The use of specific antihypertensive medication and skin cancer risk: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of hydrochlorothiazide has recently been linked to skin cancer in observational studies. This may be explained by its photosensitizing properties, but photosensitivity has also been reported for other antihypertensive drugs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare skin cancer risk among antihypertensive drug classes and individual blood pressure lowering drugs. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane and the Web of Science and included studies that investigated the association between antihypertensive medication exposure and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) or cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM). We combined the extracted odds ratios (OR) using a random effects model. RESULTS: We included 42 studies with a total of 16,670,045 subjects. Diuretics, in particular hydrochlorothiazide, were examined most frequently. Only 2 studies provided information about antihypertensive co-medication. Exposure to diuretics (OR 1.27 [1.09-1.47]) and calcium channel blockers (OR 1.06 [1.04-1.09]) was associated with an increased risk for NMSC. The increased risk for NMSC was only observed in case control studies and studies that did not correct for sun exposure, skin phototype or smoking. Studies that did correct for covariates as well as cohort studies did not show a significantly increased risk for NMSC. Egger's test revealed a significant publication bias for the subgroup of diuretics, hydrochlorothiazide and case-control studies concerning NMSC (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The available studies investigating the potential skin cancer risk that is associated with antihypertensive medication have significant shortcomings. Also, a significant publication bias is present. We found no increased skin cancer risk when analyzing cohort studies or studies that corrected for important covariates. (PROSPERO (CRD42020138908)).

Reconsidering the Edelman equation: impact of plasma sodium concentration, edema and body weight.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend treatment of dysnatremias to be guided by formulas based on the Edelman equation. This equation describes the relation between plasma sodium concentration and exchangeable cations. However, this formula does not take into account clinical parameters that have recently been associated with local tissue sodium accumulation, which occurs without concurrent water retention. We investigated to what extent such clinical factors affect the Edelman equation and dysnatremia treatment. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc analysis with original data of the Edelman study. Linear regression was used to examine the effect of age, sex, weight, edema, total body water (TBW) and heart and kidney failure on the Edelman equation. With attenuated correction, we corrected for measurement errors of both variables. Using piecewise regression, we analyzed whether the Edelman association differs for different plasma sodium concentrations. RESULTS: Data was available for 82 patients; 57 males and 25 females with a mean (SD) age of 57 (15) years. The slope of the Edelman equation was significantly affected by weight (p=0.01) and edema (p=0.03). Also, below and above plasma sodium levels of 133 mmol/L the slope of the Edelman equation was significantly different (1.25 x0025vs 0.58x0025, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Edelman's equation's coefficients are significantly affected by weight, edema and plasma sodium, possibly reflecting differences in tissue sodium accumulation capacity. The performance of Edelman-based formulas in clinical settings may be improved by taking these clinical characteristics into account.