A Prospective Assessment of a Novel, Disposable Video Laryngoscope With Physician Assistant Trainees Using a Synthetic Cadaver Model.

BACKGROUND: Airway obstruction is the second leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield. Video laryngoscopy has improved airway management in the emergency setting for several decades, and technology continues to improve. Current technology in the supply chain is cost-prohibitive to incorporate at Role 1 facilities, which is where many intubations occur by novice intubators. The i-view is a novel video laryngoscopy device that is handheld, inexpensive, and disposable. The aim of this study was to determine if the i-view is suitable based on performance assessments by physician assistant trainees and survey feedback. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled physician assistant students at the Interservice Physician Assistant Program at Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston. We provided them structured training on how to use the device, and then, a board-certified emergency medicine physician or certified registered nurse anesthetist assessed their intubations performed on a SynDaver mannequin model. We surveyed the participants afterward. RESULTS: We enrolled 60 Interservice Physician Assistant Program students. Most participants were male (75%) with a median age of 32 years. Service affiliations included Army (50%), Navy (23%), Air Force (18%), and Coast Guard (8%). Most (70%) had previous deployment experience. All the participants successfully cannulated the mannequins and 98% achieved first-attempt success. Most participants (78%) reported a grade 1 view. On postprocedure survey, 91% strongly agreed with using this device in the deployed setting and 89% strongly agreed with finding it easy to use. CONCLUSIONS: All physician assistant trainees successfully and rapidly performed endotracheal intubation using the disposable i-view video laryngoscope. Study participants rated the device as easy to use and desirable for deployment. Further research is necessary to validate this novel device in the clinical setting before recommending dissemination to the deployed military medical force sets, kits, and outfits.

Ultrasound at the Role 1: An Analysis of After-Action Reviews from the Prehospital Trauma Registry.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound is a portable and adaptable imaging modality used widely in the care of trauma patients. The initial exam, known as the "Focused Assessment in Trauma (FAST) exam focused on the evaluation for hemoperitoneum and hemopericardium. In recent years, the exam has expanded to include evaluate for thoracic pathology, including pneumothorax, and is now known as the "Extended Focused Assessment in Trauma" (E-FAST) exam. METHODS: We reviewed after-action reviews (AAR) from the Joint Trauma System Prehospital Trauma Registry from 2013-2014 in which the use of an ultrasound exam was noted. Given the largely unstructured nature of the AARs, we selected relevant information from the free text available. RESULTS: Our initial dataset contained 705 casualties, of which we identified 45 cases containing the key words with AAR data for review: 39 cases involved the use of the FAST exam, three explicitly described the use of pulmonary ultrasound and they were categorized as E-FAST exams, two cases described the use of point of care echo to evaluate for cardiac standstill, and two cases described the use of ultrasound to evaluate for vascular injury. Of those with vital signs documented, 25% (11) reported at least one episode of tachycardia (≥120/min) and 16% (7) with at least one episode of systolic hypotension (less than 90mmHg). Of the 45 cases reviewed, six were recorded as equivocal, which we interpreted to indicate more training in either performance or interpretation of the exam was needed. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that training in both the FAST exam and E-FAST has the potential to improve patient care for military trauma patients. A performance improvement system would enable real-time confirmation of findings and feedback for training and quality improvement.

US Army Combat Medic Performance With Portable Ultrasound to Detect Sonographic Findings of Pneumothorax in a Cadaveric Model.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound, due to recent advances in portability and versatility, has become a valuable clinical adjunct in austere, resource-limited settings and is well demonstrated to be an accurate/efficient means to detect pneumothorax. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of hands-on ultrasound training on ultrasound-naive US Army combat medics' ability to detect sonographic findings of pneumothorax with portable ultrasound in a cadaver model. METHODS: Ultrasound-naive US Army combat medics assigned to conventional military units were recruited from a single US Army installation and randomized to receive either didactic training only, or "blended" (didactic and hands-on) training on ultrasound detection of pneumothorax. Blinded participants were asked to perform a thoracic ultrasound exam on ventilated human cadaver models. Primary outcome measured was sensitivity and specificity of detecting sonographic findings of pneumothorax between cohorts. RESULTS: Forty-three participants examined a total of 258 hemithoraces. The didactic-only cohort (n = 24) detected sonographic findings of pneumothorax with a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 57%. The blended cohort (n = 19) detected sonographic findings of pneumothorax with an overall sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 80%. Detection sensitivities were similar between B-mode versus M-mode use. CONCLUSION: US Army combat medics can use portable U/S to detect sonographic findings of pneumothorax in a human cadaver model with high sensitivity after a brief, blended (didactic and hands-on) training intervention.

Cumulative effective radiation dose received by blunt trauma patients arriving to a military level I trauma center from point of injury and interhospital transfers.

BACKGROUND: Trauma patients sustaining blunt injuries are exposed to multiple radiologic studies. Evidence indicates that the risk of cancer from exposure to ionizing radiation rises in direct proportion to the cumulative effective dose (CED) received. The purpose of this study is to quantify the amount of ionizing radiation accumulated when arriving directly from point of injury to San Antonio Military Medical Center (SAMMC), a level I trauma center, compared with those transferred from other facilities. METHODS: A retrospective record review was conducted from 1st January 2010 through 31st December 2012. The SAMMC trauma registry, electronic medical records, and the digital radiology imaging system were searched for possible candidates. The medical records were then analyzed for sex, age, mechanism of injury, received directly from point of injury (direct group), transfer from another medical facility (transfer group), computed tomographic scans received, dose-length product, CED of radiation, and injury severity score. A diagnostic imaging physicist then calculated the estimated CED each subject received based on the dose-length product of each computed tomographic scan. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were analyzed, with 150 patients in the direct group and 150 patients in the transfer group. Both groups were similar in age and sex. Patients in the transfer group received a significantly greater CED of radiation compared with the direct group (mean, 37.6 mSv vs 28 mSv; P=.001). The radiation received in the direct group correlates with a lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of 1 in 357 compared with the transfer group with an increase in LAR to 1 in 266. CONCLUSION: Patients transferred to our facility received a 34% increase in ionizing radiation compared with patients brought directly from the injury scene. This increased dose of ionizing radiation contributes to the LAR of cancer and needs to be considered before repeating imaging studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.