Postdischarge Iron Status in Very Preterm Infants Receiving Prophylactic Iron Supplementation after Birth.

OBJECTIVE: To determine postdischarge iron status and associated factors in very preterm infants. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted through a provincial database on all very preterm infants born in Nova Scotia between 2005 and 2018. As a standard of care, all infants received prophylactic iron supplements starting at 2-4 weeks of chronological age and were tested for iron deficiency at 4 or 6 months corrected age. Iron deficiency was defined as serum ferritin <20 g/L at 4 months or <12 g/L at 6 months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with iron deficiency. RESULTS: Among 411 infants, 132 (32.1%) had iron deficiency and 11 (2.7%) had iron deficiency anemia. The prevalence of iron deficiency decreased over time, from 37.6% in 2005-2011 to 25.8% in 2012-2018. Gestational hypertension in the mother (P = .01) and gestational age <27 weeks (P = .02) were independent risk factors for iron deficiency. In addition, the odds of iron deficiency were lower in the mixed-fed group (ie, with breast milk and formula combined) compared with the exclusive formula-fed group (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Iron deficiency was prevalent in 32% of the very preterm infants despite early iron prophylaxis. These results demonstrate the importance of monitoring iron stores during preterm follow-up. Information about risk factors is important to mitigate iron deficiency in very preterm infants.

Randomized trial of occlusive wrap for heat loss prevention in preterm infants.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the application of occlusive wrap applied immediately after birth will reduce mortality in very preterm infants. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial of infants born 24 0/7 to 27 6/7 weeks' gestation who were assigned randomly to occlusive wrap or no wrap. The primary outcome was all cause mortality at discharge or 6 months' corrected age. Secondary outcomes included temperature, Apgar scores, pH, base deficit, blood pressure and glucose, respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, seizures, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, gastrointestinal perforation, intraventricular hemorrhage, cystic periventricular leukomalacia, pulmonary hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, sepsis, hearing screen, and pneumothorax. RESULTS: Eight hundred one infants were enrolled. There was no difference in baseline population characteristics. There were no significant differences in mortality (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.5). Wrap infants had statistically significant greater baseline temperatures (36.3°C wrap vs 35.7°C no wrap, P < .0001) and poststabilization temperatures (36.6°C vs 36.2°C, P < .001) than nonwrap infants. For the secondary outcomes, there was a significant decrease in pulmonary hemorrhage (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-0.9) in the wrap group and a significant lower mean one minute Apgar score (P = .007) in the wrap group. The study was stopped early because continued enrollment would not result in the attainment of a significant difference in the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: Application of occlusive wrap to very preterm infants immediately after birth results in greater mean body temperature but does not reduce mortality.

Dexamethasone given to premature infants and cardiac diastolic function in early childhood.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if dexamethasone given to premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia would result in cardiac diastolic dysfunction in early childhood, a topic unstudied in humans. STUDY DESIGN: We compared seven children ages 3 to 8 years born at 26 weeks' gestation and given dexamethasone for bronchopulmonary dysplasia with eight gestation-matched and age-matched control children using echocardiography to assess measures of systolic and diastolic function. All dexamethasone patients had resolved hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. RESULTS: Dexamethasone patients had the same normal τ and isovolumic relaxation time (24.9 ± 2.8 and 54.6 ± 6.3 ms) as control patients (22.1 ± 3.0 and 48.8 ± 6.7 ms). Peak A velocities were the same in dexamethasone patients as in control patients (59.5 ± 15 versus 49.4 ± 5.8 cm/s, P = .10), resulting in unchanged E:A ratios (1.89 ± 0.57 versus 2.15 ± 0.43, P = .22). Peak E velocity and E-wave deceleration times were not different. We found no significant differences in measures of systolic function (heart rate-corrected velocity of circumferential fiber shortening, wall stress, and ejection fraction). Left ventricular mass was the same between the groups confirming resolution of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSIONS: These data are consistent with normal myocardial relaxation, suggesting that long-term diastolic function is reassuringly normal in children who received dexamethasone as premature infants with resolution of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Indomethacin prophylaxis, patent ductus arteriosus, and the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: further analyses from the Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms (TIPP).

OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in subgroups of infants with and without patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) who were randomized to indomethacin prophylaxis or placebo, and to examine whether adverse drug effects on edema formation and oxygenation may explain why indomethacin prophylaxis does not reduce BPD. STUDY DESIGN: We studied 999 extremely low birth weight infants who participated in the Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms (TIPP) and who survived to a postmenstrual age of 36 weeks. RESULTS: The incidence of BPD in the 2 subgroups of infants with PDA was 52% (55/105) after indomethacin prophylaxis and 56% (137/246) after placebo. In contrast, rates of BPD in the 2 subgroups without a PDA were 43% (170/391) after indomethacin prophylaxis and 30% (78/257) after placebo (P [interaction] = .015). Logistic regression analysis with adjustment for prognostic baseline factors showed that adverse and independent effects of indomethacin prophylaxis on the need for supplemental oxygen and on weight loss by the end of the first week of life may increase the risk of BPD in infants without PDA. CONCLUSIONS: Harmful side effects on oxygenation and edema formation may explain why indomethacin prophylaxis does not prevent BPD even though it reduces PDA.

Male/female differences in indomethacin effects in preterm infants.

To test whether indomethacin prophylaxis has sex-mediated effects on severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grade III and IV) and on long-term outcomes in extremely-low-birth-weight infants. A secondary analysis was performed in the entire "Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms study" cohort. The results suggest a weak differential treatment effect of indomethacin by sex.