Comparative anatomy of the ovine and human pelvis for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: evaluating the effectiveness of the ovine model.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is a functional reconstructive surgery used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in middle-aged women. Although LSC is widely used, its implementation is hindered by perceived technical difficulties and surgical learning curves. Surgeons require adequate experience with LSC prior to performing the procedure on patients to improve their quality of life. This study is aimed at demonstrating the effectiveness of the ovine model (OM) for training and research in LSC, while also comparing anatomical differences between ovine and human models during the procedure. METHODS: The animal model and training were provided by the Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre. Urologists and gynecologists with experience in LSC participated in a course and their findings were recorded and documented. RESULTS: Differences in patient positioning, trocar placement, and reperitonealization were identified between the ovine and human models. Hysterectomy is always performed in the ovine model, whereas it is not mandatory in humans. There are also differences in the dissection of the levator ani muscle and attachment point of the posterior mesh to the uterus between the two models. Despite differences in some areas, the ovine pelvic structure and vagina are similar in size to those of humans. CONCLUSIONS: The ovine model is a valuable tool for surgeons in their learning curve for LSC, allowing for safe and effective practice prior to performing the procedure on patients. The use of the OM can help to improve the quality of life for women affected by pelvic organ prolapse.

Genitourinary tract symptoms in patients admitted with COVID-19: Exploring changes in frequency by determinants and pandemic waves.

Background: Urothelial cells exhibit increased expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 receptor, which is the binding site of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 to cells. The frequency and distribution of genitourinary tract symptoms in patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unknown. Objective: We explored trends in genitourinary tract symptoms by gender and each of six pandemic waves in patients admitted for COVID-19, and related them with severity, death and length of hospitalization. Design Setting and Participants: A retrospective study took place in our institution of COVID-19 admitted patients. Only patients with RT-PCR or antigen test confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. Demographic, clinical, and genitourinary symptoms were explored. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: COVID-19 patients with genitourinary tract symptoms were compared with those without. Statistical comparisons were conducted by parametric and nonparametric tests for quantitative variables, and χ 2 test for qualitative variables. Results and limitations: Out of a total of 4,661 COVID-19 patients, genitourinary symptoms were found in 21,1%. These symptoms were more frequent in patients admitted for longer than 30 days, except for urinary incontinence (UI) and erectile dysfunction (ED). Acute kidney injury (AKI) and urinary tract infections (UTI) had a higher presence in the 5th (16.7%; 12.8% respectively) and 3rd wave (13.3%; 12.6% respectively). Genitourinary symptoms were higher for those patients admitted in critical care units. Frequency of AKI, UI, UTI and acute urinary retention (AUR) were higher for patients who were finally deceased (26.2%; 3.5%; 13.6% and 3.6% respectively). Conclusions: A high frequency of genitourinary symptoms in patients admitted for COVID-19 was observed, whose frequency and distribution varied according to pandemic waves. Specific genitourinary conditions were associated with worse outcomes and poorer prognosis.