RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This in vitro study investigated the influence of material selection, crown morphology, and vertical crown height on the biomechanical behavior of monolithic hybrid abutment crowns (HACs). METHODS: Ninety implants were embedded in accordance with ISO standard 14801; ninety HACs were mounted (N=90). Monolithic crowns with varying group-specific designs were luted using titanium bases. HACs were fabricated from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic (LD) or zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLS). The crown morphology was either maxillary premolar (LD_PM, ZLS_PM) or molar (LD_MO). The three groups were further divided into three subgroups of ten specimens, each designed with a small (7.5 mm), middle (10.5 mm), and high (13.5 mm) configuration of crown heights (N=10). A load-to-failure test at 30° off-axis was conducted using a universal testing machine until failure. For statistical analysis, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted (P < 0.05). RESULTS: All LD_MO groups presented the highest failure values (808.7 to 947.9 N), followed by the LD_PM (525.8 to 722.8 N) and ZLS_PM groups (312.6 to 478.8N). A comparison between LD and ZLS materials (P < 0.001) as well as the crown morphology (P < 0.001) showed significant differences in failure values. The values in the subgroups of ZLS_PM (low, middle, high) decreased as the crown height increased. The fracture modes showed no consistent patterns across the test groups. CONCLUSIONS: Material selection, crown morphology, and vertical crown height appear to be important factors that may influence the clinical failure values and patterns of HACs.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the behavior of hybrid abutment crowns fabricated from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC) and to compare the influence of different in-vitro artificial aging protocols. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 32 monolithic hybrid abutment crowns of monolithic LDC were fabricated. 24 were artificially aged applying 3 different protocols up to a 20 year-simulation (1.2 × 106, 2.4 × 106, 4.8 × 106 chewing cycles, thermocycling), one control group underwent no artificial aging (N=32, n=8). Load-to-failure tests were conducted for all specimens and failure values were compared (p<0.05). RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: All specimens passed in-vitro aging. Mean failure load values between 532.6 and 562.8 N were found but did neither differ significantly among the test groups nor from the control group. Within the limitations of this in-vitro pilot study, hybrid abutment crowns manufactured from monolithic LDC seem to offer appropriate long-lasting mechanical stability over a simulation period up to 20 years. The failure values and complication pattern seem to be independent of several aging protocols in this test set-up.
