Plastic Surgery or Facial Plastic Surgery: Can the Public Tell the Difference?

Background: Social media and online advertising are increasingly used by plastic surgeons (PSs) to educate patients and obtain referrals, but it remains unclear whether the general public can distinguish the difference in training and accreditation among medical professionals advertising online. Our study elucidates the public's expectations regarding the distinction between plastic surgery and facial plastic surgery. Methods: A survey was distributed via MTurk, an Amazon surveying service, to collect information about demographics and assumptions that would be made solely based on the terminology "facial PS" (FPS) and "PS." Participants were restricted to those residing in the United States. Results: A total of 253 responses were collected. Based on the term FPS, respondents on average moderately to strongly agreed that they would expect an FPS to have completed a plastic and reconstructive surgery residency program (mean = 1.81; scale from 1= strongly agree to 5= strongly disagree) and would feel moderately to strongly misled if they visited an FPS for a consultation and later learned that the provider did not complete a plastic and reconstructive surgery residency (mean = 3.62; scale from 1 = not misled at all to 5 = extremely misled). Conclusions: Despite increasing advocacy by professional societies and the member societies of the American Board of Medical Specialties, this study demonstrated that the lay public is unaware of factually different training and certification pathways given similarity in nomenclature. This study was notably not designed to draw conclusions or imply superiority of one specialty, certifying board, or training model over the other.

Optimizing Readability of Patient-Facing Hand Surgery Education Materials Using Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer 3.5.

PURPOSE: To address patient health literacy, the American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health recommend that readability of patient education materials should not exceed an eighth grade reading level. However, patient-facing materials often remain above the recommended average reading level. Current online calculators provide readability scores; however, they lack the ability to provide text-specific feedback, which may streamline the process of simplifying patient materials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5 as a tool for optimizing patient-facing hand surgery education materials through reading level analysis and simplification. METHODS: The readability of 18 patient-facing hand surgery education materials was compared by a traditional online calculator for reading level and ChatGPT 3.5. The original excerpts were then entered into ChatGPT 3.5 and simplified by the artificial intelligence tool. The simplified excerpts were scored by the same calculators. RESULTS: The readability scores for the original excerpts from the online calculator and ChatGPT 3.5 were similar. The simplified excerpts' scores were lower than the originals, with a mean of 7.28, less than the maximum recommended 8. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ChatGPT 3.5 for the purpose of simplification and readability analysis of patient-facing hand surgery materials is efficient and may help facilitate the conveyance of important health information. ChatGPT 3.5 rendered readability scores comparable with traditional readability calculators, in addition to excerpt-specific feedback. It was also able to simplify materials to the recommended grade levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: By confirming ChatGPT3.5's ability to assess and simplify patient education materials, this study offers a practical solution for potentially improving patient comprehension, engagement, and health outcomes in clinical settings.

The State of Surgical Research in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Urgent Call for Surgical Research Trainers.

Background: Surgery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is poorly developed because of years of neglect. Sustained research on global surgery led to its recognition as an indivisible and indispensable part of primary healthcare in 2015. However, this has had little visible effect on surgical ecosystems within LMICs, especially in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). SSA surgical research systems strengthening, which includes skills transfer, with local priority setting driving the research agenda, is needed to propel global surgery into the future. Methods: The authors performed a literature review of the state of surgical research within SSA and also report the initial efforts of two research training nonprofits to empower young African surgeons with research skills. Results: Surgical research in SSA is disadvantaged even before it is birthed, facing monumental challenges at every stage of development, from research agenda determination to funding, study execution, and publication. Compared with a global output of 17.49 publications per 100,000 population, SSA produces 0.9 (P < 0.0001). The Surgeons in Humanitarian Alliance for Reconstructive, Research, and Education and Enabling Africa Clinical Health Research programs are involved in the longitudinal research mentorship of surgical residents within SSA; the improved quality of research and successful publications by participants suggest nascent steps in growing young surgical scientists. Conclusions: In the absence of an existing surgical research infrastructure within LMICs, global surgery research trainers should link up and collaborate to help develop a surgical research community that will provide the local data required to help transform the SSA surgical ecosystem.

Cleft Summit 2022: The Impact of a Unified Voice.

OBJECTIVE: The inaugural Cleft Summit aimed to unite experts and foster interdisciplinary collaboration, seeking a collective understanding of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) management. DESIGN: An interactive debate and conversation between a multidisciplinary cleft care team on VPI management. SETTING: A two-hour discussion within a four-day comprehensive cleft care workshop (CCCW). PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two global leaders from various cleft disciplines. INTERVENTIONS: Cleft Summit that allows for meaningful interdisciplinary collaboration and knowledge exchange. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ability to reach consensus on a unified statement for VPI management. RESULTS: Participants agreed that a patient with significant VPI and a dynamic velum should first receive a surgery that lengthens the velum to optimize patient outcome. A global, multicenter prospective study should be done to test this hypothesis. CONCLUSION: The 1st Cleft Summit successfully distilled global expertise into actionable best-practice guidelines through iterative discussions, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and paving the way for a transformative multi-center prospective study on VPI care.

Cognitive Outcomes of Children With Sagittal Craniosynostosis Treated With Either Endoscopic or Open Calvarial Vault Surgery.

Importance: Several studies have reported a higher incidence of neurodevelopmental delays and cognitive deficits in patients with single-suture craniosynostosis; however, there are few studies examining the associations of repair type with cognitive outcomes. Objective: To measure differences in neuropsychological outcomes between school-age children who were treated for sagittal craniosynostosis and unaffected controls and explore differences in cognitive function among children with sagittal craniosynostosis who were previously treated with either endoscopic strip craniectomy or open calvarial vault surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was performed between 2018 and 2022. Eligible participants included patients aged 5 to 17 years who had previously been seen as infants or toddlers (<3 years) at 1 of 3 surgical centers for craniosynostosis repair with either endoscopic surgery or open calvarial vault surgery. A separate cohort of unaffected controls were included for comparison. Data analysis was conducted from November 2023 to February 2024. Exposures: Open calvarial vault surgery or endoscopic repair for single-suture craniosynostosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the Differential Ability Scales-II (DAS-II) General Conceptual Ability (GCA) score, an index for overall intellectual ability. Secondary outcomes included DAS-II subscale scores (Verbal Ability, Nonverbal Reasoning, Spatial Ability, Working Memory, and Processing Speed), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) cognitive function scores. Results: A total of 81 patients with sagittal craniosynostosis (59 male [73%]; 22 female [27%]) and 141 controls (81 male [57%]; 60 female [43%]) were included. Of the 81 participants with sagittal craniosynostosis, 46 underwent endoscopic repair and 35 underwent open repair. Median (range) age at time of follow-up assessment was 7.7 (5.0-14.8) years for children with sagittal craniosynostosis and median age at assessment was 8.5 (7.7-10.5) years for controls. After controlling for age at assessment, sex, and socioeconomic status, there was no statistically significant or clinically meaningful difference in GCA scores between children who underwent endoscopic repair (adjusted mean score, 100; 95% CI, 96-104) and open repair (adjusted mean score, 103; 95% CI, 98-108) (P > .99). We found no significant difference in PROMIS scores between repair types (median [range] for endoscopic repair 54 [31-68] vs median [range] for open repair 50 [32-63]; P = .14). When comparing the treatment groups with the unaffected controls, differences in subscale scores for GCA and working memory were observed but were within normal range. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, there were no statistically or clinically significant differences in cognitive outcomes among school-age children by and type of surgical procedure used to repair nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis. These findings suggest primary care clinicians should be educated about different options for craniosynostosis surgery to ensure early referral of these patients so that all treatment options remain viable.

Results of a Pilot Virtual Microsurgery Course for Plastic Surgeons in LMICs.

Background: The Plastic Surgery Foundation's Surgeons in Humanitarian Alliance for Reconstruction, Research and Education (SHARE) program seeks to expand surgical capacity worldwide through mentorship and training for local plastic surgeons. This study aims to define the need for microsurgery training among SHARE global fellows and describe results of a pilot course. Methods: Ten participants of the SHARE Virtual Microsurgical Skills Course were asked to complete an anonymous survey. Pre- and post-course response rates were 100% and 50.0%, respectively. Results: There was a high incidence of microsurgical problems encountered in the clinical setting. Resource availability was varied, with high access to loupes (100%), yet limited access to microsurgery instruments (50%), medications (40%), operating microscope (20%), skilled nursing (0%) and appropriate peri-operative care settings (0%). Participants identified vessel preparation, instrument selection, and suture handling as priority learning objectives for a microsurgery skills course. Post-course satisfaction with learning objectives was high (60% "very good," 40% "excellent"). Participants reported high levels of improvement in suture handling (Likert 4.60±0.55), end-to-end anastomosis (4.40±0.55), instrument selection (4.20±0.45), vessel preparation (4.20±0.45), and economy of motion (4.20±0.45). Conclusions: This study demonstrates a high frequency of reconstructive problems encountered by global fellows yet low access to appropriate resources to perform microsurgical procedures. Initial results from a pilot virtual microsurgery course demonstrate very high satisfaction and high self-rated improvement in key microsurgical skills. The virtual course is an effective and accessible format for training surgeons in basic microsurgery skills and can be augmented by providing longitudinal opportunities for remote feedback.

Validation of ChatGPT 3.5 as a Tool to Optimize Readability of Patient-facing Craniofacial Education Materials.

Background: To address patient health literacy, the American Medical Association recommends that readability of patient education materials should not exceed a sixth grade reading level; the National Institutes of Health recommend no greater than an eigth-grade reading level. However, patient-facing materials in plastic surgery often remain at an above-recommended average reading level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ChatGPT 3.5 as a tool for optimizing patient-facing craniofacial education materials. Methods: Eighteen patient-facing craniofacial education materials were evaluated for readability by a traditional calculator and ChatGPT 3.5. The resulting scores were compared. The original excerpts were then inputted to ChatGPT 3.5 and simplified by the artificial intelligence tool. The simplified excerpts were scored by the calculators. Results: The difference in scores for the original excerpts between the online calculator and ChatGPT 3.5 were not significant (P = 0.441). Additionally, the simplified excerpts' scores were significantly lower than the originals (P < 0.001), and the mean of the simplified excerpts was 7.78, less than the maximum recommended 8. Conclusions: The use of ChatGPT 3.5 for simplification and readability analysis of patient-facing craniofacial materials is efficient and may help facilitate the conveyance of important health information. ChatGPT 3.5 rendered readability scores comparable to traditional readability calculators, in addition to excerpt-specific feedback. It was also able to simplify materials to the recommended grade levels. With human oversight, we validate this tool for readability analysis and simplification.

Vascularized Fibular Epiphyseal Transfer for Pediatric Limb Salvage: Review of Applications and Outcomes.

Vascularized fibular epiphyseal transfer (VFET) offers a functional advantage in pediatric limb salvage due to the preservation of growth potential and an articular surface for remodeling. This review summarizes the available evidence on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of pediatric reconstruction applying VFET at different recipient sites and with varying techniques. VFET was used to reconstruct the proximal humerus, distal radius or ulna, proximal femur, distal fibula, calcaneus, and mandible. Although most often harvested on the anterior tibial artery, VFET has also been performed using the peroneal artery, the inferior lateral genicular artery, and a dual pedicle. Recipient site flap inset most often involved fixation with plates and/or screws as well as soft tissue reconstruction using a retained slip of biceps femoris tendon. Outcomes included limb growth, range of motion, and strength. The most common reported complications were bone flap fracture and peroneal nerve palsy. The anterior tibial artery was the most applied pedicle with reliable limb growth, but with the added risk of postoperative peroneal palsy. Bone flap fracture most often occurred at the proximal humerus and femur recipient sites. Plate fixation and the combined use of allograft had lower instances of bone flap fracture. This review highlights how the anticipated dynamic growth and remodeling this free flap offers in the long term must be weighed against its complexity and potential complications.

Ergonomics for Cleft Providers: A Brief Communication.

Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries are the most common and debilitating work-related injuries among healthcare providers. These injuries often occur due to a lack of awareness and insufficient guidance during the early years of medical training. Recognizing the need to address this issue, the Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshop (CCCW) has taken steps to integrate an ergonomics session into its curriculum. The goal of this initiative is to enhance awareness on ergonomics, improve the integration of ergonomics into daily routine, and ultimately reduce the occurrence of MSK injuries among healthcare professionals.

Effective Local Anesthetic Use in Nasal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

Intraoperative nerve blocks have shown promise in managing pain after nasal surgery. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze existing level I and II evidence on intraoperative nerve blocks in nasal surgery to optimize postoperative recovery. Methods: The primary outcome of this systematic review and meta-analysis was postoperative pain scores; secondary outcomes included perioperative opioid requirements, patient satisfaction scores, and time to first analgesic requirement. PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were searched, and two independent reviewers conducted article screening. Methodological quality assessment of studies utilized the Jadad instrument, and interrater reliability was assessed using Cohen kappa. An inverse-variance, fixed-effects model was used for meta-analysis with Cohen d used to normalize effect size between studies. I2 and Q statistics were used to assess interstudy variability. Results: Four studies were included for meta-analysis, totaling 265 randomized patients. The nerve blocks assessed included infraorbital nerve, sphenopalatine ganglion, external nasal nerve, central facial nerve blocks, and total nerve blocks. All demonstrated significantly reduced postoperative pain compared with controls, with a large effect size (P < 0.001). Opioid requirements were lower in the nerve block groups (P < 0.001), and patient satisfaction scores were higher (P < 0.001). Supplemental meta-analyses showed a longer time to first analgesic requirement for patients who received a nerve block (P < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings support the efficacy of nerve blocks in providing postoperative pain relief and enhancing patient satisfaction with pain management. Perioperative nerve blocks, in combination with general anesthesia, should be considered for postoperative pain control.

Evaluation of acyclovir adsorption on granular activated carbon from aqueous solutions: batch and fixed-bed parametric studies.

The present study is aimed to assess the adsorptive potential of carbonaceous material for the acyclovir (ACVR) removal from the aquatic environment using batch and fixed-bed processes. In batch mode, the impact of various process conditions (contact time, pH, adsorbent dose, initial ACVR concentration, and temperature) on ACVR adsorption was investigated. Experimental results revealed that Langmuir isotherm and the pseudo-second-order kinetic model adequately represent the ACVR adsorption mechanism, indicating homogeneous adsorption. The process was found exothermic and spontaneous. Thermodynamic studies concluded that adsorption is a result of both physisorption and chemisorption. To understand the dynamic regime for the design of large-scale column studies, experimental data obtained from breakthrough curve were fitted to various analytical kinetic models. Yan model followed by Thomas model demonstrated a greater correlation of breakthrough data, confirming that the results are significant and are in line with Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic. G-AC exhibits sufficient adsorption capacity for ACVR. Hence, it is concluded that it can be used in a fixed-bed column in continuous mode for the treatment of ACVR-contaminated wastewater. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11696-023-02810-7.

Surgical outcome and treatment trends in 1289 infants with micrognathia: a multicenter cohort.

BACKGROUND: Studies of infants with micrognathia, especially Robin Sequence (RS), are limited by its rarity and both phenotypic and diagnostic variability. Most knowledge of this condition is sourced from small, single-institution samples. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study including infants with micrognathia admitted to 38 Children's Hospital Neonatal Consortium centers from 2010-2020. Predictor variables included demographic data, birth characteristics, cleft and syndrome status. Outcome variables included length of stay (LOS), death, feeding or respiratory support, and secondary airway operations. RESULTS: 1289 infants with micrognathia had a surgery to correct upper airway obstruction. Mean age and weight at operation were 34.8±1.8 weeks and 3515.4±42 grams, respectively. A syndromic diagnosis was made in 150 (11.6%) patients, with Stickler (5.4%) and Treacher Collins Syndromes (2.2%) most common. Operations included: mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO), 66.3%; tracheostomy, 25.4%; and tongue-lip adhesion (TLA), 8.3%. Tracheostomy patients had a lower birth weight, head circumference, gestational age, and APGAR scores. MDO patients were less likely to need a second airway operation compared to TLA patients (3.5%vs17.8%,p<0.001). The proportion of infants feeding exclusively orally at hospital discharge differed significantly, from most to least: MDO, TLA, tracheostomy. Hospital LOS was not statistically different for patients that had MDO and TLA, but was longer for those with primary tracheostomy. Mortality was low for all operations (0.5%). CONCLUSION: In this 1289 surgical patient cohort, MDO was associated with shorter hospital stay, improved oral feeding, and lower rates of secondary airway operations. Prospective multi-center studies are necessary to support these conclusions.

Application of Safety Protocols for International Cleft Outreach Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Global Smile Foundation Precaution Guidelines and Implications.

BACKGROUND: Since COVID-19 was declared a worldwide pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March of 2020, foundation-based cleft outreach programs to Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) were halted considering global public health challenges, scarcity of capacity and resources, and travel restrictions. This led to an increase in the backlog of untreated patients with cleft lip and/or palate, with new challenges to providing comprehensive care in those regions. Resumption of international outreach programs requires an updated course of action to incorporate necessary safety measures in the face of the ongoing pandemic. In this manuscript, the authors outline safety protocols, guidelines, and recommendations implemented in Global Smile Foundation's (GSF) most recent outreach trip to Beirut, Lebanon. METHODS: COVID-19 safety protocols for outreach cleft care and an Action Response Plan were developed by the GSF team based on the published literature and recommendations from leading international organizations. RESULTS: GSF conducted a 1-week surgical outreach program in Beirut, Lebanon, performing 13 primary cleft lip repairs, 7 cleft palate repairs, and 1 alveolar bone grafting procedure. Safety protocols were implemented at all stages of the outreach program, including patient preselection and education, hospital admission and screening, intraoperative care, and postoperative monitoring and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Organizing outreach programs in the setting of infectious diseases outbreaks should prioritize the safety and welfare of patients and team members within the program's local community. The COVID-19 protocols and guidelines described may represent a reproducible framework for planning future similar outreach initiatives in high-risk conditions.

Enhanced Recovery After Cleft Lip Repair: Protocol Development and Implementation in Outreach Settings.

INTRODUCTION: Clefts of the lip are of the most common congenital craniofacial anomalies. The development and implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol among patients undergoing cleft lip repair may decrease postoperative complications, accelerate recovery, and result in earlier postoperative discharge. METHODS: A modified ERAS program was developed and applied through Global Smile Foundation outreach craniofacial programs. The main components of this protocol include: (1) preoperative patient education, (2) nutrition screening, (3) smoking cessation when applicable, (4) use of topical anesthetic adjuncts, (5) facial nerve blocks, (6) postoperative analgesia, (7) preferential use of short-acting narcotics, (8) antibiotic administration, (9) use of elbow restraints, (10) early postoperative oral feeding and hydration, and (11) discharge planning. RESULTS: Between April 2019 and March 2020, GSF operated on 126 patients with cleft lip from different age groups and 58.8% of them were less than 1 year of age. Three patients (2.4%) had delayed wound healing and one (0.8%) had postoperative bleeding. There were no cases of mortality, length of hospital stay did not exceed 1 postoperative day, and patients were able to tolerate fluids intake at discharge. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an ERAS protocol among patients undergoing cleft lip repair has shown to be highly effective in minimizing postoperative discomfort while reducing opioids use, decreasing the length of stay in hospital, and leading to early oral feeding resumption. The ERAS principles described carry increased relevance in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and opioid crisis and can be safely applied in resource-constrained settings.

A Survey on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Elements in Cleft Palate Repair.

This study aims to characterize current use, knowledge, and attitude toward ERAS protocols by academic craniofacial surgeons.Craniofacial surgeons were provided with electronic surveys.Electronic survey; Institutional tertiary surgeons.102 cleft palate surgeons surveyed and 31 completed the survey (30.4%).None.Respondents rated their knowledge, use, and willingness to implement perioperative interventions modeled after adult ERAS protocols.Majority (67.7%) rated they were knowledgeable about ERAS. However, 61.3% "never use" a standardized protocol for cleft palate surgery. Only 3 ERAS elements are currently implemented by a majority of cleft surgeons: avoiding prolonged perioperative fasting (67.7%), using hypothermia prevention measures (74.2%), and minimizing use of opioids (62.5%). A large majority of respondents noted they never administer bolus (71.0%) or infusion (80.6%) dosing of tranexamic acid; most of these surgeons also indicated that administering tranexamic acid "would not be a valuable addition" (67.7% and 71.0%, respectively). Short-acting sedatives are used by 12.9% and by 16.1% of surgeons in all patients during extubation and postoperative recovery, respectively. By contrast, 22.6% never use such agents during extubation and 48.4% never use it during postoperative recovery. Overall, 67.7% of respondents replied that they would be willing to implement an ERAS protocol for cleft palate repair.Many respondents report using interventions compatible with an ERAS approach and the majority are willing to implement an ERAS protocol for cleft palate repair.

Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence to Teach Cleft Lip Surgery.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) leverages today's exceptional computational powers and algorithmic abilities to learn from large data sets and solve complex problems. The aim of this study was to construct an AI model that can intelligently and reliably recognize the anatomy of cleft lip and nasal deformity and automate placement of nasolabial markings that can guide surgical design. Methods: We adopted the high-resolution net architecture, a recent family of convolutional neural networks-based deep learning architecture specialized in computer-vision tasks to train an AI model, which can detect and place the 21 cleft anthropometric points on cleft lip photographs and videos. The model was tested by calculating the Euclidean distance between hand-marked anthropometric points placed by an expert cleft surgeon to ones generated by our cleft AI model. A normalized mean error (NME) was calculated for each point. Results: All NME values were between 0.029 and 0.055. The largest NME was for cleft-side cphi. The smallest NME value was for cleft-side alare. These errors were well within standard AI benchmarks. Conclusions: We successfully developed an AI algorithm that can identify the 21 surgically important anatomic landmarks of the unilateral cleft lip. This model can be used alone or integrated with surface projection to guide various cleft lip/nose repairs. Having demonstrated the feasibility of creating such a model on the complex three-dimensional surface of the lip and nose, it is easy to envision expanding the use of AI models to understand all of human surface anatomy-the full territory and playground of plastic surgeons.

Normal Neonatal Sleep Defined: Refining Patient Selection and Interpreting Sleep Outcomes for Mandibular Distraction.

BACKGROUND: Although polysomnography is paramount when evaluating neonatal airway obstruction, "normal" published references do not exist. We present normative polysomnography data for newborns age 0-1 month. We compare this reference to pre and postoperative sleep data from infants undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) at this same age. METHODS: Following IRB approval, normative subjects were recruited from our neonatal intensive care unit to undergo nap polysomnography. One blinded sleep physician read all studies. From 2016 to 2019, we prospectively collected sleep data for newborns undergoing MDO. RESULTS: In total, 22 neonates without airway obstruction provided normative sleep data. Median total apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (OAHI), and central apnea index (CAI) were 7.3, 4.9, and 0.7 events/hour. Median O2 nadir was 91%. Polysomnography for 13 neonates before MDO and during consolidation showed median preoperative AHI was 38.3, OAHI was 37.0, CAI was 1.9, and median O2 nadir was 83%. Following MDO, median AHI was 6.1, OAHI was 4.0, CAI was 1.3, and median O2 nadir was 92.5%. Paired t-tests confirmed significant improvements in all indices; when comparing the postoperative group with the normative group, there was no difference in oxygenation nor any respiratory index. CONCLUSIONS: "Normal" neonates have more obstructive events and lower oxygenation nadirs than previously appreciated. We provide normative nap polysomnography values for this age group and encourage centers with multidisciplinary MDO teams to utilize this data to calibrate patient selection algorithms, inform treatment discussions, and better understand surgical outcomes. Limitations include a small sample size and single institution study.

Emergency Response Protocols for Overseas Outreach Settings: Global Smile Foundation Strategy.

Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) aim to alleviate unmet global disease burden and promote collaboration between visiting and host countries. Well-executed emergency response protocols are foundational to providing safe and quality care in an unpredictable global setting. Global Smile Foundation (GSF) instituted a protocol in 2012 based on over three decades of cleft care experience. Here, we update this protocol and provide information on how to address special circumstances such as humanitarian crises and disease outbreaks. The GSF response protocol was developed in conjunction with surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and administrators to ensure all team members are adequately prepared to respond to emergency situations in global outreach. This protocol provides information on pre-departure preparation, onsite setup, operative precautions, and post-departure debriefings. Emphasis is placed on a standardized, reproducible workflow that accounts for necessary site-specific adjustments. Strategies include emergency simulations, site-specific safety checklists, standardized operating room protocols, and well-defined individual responsibilities. The authors also provide anticipatory guidance in addressing unexpected circumstances, such as disease outbreak and natural disaster, during global outreach. In conclusion, a proactive and systematic approach to emergency response and prevention is vital to minimizing morbidity and mortality during surgical outreach initiatives. The GSF protocol represents a reproducible approach that other organizations can adopt and adapt to their unique needs.

Historical Tools of Anthropometric Facial Assessment: A Systematic Raw Data Analysis on the Applicability of the Neoclassical Canons and Golden Ratio.

BACKGROUND: The fundamental tenets of facial aesthetic surgery education have not changed in centuries. Research is beginning to demonstrate that the Neoclassical Canons and the Golden Ratio, Phi, have limited utilization in populations other than those of White European extraction. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze comparable raw data in the literature to determine (1) if there is interethnic variability in Neoclassical Canon and Phi measurements, and (2) if the measurements in these representative samples differ from the "ideal." METHODS: A PubMed/Scopus search was performed. Manuscripts with raw data and individuals aged ≥16 were included. Measurements were extracted and employed to calculate the Neoclassical Canons and Phi. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were conducted to compare mean measurements across 6 ethnic groups (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Twenty-seven articles were included. Every continent was represented except Antarctica and Australia. Men were less commonly studied than women. Participant ages ranged from 16 to 56. Averaged Canons 2, 6-8 measurements had significant interethnic differences in males, whereas Canons 5-8 had significant differences across ethnicities in females. For men, there was significant interethnic variability in measurements of Phi 2, 5, 8, 10, and 17. For women, Phi 1, 2, 5, 8, 10, and 17 varied across ethnicities. No ethnic/gender group showed consistent approximation of the "ideal" for both the Neoclassical Canons and Phi. CONCLUSIONS: Today, the utility of the Neoclassical Canons and Phi is limited. It is incumbent on our field to systematically study and define the anthropometric measures that define the "ideal."

Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Dog-bite Wounds: A 5-year Retrospective Review.

INTRODUCTION: Dog bites are a significant health concern in the pediatric population. Few studies published to date have stratified the injuries caused by dog bites based on surgical severity to elucidate the contributing risk factors. METHODS: We used an electronic hospital database to identify all patients ≤17 years of age treated for dog bites from 2013-2018. Data related to patient demographics, injury type, intervention, dog breed, and payer source were collected. We extracted socioeconomic data from the American Community Survey. Data related to dog breed was obtained from public records on dog licenses. We calculated descriptive statistics as well as relative risk of dog bite by breed. RESULTS: Of 1,252 injuries identified in 967 pediatric patients, 17.1% required consultation with a surgical specialist for repair. Bites affecting the head/neck region were most common (61.7%) and most likely to require operating room intervention (P = 0.002). The relative risk of a patient being bitten in a low-income area was 2.24, compared with 0.46 in a high-income area. Among cases where the breed of dog responsible for the bite was known, the dog breed most commonly associated with severe bites was the pit bull (relative risk vs German shepherd 8.53, relative risk vs unknown, 3.28). CONCLUSION: The majority of injuries did not require repair and were sufficiently handled by an emergency physician. Repair by a surgical specialist was required <20% of the time, usually for bites affecting the head/neck region. Disparities in the frequency and characteristics of dog bites across socioeconomic levels and dog breeds suggest that public education efforts may decrease the incidence of pediatric dog bites.