de AVK. Son necesarias medidas inmediatas para corregir esta situación, y así mejorar el pronóstico de nuestros pacientes


Atrial fibrillation markedly increases the risk of ischemic stroke. Although vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) reduce this risk, they have limited efficacy and several disadvantages, which has meant that over the years a substantial proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation have remained without anticoagulation. In contrast, clinical trials, studies in routine clinical practice and, more recently, population-based studies have all demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are more effective and safer than VKAs and also have a greater net clinical benefit. In fact, in regions where the DOAC prescription rate is high, the incidence of ischemic stroke has decreased, as have the overall costs associated with atrial fibrillation. Although the prescription of DOACs in Spain has increased in recent years, the country has one of the lowest prescription rates in Europe, which may be associated with a higher incidence of ischemic stroke. Despite clinical guidelines all recommending that DOACs should be used in preference to VKAs in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, more prescriptions are issued for VKAs in Spain, largely due to restrictions imposed by national statements on appropriate medicine use (including the need for approval), but also because of therapeutic inertia. Immediate action should be taken to correct this situation and to improve patients' prognoses


Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Stroke/prevention & control , Rivaroxaban/administration & dosage , Brain Ischemia/prevention & control , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Vitamin K/antagonists & inhibitors
20.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 46(3): 167-171, 2019 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31708696

Exposure to ionizing radiation during cardiac catheterization can have harmful consequences for patients and for the medical staff involved in the procedures. Minimizing radiation doses during the procedures is essential. We investigated whether fine-tuning the radiation protocol reduces radiation doses in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. In January 2016, we implemented a new protocol with reduced radiation doses in the Hospital de Jerez catheterization laboratory. We analyzed 170 consecutive coronary interventional procedures (85 of which were performed after the new protocol was implemented) and the personal dosimeters of the interventional cardiologists who performed the procedures. Overall, the low-radiation protocol reduced air kerma (dose of radiation) by 44.9% (95% CI, 18.4%-70.8%; P=0.001). The dose-area product decreased by 61% (95% CI, 30.2%-90.1%; P <0.001) during percutaneous coronary interventions. We also found that the annual deep (79%, P=0.026) and shallow (62.2%, P=0.035) radiation doses to which primary operators were exposed decreased significantly under the low-radiation protocol. These dose reductions were achieved without increasing the volume of contrast media, fluoroscopy time, or rates of procedural complications, and without reducing the productivity of the laboratory. Optimizing the radiation safety protocol effectively reduced radiation exposure in patients and operators during cardiac catheterization procedures.


Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Fluoroscopy/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Risk Assessment/methods , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology
...