The Transformation of Documenting and Coding for Neurologic Hospital Inpatient and Observation Services.

ABSTRACT: Landmark changes to documenting and coding for office or other outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) codes were implemented on January 1, 2021. To decrease clinicians' administrative burden, many documentation requirements were eliminated. In addition, major changes were made in how medical decision making and time spent on the date of the encounter are used to determine the level of service. On January 1, 2023, these changes were extended to inpatient and observation E/M services. The level of service in both inpatient and outpatient settings can now be selected based on the total time dedicated to the patient's care on the day of the encounter or the new method of medical decision making. This article discusses the optimal ways to document and code for inpatient hospital and observation encounters after January 1, 2023.

The Transformation of Documenting and Coding: Evaluation and Management Codes for Outpatient Neurology Services.

ABSTRACT: This article discusses the optimal ways to document and code for outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) codes. Since the changes for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 99202-99215 were finalized for 2021, they have been modified by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in their Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and by technical corrections issued on March 9, 2021. The 21st Century Cures Act mandated that patients can access their notes and test results immediately. These developments have transformed medical documentation and coding for outpatient E/M services. One year in, the authors have a better understanding of the subtleties of documenting and accurately determining levels of service for outpatient encounters using these new rules and regulations, and they share key insights gained by experience with the new system.

Evaluation and Management Codes for Outpatient Neurology Services in 2021: Changes to 99202-99215.

Medical services can be conceptualized as falling into two categories: procedures and cognitive care. A procedure is defined as a surgical, medical, or diagnostic test performed on a patient, such as an x-ray, wound suture, surgery, or physical therapy treatment. Cognitive care, also known as Evaluation and Management (E/M) services, involves performing a medical history along with a physical examination and possibly ordering or reviewing diagnostic tests before formulating a medical opinion and initiating a care plan. The uniform language and categorization of all medical services is contained in the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) manual by the American Medical Association, which precisely describes all medical services using non-overlapping definitions and descriptions. The codes defined by CPT are the most commonly accepted set of codes used to file medical claims. In 2000, the US Department of Health and Human Services designated CPT to be the national reporting standard used in conjunction with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). CPT codes used today for E/M services were established in 1995 and define the components of history, examination, and medical decision making necessary to determine the level of each cognitive care service as delivered by a physician or other qualified health care professionals (eg, advanced practice providers). E/M rules were modified in 1997 and allowed some specialty services, such as neurology, to substitute a single system examination for a general, multisystem physical examination. Although new E/M codes were added over the years, the code descriptions and documentation guidelines for E/M services for outpatient and inpatient care remained essentially unchanged from 1997 through 2020. Most of the work performed by neurologists is E/M services, and the rules for coding outpatient care will change dramatically on January 1, 2021. This article discusses the rationale for these coding changes and explains how they are to be applied in the clinical setting.

Coding for Behavioral Neurology and Psychiatry.

Medical coding is highly technical, and proper use of both Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) is difficult because of the considerable detail of the code definitions, the changes implemented yearly, and the vast change a few years ago with the transition to ICD-10-CM. Although basic office visit and hospital visit Evaluation and Management (E/M) codes have not changed in decades, new cognitive care codes have been added to the cognitive codes that fall under E/M. Accuracy in documentation is essential as the basis for precision in coding, which will result in both best practice and proper payment from payers.

Electrodiagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (Une): a Bayesian approach.

INTRODUCTION: In ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE), we determined how electrodiagnostic cutoffs [across-elbow ulnar motor conduction velocity slowing (AECV-slowing), drop in across-elbow vs. forearm CV (AECV-drop)] depend on pretest probability (PreTP). METHODS: Fifty clinically defined UNE patients and 50 controls underwent ulnar conduction testing recording abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI), stimulating wrist, below-elbow, and 6-, 8-, and 10-cm more proximally. For various PreTPs of UNE, the cutoffs required to confirm UNE (defined as posttest probability = 95%) were determined with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and Bayes Theorem. RESULTS: On ROC and Bayesian analyses, the ADM 10-cm montage was optimal. For PreTP = 0.25, the confirmatory cutoffs were >23 m/s (AECV-drop), and <38 m/s (AECV-slowing); for PreTP = 0.75, they were much less conservative: >14 m/s, and <47 m/s, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: (1) In UNE, electrodiagnostic cutoffs are critically dependent on PreTP; rigid cutoffs are problematic. (2) AE distances should be standardized and at least 10 cm.