Condyloma lata mimicking vulvar carcinoma in an immunocompromised patient: A case report.

Background: Syphilis is a sexually transmitted infection with increasing incidence in the United States. Presentations of syphilis vary widely and can be easily mistaken for other diagnoses, including cancer, especially in atypical cases. Case description: At her delivery after no prenatal care, a 35-year-old woman was found to have exophytic vulvar and perianal lesions, inguinal lymphadenopathy, and a new diagnosis of HIV, with a strong clinical concern for vulvar and/or anal carcinoma. She was subsequently diagnosed with presumed late latent syphilis and began weekly intramuscular penicillin G benzathine treatment. CT imaging demonstrated a perineal plaque-like area with bilateral inguinal, external iliac and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. She was seen in gynecologic oncology clinic one week after her initial presentation with notable improvement in the vulvar lesions, raising suspicion for condyloma lata rather than invasive or preinvasive disease on the vulva, however concern remained for dysplasia in the perianal lesion. Another week later, she underwent an exam under anesthesia with vulvar and perianal biopsies revealing chronic inflammation and granulomatous change without evidence of malignancy or dysplasia. At the four week post operative visit, there was almost complete resolution of the lesions. Conclusion: Syphilis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of atypical vulvar lesions.

The FDA-Approved Breast Cancer HER2 Evaluation Kit (HercepTest; Dako) May Miss Some HER2-Positive Breast Cancers.

OBJECTIVES: Accurate evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer is critical. METHODS: HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) tests were performed on 52 cases using a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved kit (HercepTest, FDA kit) and a laboratory-developed test (LDT) with the HercepTest antibody and a Leica Bond automated stainer. RESULTS: By FISH, 22 were HER2 positive, 29 were negative, and one was equivocal. Of the 22 HER2 FISH-positive cases, five were negative by the FDA kit and none by LDT. The five discrepant cases were retested using the same FDA kit in another Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratory, and all five cases were still negative. None of the 29 HER2 FISH-negative cases were positive by the FDA kit or LDT. The overall IHC-FISH concordance rate was 90.4% for the FDA kit and 100% for the LDT. CONCLUSIONS: The FDA kit may miss some HER2-positive cases. The LDT has a higher sensitivity and a higher concordance rate with FISH results.