RESUMEN
The present study investigates the prognostic value of the Syntax Score II 2020 corrected for flow-limiting lesions and its ability to better address treatment by benefit prediction among patients with left main or multivessel disease. We analyzed 1274 patients from the HALE-BOPP cohort and integrated the Syntax Score II 2020 with the result of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) evaluation. Absolute risk difference (ARD) between surgical and percutaneous revascularization was calculated for anatomic and functional Syntax Score II 2020 predicted mortality. The ARD allowed to stratify the population into two large categories: "coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) better" with ARD ≥ 4.5% and "CABG-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) equipoise" with ARD < 4.5%. The mean global anatomical Syntax Score was 15.5 ± 9.2, whereas the functional one was 9.5 ± 10 (p < 0.01). Using the anatomic Syntax Score II 2020, 881 patients had a CABG-PCI equipoise. This number increased to 1041 after considering only flow-limiting lesions by FFR (p < 0.001); therefore, 40% of CABG better patients were reclassified within the CABG-PCI equipoise category. Kaplan-Maier curves showed similar actual survival rates for patients originally with CABG-PCI equipoise and those reclassified, in both cases higher than those from CABG better patients (p < 0.01). The integration between Syntax Score II 2020 and physiology is feasible, and merging clinical, anatomic and functional data allows for better risk prediction and therapeutic guidance.
RESUMEN
Background: The Cocoon patent foramen ovale (PFO) Occluder is a new generation nitinol alloy double-disk device coated with nanoplatinum, likely useful in patients with nickel hypersensitivity. Early results and mid-term outcomes of this device in percutaneous PFO closure are missing. Aims: To assess the preliminary efficacy and safety profile of PFO closure with Cocoon device in an Italian multi-center registry. Methods: This is a prospective registry of 189 consecutive adult patients treated with the Cocoon PFO Occluder at 15 Italian centers from May 2017 till May 2020. Patients were followed up for 2 years. Results: Closure of the PFO with Cocoon Occluder was carried out successfully in all patients, with complete closure without residual shunt in 94.7% of the patients and minimal shunt in 5.3%. Except from a case of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and a major vascular bleeding, no procedural and in-hospital device-related complications occurred. No patient developed cardiac erosions, allergic reactions to nickel, or any other major complications during the follow-up. During the follow-up period, 2 cases of new-onset atrial fibrillation occurred within thirty-day. Conclusions: Percutaneous closure of PFO with Cocoon Occluder provided satisfactory procedural and mid-term clinical follow-up results in a real-world registry.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiac pacing often turns out to be the only effective treatment of severe brady-arrhythmias. Several invasive and noninvasive temporary pacing procedures are known, whose application is sometimes difficult or time-consuming. An alternative temporary cardiac pacing procedure is described in this article, which is based on echocardiographic control. METHODS: Fifty-four nonconsecutive patients were studied; they all were needing urgent cardiac pacing. A first choice attempt to perform an ultrasound-guided temporary cardiac pacing, by using a right jugular venous approach, was done. The catheter pathway was monitored by means of echocardiography performed by another operator. All data concerning time of execution, pacing parameters, acute or chronic complications and the in situ time duration of the catheter without needing to be repositioned were obtained. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided cardiac pacing was not feasible in 3 patients (6%), because of a high thoracic acoustic impedance or failing to perform right jugular venous catheterization. Mean execution time was 680 +/- 179 s. Echocardiographic monitoring was performed in 50 patients by a cardiologist, in 1 patient by a non-cardiologist physician, and in 3 patients by a nurse, who had been previously trained to keep the transducer in the right position. No serious complications occurred. On 4 occasions (8%) the catheter had to be repositioned during the following hours. On 25 occasions (46%) permanent cardiac pacing was finally performed. CONCLUSIONS: Temporary ultrasound-guided cardiac pacing seems to be a safe and easy procedure; it can be performed in a broad range of clinical and logistic scenarios and does not require fluoroscopic monitoring. A limited number of human resources is needed, but technical skills in central venous catheterization are required. Further studies are needed to validate this procedure; however it shows several potential benefits as compared to the other temporary cardiac pacing techniques.
