Spatio-temporal variability of eDNA signal and its implication for fish monitoring in lakes.

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is revolutionizing the monitoring of aquatic biodiversity. The use of eDNA has the potential to enable non-invasive, cost-effective, time-efficient and high-sensitivity monitoring of fish assemblages. Although the capacity of eDNA metabarcoding to describe fish assemblages is recognised, research efforts are still needed to better assess the spatial and temporal variability of the eDNA signal and to ultimately design an optimal sampling strategy for eDNA monitoring. In this context, we sampled three different lakes (a dam reservoir, a shallow eutrophic lake and a deep oligotrophic lake) every 6 weeks for 1 year. We performed four types of sampling for each lake (integrative sampling of sub-surface water along transects on the left shore, the right shore and above the deepest zone, and point sampling in deeper layers near the lake bottom) to explore the spatial variability of the eDNA signal at the lake scale over a period of 1 year. A metabarcoding approach was applied to analyse the 92 eDNA samples in order to obtain fish species inventories which were compared with traditional fish monitoring methods (standardized gillnet samplings). Several species known to be present in these lakes were only detected by eDNA, confirming the higher sensitivity of this technique in comparison with gillnetting. The eDNA signal varied spatially, with shoreline samples being richer in species than the other samples. Furthermore, deep-water samplings appeared to be non-relevant for regularly mixed lakes, where the eDNA signal was homogeneously distributed. These results also demonstrate a clear temporal variability of the eDNA signal that seems to be related to species phenology, with most of the species detected in spring during the spawning period on shores, but also a peak of detection in winter for salmonid and coregonid species during their reproduction period. These results contribute to our understanding of the spatio-temporal distribution of eDNA in lakes and allow us to provide methodological recommendations regarding where and when to sample eDNA for fish monitoring in lakes.

DNA sequence and taxonomic gap analyses to quantify the coverage of aquatic cyanobacteria and eukaryotic microalgae in reference databases: Results of a survey in the Alpine region.

The taxonomic identification of organisms based on the amplification of specific genetic markers (metabarcoding) implicitly requires adequate discriminatory information and taxonomic coverage of environmental DNA sequences in taxonomic databases. These requirements were quantitatively examined by comparing the determination of cyanobacteria and microalgae obtained by metabarcoding and light microscopy. We used planktic and biofilm samples collected in 37 lakes and 22 rivers across the Alpine region. We focused on two of the most used and best represented genetic markers in the reference databases, namely the 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA genes. A sequence gap analysis using blastn showed that, in the identity range of 99-100%, approximately 30% (plankton) and 60% (biofilm) of the sequences did not find any close counterpart in the reference databases (NCBI GenBank). Similarly, a taxonomic gap analysis showed that approximately 50% of the cyanobacterial and eukaryotic microalgal species identified by light microscopy were not represented in the reference databases. In both cases, the magnitude of the gaps differed between the major taxonomic groups. Even considering the species determined under the microscope and represented in the reference databases, 22% and 26% were still not included in the results obtained by the blastn at percentage levels of identity ≥95% and ≥97%, respectively. The main causes were the absence of matching sequences due to amplification and/or sequencing failure and potential misidentification in the microscopy step. Our results quantitatively demonstrated that in metabarcoding the main obstacles in the classification of 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA sequences and interpretation of high-throughput sequencing biomonitoring data were due to the existence of important gaps in the taxonomic completeness of the reference databases and the short length of reads. The study focused on the Alpine region, but the extent of the gaps could be much greater in other less investigated geographic areas.

Fish eDNA metabarcoding from aquatic biofilm samples: Methodological aspects.

Fish eDNA metabarcoding is usually performed from filtered water samples. The volume of filtered water depends on the study scope and can rapidly become time consuming according to the number of samples that have to be processed. To avoid time allocated to filtration, passive DNA samplers have been used to recover fish eDNA from marine environments faster. In freshwater ecosystems, aquatic biofilms were used to catch eDNA from macroinvertebrates. Here, we test the capacity of aquatic biofilms to entrap fish eDNA in a large lake and, therefore, the possibility to perform fish eDNA metabarcoding from this matrix compared to the traditional fish eDNA approach from filtered water samples. Methodological aspects of the use of aquatic biofilms for fish eDNA metabarcoding (e.g. PCR replicates, biological replicates, bioinformatics pipeline, reference database and taxonomic assignment) were validated against a mock community. When using biofilms from habitats sheltered from wind and waves, biofilm and water approach provided similar inventories. Richness and diversity were comparable between both approaches. Approaches differed only for rare taxa. Our results illustrate the capacity of aquatic biofilms to act as passive eDNA samplers of fish eDNA and, therefore, the possibility to use biofilms to monitor fish communities efficiently from biofilms. Furthermore, our results open up avenues of research to study a diversity of biological groups (among which bioindicators as diatoms, macroinvertebrates and fish) from eDNA isolated from a single environmental matrix reducing sampling efforts, analysis time and costs.