RESUMEN
Purpose: Temporal summation (TS) of pain occurs when pain increases over repeated presentations of identical noxious stimuli. TS paradigms can model central sensitization, a state of hyperexcitability in nociceptive pathways that promotes chronic pain onset and maintenance. Many experimenters use painful heat stimuli to measure TS (TS-heat); yet, TS-heat research faces unresolved challenges, including difficulty evoking summation in up to 30-50% of participants. Moreover, substantial variability exists between laboratories regarding the methods for evoking and calculating TS-heat. Patients and Methods: To address these limitations, this study sought to identify optimal parameters for evoking TS-heat in healthy participants with a commercially available constant contact heat stimulator, the Medoc TSA-II. Working within constraints of the TSA-II, stimulus trains with varying parameters (eg, stimulus frequency, baseline temp, peak temp, peak duration, testing site) were tested in a sample of 32 healthy, chronic pain-free participants to determine which combination best evoked TS-heat. To determine whether TS scoring method altered results, TS-heat was scored using three common methods. Results: Across all methods, only two trains successfully evoked group-level TS-heat. These trains shared the following parameters: site (palmar hand), baseline and peak temperatures (44°C and 50°C, respectively), and peak duration (0.5 s). Both produced summation that peaked at moderate pain (~50 out of 100 rating). Conclusion: Future TS-heat investigations using constant contact thermodes and fixed protocols may benefit from adopting stimulus parameters that include testing on the palmar hand, using 44°C baseline and 50°C peak temperatures, at ≥0.33 Hz stimulus frequency, and peak pulse durations of at least 0.5 seconds.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Positive emotions inhibit pain, whereas negative emotions facilitate pain. Thus, many psychosocial interventions capitalize on this emotion-pain relationship to improve patients' abilities to regulate emotion (ie, reduce negative emotion, increase positive emotion), influence nociception, and manage pain. This study extended the existing literature to examine whether emotion regulation procedures could influence emotional modulation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR), a marker of spinal nociception. To elicit emotion, 2 blocks of pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant pictures were presented. In block 1, participants were asked to passively view pictures during which painful electric stimulations were delivered to evoke pain and the NFR. Valence, arousal, corrugator electromyogram, and skin conductance response were used to measure emotional responses to pictures. To manipulate emotion regulation, participants were randomized to either suppress (downregulate) or enhance (upregulate) their emotion during block 2 (other procedures same as block 1). Instructions to suppress decreased subjective and physiological responding to emotional pictures, reduced emotional modulation of pain, and generally decreased NFR magnitude (regardless of picture content). Instructions to enhance emotion increased subjective responding to emotional pictures but did not alter physiological responding to pictures or emotional modulation of pain/NFR in predictable ways. Results imply that downregulation/suppression of negative emotions may work best to reduce pain facilitation. Furthermore, this study contributes to the existing literature that shows that pain and pain signaling is tightly coupled with emotional states and that emotion regulation can impact pain perception.
