Cost-effectiveness of low-astigmatism correction with toric or spherical intraocular lenses combined with corneal incisions: an economic evaluation.

PURPOSE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of the treatment of low corneal astigmatism (≤1.5 D) at the moment of the cataract surgery. SETTING: ("Masked by journal requirement"). DESIGN: Economic Evaluation. METHODS: A decision tree was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of implanting spherical versus toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) or the spherical lens combined with the following corneal incisions: limbal relaxing incisions conducted manually (M-LRI) or assisted by femtosecond laser (F-LRI), arcuate keratotomies conducted manually (M-AK) or assisted by femtosecond (F-AK), and intrastromal arcuate keratotomies (F-iAK). Outcomes of cost were selected from a patient's perspective considering the gross cost of each one of the surgeries at European centers, and the effectiveness variable was the probability of achieving a visual acuity of 20/20 after surgery. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the uncertainty considering the evidence retrieved from the transition probabilities of the model, the effectiveness, and the cost. RESULTS: F-AK or Toric IOLs were the most effective treatments, increasing an 16% or 9%, respectively, in the percentage of eyes attaining 20/20 vision. The M-LRI, F-iAK, and F-LRI procedures were strongly dominated, while the M-AK and toric IOL were weakly dominated by the F-AK. A patient with low corneal astigmatism would need to be willing to pay 360€ [CI 95%: 231-1224] with F-AK and 472€ [CI 95%: 149-4490] with toric IOLs for a 10% increase in the probability of achieving 20/20 vision. CONCLUSIONS: From the patient's perspective, F-AK was generally the most cost-effective treatment, even though toric IOLs can dominate in some countries.

Functional Classification of Intraocular Lenses Based on Defocus Curves: A Scoping Review and Cluster Analysis.

PURPOSE: To explore a potential functional classification of intraocular lenses (IOLs) based on monocular visual acuity defocus curves (VADCs) as a primary end-point. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed. Two independent reviewers screened the literature for inclusion and data extraction. Inclusion criteria were full-text primary clinical studies of IOLs, published in English from 2010 onward, involving patients undergoing cataract or refractive lens exchange. A cluster analysis was conducted to explore similarities in the range of field (RoF) and increase of visual acuity from intermediate to near (ΔVA). RESULTS: A total of 107 studies were ultimately included from the 436 identified in the systematic search, with an additional 5 studies added through the snowballing technique search. The cluster analysis was conducted using 69 reports that included monocular VADCs. Two main categories were identified based on the achieved RoF for 0.2 and 0.3 logMAR: full (FRoF) and partial (PRoF) RoF IOLs. Three subcategories were identified for FRoF depending on ΔVA: continuous (FRoF-C), smooth (FRoF-Sm), and steep (FRoF-St). On the other hand, PRoF IOLs shared the characteristic of monotonous decrease in visual acuity and were subclassified into two subcategories depending on the achieved RoF: narrowed (PRoF-N) and extended (PRoF-Ex). An additional subcategory was added to PRoF, enhanced (PRoF-En), for 7 reports alternating between PRoF-N and PRoF-Ex depending on the use of 0.2 or 0.3 logMAR as a cut-off for calculating the RoF. CONCLUSIONS: IOLs can be functionally classified into six types depending on the RoF and shape of the monocular VADC. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(2):e108-e116.].

Screening of positive dysphotopsia before multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE: To assess the photic phenomena (PP) and positive dysphotopsia in candidates for presbyopia or cataract surgery and to evaluate their relationship with cataract grading systems. DESIGN: Retrospective observational. METHODS: Monocular data for 82 subjects measured during the preoperative screening were retrospectively retrieved from our database. The evaluated variables consisted of two methods for PP measurement: light distortion index (LDI) and parameters obtained from a simulator, both of which were combined with subjective bother related to PP. The cutoff for LDI that better predicted patients passing from slightly to moderately bothersome was estimated. The relationships between LDI and the following objective cataract grading methods were also assessed: objective scatter index (OSI), dysfunctional lens index (DLI), and Pentacam Nucleus Staging (PNS). RESULTS: LDI was the best method for measuring PP, which showed a significant correlation with the bothersome question (rho = 0.34, P = 0.002) and also with OSI (rho = 0.67, P < 0.0005), DLI (rho = -0.29, P = 0.007), and PNS (rho = 0.48, P < 0.0005). The number/percentage of patients who found it bothersome was as follows: "Not at all" (18/22%), "Slightly" (41/50%), "Moderately" (15/18.3%), and "Very" (8/9.7%). The cutoff value that predicted the transition from slightly to moderately bothersome was ≥15.20% according to LDI, which could be estimated with the following values for grading: ≥2.8 for OSI, ≤7.6 for DLI, and ≥2 for PNS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients reporting moderately or higher bothersome levels in the preoperative period and with LDI <15.20%, <2.8 for OSI, >7.6 for DLI, and <2 for PNS might deserve special attention in the multifocal intraocular lens selection.

Simulations of Multifocal Vision in Patients With Previous Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and patient acceptance of multifocal vision simulation in patients with previous monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, and to explore their willingness-to-pay (WTP) and willingness-to-accept (WTA) based on the perceived advantages and disadvantages of multifocal vision. METHODS: Seventeen patients with previous monofocal IOL implantation participated in this cross-sectional study. The SimVis Gekko device (2EyesVision SL) was used to simulate monofocal (Evaluation B) and multifocal (Evaluation C) visual experiences, compared to their existing vision (Evaluation A). Visual acuity at three distances and defocus curves were measured. Patients responded to inquiries about visual quality in each evaluation, bothersomeness of photic phenomena, probability to select the visual experience, and the monetary value they associated with enhanced WTP or diminished WTA visual quality. RESULTS: The simulations underestimated the visual acuity reported for the IOL in existing literature by one or two lines, depending on the testing distance. This underestimation was more pronounced in defocus curves. However, 70.6% of patients were likely or very likely to opt for multifocal vision, indicating they perceived the benefits of multifocality. The WTP for multifocal vision was twice that of monofocal vision, and the WTP/WTA ratio exceeded 1, suggesting the perceived vision benefits outweighed potential drawbacks. CONCLUSIONS: Despite underestimating the expected postoperative visual performance, the multifocal simulation enabled patients to perceive the benefits of multifocal vision to some extent. This system could be beneficial in avoiding potential postoperative complaints, but the possible rise in false-positive results should be considered and evaluated in future research. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(12):831-839.].

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia-correcting and toric intraocular lenses - a narrative review.

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the leading indication for EK and may coexist with cataract and presbyopia. Notably, the outcomes of phacoemulsification in FECD patients are not as favorable as those in eyes without this condition. Historically, only monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) were recommended for these patients. However, recent reports have described the implantation of Premium-IOLs (such as Multifocal IOLs, Enhanced Depth of Focus IOLs, and Toric IOLs) in FECD eyes undergoing cataract surgery and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). While the results are encouraging, they are not as optimal as those from unoperated eyes, especially when comparing simultaneous procedures to sequential ones. It's advised to perform the DMEK first to improve the accuracy of IOL calculations. Still, even successfully operated eyes may experience secondary graft failure or graft rejection after DMEK. The success rate of a secondary DMEK is typically lower than that of the initial procedure. Furthermore, if the postoperative thickness after DMEK is less than anticipated, laser enhancements might not be an option. There's a pressing need for more controlled and randomized clinical trials to ascertain the safety and effectiveness of Premium-IOLs for FECD eyes. This narrative review aims to collate evidence on the use of Premium IOL technologies in eyes receiving EK and to underscore key points for surgeons performing EK combined with cataract surgery.

The effect of sugammadex on postoperative urinary retention post-laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy with and without concomitant procedures.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study was aimed at determining the effect of sugammadex versus a combination of glycopyrrolate and neostigmine (GN) for neuromuscular reversal blockage on transient postoperative urinary retention (TPOUR) in patients undergoing a laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients undergoing a laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy between February 2017 and December 2021. Patients with and without concomitant procedures were included. Demographics and perioperative data were extracted from the patient's medical record. Before discharge, all patients were required to spontaneously void and have a post-void residual of less than 150 ml. RESULTS: We identified 500 patients and 485 were included in the final analysis. We had 319 subjects who received sugammadex and 166 GN combination. Both groups had overall similar demographics and perioperative characteristics. Most patients had a conventional laparoscopy procedure (391 [82.5%]) compared with robotic (83 [17.5%]). Patients who received GN were significantly more likely to be discharged home with an indwelling catheter (odds ratio [OR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-3.05). After adjusting for perioperative medications and sling implantation during the surgery a logistic regression model continued to demonstrate that patients who received GN had significantly higher odds of being discharged with a catheter (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.03-3.12). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that sugammadex decreases the odds of TPOUR after laparoscopic hysterectomies with and without slings compared with the combination of GN. Additional prospective trials are required to confirm this finding.

Refraction and defocus curves in eyes with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses

Several clinical techniques have been described to evaluate visual performance and optical quality with intraocular lenses (IOL). However, subjective refraction remains one of the most important methods for assessing post-surgery results, taking decisions about retreatments, advanced spectacle prescription and the refinement of the constant for the formula used in the IOL power calculation. Beyond clinical refraction, defocus curve measurement has been described as a complementary tool for assessing visual performance and taking clinical decisions. However, to date, there are no clinical guidelines or evidence-based protocols published in the scientific literature recommended for pseudophakic patients implanted with either monofocal or multifocal IOLs. This narrative review highlights the importance of clinical refraction in pseudophakic eyes, its utility in the decision of different types of IOL implantation, and describes a clinical refraction protocol for eyes implanted with monofocal and multifocal IOLs. (AU)

Consensus Practice Guidelines on Postdural Puncture Headache From a Multisociety, International Working Group: A Summary Report.

Importance: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) can follow unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during neuraxial procedures, such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia. Evidence-based guidance on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of this condition is, however, currently lacking. Objective: To fill the practice guidelines void and provide comprehensive information and patient-centric recommendations for preventing, diagnosing, and managing PDPH. Evidence Review: With input from committee members and stakeholders of 6 participating professional societies, 10 review questions that were deemed important for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of PDPH were developed. A literature search for each question was performed in MEDLINE on March 2, 2022. Additional relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews, and research studies published through March 2022 were also considered for practice guideline development and shared with collaborator groups. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with recommendations that were rated according to the US Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence. Collaborators were asked to vote anonymously on each recommendation using 2 rounds of a modified Delphi approach. Findings: After 2 rounds of electronic voting by a 21-member multidisciplinary collaborator team, 47 recommendations were generated to provide guidance on the risk factors for and the prevention, diagnosis, and management of PDPH, along with ratings for the strength and certainty of evidence. A 90% to 100% consensus was obtained for almost all recommendations. Several recommendations were rated as having moderate to low certainty. Opportunities for future research were identified. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this consensus statement suggest that current approaches to the treatment and management of PDPH are not uniform due to the paucity of evidence. The practice guidelines, however, provide a framework for individual clinicians to assess PDPH risk, confirm the diagnosis, and adopt a systematic approach to its management.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on postdural puncture headache: a consensus report from a multisociety international working group.

INTRODUCTION: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) can follow unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during neuraxial procedures such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia. Evidence-based guidance on the prevention, diagnosis or management of this condition is, however, currently lacking. This multisociety guidance aims to fill this void and provide practitioners with comprehensive information and patient-centric recommendations to prevent, diagnose and manage patients with PDPH. METHODS: Based on input from committee members and stakeholders, the committee cochairs developed 10 review questions deemed important for the prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH. A literature search for each question was performed in MEDLINE (Ovid) on 2 March 2022. The results from each search were imported into separate Covidence projects for deduplication and screening, followed by data extraction. Additional relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews and research studies published through March 2022 were also considered for the development of guidelines and shared with contributors. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with recommendations graded according to the US Preventative Services Task Force grading of evidence. The interim draft was shared electronically, with each collaborator requested to vote anonymously on each recommendation using two rounds of a modified Delphi approach. RESULTS: Based on contemporary evidence and consensus, the multidisciplinary panel generated 50 recommendations to provide guidance regarding risk factors, prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH, along with their strength and certainty of evidence. After two rounds of voting, we achieved a high level of consensus for all statements and recommendations. Several recommendations had moderate-to-low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: These clinical practice guidelines for PDPH provide a framework to improve identification, evaluation and delivery of evidence-based care by physicians performing neuraxial procedures to improve the quality of care and align with patients' interests. Uncertainty remains regarding best practice for the majority of management approaches for PDPH due to the paucity of evidence. Additionally, opportunities for future research are identified.

One-year follow-up of a multifocal intraocular lens with optimized elevated phase shift.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the standard outcomes of a multifocal intraocular lens (mIOL) with optimized elevated phase shift (EPS). SETTING: Qvision, Ophthalmology Department, VITHAS Almería, Spain. DESIGN: Retrospective observational. METHODS: 41 patients, consecutively operated on cataracts or refractive lens exchange with the implantation of the Liberty 640PM (EPS 2.0) and followed during 12 months, were included in the analysis. Retrieved variables were visual acuities at far, intermediate, and near distances; defocus curves (VADC); and prediction error of 4 formulas optimized for IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam AXL Wave. Patient-reported outcomes were also obtained for assessing spectacle independence, satisfaction, bothersome to dysphotopsia, difficulties in daily life tasks, and decision to be operated with the same mIOL. RESULTS: The median monocular efficacy with best distance correction was 0, 0.1, and 0.1 logMAR at far, intermediate, and near distances, respectively, with patients achieving binocularly a median of 0 logMAR at the 3 distances. VADC showed a depth of field of 3 diopters (D) above 0.2 logMAR with a median increase of 0.07 logMAR from -1.5 to -2.5 D. Complete spectacle independence was achieved at far distance, whereas 97.6% and 85.4% was achieved at intermediate and near distances, respectively. 7.3% of patients were bothered by dysphotopsia, and 92.6% of patients were likely to be operated again. CONCLUSIONS: EPS 2.0 restored patients' vision in the full range of the depth of field with a nearly monotone decrease of visual performance from far to near, achieving high rates of spectacle independence at all distances and with low positive dysphotopsia rates ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05735990).

Efficacy of Presbyopia-Correcting Contact Lenses: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To analyze critically the clinical trials on presbyopia correction with contact lenses (CLs) to investigate the quality of the research performed. METHODS: A search was performed in PubMed database on clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of the presbyopia correction with different CLs, including multifocal or simultaneous vision contact lenses (MCLs). After a comprehensive analysis of the relevant publications found, quality assessment of such publications was performed by means of Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist tool according to the five types of evaluations: MCL versus spectacles, MCL versus pinhole CLs, MCL versus monovision, comparison between MCL designs, and MCL versus extended depth of focus CLs. RESULTS: A total of 16 clinical trials were selected for evaluation. All evaluated studies addressed a clearly focused research question and were randomized, with a crossover design in most of the cases. Blinding was not possible in all cases due to the physical appearance of some of the CLs evaluated (pinhole or hybrid designs). Most of studies analyzed reported outcomes with complete data, providing the statistical tests used and the P -values, but some of the authors did not provide the statistical power associated to the sample size evaluated. The small sample size in some trials as well as the scarce information about the effect of addition on visual performance was the main limitations found in the peer-reviewed literature revised. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high-quality scientific evidence supporting the use of presbyopia-correcting CLs, with several randomized controlled clinical trials conducted to this date.

Managing low corneal astigmatism in patients with presbyopia correcting intraocular lenses: a narrative review.

Cataract surgery has become a refractive procedure in which emmetropia is the goal, with the implantation of extended depth-of-focus or multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) being the commonly selected option to restore vision beyond the far distance. The selection criteria for implanting these lenses can differ from those for monofocal IOLs and even between technologies, as eye characteristics can affect postoperative visual performance. Corneal astigmatism is an eye characteristic that can affect visual performance differently, depending on the implanted IOL. The magnitude of corneal astigmatism, the tolerance of the IOL to this astigmatism, economic aspects, comorbidities, and the efficacy of astigmatism treatment are factors that can make surgeons' doubt as to what astigmatism treatment should be applied to each patient. This review aims to summarize the current evidence related to low astigmatism tolerance in presbyopia-correcting lenses, the efficacy achieved through corneal incisions, and their comparison with the implantation of toric IOLs.

Factors Associated With the Acceptance of Military Applicants to a U.S. Allopathic Medical School.

INTRODUCTION: Service members and veterans applying to medical schools can be a challenging experience. Often, the applicants have difficulty providing descriptions of their experiences. Additionally, their pathway to medical school is significantly different compared to traditional applicants. We sought to determine if there were statistically significant factors within a cohort of U.S. military medical school applications to a U.S.-based allopathic medical school to provide recommendations on how to best advise military applicants. METHODS: Data about social, academic, and military factors were collected and analyzed from the American College Application Service (AMCAS) applications to the West Virginia University School of Medicine (WVU SoM) from the 2017 to 2021 cycles. Eligibility criteria included the applications that indicated that the applicant listed any type of military experience. RESULTS: In the 5-year study period, there were 25,514 applicants to the WVU SoM, and 1.6% (n = 414) self-identified as military applicants. Of the military applicants, 28 (7%) were accepted to the WVU SoM. Statistically significant differences were found in several factors, including but not limited to academic performance, number of total experiences (14.5 vs. 12, P = .01), and number of military experiences (4 vs. 2, P = .003) listed on the AMCAS applications. In the accepted group, 88% of the applications included information about military experiences, which was understandable to the nonmilitary researchers compared to 79% in the nonaccepted group (P = .24). CONCLUSIONS: Premedical advisors can share statistically significant findings with military applicants, so they are informed about the academic and experiential factors associated with medical school acceptance. Applicants should also be advised to provide clear explanations of any military lexicon used in their applications. Although not statistically significant, there were a higher percentage of applications that contained descriptions of military language that was understandable to the civilian researchers in the accepted group vs. the nonaccepted group.

Identifying Gender-Related Differences in Graduate Medical Education with the Use of a Web-Based Professionalism Monitoring Tool.

OBJECTIVES: Medical education is required to ensure a healthy training and learning environment for resident physicians. Trainees are expected to demonstrate professionalism with patients, faculty, and staff. West Virginia University Graduate Medical Education (GME) initiated a Web-based professionalism and mistreatment form ("button") on our Web site for reporting professionalism breaches, mistreatment, and exemplary behavior events. The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics in resident trainees who had a "button push" activation about their behavior to better understand ways to improve professionalism in GME. METHODS: This West Virginia University institutional review board-approved quality improvement study is a descriptive analysis of GME button push activations from July 2013 through June 2021. We compared characteristics of all of those trainees who had specific button activation(s) about their behavior. Data are reported as frequency and percentage. Nominal data and interval data were analyzed using the χ2 and the t test, respectively. P < 0.05 was significant. Logistic regression was used to analyze those differences that were significant. RESULTS: In the 8-year study period, there were 598 button activations, and 54% (n = 324) of the activations were anonymous. Nearly all of the button reports (n = 586, 98%) were constructively resolved within 14 days. Of the 598 button activations, 95% (n = 569) were identified as involving one sex, with 66.3% (n = 377) identified as men and 33.7% (n = 192) as women. Of the 598 activations, 83.7% (n = 500) involved residents and 16.3% (n = 98) involved attendings. One-time offenders comprised 90% (n = 538), and 10% (n = 60) involved individuals who had previous button pushes about their behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a professionalism-monitoring tool, such as our Web-based button push, identified gender differences in the reporting of professionalism breaches, because twice as many men as women were identified as the instigator of a professionalism breech. The tool also facilitated timely interventions and exemplary behavior recognition.

Agreement between Two Devices for Measuring Pupil Diameter in Patients Implanted with Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement between three methods for measuring pupil size in patients implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs): Keratograph 5M (K5M), Pentacam AXL Wave (PW), and a simple hand ruler. Sixty-nine subjects implanted with MIOLs and measured at the three-month follow-up visit were included in this retrospective analysis. K5M and PW were used to measure the photopic (PP) and mesopic (MP) pupil sizes, and a hand ruler was used to measure the pupil under environmental light conditions (135 lux). The Bland-Altman method with its limits (LoAs) was used to assess the agreement. The median PP was 2.8, 2.95, and 3 mm for K5M, PW, and the ruler, respectively (p < 0.05). Differences in PP were statistically significant for all paired comparisons (p < 0.0005) except between PW and the ruler (p = 0.44). The LoAs for the difference in PP between K5M and PW was 0.63 mm. The mean difference for MP between K5M and PW was 0.04 mm (p = 0.34) with LoAs of 0.72 mm. MP measured with K5M and PW could be considered interchangeable, although a correction of -0.3 mm (IC95%: -0.23 to -0.39) should be applied to PP measured with PW to attain the K5M mean.

Objective cataract grading methods and expected contrast sensitivity reestablishment with multifocal intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To determine the cut-off points for age and metrics provided by cataract grading objective systems for which a reestablishment in contrast sensitivity (CS) is expected after multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) implantation. METHODS: One hundred seven subjects were included in this retrospective analysis carried out during the screening for presbyopia and cataract surgery. Monocular distance corrected contrast sensitivity defocus curve (CSDC) and visual acuity were measured, and crystalline lens sclerosis was graded with three objective metrics: Ocular Scatter Index (OSI), Dysfunctional Lens Index (DLI) and Pentacam Nucleus Staging (PNS). A CS value of 0.8 logCS at far distance, following published literature on this matter, was selected to compute the cut-off that maximized the detection of eyes exceeding this value at the preoperative screening, either for age or objective metrics. RESULTS: The CDCS showed a stronger correlation than CDVA with objective grading methods, whereas all objective metrics were significantly correlated between them (p < 0.05). The cut-offs for age, OSI, DLI and PNS were ≤ 62, ≤ 1.25, ≥ 7.67 and ≤ 1, respectively. The OSI provided the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.85) followed by the age (0.84), DLI (0.74) and PNS (0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons conducting clear lens exchange should communicate the possible distance CS loss after surgery with MIOL implantation according to the previous described cut-offs points. Age in combination with any cataract grading objective system is recommended to detect possible inconsistencies.