Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma in women 80 years and older: Treatment, survival and impact of comorbidities.

BACKGROUND: Despite being a disease of mainly older women, little is known about the clinical management of older women with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). We evaluated their daily clinical management compared with younger women, and established the prevalence of comorbidities and its impact on overall survival (OS). METHODS: All Dutch women diagnosed with VSCC from 2015 to 2020 (n = 2249) were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Women aged ≥80 years (n = 632, 28%) were defined as "older" patients, women <80 years were considered as "younger". Chi-square tests were performed to evaluate differences in treatment by age group and comorbidities. Differences in OS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier Curves and log-rank test. RESULTS: The vast majority of both older (91%) and younger (99%) patients with FIGO IA VSCC received surgical treatment of the vulva. Older FIGO IB-IV VSCC patients were less likely to undergo groin surgery than younger patients (50% vs. 84%, p < 0.01). Performance of surgical treatment of the vulva and groin(s) was not associated with the number of comorbidities in older patients (p = 0.67 and p = 0.69). Older patients with ≥2 comorbidities did have poorer OS compared to women with one or no comorbidities (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The vast majority of older patients underwent vulvar/local surgery. Older patients less often received groin surgery compared to younger patients. The majority of older patients had at least one comorbidity, but this did not impact treatment choice. The poorer survival in older VSCC patients may therefore be due to death of competing risks instead of VSCC itself.

Contraceptives and cancer risks in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of BReast CAncer (BRCA) 1 or 2 pathogenic variant (PV) carriers, who have an inherited predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer, are being identified. Among these women, data regarding the effects of contraception on cancer risks are unclear and various guidelines provide various recommendations. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: We aim to optimize counselling regarding contraception for BRCA1/2-PV carriers. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We investigated the risk ratio for developing breast cancer or ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2-PV carriers who have used any form of contraception versus non-users. Second, we analysed breast and ovarian cancer risk among BRCA1/2-PV carriers as influenced by the duration of contraceptive use and by the time since last use. In addition, we provide an overview of all relevant international guidelines regarding contraceptive use for BRCA1/2-PV carriers. SEARCH METHODS: A systematic search in the Medline database and Cochrane library identified studies describing breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2-PV carriers as modified by contraception until June 2021. The search included medical subject headings, keywords and synonyms related to BRCA and contraceptives (any kind). PRISMA guidance was followed. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations assessments were performed. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate pooled effects for breast and ovarian cancer risk separately. Subgroup analyses were conducted for BRCA1 versus BRCA2 and for the various contraceptive methods. OUTCOMES: Results of the breast cancer risk with oral contraceptive pill (OCP) analysis depended on the outcome measure. Meta-analyses of seven studies with 7525 women revealed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.55 (95% CI: 1.36-1.76) and of four studies including 9106 women resulted in an odds ratio (OR) of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.90-1.25), heterogeneity (I2) 0% and 52%, respectively. Breast cancer risk was still increased in ever-users compared with never-users >10 years after last OCP use. In contrast, ovarian cancer risk was decreased among OCP users: HR 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.74) based on two studies including 10 981 women (I2: 0%), and OR 0.49 (95% CI: 0.38-0.63) based on eight studies including 10 390 women (I2: 64%). The protective effect vanished after cessation of use. Tubal ligation also protects against ovarian cancer: one study including 3319 women (I2: 0%): HR: 0.44 (95% CI: 0.26-0.74) and three studies with 7691 women (I2: 44%): OR: 0.74 (95% CI: 0.53-1.03). Data regarding other contraceptives were unavailable. No differences were observed between BRCA1 and BRCA2-PV carriers. The quality of evidence was either low or very low. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: The OCP potentially increases breast cancer risk, while ovarian cancer risk decreases with either the OCP and tubal ligation in BRCA1/2-PV carriers. Counselling of BRCA1/2-PV carriers should be personalized; the genetic and non-genetic factors (like prior risk-reducing surgeries, prior breast cancer and age) and patients' preferences (reversibility, ease of use, reliability and effect on menstrual cycle) should be balanced. To further optimize counselling for high-risk women, future research should focus on other (commonly used) contraceptive methods and cancer risks in this specific population, and on the potential impact of changing formulations over time.

Oncologic outcomes after splenectomy during initial cytoreductive surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients undergoing splenectomy during cytoreductive surgery represent a small subgroup of patients. Splenic metastases or technical reasons due to extensive upper abdominal disease may require a splenectomy. It has been hypothesized that as the spleen's antitumor immunologic functions may inhibit cancer growth, splenectomy may promote the growth of residual disease as observed in other cancer types of murine studies. The few studies assessing the impact of splenectomy on the oncologic outcomes of advanced stage EOC patients have reported inconsistent results. It remains unclear whether splenectomy during cytoreductive surgery is justified to achieve complete cytoreduction. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a splenectomy on perioperative outcomes and survival of advanced stage EOC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this nationwide population-based study, all consecutive patients diagnosed with FIGO stage IIIC and IV EOC between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2015 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as primary treatment were selected. Differences in clinicopathologic characteristics between splenectomy and non-splenectomy patients were assessed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for covariates that influence survival. RESULTS: A total of 3911 patients were identified: 99 splenectomy and 3812 non-splenectomy patients. Splenectomy patients were more likely to undergo extensive surgery or surgical reintervention, to receive intraperitoneal chemotherapy, intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion, to experience postoperative infections, and to be admitted to an intensive care unit (all p < 0.002). No significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between splenectomy vs non-splenectomy patients after adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Although advanced stage EOC patients who undergo splenectomy during cytoreductive surgery have less favorable perioperative outcomes, no adverse impact of splenectomy on the survival of advanced stage EOC patients was observed. Splenectomy during cytoreductive surgery seems to be justified to achieve complete cytoreduction in advanced stage EOC patients.