RESUMEN
Drug-induced methemoglobinemia is a well-known phenomenon as well as induction by poppers (alcylnitrites substance group). Usually, suspicion is thrown in the right direction by a thorough medical history and environmental survey. But if intoxication is unintended and happens within the very private environment diagnosis might be very tricky. We report on an unusual case of accidental intoxication with probably contaminated tablets which were bought in the darknet. Finally, diagnosis was made by blood gas analysis' methemoglobine values.
Asunto(s)
Contaminación de Medicamentos , Metahemoglobinemia , Citrato de Sildenafil , Humanos , Metahemoglobinemia/inducido químicamente , Metahemoglobinemia/diagnóstico , Citrato de Sildenafil/efectos adversos , Comprimidos , InternetAsunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Autocuidado/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Telemedicina/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Soluciones Isotónicas/efectos adversos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Cloruro de Sodio/efectos adversos , Lesión Renal Aguda/sangre , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Biomarcadores/sangre , Creatinina/sangre , Estudios Cruzados , Soluciones Cristaloides , Método Doble Ciego , Fluidoterapia/efectos adversos , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Fluidoterapia/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Soluciones Isotónicas/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cloruro de Sodio/administración & dosificaciónAsunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Paro Cardíaco/prevención & control , Paro Cardíaco/rehabilitación , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Laringoscopía/métodos , Cirugía Asistida por Video/métodos , Competencia Clínica , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Mechanical chest compression devices are mentioned in the current guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) as an alternative in long-lasting cardiopulmonary resuscitations (CPR) or during transport with ongoing CPR. We compared manual chest compression with mechanical devices in a rescue-helicopter-based scenario using a resuscitation manikin. Manual chest compression was compared with the mechanical devices LUCAS™ 2, AutoPulse™ and animax mono (10 series each) using the resuscitation manikin AmbuMan MegaCode Wireless, which was intubated endotracheally and controlled ventilated during the entire scenario. The scenario comprised the installation of each device, transport and loading phases, as well as a 10-min phase inside the helicopter (type BK 117). We investigated practicability as well as measured compression quality. All mechanical devices could be used readily in a BK 117 helicopter. The LUCAS 2 group was the only one that fulfilled all recommendations of the ERC (frequency 102 ± 0.1 min(-1), compression depth 54 ± 3 mm, hands-off time 2.5 ± 1.6 %). Performing adequate manual chest compression was barely possible (fraction of correct compressions 21 ± 15 %). In all four groups, the total hands-off time was <10 %. Performing manual chest compressions during rescue-helicopter transport is barely possible, and only of poor quality. If rescuers are experienced, mechanical chest compression devices could be good alternatives in this situation. We found that the LUCAS 2 system complied with all recommendations of ERC guidelines, and all three tested devices worked consistently during the entire scenario.
Asunto(s)
Ambulancias Aéreas/normas , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/instrumentación , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/normas , Diseño de Equipo/normas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Humanos , Presión , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
High-quality chest compressions are crucial during resuscitation if a positive outcome is to be achieved. Sometimes a patient must be transported within the hospital while chest compressions are being performed. We compared different chest compression devices [animax mono (AM), AutoPulse(®) (AP) and LUCAS2™ (L2)] with manual chest compression using a manikin during transport from a fifth floor ward to the cardiac catheterization laboratory in the basement. Chest compressions were interrupted for 10.7 s to set up the AM, 15.3 s for the L2 and 23.5 s for the AP. The use of a mechanical device reduced transport times from 144.5 s when manual compressions were underway, to 126.8, 111.1 and 98.5 s with the AM, L2 and AP, respectively (p < 0.05). Transfer to the laboratory gurney required little or no interruption in chest compressions with the L2 (0.8 s) and AP (no interruption), compared with 10.3 s with the AP and 3.3 s for manual compressions. Manual compression frequency was 124 min(-1), compared with 100.4 min(-1) for the AM, 99.9 min(-1) for the L2 and 79.7 min(-1) for the AP. Compression depth did not change during transport in any group. Mechanical compression devices are suitable for use during transport, but are not clearly superior to manual compressions. Devices maintain the same compression depth, but fell short of current guidelines, as did manual compressions. Some interruptions occurred while the devices were set up. Further, patient studies are necessary to determine the clinical utility of these devices.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/instrumentación , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Transporte de Pacientes , Humanos , ManiquíesRESUMEN
AIM: In special circumstances it may be necessary to transport out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with ongoing resuscitation to the hospital. External mechanical chest compression devices could be an alternative for these resuscitations. The study compares manual chest compression with external mechanical devices and a semiautomatic device in transport conditions using a resuscitation manikin. METHODS: Manual chest compressions were compared with LUCAS 2, AutoPulse and animax mono devices using the Ambu Man Wireless MegaCode manikin (10 series each). The measurements were performed in a standard ambulance vehicle during transport on a predefined track of 5.0 km. RESULTS: Mean compression frequencies in the manual group (117 ± 18 min(-1)) and in the animax mono group (115 ± 10 min(-1)) were significantly higher than in the LUCAS 2 group (100 min(-1), p=0.02) and the AutoPulse group (80 min(-1), p<0.01). Both mechanical devices worked absolutely constantly. Only the animax mono group reached with 51.2 mm the recommended compression depth. The quality of manual compressions decreased considerably during braking or change manoeuvres while the mechanical devices continued to work constantly. CONCLUSIONS: During a patient transport with ongoing resuscitation, external mechanical compression devices may be a good alternative to manual compression because they increase the safety of the rescuer and patient. Yet, in this study only animax mono reached the guideline specifications regarding chest compressions' frequency and depth. Concerning constancy, the mechanical devices work reliably and more independently from motion influences. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of these devices in patient transport.