No. 362-Ovulation Induction in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To review current non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic options for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). OPTIONS: This guideline reviews the evidence for the various options for ovulation induction in PCOS. OUTCOMES: Ovulation, pregnancy and live birth rates, risks, and side effects are the outcomes of interest. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline using appropriate controlled vocabulary and key words spanning from 2000 to 2016. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and of health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES: The evidence gathered was reviewed and evaluated by the Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. The quality of evidence was quantified using the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Benefits include weight reduction and improvements in ovulation, pregnancy, and live birth rates. Potential harms include medication side effects and multiple pregnancies. VALIDATION: These guidelines have been reviewed and approved by the Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Committee of the SOGC. CONCLUSION: First line management of infertility once a diagnosis of PCOS is made should include weight loss and exercise with goals to below class 2 obesity (BMI <35 kg/m2) as applicable. Subsequently, first line medical therapy for ovulation induction should include aromatase inhibitors (now considered both safe and effective) and selective estrogen receptor modulators as available. Insulin sensitizers should not be used as first line therapy but as adjuncts as appropriate. Referral to a reproductive endocrinologist should be considered if there is failure or resistance to these approaches to consider ovulation induction with gonadotropins or IVF as appropriate. SPONSOR: The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

First reported case of sextuplets conceived via letrozole for ovulation induction.

OBJECTIVE: To report the first case of sextuplets conceived via letrozole during ovulation induction. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Private fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): A 32-year-old female with a history of secondary infertility and polycystic ovary syndrome. INTERVENTION(S): Letrozole, 7.5 mg, on cycle days 3-7 after a progesterone-induced menses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy. RESULT(S): Sexchorionic-sexamniotic pregnancy. CONCLUSION(S): High-order multiple gestations are possible with letrozole ovulation induction, so patients should be counseled appropriately and follicle monitoring considered.

Advanced reproductive age and fertility: no. 269, November 2011.

OBJECTIVE: To improve awareness of the natural age-related decline in female and male fertility with respect to natural fertility and assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and provide recommendations for their management,and to review investigations in the assessment of ovarian aging. OPTIONS: This guideline reviews options for the assessment of ovarian reserve and fertility treatments using ART with women of advanced reproductive age presenting with infertility. OUTCOMES: The outcomes measured are the predictive value of ovarian reserve testing and pregnancy rates with natural and assisted fertility. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed or Medline, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in June 2010, using appropriate key words (ovarian aging, ovarian reserve, advanced maternal age, advanced paternal age, ART). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date or language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated into the guideline to December 2010. VALUES: The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Recommendations for practice were ranked according to the method described in that report (Table). BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Primary and specialist health care providers and women will be better informed about ovarian aging and the age-related decline in natural fertility and about options for assisted reproductive technology.

Ovulation induction in polycystic ovary syndrome: No. 242, May 2010.

OBJECTIVE: To review current non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic options for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). OPTIONS: This guideline reviews the evidence for the various options for ovulation induction in PCOS. OUTCOMES: Ovulation, pregnancy and live birth rates, risks, and side effects are the outcomes of interest. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline using appropriate controlled vocabulary and key words. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and of health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES: The evidence gathered was reviewed and evaluated by the Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. The quality of evidence was quantified using the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Benefits include weight reduction and improvements in ovulation, pregnancy, and live birth rates. Potential harms include medication side effects and multiple pregnancies. VALIDATION: These guidelines have been reviewed and approved by the Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Committee of the SOGC.

Ovulation induction in polycystic ovary syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To review current non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic options for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). OPTIONS: This guideline reviews the evidence for the various options for ovulation induction in PCOS. OUTCOMES: Ovulation, pregnancy and live birth rates, risks, and side effects are the outcomes of interest. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline using appropriate controlled vocabulary and key words. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and of health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES: The evidence gathered was reviewed and evaluated by the Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. The quality of evidence was quantified using the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Benefits include weight reduction and improvements in ovulation, pregnancy, and live birth rates. Potential harms include medication side effects and multiple pregnancies. VALIDATION: These guidelines have been reviewed and approved by the Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Committee of the SOGC. SPONSOR: The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Weight loss, exercise, and lifestyle modifications have been proven effective in restoring ovulatory cycles and achieving pregnancy in overweight women with PCOS and should be the first-line option for these women. (II-3A) Morbidly obese women should seek expert advice about pregnancy risk. (III-A) 2. Clomiphene citrate has been proven effective in ovulation induction for women with PCOS and should be considered the first-line therapy. Patients should be informed that there is an increased risk of multiple pregnancy with ovulation induction using clomiphene citrate. (I-A) 3. Metformin combined with clomiphene citrate may increase ovulation rates and pregnancy rates but does not significantly improve the live birth rate over that of clomiphene citrate alone.(I-A) Metformin may be added to clomiphene citrate in women with clomiphene resistance who are older and who have visceral obesity. (I-A) 4. Gonadotropin should be considered second-line therapy for fertility in anovulatory women with PCOS. The treatment requires ultrasound and laboratory monitoring. High costs and the risk of multiple pregnancy and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome are drawbacks of the treatment. (II-2A) 5. Laparoscopic ovarian drilling may be considered in women with clomiphene-resistant PCOS, particularly when there are other indications for laparoscopy. (I-A) Surgical risks need to be considered in these patients. (III-A) 6. In vitro fertilization should be reserved for women with PCOS who fail gonadotropin therapy or who have other indications for IVF treatment. (II-2A).

Pre-conception health awareness in infertility patients.

OBJECTIVE: Pre-conception counselling is important, as most pregnancies are unplanned. There are few published studies examining women's attitudes and knowledge in this area. As part of our ongoing education quality improvement program we evaluated the pre-conception knowledge and attitudes of women at an infertility clinic. METHODS: Women who presented for initial assessment to a university-affiliated infertility clinic completed a knowledge survey prior to the first physician consultation. RESULTS: Four hundred surveys were appropriately completed for data analysis. Patients were well informed about health optimization, folic acid consumption, infectious disease exposure, medication use, partner abuse, smoking, and recreational drug use. Patients were not well informed about the risks of daily alcohol consumption, advanced maternal age, exercise, cat litter exposure, and consumption of fish and certain other foods. They were uncertain about the importance of rubella immunization and family history. Nulliparous women were less knowledgeable about the significance of rubella immunization, exercise, recreational drug use, cat litter exposure, and fish consumption. Women who were more educated had more knowledge about the effects of the mother's age, exercise, alcohol exposure, and smoking on pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: There are gaps in knowledge, even in the highly motivated population of infertile women who are planning to be pregnant. The results of this survey suggest that women need and want their physicians to educate them about optimal pre-pregnancy lifestyle. We will revise our education programs to account for these gaps. Larger population-based studies are needed to assess knowledge in the general population, so that appropriate health promotion and education programs can be implemented.