The TeloDIAG: how telomeric parameters can help in glioma rapid diagnosis and liquid biopsy approaches.

BACKGROUND: In glioma, TERT promoter mutation and loss of ATRX (ATRX loss) are associated with reactivation of telomerase or alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT), respectively, i.e. the two telomere maintenance mechanisms (TMM). Strangely, 25% of gliomas have been reported to display neither or both of these alterations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The C-circle (CC) assay was adapted to tumor (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded and frozen) and blood samples to investigate the TMM. RESULTS: We constructed a CC-based algorithm able to identify the TMM and reported a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97.3% (n = 284 gliomas). By combining the TMM, the mutational status of the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH) gene (IDHmt), and the histological grading, we propose a new classification tool: TeloDIAG. This classification defined five subtypes: tOD, tLGA, tGBM_IDHmt, tGBM, and tAIV, corresponding to oligodendroglioma, IDHmt low-grade astrocytoma, IDHmt glioblastoma, and IDHwt glioblastoma (GBM), respectively; the last class gathers ALT+ IDHwt gliomas that tend to be related to longer survival (21.2 months) than tGBM (16.5 months). The TeloDIAG was 99% concordant with the World Health Organization classification (n = 312), and further modified the classification of 55 of 144 (38%) gliomas with atypical molecular characteristics. As an example, 14 of 69 (20%) of TERTwt, ATRXwt, and IDHwt GBM were actually tAIV. Outstandingly, CC in blood sampled from IDHmt astrocytoma patients was detected with a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of 97% (n = 206 gliomas and 30 healthy donors). CONCLUSION: The TeloDIAG is a new, simple, and effective tool helping in glioma diagnosis and a promising option for liquid biopsy.

Toxicity and time lapse between immunotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is the standard treatment for brain metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma, mostly in combination with immunotherapy. The objective was to retrospectively evaluate the influence of the time-lapse between immunotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy on toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2016 to 2019, 59 patients treated with SRT for 103 brain metastases of NSCLC (60%) and melanoma (40%) in combination with concomitant immunotherapy (≤30 days) were included. The prescribed dose was 20Gy/1f or 33Gy/3f at the isocentre and 14Gy or 23.1Gy (70%) respectively at the PTV envelope (PTV=GTV+2mm). The mean tumour diameter was 14mm (4-52mm). The immunotherapies used were anti-PD1 and anti-PDL1. The 103 metastases were classified into 3 groups according to the time-lapse between instatement of immunotherapy and instatement of SRT for the patient concerned: 7 (7%) in group A (≤7 days), 38 (37%) in group B (7 to 14 days) and 58 (56%) in group C (14 to 30 days). RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 10.1 months. The median overall survival was 11.5 months for NSCLC and 12.5 months for melanoma. The percentage of local control (LC) at one year was 65.1% (93.6% for NSCLC and 26.5% for melanoma). The time-lapse between immunotherapy and SRT was not a significant predictor of LC (P=0.86), while the histology was (P<0.001). The proportion of grade≥3 toxicities was 5.1%, and that of radionecrosis was 9.7% (among these patients, 80% were non-symptomatic): 0%, 13.1% and 8.6% for groups A, B and C respectively. The time-lapse between immunotherapy and SRT was not a significant predictor of toxicity. Only tumour volume was a significant predictive factor (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: The time lapse between immunotherapy and SRT does not influence brain toxicity. The tumour volume remains the main factor.

In vitro effects of Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) and concurrent irradiation on HER2-positive breast cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: To determine the effects of concurrent irradiation and T-DM1 on HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines. METHODS: Five human breast cancer cell lines (in vitro study) presenting various levels of HER2 expression were used to determine the potential therapeutic effect of T-DM1 combined with radiation. The toxicity of T-DM1 was assessed using viability assay and cell cycle analysis was performed by flow cytometry after BrdU incorporation. HER2 cells were irradiated at different dose levels after exposure to T-DM1. Survival curves were determined by cell survival assays (after 5 population doubling times). RESULTS: The results revealed that T-DM1 induced significant lethality due to the intracellular action of DM1 on the cell cycle with significant G2/M phase blocking. Even after a short time incubation, the potency of T-DM1 was maintained and even enhanced over time, with a higher rate of cell death. After irradiation alone, the D10 (dose required to achieve 10% cell survival) was significantly higher for high HER2-expressing cell lines than for low HER2-expressing cells, with a linearly increasing relationship. In combination with irradiation, using conditions that allow cell survival, T-DM1 does not induce a radiosensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a linear correlation between intrinsic HER2 expression and radioresistance, the results indicated that T-DM1 is not a radiation-sensitizer under the experimental conditions of this study that allowed cell survival. However, further investigations are needed, in particular in vivo studies before reaching a final conclusion.

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for large brain metastases: Optimizing the dosimetric parameters.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiotherapy plays a major role in the treatment of brain metastases (BM). We aimed to compare the dosimetric results of four plans for hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) for large brain metastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients treated with upfront NovalisTx® non-coplanar multiple dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) HFSRT for≥25mm diameter single BM were included. Three other volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans were evaluated: with coplanar arcs (Eclipse®, Varian, VMATcEclipse®), with coplanar and non-coplanar arcs (VMATncEclipse®), and with non-coplanar arcs (Elements Cranial SRS®, Brainlab, VMATncElements®). The marginal dose prescribed for the PTV was 23.1Gy (isodose 70%) in three fractions. The mean GTV was 27mm3. RESULTS: Better conformity indices were found with all VMAT techniques compared to DCA (1.05 vs 1.28, P<0.05). Better gradient indices were found with VMATncElements® and DCA (2.43 vs 3.02, P<0.001). High-dose delivery in healthy brain was lower with all VMAT techniques compared to DCA (5.6 to 6.3 cc vs 9.4 cc, P<0.001). Low-dose delivery (V5Gy) was lower with VMATncEclipse® or VMATncElements® than with DCA (81 or 94 cc vs 110 cc, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: NovalisTx® VMAT HFSRT for≥25mm diameter brain metastases provides the best dosimetric compromise in terms of target coverage, sparing of healthy brain tissue and low-dose delivery compared to DCA.

Phase 1 trial of ralimetinib (LY2228820) with radiotherapy plus concomitant temozolomide in the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This phase 1 trial aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD; primary objective) of a p38-MAPK inhibitor, ralimetinib, with radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (TMZ), in the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as an open-label dose-escalation study driven by a Tite-CRM design and followed by an expansion cohort. Ralimetinib was administered orally every 12 h, 7 days a week, for 2 cycles of 2 weeks at a dose of 100, 200 or 300 mg/12 h. Patients received ralimetinib added to standard concurrent RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions) with TMZ (75 mg/m2/day) and 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ (150-200 mg/m2 on days 1-5 every 28 days). RESULTS: The MTD of ralimetinib was 100 mg/12 h with chemoradiotherapy. The three patients treated at 200 mg/12 h presented a dose-limiting toxicity: one patient had a grade 3 face edema, and two patients had a grade 3 rash and grade 3 hepatic cytolysis (66%). Of the 18 enrolled patients, 15 received the MTD of ralimetinib. At the MTD, the grade ≥ 3 adverse events during concomitant chemoradiotherapy were hepatic cytolysis (2/15 patients), dermatitis/rash (1/15), lymphopenia (1/15) and nausea/vomiting (1/15). No interaction of TMZ and ralimetinib when administrated concomitantly has been observed. Inhibition of pMAPKAP-K2 (-54%) was observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. CONCLUSION: This phase 1 trial is the first trial to study the combination of a p38-MAPK inhibitor, ralimetinib, with radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (TMZ), in the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients. The MTD of ralimetinib was 100 mg/12 h. The most frequent dose-limiting toxicities were hepatic cytolysis and rash.

Long-Term Outcomes After Linac Radiosurgery for Benign Meningiomas.

AIMS: Although several studies on outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for benign meningiomas have been reported, Linac-based SRS outcomes have not been as widely evaluated. The aim of this retrospective institutional single-centre study was to determine long-term outcomes of Linac-based SRS for benign intracranial meningiomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1996 to May 2011, 60 patients with 69 benign meningiomas were included. All patients were treated with single-fraction Linac-based SRS with four to five non-coplanar arcs, dynamic or not. The marginal dose prescribed for the periphery was 16 Gy. Prognostic factors associated with local control, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were tested. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 128 months. No patient was lost to follow-up. The values observed at 1, 5 and 10 years were, respectively, 100%, 98.4% and 92.6% for local control, 94.9%, 93.2% and 78% for PFS and 100%, 94.7% and 92.7% for overall survival. In univariate analysis, local control after SRS was significantly higher for skull base and parasagittal meningiomas compared with convexity meningiomas (P = 0.031). Multivariate analyses showed significantly longer PFS when the minimum dose delivered to the tumour was greater than 10 Gy (P = 0.0082). No grade 5 toxicity was reported. CONCLUSION: Our long-term results from a large sample size of benign meningiomas treated with Linac-based SRS confirmed excellent local control (>90%) and good safety, which is in line with published studies on Gamma Knife surgery. Above all, we showed significantly poorer PFS if the minimum dose to the tumour was under 10 Gy.

[Tolerance of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for hepatic tumours]. / Tolérance de l'irradiation stéréotaxique hypofractionnée des tumeurs hépatiques.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of stereotactic radiation therapy for primary and secondary liver tumours in Jean-Perrin cancer centre (Clermont-Ferrand, France) in terms of efficacy and safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2013 and June 2016, 25 patients were included. Treatment was performed on a linear accelerator Novalis TX®. The prescription dose was 42 to 60Gy in three to five fractions. Local control at 1 year was evaluated with modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) and RECIST criteria. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 criteria. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 10.5 months. Treatment tolerance was good with few side effects grade 3 or above, no acute toxicity and only one late toxicity. We have highlighted that hepatic artery haemorrhage was associated with the presence of a biliary prosthesis in contact with the artery (P=0.006) and in the irradiation field. There was no correlation with the dose delivered to the artery and hepatic artery haemorrhage. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic radiation therapy for liver tumours allows a good local control with few secondary effects. Caution should be exercised when treating patients with biliary prostheses in the vicinity of the target volume because there is a risk of haemorrhage of the hepatic artery in contact with the prosthesis.

[Radionecrosis following stereotactic radiotherapy of a 3-cm brain metastasis: Can we improve the dosimetric results?] / Radionécrose après radiothérapie stéréotaxique d'une métastase cérébrale de 3cm : la technique peut-elle améliorer les résultats dosimétriques ?

Stereotactic radiotherapy is a major issue in the management of brain metastases. Radionecrosis is a major concern, especially for large lesions. Optimizing dosimetric parameters is essential to allow optimal local control rate while minimizing potential toxicity. We report the case of a 30-mm brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiotherapy after initial whole brain radiotherapy, complicated with symptomatic radionecrosis. A dose of 24Gy in three fractions on the 80% isodose were delivered using a dynamic conformal arc technique (Novalis TX®). We realized a dosimetric comparison with: (i) optimization of initial conformal arc plan, (ii) volumetric modulated arctherapy with coplanar arcs and (iii) volumetric modulated arctherapy with coplanar and non-coplanar arcs. The optimal dose planning in terms of planning target volume coverage (99.2%) and normal brain sparing (V24Gy=0.4cm3, V18Gy=6.5cm3, V10Gy=25.4cm3, V5=83.9cm3) was obtained with volumetric modulated arctherapy with coplanar and non-coplanar arcs. Volumetric modulated arctherapy-based stereotactic irradiation with coplanar and non-coplonar arcs seems an interesting option for the treatment of large brain metastases to optimize dosimetric parameters.

Fractionated radiotherapy and radiosurgery of intracranial meningiomas.

This review focuses on the role of radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy in the management of intracranial meningiomas, which are the most common benign intracranial tumors. Whenever feasible, surgery remains a cornerstone of treatment in effective health care treatment where modern radiotherapy plays an important role. Irradiation can be proposed as first-line treatment, as adjuvant treatment, or as a second-line treatment after recurrence. Stereotactic radiosurgery consists of delivering, a high-dose of radiation with high precision, to the tumor in a single-fraction with a minimal exposure of surrounding healthy tissue. Stereotactic radiosurgery, especially with the gamma knife technique, has reached a high level of success for the treatment of intracranial meningiomas with excellent local control and low morbidity. However, stereotactic radiosurgery is limited by tumor size,<3-4cm, and location, i.e. reasonable distance from the organs at risk. Fractionated radiation therapy is an interesting alternative (5 to 6weeks treatment time) for large inoperable tumors. The results of fractionated radiation therapy seem encouraging as regards both local control and morbidity although long-term prospective studies are still needed.

Radiotherapy plus temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma: a "real-life" report.

BACKGROUND: The optimization of the management for elderly glioblastoma patients is crucial given the demographics of aging in many countries. We report the outcomes for a "real-life" patient cohort (i.e. unselected) comprising consecutive glioblastoma patients aged 70 years or more, treated with different radiotherapy +/- temozolomide regimens. METHODS: From 2003 to 2016, 104 patients ≥ 70 years of age, consecutively treated by radiotherapy for glioblastoma, were included in this study. All patients were diagnosed with IDH-wild type glioblastoma according to pathological criteria. RESULTS: Our patient cohort comprised 51 female patients (49%) and 53 male. The median cohort age was 75 years (70-88), and the median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 70 (30-100). Five (5%) patients underwent macroscopic complete resection, 9 (9%) had partial resection, and 90 (86%), a stereotactic biopsy. The MGMT promoter was methylated in 33/73 cases (45%). Fifty-two (50%), 38 (36%), and 14 (14%) patients were categorized with RPA scores of III, IV, and I-II. Thirty-three (32%) patients received normofractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy, 30 sessions) with temozolomide (Stupp), 37 (35%) received hypofractionated radiotherapy (median dose 40 Gy, 15 sessions) with temozolomide (HFRT + TMZ), and 34 (33%) HFRT alone. Patients receiving only HFRT were significantly older, with lower KPSs. The median overall survival (OS; all patients) was 5.2 months. OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 months, were 19%, 12%, and 5%, respectively, with no statistical differences between patients receiving Stupp or HFRT + TMZ (P = 0.22). In contrast, patients receiving HFRT alone manifested a significantly shorter survival time (3.9 months vs. 5.9 months, P = 0.018). In multivariate analyses, the prognostic factors for OS were: i) the type of surgery (HR: 0.47 [0.26-0.86], P = 0.014), ii) RPA class (HR: 2.15 [1.17-3.95], P = 0.014), and iii) temozolomide use irrespective of radiotherapy schedule (HR: 0.54 [0.33-0.88], P < 0.02). MGMT promoter methylation was neither a prognostic nor a predictive factor. CONCLUSIONS: These outcomes agree with the literature in terms of optimal surgery and the use of HFRT as a standard treatment for elderly GBM patients. Our study emphasizes the potential benefit of using temozolomide with radiotherapy in a real-life cohort of elderly GBM patients, irrespective of their MGMT status.

[Whole brain radiation therapy for brain metastases: Advantages and controversies]. / Radiothérapie encéphalique en totalité des métastases cérébrales : intérêts et controverses dans le cadre d'un référentiel.

Whole brain radiation therapy is the angular stone of the brain metastasis radiation therapy. This treatment allows reaching two goals, potentially curative for in place metastasis and prophylactic in the rest of brain tissue. However, these two advantages can be disputed and in light of the same data opposite conclusions could be drawn.

Salivary glands radiotherapy to reduce sialorrhea in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: dose and energy.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness of salivary gland radiotherapy for reducing sialorrhea in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 2001 to February 2008, 21 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (six men, 15 women; mean age 61.2 years, range 39-81) received external beam radiotherapy for sialorrhea (evaluation by the ALS Functional Rating Scale). All patients had previously received pharmacological treatments with unsatisfactory results or side effects. The mean dose was 19.1Gy (range 3-48), delivered in five fractions (range 1-16) on 17 days (range 1-77). Eight patients received 3D-conformal and 13 received 2D-conformal radiotherapy. Clinical target volumes included the parotids and submandibular glands (18 patients), submandibular glands and one parotid (one patient), or parotids (two patients). Thirteen patients were treated with 5.5-6MV photons and eight were treated with 6-15MeV electrons. A satisfactory salivary response was defined as complete or partial improvement. The median follow up was 10.4 months (range 0.4-26). One patient was lost to follow up. RESULTS: A positive response was observed in 65% of patients during a mean of 7 months (range 1-23). Four patients (20%) treated with photons and no patients treated with electrons experienced acute toxicity. Half (50%) the patients treated with photons and 87.5% of patients treated with electrons responded positively (P=0.09). Positive responses were more common with a high total dose (≥16Gy; 78.6%) than a low total dose (<16Gy; 33%; P=0.07). No differences were observed in tolerance (P=0.27). Age and sex did not impact the response. CONCLUSION: Salivary gland radiotherapy effectively reduced sialorrhea in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. An adequate compromise between toxicity and efficiency was achieved with 3D-conformal radiotherapy delivered with electrons to parotids and submandibular glands in a total dose of 16Gy or more (mean: 20Gy in five fractions).

[Whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases: the technique of irradiation influences the dose to parotid glands]. / Irradiation panencéphalique des métastases cérébrales : la technique d'irradiation influence la dose aux glandes parotides.

In the treatment of brain metastases, whole brain radiotherapy can be carried out according two distinct methods: one using multileaf collimator for field shaping and protection of organs at risk, and a second one is to make a rotation of the field to avoid the eyes. The aim of the study was to compare for 10 patients the dose distributions at organs at risk for each method. Patients received 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Except for parotid glands, the dose received by organs at risk and the planning target volume was the same with each method. For whole brain radiotherapy, excluding the cisterna cerebellomedullaris, the mean parotid dose was 9.63 Gy using the multileaf collimator versus 12.32 Gy using the field rotation (P=0.04). For whole brain radiotherapy including the cisterna cerebellomedullaris, the mean parotid dose was 11.12 Gy using the multileaf collimator versus 20.06 Gy using field rotation (P<0.001). Using the multileaf collimator seems recommended for whole brain radiotherapy, to reduce the dose to the parotids.

[Role of radiosurgery in the management of intracranial cavernomas. Review of the literature]. / Place de la radiochirurgie dans la prise en charge des cavernomes intracrâniens. Revue de la littérature.

From a review of the literature dealing with radiosurgery of cavernous malformations, we have analyzed its impact on hemorrhagic risk, epilepsy, histological modifications, morbidity and potential indications of treatment. Radiosurgery could significantly reduce the hemorrhagic risk, in a selected population with a high risk of hemorrhage, after an interval of about 2 years, but cannot provide protection against rebleeding. As for epilepsy related to the lesion, a significant reduction of seizures has been observed in certain cases, with better control in case of recent evolution and simple seizures linked to the site of the vascular malformation. Histologic lesions are vascular fibrosis, fibrinoid necrosis and ferrugination, without good correlation with results of CT scan or MRI. Morbidity of radiosurgery seems higher compared to other diseases with similar doses and target volumes. The rate of transient complications was about 25%, with permanent sequelae in 5 to 10% of patients. This would be due to a radiosensitizing effect of the hemosiderin halo around the lesion. Radiosurgery can be proposed for non-surgical lesions with a high risk of hemorrhage, nevertheless the superiority of the technique over conservative treatment has to be proven. Without long-term prospective studies, the efficiency of RS for cavernomas remains questionable and subject to debate. New imaging methods proving the obstruction of the cavernous malformation are needed.

Radiotherapy of pituitary adenomas: state of the art.

Pituitary adenomas represent approximately 12% of intracranial tumors. They are defined as tumors that are functional or nonfunctional and invasive or noninvasive. Therapeutic strategies rely on surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy depending on histology. Neither the role of external radiotherapy nor the technique to be used are firmly established. Nonfunctioning adenomas must be operated on to relieve the compression. Prolactin-secreting adenomas are first treated with dopamine agonists, and GH-secreting adenomas are first treated by surgery if excising the complete tumor is possible; otherwise medical treatment is started. The first-line treatment of ACTH-secreting adenomas is surgery; however, in many cases, insufficient control of either secretion or tumoral volume leads to consideration of irradiation. Complications of conventional radiotherapy are well known and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy appears to be as safe as radiosurgery. The volume to irradiate is still difficult to define, and this parameter can influence the technique chosen for treatment. Because the indications of radiotherapy are still debated, irradiation of pituitary adenomas must be decided by the complete team of endocrinologists, neurosurgeons, radiologists and radiotherapists.

Interleukin-6 gene amplification and shortened survival in glioblastoma patients.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is known to promote tumour growth and survival. We evaluated IL-6 gene amplification in tumours from 53 glioma patients using fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Amplification events were detected only in glioblastomas (15 out of 36 cases), the most malignant tumours, and were significantly associated with decreased patient survival.

Cystemustine in recurrent high grade glioma.

In this study, we have assessed the efficacy of a nitrosourea, cystemustine, in treating patients with recurrent high grade glioma with overall survival analysis as primary end-point. Forty-eight patients with recurrent high grade glioma (24 glioblastomas, 17 astrocytomas and 5 oligodendrogliomas) were treated every 2 weeks with 60 mg/m2 cystemustine by a 15 min-infusion. The median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range 1-17). The median overall survival was 8.3 months (range 1-97) and the 6- and 12-month overall survival rates were 55.3% (95% CI, 41.3-68.6%) and 29.8% (95% CI, 18.6-44.0%), respectively. The objective response rate was 18.8% (95% CI, 7.7-29.9%), and 54.2% of patients had stable disease (95% CI, 40.1-68.3%). Multivariate analysis showed that WHO performance status, histology and response to cystemustine were significant prognostic factors for survival of patients with recurrent glioma. In conclusion, cystemustine has encouraging activity for patients with recurrent high grade glioma.