Impact of payment source, referral site, and place of residence on outcomes after allogeneic transplantation in Mexico.

BACKGROUND: The impact of social determinants of health in allogeneic transplant recipients in low- and middle-income countries is poorly described. This observational study analyzes the impact of place of residence, referring institution, and transplant cost coverage (out-of-pocket vs government-funded vs private insurance) on outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in two of Mexico's largest public and private institutions. AIM: To evaluate the impact of social determinants of health and their relationship with outcomes among allogeneic transplant recipients in Mexico. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included adolescents and adults ≥ 16 years who received a matched sibling or haploidentical transplant from 2015-2022. Participants were selected without regard to their diagnosis and were sourced from both a private clinic and a public University Hospital in Mexico. Three payment groups were compared: Out-of-pocket (OOP), private insurance, and a federal Universal healthcare program "Seguro Popular". Outcomes were compared between referred and institution-diagnosed patients, and between residents of Nuevo Leon and out-of-state. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), categorized by residence, referral, and payment source. Secondary outcomes encompassed early mortality, event-free-survival, graft-versus-host-relapse-free survival, and non-relapse-mortality (NRM). Statistical analyses employed appropriate tests, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazard regression modeling. Statistical software included SPSS and R with tidycmprsk library. RESULTS: Our primary outcome was overall survival. We included 287 patients, n = 164 who lived out of state (57.1%), and n = 129 referred from another institution (44.9%). The most frequent payment source was OOP (n = 139, 48.4%), followed by private insurance (n = 75, 26.1%) and universal coverage (n = 73, 25.4%). No differences in OS, event-free-survival, NRM, or graft-versus-host-relapse-free survival were observed for patients diagnosed locally vs in another institution, nor patients who lived in-state vs out-of-state. Patients who covered transplant costs through private insurance had the best outcomes with improved OS (median not reached) and 2-year cumulative incidence of NRM of 14% than patients who covered costs OOP (Median OS and 2-year NRM of 32%) or through a universal healthcare program active during the study period (OS and 2-year NRM of 19%) (P = 0.024 and P = 0.002, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, payment source and disease risk index were the only factors associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION: In this Latin-American multicenter study, the site of residence or referral for alloHSCT did not impact outcomes. However, access to healthcare coverage for alloHSCT was associated with improved OS and reduced NRM.

Treatment of Ph-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults with an Affordable Outpatient Pediatric Regimen.

BACKGROUND: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia is frequent in Hispanic adolescents and young adults. Outcomes of implementation of pediatric-inspired regimens in low-and middle-income countries are not well known. METHODS: In this study we treated 94 adolescents and young adults with a local BFM regimen designed to be affordable with the use of native L-asparaginase and mitoxantrone administered in an outpatient fashion, and the of BCR/ABL and measurable residual disease (MRD) determined by high sensitivity flow cytometry for risk stratification. RESULTS: Induction mortality was 11%; 25% of patients had to abandon treatment or be transferred to another health system. Two-year overall (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were 61.5% and 49.8%, MRD-negative patients had a 24-month OS of 85.6% vs. 69.6% (p = .024) and EFS of 76% vs. 45.5% (p = .004). Patients older than 40 years and those who abandoned treatment had worse EFS. Overall drug costs in our regimen were 52% lower than those of CALGB10403. CONCLUSION: The treatment of AYAs with ALL with an outpatient focus was implemented successfully at a reduced cost. Genetic risk assessment, treatment abandonment and lack of access to novel therapies remain major barriers for improving outcomes.

Desensitization to Brentuximab Vedotin after anaphylaxis in refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD30 antigen. It is indicated for the treatment of CD30 + lymphomas and classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), including advanced (stage III-IV) untreated disease, relapsed/refractory disease, and consolidation after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In clinical trials the incidence of a hypersensitivity reaction is 1.2%. CASES REPORT: We present 3 cases of patients with refractory HL and anaphylaxis to the administration of BV ( Table 1). Symptoms are analyzed using a grading system described by Brown (2004) and a desensitization protocol was performed with a total dose of 100 mg of BV in 4 solution bags with an initial concentration of 1:1000 of total dose for cases of severe anaphylaxis, and desensitization of 3 solution bags with baseline concentration of 1: 100 for cases of moderate anaphylaxis. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: Intradermal skin tests were positive. Before desensitization, premedication with methylprednisolone and chlorphenamine was administered, as well as fluid therapy with 0.9% physiological solution at 100 cc/hour at induction stage, 250 cc/hour at maintenance stage, and increased to 500 cc/hour in case of hypersensitivity reaction. DISCUSSION: Drug desensitization in 12 or 16 steps allows tolerable administration of brentuximab vedotin after moderate to severe anaphylaxis. The favorable response to treatment of these patients may indicate that desensitization is a viable strategy for patients with relapsed or refractory HL.

Consenso de hemofilia en México / Mexican Consensus in Haemophilia

resumen está disponible en el texto completo

Abstract Hemophilia is a hemorrhagic disorder with a sex-linked inherited pattern, characterized by an inability to amplify coagulation due to a deficiency in coagulation factor VIII (hemophilia A or classic) or factor IX (hemophilia B). Sequencing of the genes involved in hemophilia has provided a description and record of the main mutations, as well as a correlation with the various degrees of severity. Hemorrhagic manifestations are related to levels of circulating factor, mainly affecting the musculoskeletal system and specifically the large joints (knees, ankles and elbows). This document is a review and consensus of the main genetic aspects of hemophilia, from the inheritance pattern to the concept of women carriers, physiopathology and classification of the disorder, the basic and confirmation studies when hemophilia is suspected, the various treatment regimens based on infusion of the deficient coagulation factor as well as innovative factor-free therapies and recommendations for the management of complications associated with treatment (development of inhibitors and/or transfusion transmitted infections) or secondary to articular hemorrhagic events (hemophilic arthropathy). Finally, relevant reviews of clinical and treatment aspects of hemorrhagic pathology charachterized by acquired deficiency of FVIII secondary to neutralized antibodies named acquired hemophilia.