Photosensitizer-antibody conjugates for detection and therapy of cancer.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising approach for the treatment of superficially localized tumors. A limitation, however, is the lack of selectivity of the photosensitizers, which can result in severe toxicity. In this overview, the possibilities for using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) for selective delivery of photosensitizers to tumors, are discussed. This approach is called photoimmunotherapy (PIT). For PIT to be successful, sufficient amounts of sensitizer should be coupled to the MAb without altering its biological properties. A challenging aspect herein is the hydrophobicity of therapeutic photosensitizers. Options for direct and indirect coupling of photosensitizers to MAbs are evaluated, while pros and cons are indicated. Special attention is paid to the quality testing of photoimmunoconjugates, as this information is important for further optimization of PIT. Results obtained thus far with PIT in in vitro and in vivo model systems are discussed. Despite the encouraging progress made, showing the high selectivity of photoimmunoconjugates, PIT still awaits initial clinical evaluation.

Targeting of aluminum (III) phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate by use of internalizing monoclonal antibodies: improved efficacy in photodynamic therapy.

The use of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed against tumor-associated antigens for targeting of photosensitizers is an interesting option to improve the selectivity of photodynamic therapy (PDT). Hydrophilic photosensitizers are most suitable for conjugation to MAbs because of their water solubility. The photosensitizer aluminum (III) phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate [AlPc(SO3H)4] has many ideal photochemical properties; however, because of its hydrophilicity, the free form of this sensitizer does not readily reach the critical intracellular target and, therefore, is ineffective in PDT. On the basis of our previous studies, we hypothesized that AlPc(SO3H)4 might be suitable for PDT when coupled to internalizing tumor-selective MAbs. In this study, a reproducible procedure is presented for coupling of AlPc(SO3H)4 to MAbs via the tetra-glycine derivative AlPc(SO2Ngly)4. Conjugation was performed to chimeric MAb (cMAb) U36 and murine MAbs (mMAb) E48 and 425 using a labile ester. Conjugates showed preservation of integrity and immunoreactivity and full stability in serum in vitro. At molar ratios >4, the solubility of the conjugates decreased. Data on the in vitro efficacy of PDT showed that in the chosen experimental setup the internalizing AlPc(SO2Ngly)4-mMAb 425 conjugate was about 7500 times more toxic to A431 cells than the free sensitizer (IC50s, 0.12 nM versus 900 nM). The AlPc(SO2Ngly)4-mMAb 425 conjugate was also more toxic than meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin-mMAb 425 conjugates and free meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin that had been tested previously (M. B. Vrouenraets et al., Cancer Res., 59: 1505-1513, 1999) in the same system (IC50s, 7.3 nm and 2.0 nM, respectively). Biodistribution analysis of AlPc(SO2Ngly)4-125I-labeled cMAb U36 conjugates with different sensitizer:MAb ratios in squamous cell carcinoma-bearing nude mice revealed selective accumulation in the tumor, although to a lesser extent than for the unconjugated 125I-labeled cMAb U36, whereas tumor:blood ratios were similar. These findings indicate that AlPc(SO3H)4 has high potential for use in PDT when coupled to internalizing tumor-selective MAbs.

Targeting of a hydrophilic photosensitizer by use of internalizing monoclonal antibodies: A new possibility for use in photodynamic therapy.

Coupling of photosensitizers to tumor-selective monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) is an attractive option for improving the selectivity of photodynamic therapy (PDT). For this purpose, hydrophilic sensitizers would be most suitable because of their solubility in water. However, such sensitizers are known to be ineffective in PDT, probably because they cannot readily pass the cell membrane and reach the critical intracellular target. We used the model compound TrisMPyP-PhiCO(2)H, a hydrophilic porphyrin derivative, to test the hypothesis that hydrophilic photosensitizers might become of therapeutic value when directed into the tumor cell by use of internalizing MAbs. TrisMPyP-PhiCO(2)H was conjugated using a labile ester. Conjugates showed no impairment of integrity on SDS-PAGE, full stability in serum in vitro, and optimal immunoreactivity when the sensitizer:MAb ratio was

Development of meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin-monoclonal antibody conjugates for photoimmunotherapy.

A limitation of photodynamic therapy is the lack of tumor selectivity of the photosensitizer. To overcome this problem, a protocol was developed for coupling of meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC), one of the most promising photosensitizers, to tumor-selective monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). mTHPC was radiolabeled with 131I to facilitate the assessment of the in vitro and in vivo behavior. After the modification to 131I-mTHPC-(CH2COOH)4, thus increasing the water solubility and creating a functional moiety suitable for coupling, conjugation was performed using a labile ester. Insoluble aggregates were not formed when mTHPC-MAb conjugates with a molar ratio of up to 4 were prepared. These conjugates showed a minimal impairment of the integrity on SDS-PAGE, full stability in serum in vitro, and an optimal immunoreactivity. To test the in vivo behavior of the mTHPC-MAb conjugates, the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-selective chimeric MAb U36 was used in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-bearing nude mice. Biodistribution data showed that the tumor selectivity of cMAb U36-conjugated mTHPC was increased in comparison with free mTHPC, despite the fact that conjugates with a higher mTHPC:MAb ratio were more rapidly cleared from the blood. Preliminary results on the in vitro efficacy of photodynamic therapy with MAb-conjugated mTHPC showed that mTHPC coupled to the internalizing murine MAb 425 exhibited more phototoxicity than when coupled to the noninternalizing chimeric MAb U36.