Dose reduction in sequence scanning 4D CT imaging through respiratory signal-guided tube current modulation: A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory signal-guided 4D CT sequence scanning such as the recently introduced Intelligent 4D CT (i4DCT) approach reduces image artifacts compared to conventional 4D CT, especially for irregular breathing. i4DCT selects beam-on periods during scanning such that data sufficiency conditions are fulfilled for each couch position. However, covering entire breathing cycles during beam-on periods leads to redundant projection data and unnecessary dose to the patient during long exhalation phases. PURPOSE: We propose and evaluate the feasibility of respiratory signal-guided dose modulation (i.e., temporary reduction of the CT tube current) to reduce the i4DCT imaging dose while maintaining high projection data coverage for image reconstruction. METHODS: The study is designed as an in-silico feasibility study. Dose down- and up-regulation criteria were defined based on the patients' breathing signals and their representative breathing cycle learned before and during scanning. The evaluation (including an analysis of the impact of the dose modulation criteria parameters) was based on 510 clinical 4D CT breathing curves. Dose reduction was determined as the fraction of the downregulated dose delivery time to the overall beam-on time. Furthermore, under the assumption of a 10-phase 4D CT and amplitude-based reconstruction, beam-on periods were considered negatively affected by dose modulation if the downregulation period covered an entire phase-specific amplitude range for a specific breathing phase (i.e., no appropriate reconstruction of the phase image possible for this specific beam-on period). Corresponding phase-specific amplitude bins are subsequently denoted as compromised bins. RESULTS: Dose modulation resulted in a median dose reduction of 10.4% (lower quartile: 7.4%, upper quartile: 13.8%, maximum: 28.6%; all values corresponding to a default parameterization of the dose modulation criteria). Compromised bins were observed in 1.0% of the beam-on periods (72 / 7370 periods) and affected 10.6% of the curves (54/510 curves). The extent of possible dose modulation depends strongly on the individual breathing patterns and is weakly correlated with the median breathing cycle length (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.22, p < 0.001). Moreover, the fraction of beam-on periods with compromised bins is weakly anti-correlated with the patient's median breathing cycle length (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.24; p < 0.001). Among the curves with the 17% longest average breathing cycles, no negatively affected beam-on periods were observed. CONCLUSION: Respiratory signal-guided dose modulation for i4DCT imaging is feasible and promises to significantly reduce the imaging dose with little impact on projection data coverage. However, the impact on image quality remains to be investigated in a follow-up study.

Comparison of intelligent 4D CT sequence scanning and conventional spiral 4D CT: a first comprehensive phantom study.

4D CT imaging is a cornerstone of 4D radiotherapy treatment. Clinical 4D CT data are, however, often affected by severe artifacts. The artifacts are mainly caused by breathing irregularity and retrospective correlation of breathing phase information and acquired projection data, which leads to insufficient projection data coverage to allow for proper reconstruction of 4D CT phase images. The recently introduced 4D CT approach i4DCT (intelligent 4D CT sequence scanning) aims to overcome this problem by breathing signal-driven tube control. The present motion phantom study describes the first in-depth evaluation of i4DCT in a real-world scenario. Twenty-eight 4D CT breathing curves of lung and liver tumor patients with pronounced breathing irregularity were selected to program the motion phantom. For every motion pattern, 4D CT imaging was performed with i4DCT and a conventional spiral 4D CT mode. For qualitative evaluation, the reconstructed 4D CT images were presented to clinical experts, who scored image quality. Further quantitative evaluation was based on established image intensity-based artifact metrics to measure (dis)similarity of neighboring image slices. In addition, beam-on and scan times of the scan modes were analyzed. The expert rating revealed a significantly higher image quality for the i4DCT data. The quantitative evaluation further supported the qualitative: While 20% of the slices of the conventional spiral 4D CT images were found to be artifact-affected, the corresponding fraction was only 4% for i4DCT. The beam-on time (surrogate of imaging dose) did not significantly differ between i4DCT and spiral 4D CT. Overall i4DCT scan times (time between first beam-on and last beam-on event, including scan breaks to compensate for breathing irregularity) were, on average, 53% longer compared to spiral CT. Thus, the results underline that i4DCT significantly improves 4D CT image quality compared to standard spiral CT scanning in the case of breathing irregularity during scanning.

Intelligent 4D CT sequence scanning (i4DCT): First scanner prototype implementation and phantom measurements of automated breathing signal-guided 4D CT.

PURPOSE: Four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) imaging is an essential part of current 4D radiotherapy treatment planning workflows, but clinical 4D CT images are often affected by artifacts. The artifacts are mainly caused by breathing irregularity during data acquisition, which leads to projection data coverage issues for currently available commercial 4D CT protocols. It was proposed to improve projection data coverage by online respiratory signal analysis and signal-guided CT tube control, but related work was always theoretical and presented as pure in silico studies. The present work demonstrates a first CT prototype implementation along with respective phantom measurements for the recently introduced intelligent 4D CT (i4DCT) sequence scanning concept (https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13632). METHODS: Intelligent 4D CT was implemented on the Siemens SOMATOM go platform. Four-dimensional CT measurements were performed using the CIRS motion phantom. Motion curves were programmed to systematically vary from regular to very irregular, covering typical irregular patterns that are known to result in image artifacts using standard 4D CT imaging protocols. Corresponding measurements were performed using i4DCT and routine spiral 4D CT with similar imaging parameters (e.g., mAs setting and gantry rotation time, retrospective ten-phase reconstruction) to allow for a direct comparison of the image data. RESULTS: Following technological implementation of i4DCT on the clinical CT scanner platform, 4D CT motion artifacts were significantly reduced for all investigated levels of breathing irregularity when compared to routine spiral 4D CT scanning. CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms feasibility of fully automated respiratory signal-guided 4D CT scanning by means of a first implementation of i4DCT on a CT scanner. The measurements thereby support the conclusions of respective in silico studies and demonstrate that respiratory signal-guided 4D CT (here: i4DCT) is ready for integration into clinical CT scanners.