Mayo Clinic consensus report on membranous nephropathy: proposal for a novel classification.

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a pattern of injury caused by autoantibodies binding to specific target antigens, with accumulation of immune complexes along the subepithelial region of glomerular basement membranes. The past 20 years have brought revolutionary advances in the understanding of MN, particularly via the discovery of novel target antigens and their respective autoantibodies. These discoveries have challenged the traditional classification of MN into primary and secondary forms. At least 14 target antigens have been identified, accounting for 80%-90% of cases of MN. Many of the forms of MN associated with these novel MN target antigens have distinctive clinical and pathologic phenotypes. The Mayo Clinic consensus report on MN proposes a 2-step classification of MN. The first step, when possible, is identification of the target antigen, based on a multistep algorithm and using a combination of serology, staining of the kidney biopsy tissue by immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry, and/or mass spectrometry methodology. The second step is the search for a potential underlying disease or associated condition, which is particularly relevant when knowledge of the target antigen is available to direct it. The meeting acknowledges that the resources and equipment required to perform the proposed testing may not be generally available. However, the meeting consensus was that the time has come to adopt an antigen-based classification of MN because this approach will allow for accurate and specific MN diagnosis, with significant implications for patient management and targeted treatment.

Mayo Clinic Consensus Report on Membranous Nephropathy: Proposal for a Novel Classification.

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a pattern of injury caused by autoantibodies binding to specific target antigens, with accumulation of immune complexes along the subepithelial region of glomerular basement membranes. The past 20 years have brought revolutionary advances in the understanding of MN, particularly via the discovery of novel target antigens and their respective autoantibodies. These discoveries have challenged the traditional classification of MN into primary and secondary forms. At least 14 target antigens have been identified, accounting for 80%-90% of cases of MN. Many of the forms of MN associated with these novel MN target antigens have distinctive clinical and pathologic phenotypes. The Mayo Clinic consensus report on MN proposes a 2-step classification of MN. The first step, when possible, is identification of the target antigen, based on a multistep algorithm and using a combination of serology, staining of the kidney biopsy tissue by immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry, and/or mass spectrometry methodology. The second step is the search for a potential underlying disease or associated condition, which is particularly relevant when knowledge of the target antigen is available to direct it. The meeting acknowledges that the resources and equipment required to perform the proposed testing may not be generally available. However, the meeting consensus was that the time has come to adopt an antigen-based classification of MN because this approach will allow for accurate and specific MN diagnosis, with significant implications for patient management and targeted treatment.

Kidney allograft fibrosis and atrophy early after living donor transplantation.

Kidney allograft failure is most often caused by chronic allograft nephropathy, a process of interstitial fibrosis (GIF) and tubular atrophy (TA). We assessed the pathology of living donor (LD) grafts compared to deceased donor (DD). Included are 321 recipients (245 LD; 76 DD) with protocol biopsies the first 2 years of transplant. In LD, GIF was present in 7%, 31%, 61% and 71% of grafts at 0, 4, 12 and 24 months. TA progressed in parallel to GIF. Compared to LD, more DD grafts had GIF at time 0 (29%, p = 0.002); thereafter the incidence of GIF was similar. In LD, GIF was associated with lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR)(1 year) (no GIF, 62 +/- 16; GIF, 49 +/- 15 mL/min/m(2) iothalamate clearance, p = 0.001) and reduced graft survival (HR = 2.2, p = 0.009). GIF in LD related to acute rejection (HR = 2.6, p = 0.01), polyoma nephropathy (OR = 4.4, p = 0.02) and lower levels of GFR 3 weeks post-transplant (HR = 0.961; p = 0.03, multivariate). However, GIF also developed in 53% of recipients lacking these covariates. Thus, GIF/TA develops in the majority of LD grafts, it is often mild but is associated with reduced function and survival. GIF frequently develops in the absence of risk factors. Lower GFR post-transplant identify patients at highest risk of GIF.

Patient and graft outcomes from older living kidney donors are similar to those from younger donors despite lower GFR.

BACKGROUND: Donor age adversely affects deceased-donor kidney transplant outcomes, but its influence on living-donor transplantation is less well characterized. METHODS: Living-donor kidney transplants at a single center between 1998 and 2000 were reviewed. Data were abstracted for 52 transplants from donors aged > or =50 years and for a matched group of 104 transplants from donors aged <50 years. Survival indices were compared during the first three years' post-transplantation. Functional indices, including serial iothalamate clearances, were compared at 1, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: Predonation glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was lower among older donors (94 +/- 12 vs. 108 +/- 17 mL/min/SA) but post-transplant compensatory hypertrophy was similar (11.7 +/- 26.3% vs. 7.7 +/- 31.4%). Recipients of older-donor grafts were older (52.8 +/- 16.5 vs. 46.1 +/- 15.1 years) and more frequently unrelated to the donor (54% vs. 39%). Trends toward higher frequency of slow graft function, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, and polyomavirus nephropathy were observed for older-donor grafts. Three-year recipient, graft, and death-censored graft survivals were > or =90% for both groups. At 1, 12, and 24 months, serum creatinine was higher and GFR was lower among recipients of older- compared with younger-donor grafts. Other functional indices (urine total protein, serum potassium and uric acid, hemoglobin, and number of antihypertensives) were not different. Donor age correlated with graft GFR at 1, 12, and 24 months for the entire study cohort by linear regression. CONCLUSION: Older donor age does not preclude excellent results from living-donor kidney transplantation but should be appreciated as being associated with relatively lower GFR.

Acute rapamycin nephrotoxicity in native kidneys of patients with chronic glomerulopathies.

BACKGROUND: Based on its success as a transplant immunosuppressor, there is intense interest in using rapamycin in the treatment of progressive glomerulopathies involving native kidneys. However, we call attention to the potential toxicity associated with the use of rapamycin in this setting. METHODS: We conducted a study to examine the efficacy and safety of rapamycin in patients with progressive chronic renal failure. Eleven patients with either focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, immunoglobulin A nephropathy, membranous nephropathy or membrano-proliferative glomerulonephritis and progressive renal failure (defined as an increase in >25% of baseline serum creatinine over the last year or loss of glomerular filtration rate > or =5 ml/min/year as determined by the Cockcroft-Gault formula), proteinuria > or =1.0 g/24 h and with a creatinine clearance of > or 20 ml/min/1.73 m(2) were entered into a 12 month study. Patients were treated with rapamycin, starting at 5 mg/day, orally, aiming for target blood levels of 7-10 ng/dl. All patients were on treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and/or an angiotensin receptor blocker, aiming to control blood pressure < or =145/90 mmHg. RESULTS: Six patients developed acute renal failure, defined as an increase in serum creatinine > or =0.5 mg/dl (baseline: 3.2+/-0.9 mg/dl; peak: 5.6+/-1.6 mg/dl; P<0.01, paired t-test). In four patients, discontinuation of the drug resulted in improvement of renal function close to baseline levels. One patient required haemodialysis and had no subsequent recovery of renal function. In another patient, renal function recovered after discontinuation of the drug and then rapamycin was resumed at a lower dose when creatinine returned to baseline. This resulted in a second acute increase in serum creatinine that failed to return to baseline when the medication was discontinued. Four other patients had the following adverse events: skin rash, severe hypertriglyceridaemia, diarrhoea and hyperkalaemia. In none of the subjects were rapamycin levels >15 ng/dl. CONCLUSIONS: Rapamycin can cause nephrotoxicity in some patients with chronic glomerulopathies. Whether the toxicity is solely related to rapamycin, due to the combination of proteinuria and rapamycin, or other unknown factor use is presently undetermined.

Correlation of quantitative digital image analysis with the glomerular filtration rate in chronic allograft nephropathy.

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is characterized by progressive renal functional loss and histologic abnormalities of one or more tissue compartments. In this study, correlations between histologic abnormalities and graft function [glomerular filtration rate (GFR, measured by iothalamate clearance), serum creatinine (SCr) and urinary protein (UPr)] were investigated using biopsies from 49 patients with newly diagnosed CAN. Extent of tubulointerstitial fibrosis (%TIF), as assessed by a semi-quantitative score, correlated significantly with GFR, SCr and UPr. The close correlation between %TIF and GFR suggested that quantitative measurement of %TIF may predict functional consequences of CAN. Calculation of %TIF by computerized digital analysis was performed using four strategies: (a) quantitation of blue material in Masson's trichrome (MT)-stained sections, (b) quantitation of red material in Sirius Red-stained sections (SR-nonpolarized), (c) quantitation of birefringent material in Sirius Red stained-sections examined under polarized light (SR-polarized) and (d) quantification of brown material in sections stained by immunoperoxidase for alpha-smooth muscle actin. Only the SR-nonpolarized score correlated significantly with GFR at the time of biopsy-diagnosis of CAN. We conclude that digital analysis strategies demonstrate variable accuracy in quantifying %TIF. Validation of the SR-nonpolarized strategy against histologic scoring and GFR supports the application of this technique to longitudinal studies of CAN.

Influence of surveillance renal allograft biopsy on diagnosis and prognosis of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is an increasingly prevalent cause of allograft dysfunction. METHODS: In 18 histologically proven cases of PVAN managed by reduced immunosuppression, monitoring of serum creatinine, and repeated biopsy, graft outcomes were correlated with clinical and histologic indices. Six months postdiagnosis the status of each graft was classified as poor (N = 7) or satisfactory (N = 11). Poor transplant status was defined as graft loss, increased severity of PVAN on repeat biopsy, or serum creatinine>3.0 mg/dL. Diagnosis resulted from either surveillance allograft biopsies (N = 8) or biopsies performed for increased serum creatinine (nonsurveillance, N = 10). RESULTS: The surveillance biopsy group was more likely than the nonsurveillance group to have satisfactory graft status at 6 months (eight of eight vs. three of ten, P = 0.004) and had significantly lower serum creatinine at diagnosis, 3, and 6 months. Histologic scoring for chronic interstitial and tubular injury was lower in diagnostic surveillance biopsies compared to nonsurveillance biopsies (P = 0.01). Satisfactory transplant status was also associated with reduced or absent virus on repeat biopsy (P = 0.01). Poor transplant status was associated with a higher frequency of recipientneg/donorpos cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology (71% vs. 9%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Surveillance allograft biopsy provides an important means for earlier detection of PVAN and permits timely alterations to immunosuppression. Early diagnosis is associated with a lesser degree of interstitial fibrosis at diagnosis and lower baseline and subsequent serum creatinine.

Overcoming a positive crossmatch in living-donor kidney transplantation.

Many patients who have an otherwise acceptable living-kidney donor do not undergo transplantation because of the presence of antibodies against the donor cells resulting in a positive crossmatch. In the current study, 14 patients with a positive cytotoxic crossmatch (titer

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation using both A2 and non-A2 living donors.

BACKGROUND: Given the scarcity of cadaveric organs, efforts are intensifying to increase the availability of living donors. The current study assessed the feasibility of using ABO-incompatible living-donor kidneys to expand the donor pool. METHODS: The authors performed 18 ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplants between May 1999 and April 2001. Ten patients received living-donor kidneys from A2 and eight patients received kidneys from non-A2 blood group donors. Immunosuppression consisted of Thymoglobulin antibody induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Eight non-A2 and two A2 kidney recipients also received a pretransplant conditioning regimen of four plasmapheresis treatments followed by intravenous immunoglobulin and splenectomy at the time of transplantation. Antidonor blood group antibody titer was measured at baseline, pretransplant, at 1- to 3-month and 1-year follow-up, and at the time of diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection. RESULTS: No hyperacute rejection episodes occurred. One-year graft and patient survival rates in the 18 ABO-incompatible recipients were only slightly lower than those of 81 patients who received ABO-compatible kidney transplants during the same period (89% vs. 96% and 94% vs. 99%, respectively). Glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine levels did not differ between the groups. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in 28% of ABO-incompatible recipients, and was reversible with plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and increasing immunosuppression in all patients except one. CONCLUSIONS: ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplants can achieve an acceptable 1-year graft survival rate using an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of Thymoglobulin induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone combined with pretransplant plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and splenectomy.

Can a transplanted living donor kidney function equivalently to its native partner?

Early renal functional adaptation was examined in 81 haploidentical donor and recipient pairs, as well as long-term stability of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in 78 recipients. GFR was determined pre- and 1 month postnephrectomy in donors and 1 month post-transplant and yearly thereafter in recipients. Compensatory increase in filtration (CIF) of transplanted and native kidneys was calculated using donor pretransplant GFR: [CIF= (GFR at 1 month/donor prenephrectomy GFR) x 100]. Annual rates of change in GFR were estimated using within-patient linear regression analysis (slopes). Recipients without rejection (n = 62) and their donors had similar early GFR and CIF. Those with acute rejection (n = 19) had significantly lower GFR and CIF than their donors (61 +/- 16 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 57 +/- 14% vs. 75 +/- 11 and 69 +/- 9; p = 0.01 and p < 0.001). Recipients without cyclosporine (n = 52) had 1 month GFR and CIF of 70 +/- 14 and 67 +/- 14 vs. 72 +/- 11 and 69 +/- 11 for their donors. Those with cyclosporine (n = 29) had 1 month GFR and CIF of 64 +/- 14 and 62 +/- 16 vs. 69 +/- 12 and 67 +/- 11 for their donors (p = 0.15 and 0.16). Comparison of median (25th, 75th) rates of change of GFR with and without acute rejection or cyclosporine did not demonstrate significant effects of either on stability of allograft function, although there was a trend towards greater loss of GFR in cyclosporine-treated patients [-1.1 (-2.5, 0.8) vs. 0.0 (-1.8, 1.2) mL/min/1.73 m2/year, p = 0.47]. We conclude that, in the absence of rejection, the transplanted kidney maintains the same capacity for functional adaptation as its native partner. Therapy with cyclosporine does not significantly inhibit early physiological adaptation of renal transplants.

Subclinical rejection in tacrolimus-treated renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Subclinical rejection, defined as histologic acute rejection in the absence of graft dysfunction, has been suggested as a cause of chronic allograft rejection. In cyclosporine-treated patients, the incidence of subclinical rejection 3 months after transplant is reported to be approximately 30%. The intent of our study was to determine the incidence of subclinical rejection in tacrolimus-treated renal allograft recipients. METHODS: We prospectively studied the incidence of subclinical rejection on surveillance biopsies performed 3 months after transplantation in 114 patients transplanted between September 1, 1998 and November 30, 2000. All patients received tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone, and 56% received antibody induction. RESULTS: Subclinical rejection was detected in 2.6% of patients (3/114, 95% confidence interval 0.5-7.5%). Borderline changes were detected in 11% (12/114). Subclinical rejections were treated with bolus methylprednisolone. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of subclinical rejection early after kidney transplantation is extremely low in tacrolimus-treated patients in whom early rejections are aggressively treated, suggesting that surveillance biopsies may not be necessary with this regimen.

Posttransplantation diabetes: a systematic review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the incidence of posttransplantation diabetes (PTD), risk factors for its development, prognostic implications, and optimal management. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We searched databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and others) from inception to September 2000, reviewed bibliographies in reports retrieved, contacted transplantation experts, and reviewed specialty journals. Two reviewers independently determined report inclusion (original studies, in all languages, of PTD in adults with no history of diabetes before transplantation), assessed study methods, and extracted data using a standardized form. Meta-regression was used to explain between-study differences in incidence. RESULTS: Nineteen studies with 3,611 patients were included. The 12-month cumulative incidence of PTD is lower (<10% in most studies) than it was 3 decades ago. The type of immunosuppression explained 74% of the variability in incidence (P = 0.0004). Risk factors were patient age, nonwhite ethnicity, glucocorticoid treatment for rejection, and immunosuppression with high-dose cyclosporine and tacrolimus. PTD was associated with decreased graft and patient survival in earlier studies; later studies showed improved outcomes. Randomized trials of treatment regimens have not been conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should consider modification of immunosuppressive regimens to decrease the risk of PTD in high-risk transplant recipients. Randomized trials are needed to evaluate the use of oral glucose-lowering agents in transplant recipients, paying particular attention to interactions with immunosuppressive drugs.