Estimated Loss of Productivity Attributed to Cardiovascular Diseases in South America. / Estimativa de Produtividade Perdida Atribuída a Doenças Cardiovasculares na América do Sul.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have significant health and economic burdens. In South America, the loss of productivity related to these diseases has not yet been well explored. OBJECTIVE: Estimate the potentially productive years of life lost (PPYLL) and loss of productivity related to premature mortality associated with CVD in South America, in 2019. METHODS: Mortality data available from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study were used to estimate the burden of disease attributable to CVD. For monetary calculations of productivity loss, a proxy of the human capital approach was used. Data were stratified by sex, in working age groups. RESULTS: The total number of deaths due to CVD in South America in 2019 was 754,324, and the total number of PPYLL was 2,040,973. The total permanent loss of productivity was approximately US$ 3.7 billion and US$ 7.8 billion in purchasing power parity, equivalent to 0.11% of the gross domestic product. The cost per death was US$ 22,904, and the ratio between men and women for the cost per death was 1.45. The variation in scenarios indicates that the estimates are robust, even with important differences between countries. CONCLUSIONS: CVD impose a significant economic burden on countries in South America. The characterization of this burden can support governments in the allocation of resources for the planning and execution of health policies and interventions in promotion, prevention, and recovery.

FUNDAMENTO: As doenças cardiovasculares (DCV) têm ônus sanitário e econômico significativos. Na América do Sul (AS), a perda de produtividade relacionada a estas enfermidades ainda não foi bem explorada. OBJETIVO: Estimar os anos de vida produtiva perdidos (AVPP) e a perda de produtividade relacionados a mortalidade prematura associada as DCV na AS, em 2019. MÉTODOS: Empregou-se dados de mortalidade disponíveis no Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 na estimativa da carga de doença atribuível a DCV. Para os cálculos monetários da perda da produtividade usou-se uma proxy da abordagem de capital humano. Estratificou-se por sexo, nas faixas etárias de trabalho. RESULTADOS: O número total de mortes por DCV na AS no ano de 2019 foi de 754.324 e os AVPP foram 2.040.973. A perda permanente de produtividade total foi de aproximadamente US$ 3,7 bilhões e US$ 7,8 bilhões em paridade do poder de compra, equivalente a 0,11% do produto interno bruto. O custo por morte foi de US$ 22.904, e a razão desse custo por óbito, entre homens e mulheres foi 1,45. A variação dos cenários aponta robustez nas estimativas, mesmo com diferenças importantes entre os países. CONCLUSÕES: As DCV impõem um ônus econômico significativo a este bloco de países. A caracterização deste fardo pode amparar os governos na alocação de recursos destinados ao planejamento e execução de políticas e intervenções sanitárias, sejam de promoção, prevenção ou recuperação.

Estimativa de Produtividade Perdida Atribuída a Doenças Cardiovasculares na América do Sul / Estimated Loss of Productivity Attributed to Cardiovascular Diseases in South America

Resumo Fundamento: As doenças cardiovasculares (DCV) têm ônus sanitário e econômico significativos. Na América do Sul (AS), a perda de produtividade relacionada a estas enfermidades ainda não foi bem explorada. Objetivo: Estimar os anos de vida produtiva perdidos (AVPP) e a perda de produtividade relacionados a mortalidade prematura associada as DCV na AS, em 2019. Métodos: Empregou-se dados de mortalidade disponíveis no Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 na estimativa da carga de doença atribuível a DCV. Para os cálculos monetários da perda da produtividade usou-se uma proxy da abordagem de capital humano. Estratificou-se por sexo, nas faixas etárias de trabalho. Resultados: O número total de mortes por DCV na AS no ano de 2019 foi de 754.324 e os AVPP foram 2.040.973. A perda permanente de produtividade total foi de aproximadamente US$ 3,7 bilhões e US$ 7,8 bilhões em paridade do poder de compra, equivalente a 0,11% do produto interno bruto. O custo por morte foi de US$ 22.904, e a razão desse custo por óbito, entre homens e mulheres foi 1,45. A variação dos cenários aponta robustez nas estimativas, mesmo com diferenças importantes entre os países. Conclusões: As DCV impõem um ônus econômico significativo a este bloco de países. A caracterização deste fardo pode amparar os governos na alocação de recursos destinados ao planejamento e execução de políticas e intervenções sanitárias, sejam de promoção, prevenção ou recuperação.

Abstract Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have significant health and economic burdens. In South America, the loss of productivity related to these diseases has not yet been well explored. Objective: Estimate the potentially productive years of life lost (PPYLL) and loss of productivity related to premature mortality associated with CVD in South America, in 2019. Methods: Mortality data available from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study were used to estimate the burden of disease attributable to CVD. For monetary calculations of productivity loss, a proxy of the human capital approach was used. Data were stratified by sex, in working age groups. Results: The total number of deaths due to CVD in South America in 2019 was 754,324, and the total number of PPYLL was 2,040,973. The total permanent loss of productivity was approximately US$ 3.7 billion and US$ 7.8 billion in purchasing power parity, equivalent to 0.11% of the gross domestic product. The cost per death was US$ 22,904, and the ratio between men and women for the cost per death was 1.45. The variation in scenarios indicates that the estimates are robust, even with important differences between countries. Conclusions: CVD impose a significant economic burden on countries in South America. The characterization of this burden can support governments in the allocation of resources for the planning and execution of health policies and interventions in promotion, prevention, and recovery.

Harms and benefits of mammographic screening for breast cancer in Brazil.

INTRODUCTION: In the absence of evidence on the effect of mammographic screening on overall mortality, comparing the number of deaths avoided with the number of deaths caused by screening would be ideal, but the only existing models of this type adopt a very narrow definition of harms. The objective of the present study was to estimate the number of deaths prevented and induced by various mammography screening protocols in Brazil. METHODS: A simulation study of cohorts of Brazilian women screened, considering various age groups and screening interval protocols, was performed based on life tables. The number of deaths avoided and caused by screening was estimated, as was the absolute risk reduction, the number needed to invite for screening-NNS, the net benefit of screening, and the ratio of "lives saved" to "lives lost". Nine possible combinations of balances between benefits and harms were performed for each protocol, in addition to other sensitivity analyses. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The most efficient protocol was biennial screening from 60 to 69 years of age, with almost three times more deaths avoided than biennial screening from 50 to 59 years of age, with a similar number of deaths avoided by biennial screening from 50 to 69 years of age and with the greatest net benefit. Compared with the best scenario of annual screening from 40 to 49 years of age, the NNS of the protocol with biennial screening from 60 to 69 years of age was three-fold lower. Even in its best scenario, the addition of annual screening from 40 to 49 years of age to biennial screening from 50 to 69 years of age results in a decreased net benefit. However, even in the 50-69 year age group, the estimated reduction in breast cancer mortality for Brazil was half that estimated for the United Kingdom.

Health and economic burden of sugar-sweetened beverages consumption in Brazil.

Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are a major source of added sugar and are associated with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) such as obesity and diabetes. This study assessed the impact of SSBs consumption on disease burden in Brazil, including deaths, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and healthcare costs. A 3-stage methodology was used to assess the direct effects of SSBs on diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and body mass index (BMI), along with the influence of BMI on disease incidence. These assessments were then used to estimate the economic and health burden using population-attributable factors. Results showed that 2.7% and 11% of adult and children overweight/obesity cases were attributable to SSBs, respectively. SSBs consumption in Brazil led to 1,814,486 cases, 12,942 deaths, 362,088 DALYs, and USD 2,915.91 million in medical costs related to diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, oncological diseases, and other NCDs. Urgent implementation of public policies is crucial to address the consumption of SSBs, recognized as a key risk factor for NCDs.

What does our region need in order to strengthen public policies on sugar-sweetened beverages? decision-makers' dialogue. / ¿Qué necesita nuestra región para fortalecer políticas públicas sobre bebidas azucaradas? diálogo de decisores.

In order to prioritize public policies to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in Argentina, Brazil, El Salvador and Trinidad and Tobago and to identify information gaps related to the burden of disease attributable to their consumption, a policy dialogue was held with government members, civil society organizations, researchers and communicators from Latin American and Caribbean countries. Presentations and deliberative workshops were conducted using semi-structured data collection tools and group discussions. The prioritized interventions were tax increases, front labeling, restriction of advertising, promotion and sponsorship, and modifications regarding the school environment. The main perceived barrier was the interference from the food industry. This dialogue among decision-makers led to the identification of priority public policies to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in the region.

Con el objetivo de priorizar políticas públicas para disminuir el consumo de bebidas azucaradas en Argentina, Brasil, El Salvador y Trinidad y Tobago e identificar las necesidades de información relacionadas con la carga de enfermedad atribuible a su consumo se realizó un diálogo de políticas en el que participaron miembros de gobierno, organizaciones de la sociedad civil, investigadores y comunicadores de países de Latinoamérica y el Caribe. Se llevaron a cabo exposiciones y talleres deliberativos utilizándose herramientas de recolección de datos semiestructuradas y discusiones grupales facilitadas. Las intervenciones priorizadas fueron el incremento de impuestos, el etiquetado frontal, la restricción de la publicidad, promoción y patrocinio y las modificaciones del entorno escolar. La principal barrera percibida fue la interferencia de la industria alimentaria. La realización de este diálogo de decisores permitió la identificación de las políticas públicas prioritarias para disminuir el consumo de bebidas azucaradas en la región.

Cost of lost productivity from acute respiratory infections in South America.

Objectives: To estimate the burden of permanent productivity losses caused by acute respiratory infections in South American countries in 2019. Methods: Mortality data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 were analyzed to estimate the burden of disease attributable to acute respiratory infections. An approach based on the human capital method was used to estimate the cost of permanent productivity losses associated with respiratory diseases. To calculate this cost, the sum of the years of productive life lost for each death was multiplied by the proportion in the workforce and the employment rate, and then by the annual minimum wage or purchasing power parity in United States dollars (US$) for each country in the economically active age groups. Separate calculations were done for men and women. Results: The total number of deaths from acute respiratory infections in 2019 was 30 684 and the years of productive life lost were 465 211 years. The total cost of permanent productivity loss was about US$ 835 million based on annual minimum wage and US$ 2 billion in purchasing power parity, representing 0.024% of the region's gross domestic product. The cost per death was US$ 33 226. The cost of productivity losses differed substantially between countries and by sex. Conclusion: Acute respiratory infections impose a significant economic burden on South America in terms of health and productivity. Characterization of the economic costs of these infections can support governments in the allocation of resources to develop policies and interventions to reduce the burden of acute respiratory infections.

Cost of lost productivity from acute respiratory infections in South America

[ABSTRACT]. Objectives. To estimate the burden of permanent productivity losses caused by acute respiratory infections in South American countries in 2019. Methods. Mortality data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 were analyzed to estimate the burden of disease attributable to acute respiratory infections. An approach based on the human capital method was used to estimate the cost of permanent productivity losses associated with respiratory diseases. To calculate this cost, the sum of the years of productive life lost for each death was multiplied by the proportion in the work- force and the employment rate, and then by the annual minimum wage or purchasing power parity in United States dollars (US$) for each country in the economically active age groups. Separate calculations were done for men and women. Results. The total number of deaths from acute respiratory infections in 2019 was 30 684 and the years of productive life lost were 465 211 years. The total cost of permanent productivity loss was about US$ 835 mil- lion based on annual minimum wage and US$ 2 billion in purchasing power parity, representing 0.024% of the region’s gross domestic product. The cost per death was US$ 33 226. The cost of productivity losses differed substantially between countries and by sex. Conclusion. Acute respiratory infections impose a significant economic burden on South America in terms of health and productivity. Characterization of the economic costs of these infections can support governments in the allocation of resources to develop policies and interventions to reduce the burden of acute respiratory infections.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivos. Estimar la carga de la pérdida permanente de productividad causada por infecciones respiratorias agudas en países sudamericanos en el 2019. Métodos. Se analizaron los datos de mortalidad del estudio sobre carga mundial de enfermedad del 2019 para estimar la carga de enfermedad atribuible a las infecciones respiratorias agudas. Se empleó un enfoque basado en el método del capital humano para estimar el costo de las pérdidas permanentes de productividad relacionadas con las enfermedades respiratorias. Para ello, la suma de los años perdidos de vida productiva por cada muerte se multiplicó por la proporción de la fuerza de trabajo y la tasa de empleo y, a continuación, por el salario mínimo anual o la paridad del poder adquisitivo en dólares estadounidenses en los grupos etarios económicamente activos de cada país. Se realizaron cálculos separados para hombres y mujeres. Resultados. El número total de muertes por infecciones respiratorias agudas en el 2019 fue de 30 684 y se perdieron 465 211 años de vida productiva. El costo total de la pérdida permanente de productividad fue de aproximadamente US$ 835 millones según el salario mínimo anual y de US$ 2000 millones en cuanto a la paridad de poder adquisitivo, lo que representa el 0,024% del producto interno bruto de la región. El costo por muerte fue de US$ 33 226. El costo de la pérdida de productividad difirió sustancialmente entre los países y según el sexo. Conclusión. Las infecciones respiratorias agudas suponen una carga económica significativa para América del Sur en términos de salud y productividad. La caracterización de los costos económicos de estas infecciones puede ayudar a los gobiernos en la asignación de recursos para elaborar políticas e intervenciones que permitan reducir la carga de las infecciones respiratorias agudas.

[RESUMO]. Objetivos. Estimar a carga de perdas permanentes de produtividade causadas por infecções respiratórias agudas em países da América do Sul em 2019. Métodos. Dados de mortalidade do estudo Carga Global de Doença 2019 foram analisados para estimar a carga de doença atribuível a infecções respiratórias agudas. Utilizou-se uma abordagem baseada no método do capital humano para estimar o custo das perdas permanentes de produtividade associadas às doenças respiratórias. Para calcular esse custo, a soma dos anos de vida produtiva perdidos devido a cada morte foi multiplicada pela proporção da força de trabalho e da taxa de emprego. Em seguida, esse valor foi multiplicado pelo salário mínimo anual ou pela paridade do poder de compra, em dólares dos Estados Unidos (US$), de cada país nas faixas etárias economicamente ativas. Foram feitos cálculos separados para homens e mulheres. Resultados. O número total de mortes por infecções respiratórias agudas em 2019 foi de 30 684, com 465 211 anos de vida produtiva perdidos. O custo total da perda permanente de produtividade foi de cerca de US$ 835 milhões com base no salário mínimo anual e US$ 2 bilhões em paridade de poder de compra, o que representa 0,024% do produto interno bruto da região. O custo por morte foi US$ 33 226. O custo da perda de produtividade diferiu substancialmente entre os países e por sexo. Conclusão. As infecções respiratórias agudas impõem uma carga econômica significativa à América do Sul em termos de saúde e produtividade. A caracterização dos custos econômicos dessas infecções pode fundamentar as decisões de alocação de recursos tomadas pelos governos para desenvolver políticas e intervenções com o intuito de reduzir a carga das infecções respiratórias agudas.

Health and economic burden of disease of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in four Latin American and Caribbean countries: a modelling study.

OBJECTIVE: Overweight and obesity are important contributors to the non-communicable disease burden. The consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) has been associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cardiovascular disease, cancer and other conditions. The objective of this study was to estimate the burden of disease attributable to the consumption of SSBs and the costs to the healthcare systems in Argentina, Brazil, El Salvador, and Trinidad and Tobago. DESIGN: Following a systematic review of models, a comparative risk assessment framework was developed to estimate the health and economic impact associated with the consumption of SSBs. SETTING: Argentina, Brazil, El Salvador, and Trinidad and Tobago. PARTICIPANTS: Overall population. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The model estimated the effects of SSB consumption on health through two causal pathways: one mediated by body mass index (BMI) and health conditions associated with BMI and another that reflected the independent effects of SSB consumption on T2DM and cardiovascular diseases. RESULTS: The model results indicated that for all four countries, in 1 year, SSB consumption was associated with 18 000 deaths (3.2% of the total disease-related deaths), seven million disease events (3.3% of the total disease-related events), a half-million DALYs and US$2 billion in direct medical costs. This included 1.5 million cases of overweight and obesity in children/adolescents (12% of the excess weight cases) and 2.8 million cases in adults (2.8%); 2.2 million cases of type 2 diabetes (19%); 200 000 cases of heart disease (3.8%); 124 000 strokes (3.9%); 116 000 cases of musculoskeletal disease (0.2%); 102 000 cases of kidney disease (0.9%); and 45 000 episodes of asthma (0.4%). The Trinidad and Tobago population were the most affected by disease events. CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that the consumption of SSBs is associated with a significant burden of disease and death in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Cost-effectiveness analysis and budgetary impact of anidulafungin treatment for patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis in Brazil.

Candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis (C/IC) are serious conditions, especially for immunosuppressed individuals with prolonged hospitalization in intensive care units (ICU). This study analyzed the incremental cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact (BI) of treatment for IC with anidulafungin compared to amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) and amphotericin B deoxycholate (ABD) or conventional amphotericin B (CAB), in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). A decision model was conducted with a time horizon of two weeks from the perspective of SUS. The primary effectiveness endpoints were survival and treatment response rate. All patients were followed up until successful therapy or death. BI analysis was performed based on the measured demand method. A five-year time horizon was adopted based on the number of hospitalizations (per 1,000 hospitalizations). For effectiveness measured in the successful response rate (SRR), anidulafungin dominated the ABLC and ABD formulations. In the results of the analysis with the effectiveness measured according to survival, anidulafungin had a better cost-effectiveness ratio (R$988.26/survival) compared to ABD (R$16,359.50/survival). The BI estimate related to the incorporation of anidulafungin suggests savings of approximately 148 million reais in 5 years when comparing it to ABD. The economic evaluation of anidulafungin and its comparators found it to be cost-effective. The consensus of international scientific societies recommends it as a first-line drug for IC, and its incorporation by SUS would be important.

¿Qué necesita nuestra región para fortalecer políticas públicas sobre bebidas azucaradas? diálogo de decisores / What does our region need in order to strengthen public policies on sugar-sweetened beverages? decision-makers' dialogue

Con el objetivo de priorizar políticas públicas para disminuir el consumo de bebidas azucaradas en Argentina, Brasil, El Salvador y Trinidad y Tobago e identificar las necesidades de información relacionadas con la carga de enfermedad atribuible a su consumo se realizó un diálogo de políticas en el que participaron miembros de gobierno, organizaciones de la sociedad civil, investigadores y comunicadores de países de Latinoamérica y el Caribe. Se llevaron a cabo exposiciones y talleres deliberativos utilizándose herramientas de recolección de datos semiestructuradas y discusiones grupales facilitadas. Las intervenciones priorizadas fueron el incremento de impuestos, el etiquetado frontal, la restricción de la publicidad, promoción y patrocinio y las modificaciones del entorno escolar. La principal barrera percibida fue la interferencia de la industria alimentaria. La realización de este diálogo de decisores permitió la identificación de las políticas públicas prioritarias para disminuir el consumo de bebidas azucaradas en la región.

In order to prioritize public policies to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in Argentina, Brazil, El Salvador and Trinidad and Tobago and to identify information gaps related to the burden of disease attributable to their consumption, a policy dialogue was held with government members, civil society organizations, researchers and communicators from Latin American and Caribbean countries. Presentations and deliberative workshops were conducted using semi-structured data collection tools and group discussions. The prioritized interventions were tax increases, front labeling, restriction of advertising, promotion and sponsorship, and modifications regarding the school environment. The main perceived barrier was the interference from the food industry. This dialogue among decision-makers led to the identification of priority public policies to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in the region.

Perda de Produtividade Atribuída a Neoplasias na América do Sul / Lost Productivity Attributed to Neoplasms in South America / Pérdida de Productividad Atribuida a Neoplasias en América del Sur

Introdução: A carga da doença tem sido empregada em estimativas do impacto das neoplasias, mas a perda de produtividade em razão dessas enfermidades ainda não foi tão explorada. Objetivo: Estimar os anos de vida produtiva perdidos (AVPP) e a perda de produtividade por conta da mortalidade prematura relacionada ao câncer em países da América do Sul em 2019. Método: Dados de mortalidade disponíveis no Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2019 foram usados para estimar a carga de doença atribuível a neoplasias. A perda de produtividade em termos monetários foi calculada usando um proxy da abordagem do capital humano (ACH). Os cálculos foram realizados por sexo, nas faixas etárias de trabalho. Resultados: O total de óbitos foi de 192.240 e o de AVPP, 2.463.155. A perda total de produtividade permanente foi de US$ 4,4 bilhões e US$ 9,4 bilhões em purchasing power parity (PPP) ­ 0,13% do produto interno bruto (PIB) da região. O custo total por morte foi de US$ 23.617. Houve diferenças significativas entre os países, mas a variação dos cenários mostra robustez das estimativas. Conclusão: O câncer impõe um ônus econômico significativo à América do Sul tanto em termos de saúde quanto de produtividade. Sua caracterização pode subsidiar os governos na alocação de recursos destinados ao planejamento de políticas e execução de intervenções de saúde

Introduction: The burden of the disease has been utilized in estimates of the impact of neoplasms, but the loss of productivity due to these diseases has not yet been explored. Objective: To estimate the years of productivity life lost (YPLL) and lost productivity due to premature cancer-related mortality in South American countries in 2019. Method: Mortality data available from Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2019 was analyzed to estimate the burden attributable to neoplasms. The productivity loss in monetary terms was estimated using a proxy of the human capital approach (HCA). Calculations were performed by sex, in working age groups. Results: The total deaths and YPLL reached 192,240 and 2.463.155, respectively. The total permanent productivity loss was around US$ 4.4 billion and US$ 9.4 billion in purchasing power parity (PPP) ­ 0.13% of the continent's gross domestic product (GDP). Total cost per death was US$23,617. There were significant differences among countries, but the variation of scenarios shows robustness of the estimates. Conclusion: Cancer imposes a significant economic burden on South American, both in terms of health and productivity. Its characterization can help governments to allocate resources for policies planning and health interventions.

Introducción: Se ha utilizado la carga de enfermedad en las estimaciones del impacto de las neoplasias, pero aún no se ha explorado la pérdida de productividad por estas enfermedades. Objetivo: Estimar los años de vida productiva perdidos (AVPP) y la pérdida de productividad debido a la mortalidad prematura relacionada con el cáncer en los países de la América del Sur en 2019. Método: Datos de mortalidad disponibles del Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2019 fueron utilizado para estimar la carga de enfermedad atribuible a las neoplasias. La pérdida de productividad en términos monetarios se calculó utilizando un proxy de enfoque de capital humano (ACH). Los cálculos se realizaron por sexo, en los grupos de edad laboral. Resultados: El número total de muertes fue de 192.240 y de AVPP, 2.463.155. La pérdida total de productividad permanente fue del orden de US$ 4.400 millones y US$ 9.400 millones en purchasing power parity (PPP) ­ 0,13% del producto interior bruto (PIB) de la región. El costo total por muerte fue de $23,617. Hubo diferencias significativas entre países, pero la variación de escenarios muestra la robustez de las estimaciones. Conclusión: El cáncer impone una carga económica significativa a América del Sur, tanto en términos de salud como de productividad. Su caracterización puede apoyar a los gobiernos en la asignación de recursos para la planificación de políticas y ejecución de intervenciones en salud.

Cost-effectiveness analysis and budgetary impact of anidulafungin treatment for patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis in Brazil

ABSTRACT Candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis (C/IC) are serious conditions, especially for immunosuppressed individuals with prolonged hospitalization in intensive care units (ICU). This study analyzed the incremental cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact (BI) of treatment for IC with anidulafungin compared to amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) and amphotericin B deoxycholate (ABD) or conventional amphotericin B (CAB), in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). A decision model was conducted with a time horizon of two weeks from the perspective of SUS. The primary effectiveness endpoints were survival and treatment response rate. All patients were followed up until successful therapy or death. BI analysis was performed based on the measured demand method. A five-year time horizon was adopted based on the number of hospitalizations (per 1,000 hospitalizations). For effectiveness measured in the successful response rate (SRR), anidulafungin dominated the ABLC and ABD formulations. In the results of the analysis with the effectiveness measured according to survival, anidulafungin had a better cost-effectiveness ratio (R$988.26/survival) compared to ABD (R$16,359.50/survival). The BI estimate related to the incorporation of anidulafungin suggests savings of approximately 148 million reais in 5 years when comparing it to ABD. The economic evaluation of anidulafungin and its comparators found it to be cost-effective. The consensus of international scientific societies recommends it as a first-line drug for IC, and its incorporation by SUS would be important.

Health and economic burden of sugar-sweetened beverages consumption in Brazil / Carga sanitaria y económica del consumo de bebidas azucaradas en Brasil / Carga sanitária e econômica do consumo de bebidas açucaradas no Brasil

Abstract: Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are a major source of added sugar and are associated with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) such as obesity and diabetes. This study assessed the impact of SSBs consumption on disease burden in Brazil, including deaths, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and healthcare costs. A 3-stage methodology was used to assess the direct effects of SSBs on diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and body mass index (BMI), along with the influence of BMI on disease incidence. These assessments were then used to estimate the economic and health burden using population-attributable factors. Results showed that 2.7% and 11% of adult and children overweight/obesity cases were attributable to SSBs, respectively. SSBs consumption in Brazil led to 1,814,486 cases, 12,942 deaths, 362,088 DALYs, and USD 2,915.91 million in medical costs related to diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, oncological diseases, and other NCDs. Urgent implementation of public policies is crucial to address the consumption of SSBs, recognized as a key risk factor for NCDs.

Resumen: Las bebidas azucaradas (BA) tienen una gran fuente de azúcar añadido y están asociadas con enfermedades no transmisibles (ENT), como la obesidad y la diabetes. Este estudio evaluó el impacto del consumo de las BA en la carga de enfermedad en Brasil, incluidas las muertes, los años de vida ajustados por discapacidad (AVAD) y los costos con la salud. Con el uso de una metodología de tres etapas, se evaluaron los efectos directos de las BA sobre la diabetes, las enfermedades cardiovasculares y el índice de masa corporal (IMC), la influencia del IMC en la incidencia de la enfermedad, y se estimó la carga económica y de salud utilizando los factores atribuibles a la población. Los resultados mostraron que el 2,7% de los casos de sobrepeso/obesidad en adultos y del 11% en niños fueron atribuibles a las BA. El consumo de las BA en Brasil generó 1.814.486 casos, 12.942 muertes, 362.088 AVAD y USD 2.915,91 millones en costos médicos relacionados con diabetes, enfermedades cardiovasculares, enfermedades oncológicas y otras ENT. Es necesario implementar políticas públicas para tratar el consumo de las BA, reconocido este como un factor de riesgo clave para las ENT.

Resumo: As bebidas açucaradas (BAs) são uma grande fonte de açúcar adicionado e estão associadas a doenças não transmissíveis (DNTs), como obesidade e diabetes. Este estudo avaliou o impacto do consumo de BAs sobre a carga de doenças no Brasil, incluindo óbitos, anos de vida ajustados por incapacidade (AVPIs) e custos de saúde. Usando uma metodologia de três estágios, examinamos os efeitos diretos das BAs sobre diabetes, doenças cardiovasculares e índice de massa corporal (IMC), a influência do IMC na incidência de doenças e estimamos o carga econômica e de saúde usando fatores atribuíveis à população. Os resultados mostraram que 2,7% dos casos de sobrepeso/obesidade em adultos e 11% em crianças foram atribuíveis a BAs. O consumo de BAs no Brasil levou a 1.814.486 casos, 12.942 mortes, 362.088 AVPIs e USD 2.915,91 milhões em custos médicos relacionados a diabetes, doenças cardiovasculares, doenças oncológicas e outras DNT. A implementação urgente de políticas públicas é crucial para enfrentar o consumo de BAs, reconhecido como um fator de risco fundamental para as DNT.

Cost of lost productivity from acute respiratory infections in South America / Costo de la pérdida de productividad por infecciones respiratorias agudas en América del Sur / Custo da perda de produtividade devido a infecções respiratórias agudas na América do Sul

ABSTRACT Objectives. To estimate the burden of permanent productivity losses caused by acute respiratory infections in South American countries in 2019. Methods. Mortality data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 were analyzed to estimate the burden of disease attributable to acute respiratory infections. An approach based on the human capital method was used to estimate the cost of permanent productivity losses associated with respiratory diseases. To calculate this cost, the sum of the years of productive life lost for each death was multiplied by the proportion in the workforce and the employment rate, and then by the annual minimum wage or purchasing power parity in United States dollars (US$) for each country in the economically active age groups. Separate calculations were done for men and women. Results. The total number of deaths from acute respiratory infections in 2019 was 30 684 and the years of productive life lost were 465 211 years. The total cost of permanent productivity loss was about US$ 835 million based on annual minimum wage and US$ 2 billion in purchasing power parity, representing 0.024% of the region's gross domestic product. The cost per death was US$ 33 226. The cost of productivity losses differed substantially between countries and by sex. Conclusion. Acute respiratory infections impose a significant economic burden on South America in terms of health and productivity. Characterization of the economic costs of these infections can support governments in the allocation of resources to develop policies and interventions to reduce the burden of acute respiratory infections.

RESUMEN Objetivos. Estimar la carga de la pérdida permanente de productividad causada por infecciones respiratorias agudas en países sudamericanos en el 2019. Métodos. Se analizaron los datos de mortalidad del estudio sobre carga mundial de enfermedad del 2019 para estimar la carga de enfermedad atribuible a las infecciones respiratorias agudas. Se empleó un enfoque basado en el método del capital humano para estimar el costo de las pérdidas permanentes de productividad relacionadas con las enfermedades respiratorias. Para ello, la suma de los años perdidos de vida productiva por cada muerte se multiplicó por la proporción de la fuerza de trabajo y la tasa de empleo y, a continuación, por el salario mínimo anual o la paridad del poder adquisitivo en dólares estadounidenses en los grupos etarios económicamente activos de cada país. Se realizaron cálculos separados para hombres y mujeres. Resultados. El número total de muertes por infecciones respiratorias agudas en el 2019 fue de 30 684 y se perdieron 465 211 años de vida productiva. El costo total de la pérdida permanente de productividad fue de aproximadamente US$ 835 millones según el salario mínimo anual y de US$ 2000 millones en cuanto a la paridad de poder adquisitivo, lo que representa el 0,024% del producto interno bruto de la región. El costo por muerte fue de US$ 33 226. El costo de la pérdida de productividad difirió sustancialmente entre los países y según el sexo. Conclusión. Las infecciones respiratorias agudas suponen una carga económica significativa para América del Sur en términos de salud y productividad. La caracterización de los costos económicos de estas infecciones puede ayudar a los gobiernos en la asignación de recursos para elaborar políticas e intervenciones que permitan reducir la carga de las infecciones respiratorias agudas.

RESUMO Objetivos. Estimar a carga de perdas permanentes de produtividade causadas por infecções respiratórias agudas em países da América do Sul em 2019. Métodos. Dados de mortalidade do estudo Carga Global de Doença 2019 foram analisados para estimar a carga de doença atribuível a infecções respiratórias agudas. Utilizou-se uma abordagem baseada no método do capital humano para estimar o custo das perdas permanentes de produtividade associadas às doenças respiratórias. Para calcular esse custo, a soma dos anos de vida produtiva perdidos devido a cada morte foi multiplicada pela proporção da força de trabalho e da taxa de emprego. Em seguida, esse valor foi multiplicado pelo salário mínimo anual ou pela paridade do poder de compra, em dólares dos Estados Unidos (US$), de cada país nas faixas etárias economicamente ativas. Foram feitos cálculos separados para homens e mulheres. Resultados. O número total de mortes por infecções respiratórias agudas em 2019 foi de 30 684, com 465 211 anos de vida produtiva perdidos. O custo total da perda permanente de produtividade foi de cerca de US$ 835 milhões com base no salário mínimo anual e US$ 2 bilhões em paridade de poder de compra, o que representa 0,024% do produto interno bruto da região. O custo por morte foi US$ 33 226. O custo da perda de produtividade diferiu substancialmente entre os países e por sexo. Conclusão. As infecções respiratórias agudas impõem uma carga econômica significativa à América do Sul em termos de saúde e produtividade. A caracterização dos custos econômicos dessas infecções pode fundamentar as decisões de alocação de recursos tomadas pelos governos para desenvolver políticas e intervenções com o intuito de reduzir a carga das infecções respiratórias agudas.

Using the analytic hierarchy process to elicit patient preference in the evaluation of first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer / Uso do processo analítico hierárquico para eleger a preferência do paciente na avaliação da primeira linha de tratamento do câncer de mama metastático her2 hiperexpresso

Abstract Background The many combinations of chemotherapeutic agents and biologicals available in the Brazilian National Health System for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer require analysis that contribute to decision making. Objective The study's primary aim was to evaluate the first-line treatment of HER2- overexpressing metastatic breast cancer from the Brazilian Unified Health System perspective using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). Method The treatment options evaluated were (a) pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab and docetaxel, and (b) trastuzumab in combination with docetaxel. Using the hierarchical analytical method, medical oncologists compared the relevance of five predefined criteria: overall survival, response to treatment, adverse events, cost- effectiveness, and budget impact. Results The therapeutic scheme considered more appropriate by the model was pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab and docetaxel. The most sensitive criteria were adverse events, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact. The results suggest that the classification has a close relationship with the perspective of healthcare professionals participating in the questionnaire. Conclusion Defining the treatment of an incurable disease associated with a short survival time and high-cost treatment options necessitates complex decision-making. MCDA allows the weighting of criteria and considering criteria that would be difficult to measure in other methods, such as cost-effectiveness. These aspects differ from economic models and contribute to a broader evaluation of health decision-making.

Resumo Introdução As diversas combinações de agentes quimioterápicos e biológicos disponíveis no Sistema Único de Saúde brasileiro para o tratamento do câncer de mama metastático requerem análises que contribuam para a tomada de decisões. Objetivo O objetivo principal deste estudo foi avaliar o tratamento de primeira linha para câncer de mama metastático HER2 hiperexpresso sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde, utilizando a análise de decisão multicritérios (MCDA). Método As opções de tratamento avaliadas foram: (a) pertuzumabe em combinação com trastuzumabe e docetaxel, e (b) trastuzumabe em combinação com docetaxel. Usando o método analítico hierárquico, médicos oncologistas compararam a relevância dos cinco critérios predefinidos: sobrevida global, resposta ao tratamento, eventos adversos, custo-efetividade e impacto orçamentário. Resultados O esquema terapêutico considerado mais apropriado pelo modelo foi pertuzumabe em combinação com trastuzumabe e docetaxel. Os critérios mais sensíveis foram eventos adversos, custo-efetividade e impacto orçamentário. Os resultados sugerem que a classificação está associada à perspectiva do profissional de saúde participante do questionário. Conclusão Definir o tratamento de uma doença incurável associada a um tempo de sobrevida curto e opções de tratamento de alto custo requer uma tomada de decisão complexa. O MCDA permite ponderar e considerar critérios que seriam difíceis de medir em outros modelos de decisão. Esses aspectos contribuem para uma avaliação mais ampla da tomada de decisões em saúde.

Burden of disease attributed to acute respiratory infections in South America.

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory diseases (RD) are an important public health problem. Their burden has not been comprehensively evaluated in South America (SA). This study describes the burden of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in SA in 2019. METHODOLOGY: This is an exploratory, population-based study with a quantitative approach to incidence, mortality, and Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) by standardized age group among the 12 countries. Measurements were captured through the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) website. It used the Burden Study Global Disease, Injury and Risk Factors (GBD) 2019 assessment. Correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: The age-standardized incidence rate per 1,00,000 people for lower respiratory infections (LRIs) is lowest in Chile (3,902) and highest in Peru (9,997). For upper respiratory infections (URIs), Bolivia (2,25,826) had the lowest rates, while Brazil (3,16,667) and Colombia (3,06,302) had the highest. Standardized mortality rates for LRI were lowest in Colombia (15.10) and highest in Bolivia (80.53). Bolivia had the highest standardized DALY rate (2,083), while Uruguay had the lowest (468). Upper ARI had lower incidence rates than lower ARI. The lowest DALY rates were in Suriname (82) and the highest were in Brazil (111). There is a correlation between sociodemographic and economic health indicators and the standardized rates of incidence and DALY in the upper ARIs. CONCLUSIONS: The present paper provides comprehensive ARI burden estimates for the region. The substantial incidence and considerable mortality and DALYs are noteworthy and lead to reflections on preventive measures such as rational use of antibiotics and deeper epidemiological investigations.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Varenicline Versus Currently Funded Smoking Cessation Strategies in Brazil.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of varenicline in comparison to currently funded smoking cessation strategies in Brazil. METHODS: We modeled the lifetime direct costs and health-related quality of life of a hypothetical cohort of smokers with a single attempt to quit smoking using one of the following: (1) cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) without any pharmacological intervention, (2) varenicline, (3) bupropion, (4) nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) with transdermal patch, (5) bupropion in combination with NRT transdermal patch, and (6) combined NRT (oral plus transdermal). All drug alternatives were considered with concomitant CBT. The analysis relied on a Markov model based on the Benefits of Smoking Cessation and Outcomes study and used different age and sex categories in the consideration of relative risks and incidence rates of the diseases included in the model. The analysis was conducted from the healthcare system perspective, and a 3% discounting rate for costs and outcomes was applied. Model parameter values were sourced from published literature. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses assessed robustness. RESULTS: Among the smoking cessation alternatives available in Brazil, varenicline and combined NRT were estimated to have higher effectiveness; varenicline, however, was dominated due to its higher average cost. In the base-case analysis, combined NRT had an incremental gain of 0.25 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) in comparison to the second-best option (bupropion in combination with NRT transdermal patch) and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of R$2173.47/QALY ($595.45/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: Combination of oral and transdermal NRT (coupled with CBT) was the most effective smoking cessation option and was 100% cost-effective within a conservative willingness-to-pay threshold.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Implementation of Cryptococcal Antigen Lateral Flow Assay for the Diagnosis of Cryptococcal Meningitis in Symptomatic People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Brazil.

OBJECTIVES: Cryptococcal meningitis constitutes a significant source of mortality in the developing world. Annually, approximately 625 000 deaths occur worldwide among patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of implementing cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay (CRAG-LFA) screening in Brazil compared with the current practice. METHODS: An economic evaluation using a Monte Carlo microsimulation was conducted, considering the perspective of the Brazilian Public Health System, to calculate the cost-effectiveness of 4 diagnosis tests: (1) CRAG-LFA, (2) the cryptococcal antigen latex agglutination (CRAG-LA) test, (3) India ink, and (4) nontracking as a baseline. The time horizon comprised 1 year for the intervention and 5 years for the budgetary impact analysis. Two primary effectiveness outcomes were considered: years of life and quality-adjusted life-years. RESULTS: CRAG-LFA has extended dominance vis à vis CRAG-LA and India ink. CRAG-LFA would cost $418.46 more than CRAG-LA for the treatment of each symptomatic patient living with HIV, with an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of $2478.75/quality-adjusted life year. The budgetary impact analysis estimated that the incorporation of CRAG-LFA would have an additional cost of $1 959 236.50 in 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, for patients living with HIV in the Brazilian Public Health System, the adoption of CRAG-LFA screening is cost-effective compared with the use of CRAG-LA and India ink. It represents an opportunity to prevent cryptococcal meningitis and its mortality in Brazil.

Cost-effectiveness analysis and budgetary impact of the Cryptococcal Antigen Lateral Flow Assay (CRAG-LFA) implementation for the screening and diagnosis of cryptococcosis in asymptomatic people living with HIV in Brazil.

Cryptococcal infection is a frequent cause of mortality in Brazilian HIV-infected patients. The present study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of four cryptococcosis screening strategies in HIV-infected patients with CD4+ ≤ 200 cells/mm3, in Brazil. A Monte Carlo microsimulation was used to compare the following diagnostic tests: a systematic serum cryptococcal antigen (CRAG) screening with latex agglutination (CRAG-LA), a lateral flow immunochromatographic test (CRAG-LFA), India ink staining and no intervention. The rationale was that of the Unified Health System (SUS), and the time horizon was of one year for the intervention and of five years for the budgetary impact analysis (BIA). The effectiveness outcomes were years of life and years of life adjusted for quality (QALY). The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the two cryptococcal antigen tests were cost-effective, presenting with superior results in comparison with India ink and no screening. CRAG-LFA, compared to CRAG-LA, has an incremental cost of US$0.25 and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$73.36 (considering the US dollar equal to 5 reais, the Brazilian current money). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis between CRAG-LFA and CRAG-LA, despite showing a high agreement between the two tests, indicated the superiority of CRAG-LFA. The BIA estimated that the incorporation of CRAG-LFA would have an additional cost of approximately U$S 10.4 million dollars in five years. These findings suggest that, for the group of studied patients, the adoption of CRAG-LFA and CRAG-LA are cost-effective, while the India ink test and no intervention are less effective strategies. The BIA showed that using the CRAG-LFA test for people living with HIV (PLHIV) with CD4+ ≤ 200 cells/mm3 could reduce costs for the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS).

Drug prices in Latin American countries: the case of rheumatoid arthritis Biosimilars.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this paper is to analyze the prices of biological drugs in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in three Latin American countries (Brazil, Colombia and Mexico), as well as in Spain and the United States of America (US), from the point of market entry of biosimilars. METHODS: We analyzed products authorized for commercialization in the last 20 years, in Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico, comparing them to the United States of America (USA) and Spain. For this analysis, we sought the prices and registries of drugs marketed between 1999 and October 1, 2019, in the regulatory agencies' databases. The pricing between countries was based on purchasing power parity (PPP). RESULTS: The US authorized the commercialization of 13 distinct biologicals and four biosimilars in the period. Spain and Brazil marketed 14 biopharmaceuticals for RA, ten original, four biosimilars. Colombia and Mexico have authorized three biosimilars in addition to the ten biological ones. For biological drug prices, the US is the most expensive country. Spain's price behavior seems intermediate when compared to the three LA countries. Brazil has the highest LA prices, followed by Mexico and Colombia, which has the lowest prices. Spain has the lowest values in PPP, compared to LA countries, while the US has the highest prices. CONCLUSION: The economic effort that LA countries make to access these medicines is much higher than the US and Spain. The use of the PPP ensured a better understanding of the actual access to these inputs in the countries analyzed.