RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Various electrodiagnostic criteria have been developed in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Their performance in a broad representation of GBS patients has not been evaluated. Motor conduction data from the International GBS Outcome Study (IGOS) cohort were used to compare two widely used criterion sets and relate these to diagnostic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis criteria. METHODS: From the first 1500 patients in IGOS, nerve conduction studies from 1137 (75.8%) were available for the current study. These patients were classified according to nerve conduction studies criteria proposed by Hadden and Rajabally. RESULTS: Of the 1137 studies, 68.3% (N = 777) were classified identically according to criteria by Hadden and Rajabally: 111 (9.8%) axonal, 366 (32.2%) demyelinating, 195 (17.2%) equivocal, 35 (3.1%) inexcitable and 70 (6.2%) normal. Thus, 360 studies (31.7%) were classified differently. The areas of differences were as follows: 155 studies (13.6%) classified as demyelinating by Hadden and axonal by Rajabally; 122 studies (10.7%) classified as demyelinating by Hadden and equivocal by Rajabally; and 75 studies (6.6%) classified as equivocal by Hadden and axonal by Rajabally. Due to more strictly defined cutoffs fewer patients fulfilled demyelinating criteria by Rajabally than by Hadden, making more patients eligible for axonal or equivocal classification by Rajabally. In 234 (68.6%) axonal studies by Rajabally the revised El Escorial (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) criteria were fulfilled; in axonal cases by Hadden this was 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: This study shows that electrodiagnosis in GBS is dependent on the criterion set utilized, both of which are based on expert opinion. Reappraisal of electrodiagnostic subtyping in GBS is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Electrodiagnóstico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Conducción Nerviosa , Humanos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/clasificación , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/fisiopatología , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología , Electrodiagnóstico/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/diagnóstico , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/clasificación , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/fisiopatología , Anciano , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
Diagnosing Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) poses numerous challenges. The heterogeneous presentations of CIDP variants, its mimics, and the complexity of interpreting electrodiagnostic criteria are just a few of the many reasons for misdiagnoses. Early recognition and treatment are important to reduce the risk of irreversible axonal damage, which may lead to permanent disability. The diagnosis of CIDP is based on a combination of clinical symptoms, nerve conduction study findings that indicate demyelination, and other supportive criteria. In 2021, the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) published a revision on the most widely adopted guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of CIDP. This updated guideline now includes clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria for CIDP variants (previously termed atypical CIDP), updated supportive criteria, and sensory criteria as an integral part of the electrodiagnostic criteria. Due to its many rules and exceptions, this guideline is complex and misinterpretation of nerve conduction study findings remain common. CIDP is treatable with intravenous immunoglobulins, corticosteroids, and plasma exchange. The choice of therapy should be tailored to the individual patient's situation, taking into account the severity of symptoms, potential side effects, patient autonomy, and past treatments. Treatment responses should be evaluated as objectively as possible using disability and impairment scales. Applying these outcome measures consistently in clinical practice aids in recognizing the effectiveness (or lack thereof) of a treatment and facilitates timely consideration of alternative diagnoses or treatments. This review provides an overview of the current perspectives on the diagnostic process and first-line treatments for managing the disease.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To develop an artificial neural network (ANN) for classification of motor unit action potential (MUAP) duration in real-word, unselected and uncleaned needle electromyography (n-EMG) recordings. METHODS: Two nested ANN models were trained, the first discerning muscle rest, contraction and artifacts in n-EMG recordings from 2674 individual muscles from 326 patients obtained as part of daily care. The second ANN model subsequently used segments labeled as contraction for prediction of prolonged, normal and shortened MUAPs. Model performance was assessed in one internal and two external validation datasets of 184, 30 and 50 muscles, respectively. RESULTS: The first model discerned rest, contraction and artifacts with an accuracy of 96%. The second model predicted prolonged, normal and shortened MUAPs with an accuracy of 67%, 83% and 68% in the different validation sets. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a two-step ANN that classifies rest, muscle contraction and artifacts from real-world n-EMG recordings with very high accuracy. MUAP duration classification had moderate accuracy. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to show that an ANN can classify MUAPs in real-world n-EMG recordings highlighting the potential for AI assisted MUAP classification as a clinical tool.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Músculos , Humanos , Potenciales de Acción/fisiología , Electromiografía , Contracción Muscular/fisiología , Músculo Esquelético/fisiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: For idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) ('myositis') standard initial treatment is high-dosed glucocorticoids, which results in relatively slow improvement of muscle strength. Early immunosuppression or modulation by intensive treatment ('hit-early, hit-hard') may induce faster reduction of disease activity and prevent chronic disability due to disease-induced structural muscle damage. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in addition to standard glucocorticoid treatment may be promising in this regard as was shown in various studies: add-on IVIg improved symptoms and muscle strength in refractory myositis patients and monotherapy IVIg improved outcomes after 9 weeks, in about half of treatment-naive patients. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesise that early add-on IVIg leads to a greater clinical response after 12 weeks in patients with newly diagnosed myositis, in comparison to prednisone monotherapy. Second, we expect that early treatment with add-on IVIg leads to a faster time to improvement and sustained positive effects on multiple secondary outcomes. METHODS: The Time Is Muscle trial is a phase-2 double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial. Forty-eight patients with IIM will be treated with IVIg or placebo at baseline (within 1 week after diagnosis) and after 4 and 8 weeks, in addition to standard therapy with prednisone. The primary outcome is the Total Improvement Score (TIS) of the myositis response criteria at 12 weeks. At baseline, and after 4, 8, 12, 26 and 52 weeks, relevant secondary outcomes will be assessed, including time to moderate improvement (TIS≥40), mean daily prednisone dosage, physical activity, health-related quality of life, fatigue and MRI muscle imaging parameters. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the medical ethics committee of the Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands (2020_180; including a first amendment approval at the 12 April 2023; A2020_180_0001). The results will be distributed through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EU Clinical trials register (2020-001710-37).
Asunto(s)
Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas , Miositis , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Músculos , Miositis/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como AsuntoRESUMEN
Electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies are helpful in diagnosing and subtyping of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Published criteria for differentiation into GBS subtypes focus on cutoff values, but other items receive less attention, although they may influence EDx subtyping: (a) extensiveness of EDx testing, (b) nerve-specific considerations, (c) distal compound muscle action potential (CMAP)-amplitude requirements, (d) criteria for conduction block and temporal dispersion. The aims of this study were to investigate how these aspects were approached by neuromuscular EDx experts in practice and how this was done in previously published EDx criteria for GBS. A completed questionnaire was returned by 24 (of 49) members of the electrophysiology expertise group from the International GBS Outcome Study. Six published EDx criteria for GBS subtyping were compared regarding these aspects. The indicated minimal number of motor nerves to study varied among respondents and tended to be more extensive in equivocal than normal studies. Respondents varied considerably regarding usage of compression sites for subtyping (median/wrist, ulnar/elbow, peroneal/fibular head): 29% used all variables from all sites, 13% excluded all sites, and 58% used only some sites and/or variables. Thirty-eight percent of respondents required a minimal distal CMAP amplitude to classify distal motor latency as demyelinating, and 58% did for motor conduction velocity. For proximal/distal CMAP-amplitude ratio and F-wave latency, a requisite minimal CMAP amplitude was more often required (79%). Also, the various published criteria sets showed differences on all items. Practical use of EDx criteria for subtyping GBS vary extensively across respondents, potentially lowering the reproducibility of GBS subtyping.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Conducción Nerviosa , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Humanos , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To prospectively compare ultrasound (US) and whole-body MRI for detection of muscle abnormalities compatible with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). METHODS: Newly diagnosed IIM patients underwent US (14 muscles) and MRI (36 muscles) at diagnosis and after nine weeks monotherapy with intravenous immunoglobulin. Muscles were compatible with IIM when quantitative US echo-intensity (EI) z scores was ≥1.5, semi-quantitative US Heckmatt score was ≥2, qualitative US was abnormal, or when MRI showed oedema on T2-weighted images. At patient level, findings were classified as abnormal when quantitative US EI z scores was >1.5 (n = 3 muscles), >2.5 (n = 2 muscles) or >3.5 (n = 1 muscle), or if ≥3 muscles showed abnormalities as described above for the other diagnostic methods. RESULTS: At diagnosis, in 18 patients US of 252 muscles revealed abnormalities in 36 muscles (14%) with quantitative, in 153 (61%) with semi-quantitative and in 168 (67%) with qualitative analysis. MRI showed oedema in 476 out of 623 muscles (76%). Five patients (28%) reached abnormal classification with quantitative US, 16 (89%) with semi-quantitative and qualitative US, and all patients (100%) with MRI. Nine-week follow-up of 12 patients showed no change over time with quantitative US or MRI, and a decrease in abnormalities with semi-quantitative US (P <0.01), and qualitative US (P <0.01). CONCLUSION: At diagnosis, MRI was more sensitive than US to detect muscle abnormalities compatible with IIM. Semi-quantitative US and qualitative US detected abnormalities in the majority of the patients while evaluating fewer muscles than MRI and showed change over time after nine weeks of treatment.
Asunto(s)
Músculo Esquelético , Miositis , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagen , Miositis/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Edema/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral neuropathy. The optimal treatment strategy is still unknown. The objective of the Dutch Injection versus Surgery TRIal in patients with CTS (DISTRICTS) is to investigate if initial surgery of CTS results in a better clinical outcome and is more cost-effective when compared with initial treatment with corticosteroid injection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The DISTRICTS is an ongoing multicenter, open-label randomised controlled trial. Participants with CTS are randomised to treatment with surgery or with a corticosteroid injection. If needed, any additional treatments after this first treatment are allowed and these are not dictated by the study protocol. The primary outcome is the difference between the groups in the proportion of participants recovered at 18 months. Recovery is defined as having no or mild symptoms as measured with the 6-item carpal tunnel symptoms scale. Secondary outcome measurements are among others: time to recovery, hand function, patient satisfaction, quality of life, additional treatments, adverse events, and use of care and health-related costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centers (study number 2017-171). Study results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN Registry: 13164336.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/cirugía , Humanos , Inyecciones , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , MuñecaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the heterogeneity of electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients collected as part of the International GBS Outcome Study (IGOS). METHODS: Prospectively collected clinical and EDx data were available in 957 IGOS patients from 115 centers. Only the first EDx study was included in the current analysis. RESULTS: Median timing of the EDx study was 7 days (interquartile range 4-11) from symptom onset. Methodology varied between centers, countries and regions. Reference values from the responding 103 centers were derived locally in 49%, from publications in 37% and from a combination of these in the remaining 15%. Amplitude measurement in the EDx studies (baseline-to-peak or peak-to-peak) differed from the way this was done in the reference values, in 22% of motor and 39% of sensory conduction. There was marked variability in both motor and sensory reference values, although only a few outliers accounted for this. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed extensive variation in the clinical practice of EDx in GBS patients among IGOS centers across the regions. SIGNIFICANCE: Besides EDx variation in GBS patients participating in IGOS, this diversity is likely to be present in other neuromuscular disorders and centers. This underlines the need for standardization of EDx in future multinational GBS studies.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Conducción Nerviosa , Electrodiagnóstico/métodos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Humanos , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Valores de ReferenciaRESUMEN
Expert consensus was sought to guide clinicians on the use of electrodiagnostic tests (EDX) and neuromuscular ultrasound (NMUS) in the investigation of suspected carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Consensus was achieved using the Delphi method via three consecutive anonymised surveys of 15 experts and was defined as rating agreement ≥ 80%. The panel agreed that combining EDX and NMUS is more informative than using each modality alone. NMUS adds value in patients with clinically suspected CTS with non-localizing or normal EDX, atypical EDX, failed CTS surgery, polyneuropathy, and CTS suspected to be secondary to structural pathology. The median nerve cross-sectional area should be measured at the site of maximal nerve enlargement, and the nerve should be scanned from mid-forearm to the palm. The group also identified those situations where the wrist-to-forearm area ratio and longitudinal scans of the median nerve should also be obtained. EDX should always be performed to quantify CTS severity and in individuals over age 70. This document is an initial step to guide clinicians on the combined investigation of CTS using EDX and NMUS, to be updated regularly with the emergence of new research.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/diagnóstico , Electrodiagnóstico/métodos , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/fisiopatología , Consenso , Electrodiagnóstico/normas , Humanos , Unión Neuromuscular/diagnóstico por imagen , Unión Neuromuscular/fisiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Ultrasonografía/normasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinimetric properties of the Academic Medical Centre Disability Score (ALDS) in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). METHODS: We used prospectively collected data of IIM patients who completed a phase-2 study with first-line IVIG monotherapy. The ALDS is a patient-reported questionnaire which contains 25 items relevant for disability in myositis. ALDS and all core set measures (CSMs) for myositis [including HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)] were evaluated at baseline and 9 weeks follow-up. In addition, the 2016 ACR/EULAR myositis response criteria outcome called Total Improvement Score (TIS) was evaluated at 9 weeks. We examined floor/ceiling effects, reliability and construct validity of the ALDS. To examine known-group validity, ALDS change scores over time were compared with TIS and physician impression of clinical response. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with IIM [median age 59 years, 12 (63%) female] were enrolled. At baseline, ALDS showed a median score of 65.4 (IQR 58.2-73.5), good Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.84) and a small ceiling effect (11%). Construct validity was confirmed by moderate to strong correlations between ALDS and HAQ-DI [rs = -0.57 (baseline); -0.86 (follow-up)]. ALDS change score correlated with TIS (rs = 0.70), discriminated between responders and non-responders (TIS ≥ 40; P = 0.001), between groups based on physician impression of clinical response (P = 0.03), and detected deterioration. CONCLUSION: The ALDS showed promising clinimetric properties and detected relevant changes in disability in patients with myositis. These results warrant further investigations.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Miositis , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Miositis/diagnóstico , Miositis/tratamiento farmacológico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) excluding inclusion body myositis (IBM) are a group of heterogeneous autoimmune disorders characterised by subacute-onset and progressive proximal muscle weakness, which are frequently part of a multisystem autoimmune disorder. Reaching the diagnosis can be challenging, and no gold standard for the diagnosis of IIM exists. Diagnostic modalities include serum creatine kinase activity, muscle imaging (MRI or ultrasound (US)), electromyography (EMG), myositis autoantibody testing and muscle biopsy. Several diagnostic criteria have been developed for IIMs, varying in reported sensitivity and specificity. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesise that an evidence-based diagnostic strategy, using fewer and preferably the least invasive diagnostic modalities, can achieve the accuracy of a complete panel of diagnostic tests, including MRI, US, EMG, myositis-specific autoantibody testing and muscle biopsy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The OptimizAtion of Diagnostic Accuracy in idioPathic inflammaTory myopathies study is a prospective diagnostic accuracy study with an over-complete study design. 100 patients suspected of an IIM excluding IBM will be included. A reference diagnosis will be assigned by an expert panel using all clinical information and all results of all ancillary tests available, including 6 months of follow-up. Several predefined diagnostic strategies will be compared against the reference diagnosis to find the optimal diagnostic strategy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the medical ethics committee of the Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2019-814). The results will be distributed through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands trial register; NL8764.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Miositis , Autoanticuerpos , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/diagnóstico , Biopsia , Humanos , Miositis/diagnóstico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A) is a rare, orphan, hereditary neuromuscular disorder with no cure and for which only symptomatic treatment is currently available. A previous phase 2 trial has shown preliminary evidence of efficacy for PXT3003 in treating CMT1A. This phase 3, international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study further investigated the efficacy and safety of high- or low-dose PXT3003 (baclofen/naltrexone/D-sorbitol [mg]: 6/0.70/210 or 3/0.35/105) in treating subjects with mild to moderate CMT1A. METHODS: In this study, 323 subjects with mild-to-moderate CMT1A were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 5 mL of high- or low-dose PXT3003, or placebo, orally twice daily for up to 15 months. Efficacy was assessed using the change in Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale total score from baseline to months 12 and 15 (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints included the 10-m walk test and other assessments. The high-dose group was discontinued early due to unexpected crystal formation in the high-dose formulation, which resulted in an unanticipated high discontinuation rate, overall and especially in the high-dose group. The statistical analysis plan was adapted to account for the large amount of missing data before database lock, and a modified full analysis set was used in the main analyses. Two sensitivity analyses were performed to check the interpretation based on the use of the modified full analysis set. RESULTS: High-dose PXT3003 demonstrated significant improvement in the Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale total score vs placebo (mean difference: - 0.37 points; 97.5% CI [- 0.68 to - 0.06]; p = 0.008), and consistent treatment effects were shown in the sensitivity analyses. Both PXT3003 doses were safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: The high-dose group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint and a good safety profile. Overall, high-dose PXT3003 is a promising treatment option for patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Charcot-Marie-Tooth , Baclofeno , Enfermedad de Charcot-Marie-Tooth/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Naltrexona , SorbitolRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether serum levels of contactin-1, a paranodal protein, correlate with paranodal injury as seen in patients with CIDP with antibodies targeting the paranodal region. METHODS: Serum contactin-1 levels were measured in 187 patients with CIDP and 222 healthy controls. Paranodal antibodies were investigated in all patients. RESULTS: Serum contactin-1 levels were lower in patients (N = 41) with paranodal antibodies compared with patients (N = 146) without paranodal antibodies (p < 0.01) and showed good discrimination between these groups (area under the curve 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that serum contactin-1 levels have the potential to serve as a possible diagnostic biomarker of paranodal injury in CIDP. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides class II evidence that serum contactin-1 levels can discriminate between patients with CIDP with or without paranodal antibodies with a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI: 56%-85%) and a specificity of 97% (95% CI: 83%-100%).
Asunto(s)
Contactina 1/sangre , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/sangre , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
The addition of ultrasound (US) to electrodiagnostic (EDX) tests can significantly enhance the accuracy of testing for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE). We aimed to obtain expert consensus to guide clinicians on the combined use of EDX and US in UNE investigation. Consensus was achieved using the Delphi method. Two consecutive anonymised questionnaires were submitted to 15 experts, who were asked to choose their level of agreement with each statement. Consensus was pre-defined as ≥ 80% rating agreement. The experts concluded that all investigations of UNE should include both nerve conduction studies and US. There was consensus that US should include cross-sectional area measurement and assessment of nerve mobility at the elbow, and that the entire ulnar nerve should be imaged. This study defined expert opinion on the 'core' techniques that should be used routinely in the UNE investigation using EDX and US. Areas with lack of consensus highlighted some controversial issues in the current use of these diagnostic modalities and the need for future research. This document is an initial step to guide clinicians on the combined investigation of UNE using EDX and US, to be regularly updated as new research emerges.
Asunto(s)
Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto , Electrodiagnóstico/métodos , Neuropatías Cubitales/diagnóstico , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Codo/diagnóstico por imagen , Codo/fisiopatología , Electrodiagnóstico/normas , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Neuropatías Cubitales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuropatías Cubitales/fisiopatología , Ultrasonografía/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The immunological pathophysiologies of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) differ considerably, but neither has been elucidated completely. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging, T2 mapping, and fat fraction analysis may indicate in vivo pathophysiological changes in nerve architecture. Our study aimed to systematically study nerve architecture of the brachial plexus in patients with CIDP, MMN, motor neuron disease (MND) and healthy controls using these quantitative MRI techniques. METHODS: We enrolled patients with CIDP (n = 47), MMN (n = 29), MND (n = 40) and healthy controls (n = 10). All patients underwent MRI of the brachial plexus and we obtained diffusion parameters, T2 relaxation times and fat fraction using an automated processing pipeline. We compared these parameters between groups using a univariate general linear model. RESULTS: Fractional anisotropy was lower in patients with CIDP compared to healthy controls (p < 0.001), patients with MND (p = 0.010) and MMN (p < 0.001). Radial diffusivity was higher in patients with CIDP compared to healthy controls (p = 0.015) and patients with MND (p = 0.001) and MMN (p < 0.001). T2 relaxation time was elevated in patients with CIDP compared to patients with MND (p = 0.023). Fat fraction was lower in patients with CIDP and MMN compared to patients with MND (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results show that quantitative MRI parameters differ between CIDP, MMN and MND, which may reflect differences in underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.
Asunto(s)
Plexo Braquial , Enfermedad de la Neurona Motora , Polineuropatías , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante , Plexo Braquial/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen de Difusión Tensora , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Enfermedad de la Neurona Motora/diagnóstico por imagen , Polineuropatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Nerve ultrasound is a promising new tool in chronic inflammatory neuropathies. The aim of this study was to determine its prognostic value in a prospective multicenter cohort study including incident and prevalent patients with CIDP and MMN. METHODS: We enrolled 126 patients with CIDP, and 72 with MMN; 71 were treatment-naive. Patients with chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP; n = 35) were considered as disease controls. Standardized neurological examination, questionnaires, and nerve ultrasonography were obtained at time of inclusion and 1-year follow-up. Nerve size development over time and correlation between nerve size and clinical outcome measures were determined using linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: Nerve size development over time was heterogeneous. Only in MMN was there a correlation between C5 nerve root size and deterioration of grip strength (-1.3 kPa/mm2 (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.3 to -0.2). No other significant correlations between nerve size and clinical outcome measures were found. In MMN, presence of nerve enlargement at inclusion predicted deterioration of grip strength, and MMN patients with enlargement confined to the brachial plexus seemed to have more favorable outcomes. No other predictive effects of sonographic nerve size were found. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that the natural course of nerve size development in CIDP and MMN is heterogeneous, and that the prognostic value of sonographic nerve enlargement is limited. It had some predictive effect in patients with MMN. Further research in specific subgroups of chronic inflammatory neuropathy is necessary to determine the usefulness of nerve ultrasonography after the diagnostic phase.
Asunto(s)
Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/diagnóstico por imagen , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We explored efficacy and safety of IVIg as first-line treatment in patients with an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated phase 2 open-label study, we included 20 adults with a newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, and a disease duration of less than 9 months. Patients with IBM and prior use of immunosuppressants were excluded. The standard treatment regimen consisted of IVIg (Privigen) monotherapy for 9 weeks: a loading dose (2 g/kg body weight) and two subsequent maintenance doses (1 g/kg body weight) with a 3-week interval. The primary outcome was the number of patients with at least moderate improvement on the 2016 ACR/EULAR Total Improvement Score. Secondary outcomes included time to improvement, the number of patients requiring rescue medication and serious adverse events. RESULTS: We included patients with DM (n = 9), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (n = 6), non-specific myositis/overlap myositis (n = 4) and anti-synthetase syndrome (n = 1). One patient was excluded from analyses because of minimal weakness resulting in a ceiling effect. Eight patients (8/19 = 42.0%; Clopper-Pearson 95% CI: 19.6, 64.6) had at least moderate improvement by 9 weeks. Of these, six reached improvement by 3 weeks. Seven patients required rescue medication due to insufficient efficacy and prematurely ended the study. Three serious adverse events occurred, of which one was pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION: First-line IVIg monotherapy led to at least moderate improvement in nearly half of patients with a fast clinical response in the majority of responders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register identifier, NTR6160.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administración & dosificación , Miositis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Creatina Quinasa/sangre , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Foliculitis/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Debilidad Muscular/inducido químicamente , Proyectos Piloto , Embolia Pulmonar/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) consists of a spectrum of autoimmune diseases of the peripheral nerves, causing weakness and sensory symptoms. Diagnosis often is challenging, because of the heterogeneous presentation and both mis- and underdiagnosis are common. Nerve conduction study (NCS) abnormalities suggestive of demyelination are mandatory to fulfil the diagnostic criteria. On the one hand, performance and interpretation of NCS can be difficult and none of these demyelinating findings are specific for CIDP. On the other hand, not all patients will be detected despite the relatively high sensitivity of NCS abnormalities. The electrodiagnostic criteria can be supplemented with additional diagnostic tests such as CSF examination, MRI, nerve biopsy, and somatosensory evoked potentials. However, the evidence for each of these additional diagnostic tests is limited. Studies are often small without the use of a clinically relevant control group. None of the findings are specific for CIDP, meaning that the results of the diagnostic tests should be carefully interpreted. In this update we will discuss the pitfalls in diagnosing CIDP and the value of newly introduced diagnostic tests such as nerve ultrasound and testing for autoantibodies, which are not yet part of the guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/diagnóstico , Animales , Errores Diagnósticos , Electrodiagnóstico , Potenciales Evocados Somatosensoriales , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Conducción NerviosaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To validate the diagnostic accuracy of a previously described short sonographic protocol to identify chronic inflammatory neuropathy (CIN), including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), Lewis Sumner syndrome, and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), and to determine the added value of nerve ultrasound to detect treatment-responsive patients compared to nerve conduction studies (NCS) in a prospective multicenter study. METHODS: We included 100 consecutive patients clinically suspected of CIN in 3 centers. The study protocol consisted of neurologic examination, laboratory tests, NCS, and nerve ultrasound. We validated a short sonographic protocol (median nerve at forearm, upper arm, and C5 nerve root) and determined its diagnostic accuracy using the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society criteria of CIDP/MMN (reference standard). In addition, to determine the added value of nerve ultrasound in detecting treatment-responsive patients, we used previously published diagnostic criteria based on clinical, NCS, and sonographic findings and treatment response (alternative reference standard). RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of the sonographic protocol for CIN according to the reference standard were 87.4% and 67.3%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of this protocol according to the alternative reference standard were 84.6% and 72.8%, respectively, and of NCS 76.1% and 93.4%. With addition of nerve ultrasound, 44 diagnoses of CIN were established compared to 33 diagnoses with NCS alone. CONCLUSIONS: A short sonographic protocol shows high diagnostic accuracy for detecting CIN. Nerve ultrasound is able to detect up to 25% more patients who respond to treatment. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This multicenter study provides Class IV evidence that nerve ultrasound improves diagnosis of CIN.