Rodent Inferior Vena Cava Venoplasty Balloon Model.

Balloon venoplasty is a commonly used clinical technique to treat deep vein stenosis and occlusion as a consequence of trauma, congenital anatomic abnormalities, acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or stenting. Chronic deep venous obstruction is histopathologically characterized by thrombosis, fibrosis, or both. Currently, no direct treatment is available to target these pathological processes. Therefore, a reliable in vivo animal model to test novel interventions is necessary. The rodent survival inferior vena cava (IVC) venoplasty balloon model (VBM) allows the study of balloon venoplasty in non-thrombotic and post-thrombotic conditions across multiple time points. The local and systemic effect of coated and uncoated venoplasty balloons can be quantified via tissue, thrombus, and blood assays such as real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), western blot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), zymography, vein wall and thrombus cellular analysis, whole blood and plasma assays, and histological analysis. The VBM is reproducible, replicates surgical human interventions, can identify local vein wall-thrombi protein changes, and allows multiple analyses from the same sample, decreasing the number of animals required per group.

A comparative study of altered hemodynamics in iliac vein compression syndrome.

Introduction: Iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) is present in over 20% of the population and is associated with left leg pain, swelling, and thrombosis. IVCS symptoms are thought to be induced by altered pelvic hemodynamics, however, there currently exists a knowledge gap on the hemodynamic differences between IVCS and healthy patients. To elucidate those differences, we carried out a patient-specific, computational modeling comparative study. Methods: Computed tomography and ultrasound velocity and area data were used to build and validate computational models for a cohort of IVCS (N = 4, Subject group) and control (N = 4, Control group) patients. Flow, cross-sectional area, and shear rate were compared between the right common iliac vein (RCIV) and left common iliac vein (LCIV) for each group and between the Subject and Control groups for the same vessel. Results: For the IVCS patients, LCIV mean shear rate was higher than RCIV mean shear rate (550 ± 103 s-1 vs. 113 ± 48 s-1, p = 0.0009). Furthermore, LCIV mean shear rate was higher in the Subject group than in the Control group (550 ± 103 s-1 vs. 75 ± 37 s-1, p = 0.0001). Lastly, the LCIV/RCIV shear rate ratio was 4.6 times greater in the Subject group than in the Control group (6.56 ± 0.9 vs. 1.43 ± 0.6, p = 0.00008). Discussion: Our analyses revealed that IVCS patients have elevated shear rates which may explain a higher thrombosis risk and suggest that their thrombus initiation process may share aspects of arterial thrombosis. We have identified hemodynamic metrics that revealed profound differences between IVCS patients and Controls, and between RCIV and LCIV in the IVCS patients. Based on these metrics, we propose that non-invasive measurement of shear rate may aid with stratification of patients with moderate compression in which treatment is highly variable. More investigation is needed to assess the prognostic value of shear rate and shear rate ratio as clinical metrics and to understand the mechanisms of thrombus formation in IVCS patients.

An ultrasound imaging and computational fluid dynamics protocol to assess hemodynamics in iliac vein compression syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Elevated shear rates are known to play a role in arterial thrombosis; however, shear rates have not been thoroughly investigated in patients with iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) owing to imaging limitations and assumptions on the low shear nature of venous flows. This study was undertaken to develop a standardized protocol that quantifies IVCS shear rates and can aid in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with moderate yet symptomatic compression. METHODS: Study patients with and without IVCS had their iliac vein hemodynamics measured via duplex ultrasound (US) at two of the following three vessel locations: infrarenal inferior vena cava (IVC), right common iliac vein, and left common iliac vein, in addition to acquiring data at the right and left external iliac veins. US velocity spectra were multiplied by a weighted cross-sectional area calculated from US and computed tomography (CT) data to create flow waveforms. Flow waveforms were then scaled to enforce conservation of flow across the IVC and common iliac veins. A three-dimensional (3D), patient-specific model of the iliac vein anatomy was constructed from CT and US examination. Flow waveforms and the 3D model were used as a basis to run a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. Owing to collateral vessel flow and discrepancies between CT and US area measurements, flows in internal iliac veins and cross-sectional areas of the common iliac veins were calibrated iteratively against target common iliac flow. Simulation results on mean velocity were validated against US data at measurement locations. Simulation results were postprocessed to derive spatial and temporal values of quantities such as velocity and shear rate. RESULTS: Using our modeling protocol, we were able to build CFD models of the iliac veins that matched common iliac flow splits within 2% and measured US velocities within 10%. Proof-of-concept analyses (1 subject, 1 control) have revealed that patients with IVCS may experience elevated shear rates in the compressed left common iliac vein, more typical of the arterial rather than the venous circulation. These results encourage us to extend this protocol to a larger group of patients with IVCS and controls. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a protocol that obtains hemodynamic measurements of the IVC and iliac veins from US, creates patient-specific 3D reconstructions of the venous anatomy using CT and US examinations, and computes shear rates using calibrated CFD methods. Proof-of-concept results have indicated that patients with IVCS may experience elevated shear rates in the compressed left common iliac vein. Larger cohorts are needed to assess the relationship between venous compression and shear rates in patients with IVCS as compared with controls with noncompressed iliac veins. Further studies using this protocol may also give promising insights into whether or not to treat patients with moderate, yet symptomatic compression.

Thromboembolic outcomes are decreased with the use of a standardized venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis protocol for patients undergoing superficial venous procedures.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with venous insufficiency can be treated with ablation or phlebectomy, or both. Patients undergoing superficial venous procedures have an elevated risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). At our institution, we initiated a standardized protocol in which patients with a Caprini score (2005 version) of ≥8 are treated with 1 week of prophylactic anticoagulation after the procedure. Duplex ultrasound was performed at 1 week and then within 90 days after the procedure. This aim of the present study was to determine the thrombotic and clinical outcomes after superficial vein procedures using a standardized protocol for DVT/PE risk assessment and prophylaxis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of superficial vein procedures from 2015 to 2021 at a single center. The patient demographics, CEAP (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology) clinical class, venous clinical severity score, patient-reported outcomes, treatment type, Caprini scores, pre- and postoperative anticoagulation use, and outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics were used for the patient demographics, procedure details, and unadjusted surgical outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between procedure type and DVT and PE after adjusting for patient characteristics, disease severity, periprocedural anticoagulation, and Caprini score. RESULTS: A total of 1738 limbs were treated with ablation (n = 820), phlebectomy (n = 181), or ablation and phlebectomy (n = 737). More patients were women (67.1%) and White (90.9%). The overall incidence of DVT/PE was 1.4%. Patients undergoing ablation with phlebectomy had higher rates of DVT/PE (2.7%) than those undergoing ablation (0.2%) or phlebectomy alone (1.7%; P < .01). However, only 30% of DVTs were above the knee. On multivariate analysis, only the procedure type predicted for DVT/PE. However, patients undergoing ablation and phlebectomy achieved better patient-reported outcomes (Caprini score, 5.9) compared with those undergoing ablation (Caprini score, 7.2) or phlebectomy (Caprini score, 7.9) alone (P < .01). The best improvement in the venous clinical severity score was seen with phlebectomy alone. CONCLUSIONS: The expected difference in the DVT/PE rates between high- and low-risk groups did not materialize in our patients, perhaps secondary to the additional chemoprophylaxis prescribed for the high-risk cohort (Caprini score, ≥8). These results call for a randomized trial to assess the efficacy of a standardized protocol in the reduction of DVT/PE after superficial vein procedures.

The histone methyltransferase MLL1/KMT2A in monocytes drives coronavirus-associated coagulopathy and inflammation.

Coronavirus-associated coagulopathy (CAC) is a morbid and lethal sequela of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. CAC results from a perturbed balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis and occurs in conjunction with exaggerated activation of monocytes/macrophages (MO/Mφs), and the mechanisms that collectively govern this phenotype seen in CAC remain unclear. Here, using experimental models that use the murine betacoronavirus MHVA59, a well-established model of SARS-CoV-2 infection, we identify that the histone methyltransferase mixed lineage leukemia 1 (MLL1/KMT2A) is an important regulator of MO/Mφ expression of procoagulant and profibrinolytic factors such as tissue factor (F3; TF), urokinase (PLAU), and urokinase receptor (PLAUR) (herein, "coagulopathy-related factors") in noninfected and infected cells. We show that MLL1 concurrently promotes the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines while suppressing the expression of interferon alfa (IFN-α), a well-known inducer of TF and PLAUR. Using in vitro models, we identify MLL1-dependent NF-κB/RelA-mediated transcription of these coagulation-related factors and identify a context-dependent, MLL1-independent role for RelA in the expression of these factors in vivo. As functional correlates for these findings, we demonstrate that the inflammatory, procoagulant, and profibrinolytic phenotypes seen in vivo after coronavirus infection were MLL1-dependent despite blunted Ifna induction in MO/Mφs. Finally, in an analysis of SARS-CoV-2 positive human samples, we identify differential upregulation of MLL1 and coagulopathy-related factor expression and activity in CD14+ MO/Mφs relative to noninfected and healthy controls. We also observed elevated plasma PLAU and TF activity in COVID-positive samples. Collectively, these findings highlight an important role for MO/Mφ MLL1 in promoting CAC and inflammation.

Women benefit from endovenous ablation with fewer complications: Analysis of the Vascular Quality Initiative Varicose Vein Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between gender and long-term clinician-reported and patient-reported outcomes after endovenous ablation procedures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data from the Vascular Quality Initiative's Varicose Vein Registry included patients undergoing endovenous ablation procedures on truncal veins with or without treatment of perforating veins between 2015 and 2019. A univariate analysis included comparisons of preprocedural, postprocedural, and periprocedural change in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and total symptom score by gender. Rates of complications including deep vein thrombosis, endovenous heat-induced thrombosis, leg pigmentation, blistering, paresthesia, incisional infection, and any postprocedural complications were reported by gender. Multivariable analysis leveraged linear regression to examine how gender affected the relationships between patient characteristics, complication rates, and periprocedural change in VCSS score and total symptom score. RESULTS: Of 9743 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 3090 (31.7%) were men and 6653 (68.2%) were women. The perioperative change in VCSS score was greater for men than women (average -4.46 for men vs -4.13 for women; P < .0001). Perioperative change in total symptom score was greater for women than for men (average -10.64 for women vs -9.64 for men; P < .0001). Women had lower incidence of any leg complication (6.1% vs 8.6%; P = .001) endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (1.1% vs 2.2%; P = .002), and infection (0.4% vs 0.7%; P = .001). In multivariable analysis, among patients with a body mass index of more than 40, presence of deep reflux, and preoperative Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, and Physiologic classification of 2, women had a greater periprocedural change in VCSS score than men. CONCLUSIONS: Women benefited from endovenous ablation similarly as men, with a lower incidence of postprocedural complications. Gender may be useful for patient selection and counseling for endovenous ablation, with particular usefulness among patients with a high body mass index, presence of deep reflux, and preoperative Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, and Physiologic classification of 2.

Contemporary management and outcomes of peripheral venous aneurysms: A multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVE: Extremity venous aneurysms result in the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) and chronic venous insufficiency. At present, owing to the rarity of these aneurysms, no consensus for their treatment has been established. The purpose of the present study was to review the presentation, natural history, and contemporary management of extremity venous aneurysms. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multi-institutional review of all patients with extremity venous aneurysms treated from 2008 to 2018. A venous aneurysm was defined as saccular or fusiform with an aneurysm/vein ratio of >1.5. RESULTS: A total of 66 extremity aneurysms from 11 institutions were analyzed, 40 of which were in a popliteal location, 14 iliofemoral, and 12 in an upper extremity or a jugular location. The median follow-up was 27 months (range, 0-120 months). Of the 40 popliteal venous aneurysms, 8 (20%) had presented with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or PE, 13 (33%) had presented with pain, and 19 had been discovered incidentally. The mean size of the popliteal venous aneurysms presenting with DVT or PE was larger than that of those presenting without thromboembolism (3.8 cm vs 2.5 cm; P = .003). Saccular aneurysm morphology in the lower extremity was associated with thromboembolism (30% vs 9%; P = .046) and fusiform aneurysm morphology with a thrombus burden >25% (45% vs 3%). Patients presenting with thromboembolism were more likely to have had a thrombus burden >25% in their lower extremity venous aneurysm compared with those who had presented without thromboembolism (70% vs 9%). Approximately half of all the patients underwent immediate intervention, and half were managed with observation or antithrombotic regimen. In the non-operative cohort, three patients subsequently developed a DVT. Eight patients in the medically managed cohort went on to require surgical intervention. Of the 12 upper extremity venous aneurysms, none had presented with DVT or PE, and only 2 (17%) had presented with pain. Of the 66 patients in the entire cohort, 41 underwent surgical intervention. The most common indication was the absolute aneurysm size. Nine patients had undergone surgery because of a DVT or PE, and 11 for pain or extremity swelling. The most common surgery was aneurysmorrhaphy in 21 patients (53%), followed by excision and ligation in 14 patients (35%). Five patients (12%) had undergone interposition bypass grafting. A postoperative hematoma requiring reintervention was the most common complication, occurring in three popliteal vein repairs and one iliofemoral vein repair. None of the patients, treated either surgically or medically, had reported post-thrombotic complications during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Large lower extremity venous aneurysms and saccular aneurysms with thrombus >25% of the lumen are more likely to present with thromboembolic complications. Surgical intervention for lower extremity venous aneurysms is indicated to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the need for continued anticoagulation. Popliteal aneurysms >2.5 cm and all iliofemoral aneurysms should be considered for repair. Upper extremity aneurysms do not have a significant risk of VTE and warrant treatment primarily for symptoms other than VTE.

Treatment and contemporary outcomes associated with adjunct tourniquet use during phlebectomy of complex, voluminous truncular varicosities.

OBJECTIVE: Phlebectomy of large voluminous varicose veins comes with a risk of substantial blood loss. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the outcomes associated with the use of an adjunct tourniquet during varicose vein surgery of complex and large truncular varicosities. METHODS: The prospectively collected registry data included anatomic and outcomes details for patients who presented with complex and large truncular varicosities with a CEAP clinical class of C2, or higher (indicating more serious venous disease) from December 2014 to December 2021. Of all patients, those treated with an adjunct tourniquet for large complex varicosities (largest diameter varicosity ≥1 cm by visual inspection) were selected for analysis. The venous clinical severity scores (VCSSs) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were obtained. Additional parameters, including operative time, tourniquet time, and blood loss, were obtained retrospectively via a review of the medical records. Univariate descriptive statistics of the demographic and procedural data were performed pre- and postoperatively, with comparisons performed using the Student two-tailed t test. RESULTS: The data from 19 patients (22 limbs; 7 women and 12 men) were analyzed. Of the 22 limbs, 11 (50%) had advanced venous disease of C4 or higher preoperatively. A review of the preoperative duplex ultrasound scans confirmed the presence of large varicosities (average, 1.0 ± 0.54 cm; n = 18). All the limbs were treated using radiofrequency ablation of axial reflux and phlebectomy (a combination of powered and stab) under tourniquet control (82%) or phlebectomy under tourniquet control alone (18%). The average tourniquet time was 40 ± 12 minutes, with a median blood loss of 50 mL (interquartile range, 30-100 mL). The average follow-up was 332 ± 422 days after 19 procedures for 16 patients (2 patients moved out of state during the immediate postoperative period and 1 patient was lost to follow-up). Of the patients who completed >3 months of follow-up, 14 limbs experienced improvement in the CEAP class, 5 limbs had no change, and 3 were limbs of patients who moved or were lost to follow-up. The VCSSs significantly improved (8.8 ± 2.8 vs 3.9 ± 1.9; P < .0001). The PROs also improved significantly (16.1 ± 5.0 vs 2.2 ± 2.3; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Tourniquet use in the treatment of varicosities has only been described in the setting of high ligation and stripping. Our data suggest that in the modern era of minimally invasive endovenous treatment of axial reflux and phlebectomy, adjunct tourniquet use during the treatment of large complex varicosities can result in significant improvements in the VCSSs and PROs, with minimal blood loss.

Low to Moderate Risk Non-orthopedic Surgical Patients Do Not Benefit From VTE Chemoprophylaxis.

This retrospective cohort study analyzes venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence, morbidity, and mortality amongst postsurgical patients with and without VTE chemoprophylaxis within a quality collaborative. Postoperative thromboprophylaxis was broadly applied, yet was associated with no decrease in VTE, without affecting transfusion or mortality. Predictors of breakthrough VTE development despite evidence-based thromboprophylaxis are identified. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that a high rate of prescription of VTE chemoprophylaxis would be associated with decreased VTE incidence and mortality. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recommendations for VTE prevention in surgical patients include chemoprophylaxis based upon preoperative risk stratification. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed VTE incidence, morbidity, and mortality amongst postsurgical patients with and without VTE chemoprophylaxis between April 2013 and September 2017 from 63 hospitals within the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative. A VTE risk assessment survey was distributed to providers. Bivariate and multivariate comparisons were made, as well as using propensity score matched cohorts to determine if VTE chemoprophylaxis was associated with decreased VTE events. Hospitals were compared using risk-reliability adjusted VTE prophylaxis and postoperative VTE event rates. RESULTS: Within the registry, 80% of practitioners reported performing formal VTE risk assessment. Amongst 32,856 operations, there were 480 (1.46%) postoperative VTE, and an overall mortality of 609 (1.85%) patients. Using a propensity matched cohort, we found that rates of VTE were similar in those receiving unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin compared to those not receiving chemoprophylaxis (1.22 vs 1.13%, P = 0.57). When stratified further by VTE risk scoring, even the highest risk patients did not have an associated lower VTE rate (3.68 vs 4.22% P = 0.092). Postoperative transfusion (8.28 vs 7.50%, P = 0.057) and mortality (2.00% vs 1.62%, P = 0.064) rates were similar amongst those receiving and those not receiving chemoprophylaxis. No correlation was found between postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis application and hospital specific risk adjusted postoperative VTE rates. CONCLUSIONS: In modern day postsurgical care, VTE remains a significant occurrence, despite wide adoption of VTE risk assessment. Although postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis was broadly applied, after adjusting for confounders, no reduction in VTE was observed in at-risk surgical patients.

A narrative review on the epidemiology, prevention, and treatment of venous thromboembolic events in the context of chronic venous disease.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic venous disease (CVD) describes a spectrum of conditions associated with venous hypertension. The association between various CVD etiologies and the subsequent risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, is a topic of considerable clinical interest. The aims of the present review were to characterize the risk of VTE according to the CVD etiology and to determine the optimal anticoagulation strategy for the treatment or prevention of VTE in patients with CVD. METHODS: An extensive search of the available surgical and medical data was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar. We searched for the following terms and other related terms to identify relevant studies: CVD, chronic venous insufficiency, varicose veins, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), anticoagulation, venous thromboembolism, and venous disease scoring systems (eg, CEAP [clinical, etiology, anatomic, pathophysiology], Villalta, Ginsberg, venous clinical severity score). The identified studies included randomized control trials, retrospective and prospective observational studies, narrative and systematic reviews, case reports, and case series that contributed to the proposed aims. The ClinicalTrials.gov database was also queried to identify any relevant ongoing clinical trials. RESULTS: Congenital CVD carries a heightened risk of VTE, although few higher level studies are available to inform on this topic or on the appropriate anticoagulation strategies for these patients. Noncongenital CVD seems to carry a heightened risk of VTE, although few studies have adequately differentiated between primary and secondary etiologies. Varicose veins are a risk factor for primary VTE but might not be associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE. In the hospital setting, patients with varicosities should be provided thromboprophylaxis. In the setting of varicose vein intervention, high-risk patients should be identified using risk assessment models and receive thromboprophylaxis. The risk of recurrent VTE in the setting of PTS is unclear but indefinite anticoagulation is not currently indicated. For patients with PTS, residual vein thrombosis might be an indicator of when anticoagulation can be safely stopped, although practical limitations to its application exist. CONCLUSIONS: CVD is associated with an increased risk of VTE. Few studies have differentiated between classes of CVD using a standardized method and have assessed the efficacy of anticoagulation prophylaxis against or treatment of VTE. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimal therapy for preventing and treating VTE in patients with active concurrent CVD.

Antisense oligonucleotides and nucleic acids generate hypersensitive platelets.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the great promise for therapies using antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), their adverse effects, which include pro-inflammatory effects and thrombocytopenia, have limited their use. Previously, these effects have been linked to the phosphorothioate (PS) backbone necessary to prevent rapid ASO degradation in plasma. The main aim of this study was to assess the impact of the nucleic acid portion of an ASO-type drug on platelets and determine if it may contribute to thrombosis or thrombocytopenia. METHODS: Platelets were isolated from healthy donors and men with advanced prostate cancer. Effects of antisense oligonucleotides (ASO), oligonucleotides, gDNA, and microRNA on platelet activation and aggregation were evaluated. A mouse model of lung thrombosis was used to confirm the effects of PS-modified oligonucleotides in vivo. RESULTS: Platelet exposure to gDNA, miRNA, and oligonucleotides longer than 16-mer at a concentration above 8 mM resulted in the formation of hypersensitive platelets, characterized by an increased sensitivity to low-dose thrombin (0.1 nM) and increase in p-Selectin expression (6-8 fold greater than control; p < 0.001). The observed nucleic acid (NA) effects on platelets were toll-like receptor (TLR) -7 subfamily dependent. Injection of a p-Selectin inhibitor significantly (p = 0.02) reduced the formation of oligonucleotide-associated pulmonary microthrombosis in vivo. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that platelet exposure to nucleic acids independent of the presence of a PS modification leads to a generation of hypersensitive platelets and requires TLR-7 subfamily receptors. ASO studies conducted in cancer patients may benefit from testing the ASO effects on platelets ex vivo before initiation of patient treatment.

Closed plication is a safe and effective method for treating popliteal vein aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Popliteal vein aneurysms are a rare vascular anomaly first reported in the 1980s. Degeneration of elastic fibers and smooth muscle cell reduction, possibly secondary to inflammation, are implicated as integral steps in the development of these aneurysms. Given the rarity of this clinical entity, significant controversy exists regarding ideal treatment strategies, including the role of observation, medical management with anticoagulation, and surgical intervention. Retrospective reviews have demonstrated a failure rate of >40% with anticoagulation alone, with patients often presenting with pulmonary embolism. This has prompted our institutional preference for surgical management once the aneurysm is identified. Surgical management involves tangential repair with lateral venorrhaphy most commonly, followed in prevalence by aneurysm resection and end-to-end anastomosis either primarily or with vein interposition. Herein, we report our results with venous plications, through both closed and open techniques. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for 10 patients undergoing popliteal vein plication for treatment of popliteal vein aneurysms. Patient-level characteristics and operative details were examined from periprocedural and follow-up records. RESULTS: We identified 10 patients undergoing popliteal vein plication, including 9 closed plications and 1 open plication. The average aneurysm size at presentation was 2.35 ± 0.69 cm for closed plication and 4.74 cm for the one open plication. After treatment, the average popliteal vein size was significantly reduced to 1.12 ± 0.45 cm for the closed plications (P < .001 from preprocedural size) and 1.13 cm for the open plication with 100% primary patency. Average follow-up for patients treated with closed plication was 35.0 ± 25.2 months, during which seven (78%) patients had a stable, normal popliteal vein size. One patient with recurrence was diagnosed with Klippel-Trénaunay syndrome. The other had degeneration of the popliteal vein cranial to the previous repair at 39 months after the original operation that required additional plication. The open plication patient experienced a hematoma requiring washout and resulting in a transient peroneal mononeuropathy. There was one case of cellulitis after closed plication but no hematomas within this group. CONCLUSIONS: Closed plication demonstrated favorable primary patency rates and low recurrence rates, avoiding technical issues or need for early institution of systemic anticoagulation associated with tangential repair and venorrhaphy or resection methods. Closed plication represents an attractive option in patients without luminal thrombus to limit the risk of these postoperative complications and obviates the need for bypass conduit and postoperative anticoagulation.

Outcomes after truncal ablation with or without concomitant phlebectomy for isolated symptomatic varicose veins (C2 disease).

OBJECTIVE: Many insurance payers are hesitating to cover interventional treatments in patients with isolated symptomatic varicose veins. In this study, we sought to determine the outcomes of patients with varicose veins who were treated with venous ablation alone or ablation plus phlebectomy using the Vascular Quality Initiative Varicose Vein Registry. METHODS: Using data from the Varicose Vein Registry between January 2015 and March 2019, we investigated immediate postoperative as well as long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes among patients with documented symptomatic C2 disease undergoing truncal endovenous ablations alone and combined ablation and phlebectomy. Preprocedural and postprocedural comparisons were performed using t-test, χ2 test, or nonparametric tests when appropriate. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was performed on ordinal outcome variables. RESULTS: Among 3375 patients with symptomatic C2 disease, 40.1% of patients (1376) underwent isolated truncal ablation and 59.9% (1999) underwent ablation and phlebectomy. Complications overall were low (8.6%) and varied between 8.4% and 8.7% in patients undergoing ablation alone and ablation plus phlebectomy, respectively (P = .820). The most common complication noted was paresthesia, 3.4% overall, which occurred more commonly after ablation and phlebectomy (4.5%) than after ablation alone (1.3%; P < .001). An improvement in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) was experienced by 87.4% of patients; median change in VCSS was 4 points (interquartile range [IQR], 2-5 points), with an improvement of 3 points among patients undergoing ablation alone (IQR, 1-5 points) and 5 points among patients undergoing ablation and phlebectomy (IQR, 3-5 points; P < .001). An improvement in overall symptoms was experienced by 94.4% of patients (median improvement, 11 points; (maximum, 30 points), with more significant decreases among patients undergoing ablation and phlebectomy (median, 12 points; IQR, 8-17 points) compared with ablation alone (median, 9 points; IQR, 5-13 points; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with isolated symptomatic varicose veins (C2 disease), ablation and ablation with phlebectomy are safe and effective in improving both patient-reported outcomes and clinical severity (VCSS). Given these data, payers should continue to cover these treatments.

Comparison of unilateral vs bilateral and staged bilateral vs concurrent bilateral truncal endovenous ablation in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: Venous insufficiency is commonly bilateral, and patients often prefer single-episode care compared with staged procedures. Few studies have investigated clinical outcomes after unilateral vs bilateral venous ablation procedures or between staged and concurrent bilateral procedures. Here, we report data from the Vascular Quality Initiative regarding truncal venous ablation for chronic venous insufficiency. METHODS: Using data from the Vascular Quality Initiative, we investigated immediate postoperative as well as long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing unilateral vs bilateral truncal endovenous ablation from 2015 to 2019. We further investigated outcomes between staged bilateral and concurrent bilateral ablations. Preprocedural and postprocedural comparisons were performed using t-test, χ2 test, or their nonparametric counterpart when appropriate. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was performed on ordinal outcome variables. RESULTS: A total of 5029 patients were included, of whom 3782 (75.2%) underwent unilateral procedures. Median follow-up was 227 days (interquartile range [IQR], 55-788 days). Unilateral patients were less likely to be female (67.0% vs 70.3%; P = .031) and white (86.3% vs 91.2%; P < .001) and had lower body mass index (30.3 ± 7.3 kg/m2 vs 31.8 ± 7.6 kg/m2; P < .001) compared with patients undergoing bilateral procedures. In addition, unilateral patients had fewer prior varicose vein treatments (23.0% vs 15.7%; P < .001) and had higher median preprocedural Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS; 8 [IQR, 6-10] vs 7 [IQR, 5.5-9]; P < .001). No difference was seen in complications (6.9% vs 8.2%; P = .292), and systemic complications were rare in both groups. No difference was seen in VCSS improvement after treatment (median, 3 [IQR, 1-6] for unilateral; median, 3 [IQR 1-5] for bilateral; P = .055). In comparing staged with concurrent bilateral procedures, there was no difference in overall complications (7.5% vs 12.2%; P = .144). Staged bilateral patients were older (56.9 ± 13.3 years vs 54.2 ± 12.9 years; P = .002), less likely to have had prior varicose vein treatment (14.3% vs 19.8%; P = .020), and more likely to be therapeutically anticoagulated (10.8% vs 6.5%; P = .028) compared with concurrent bilateral patients. Staged patients also have higher preprocedural VCSS compared with concurrent patients (median, 8 [IQR, 6-10] vs 7 [IQR, 5.5-9]; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, there was no difference in the likelihood of VCSS improvement for concurrent compared with staged procedures (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.24; P = .226). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent bilateral truncal endovenous ablation can be performed safely without increased morbidity compared with staged bilateral or unilateral ablations.

Venous thrombosis epidemiology, pathophysiology, and anticoagulant therapies and trials in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.

OBJECTIVE: Infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus confers a risk of significant coagulopathy, with the resulting development of venous thromboembolism (VTE), potentially contributing to the morbidity and mortality. The purpose of the present review was to evaluate the potential mechanisms that contribute to this increased risk of coagulopathy and the role of anticoagulants in treatment. METHODS: A literature review of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and/or SARS-CoV-2 and cell-mediated inflammation, clinical coagulation abnormalities, hypercoagulability, pulmonary intravascular coagulopathy, and anticoagulation was performed. The National Clinical Trials database was queried for ongoing studies of anticoagulation and/or antithrombotic treatment or the incidence or prevalence of thrombotic events in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: The reported rate of VTE among critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 has been 21% to 69%. The phenomenon of breakthrough VTE, or the acute development of VTE despite adequate chemoprophylaxis or treatment dose anticoagulation, has been shown to occur with severe infection. The pathophysiology of overt hypercoagulability and the development of VTE is likely multifactorial, with evidence supporting the role of significant cell-mediated responses, including neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages, endothelialitis, cytokine release syndrome, and dysregulation of fibrinolysis. Collectively, this inflammatory process contributes to the severe pulmonary pathology experienced by patients with COVID-19. As the infection worsens, extreme D-dimer elevations, significant thrombocytopenia, decreasing fibrinogen, and prolongation of prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time occur, often associated with deep vein thrombosis, in situ pulmonary thrombi, and/or pulmonary embolism. A new phenomenon, termed pulmonary intravascular coagulopathy, has been associated with morbidity in patients with severe infection. Heparin, both unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin, have emerged as agents that can address the viral infection, inflammation, and thrombosis in this syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The overwhelming inflammatory response in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to a hypercoagulable state, microthrombosis, large vessel thrombosis, and, ultimately, death. Early VTE prophylaxis should be provided to all admitted patients. Therapeutic anticoagulation therapy might be beneficial for critically ill patients and is the focus of 39 ongoing trials. Close monitoring for thrombotic complications is imperative, and, if confirmed, early transition from prophylactic to therapeutic anticoagulation should be instituted. The interplay between inflammation and thrombosis has been shown to be a hallmark of the SARS-CoV-2 viral infection.

Effect of concomitant deep venous reflux on truncal endovenous ablation outcomes in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have investigated outcomes after truncal endovenous ablation in patients with combined deep and superficial reflux and no studies have evaluated patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: We investigated the short- and long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes among patients with and without deep venous reflux undergoing truncal endovenous ablation from 2015 to 2019 in the Vascular Quality Initiative. Preprocedural and postprocedural comparisons were performed using the t-test, χ2, or their nonparametric counterpart when appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess for confounding. RESULTS: A total of 4881 patients were included, of which 2254 (46.2%) had combined deep and superficial reflux. The median follow-up was 336.5 days. Patients with deep reflux were less likely to be female (65.9% vs 69.9%; P = .003), more likely to be Caucasian (90.2% vs 86.5%; P = .003) and had no difference in BMI (30.6 ± 7.5 vs 30.6 ± 7.2; P = .904). Additionally, no difference was seen in rates of prior varicose vein treatments, number of pregnancies, or history of deep venous thrombosis; however, patients without deep reflux were more likely to be on anticoagulation at the time of the procedure (10.9% vs 8.1%; P < .001). Patients without deep reflux had slightly higher median preprocedural Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) scores (8 [interquartile range (IQR), 6-10]) vs 7 [IQR, 6-10]; P = .005) as well as postprocedural VCSS scores (5 [IQR, 3-7] vs 4 [IQR, 2-6]; P < .001). The median change in VCSS from before to after the procedure was lower for patients without deep reflux (3 [IQR, 1.0-5.5] vs 3.5 [IQR, 1-6]; P = .006). Total symptom score was higher for patients without deep reflux both before (median, 14 [IQR, 10-19] vs median, 13.5 [IQR, 9.5-18]; P = .005) and postprocedurally (median, 4 [IQR, 1-9] vs median, 3.25 [IQR, 1-7]; P < .001), but no difference was seen in change in symptom score (median, 8 [IQR, 4-13] vs median, 9 [IQR, 4-13]; P = .172). Patients with deep reflux had substantially higher rates of complications (10.4% vs 3.0%; P < .001), with a particular increase in proximal thrombus extension (3.1% vs 1.1%; P < .001). After controlling for confounding, this estimate of effect size for any complication increased (odds ratio, 5.72; 95% confidence interval, 2.21-14.81; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference is seen in total symptom improvement when patients undergo truncal endovenous ablation with concomitant deep venous reflux, although a greater improvement was seen in VCSS score in these patients. Patients with deep venous reflux had a significantly increased rate of complications, independent of confounding variables, and should be counseled appropriately before the decision for treatment.

Practical diagnosis and treatment of suspected venous thromboembolism during COVID-19 pandemic.

A markedly increased demand for vascular ultrasound laboratory and other imaging studies in COVID-19-positive patients has occurred, due to most of these patients having a markedly elevated D-dimer and a presumed prothrombotic state in many of the very ill patients. In the present report, we have summarized a broad institutional consensus focusing on evaluation and recommended empirical therapy for COVID-19-positive patients. We recommend following the algorithms with the idea that as more data becomes available these algorithms may well change.