Recurrence Rate of Early Hepatitis C Virus Infection After Renal Transplantation Following Successful Treatment of Patients on Dialysis With Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents.

OBJECTIVES: Recurrence of hepatitis C virus after organ transplant has dreadful complications. An excellent response has been shown with direct-acting antiviral agents in transplant recipients. Although a sustained virological response is considered as the virological cure, it requires patients to be on dialysis for 3 months more before undergoing renal transplant, thus increasing the risk of hepatitis C virus reinfection and associated complications. We aimed to determine hepatitis C virus recurrence in renal transplant recipients who had achieved endof-treatment response before transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Per our institutional dialysis protocol, patients who do not achieve rapid virological response are treated with 6 months of direct-acting antiviral agents. All patients who achieve end-of-treatment response are then referred for renal transplant. Our study included kidney transplant recipients who were treated with directacting antiviral agents and had a hepatitis C virus polymerase chain reaction test 3 months after renal transplant. We obtained demographic and clinical data of patients and used SPSS version 20.0 for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Our study included 48 transplant recipients; most were males (81.1%) with mean age of 28.7 ± 9.4 years. All patients received sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, and ribavirin combination before transplant. Most patients (70%) received treatment for 3 months. The polymerase chain reaction test for hepatitis C virus was conducted after a mean of 8.3 ± 3.3 months posttransplant. Laboratory parameters showed total bilirubin of 3.6 ± 17.5 mg/day, alanine aminotransferase of 51.5 ± 80.2 IU/L, and gammaglutamyltransferase of 133.9 ± 220 IU/L. Two recipients (4.2%) had posttransplant recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study is the first to document excellent response of direct-acting antivirals in renal transplant recipients who had been referred early for transplant. Thus, dialysis patients can undergo transplant after achieving end-oftreatment response.

Screening for viral hepatitis prior to rituximab chemotherapy.

In 2008, the CDC published guidelines recommending screening of all persons undergoing treatment with rituximab to identify persons at risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. We evaluated implementation of this recommendation in veterans, who are at increased risk of HBV, and determined characteristics of those screened. We also evaluated a control setting, rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening among the same rituximab-treated patients. There are no guidelines that recommend HCV screening prior to initiation of rituximab. Medical records of patients receiving rituximab between January 2006 and December 2012 were reviewed according to two time periods: 2006-2008 (period 1, pre-guidelines) and 2009-2012 (period 2, post-guidelines). Patient demographics, concomitant chemotherapy regimen (protocol, dose, duration), treatment indication, risk factors for hepatitis infection (substance abuse, homelessness, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)), and HBV/HCV screening status were documented. During the study period, 102 patients were treated with rituximab (49 in period 1 and 53 in period 2). During periods 1 and 2, 22 and 32 % of rituximab-treated patients were screened for HBV, respectively (p = 0.375). Treatment during 2009 was the only significant predictor of HBV screening in the adjusted model (p = 0.01). For HCV during periods 1 and 2, 22 and 21 % of patients were screened, respectively (p = 1.00). There were no significant predictors of HCV screening. Rates of screening for HBV among rituximab-treated patients were low, both before and after dissemination of guidelines recommending universal HBV screening of rituximab-treated patients.

Circadian function in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

This study aimed to evaluate whether patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer experience disrupted rest-activity daily rhythms, poor sleep quality, weakness, and maintain attributes that are linked to circadian function such as fatigue. This report describes the rest-activity patterns of 33 non-small-cell lung cancer patients who participated in a randomised clinical trial evaluating the benefits of melatonin. Data are reported on circadian function, health-related quality of life (QoL), subjective sleep quality, and anxiety/depression levels prior to randomisation and treatment. Actigraphy data, an objective measure of circadian function, demonstrated that patients' rest-activity circadian function differs significantly from control subjects. Our patients reported poor sleep quality and high levels of fatigue. Ferrans and Powers QoL Index instrument found a high level of dissatisfaction with health-related QoL. Data from the European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer reported poor capacity to fulfil the activities of daily living. Patients studied in the hospital during or near chemotherapy had significantly more abnormal circadian function than those studied in the ambulatory setting. Our data indicate that measurement of circadian sleep/activity dynamics should be accomplished in the outpatient/home setting for a minimum of 4-7 circadian cycles to assure that they are most representative of the patients' true condition. We conclude that the daily sleep/activity patterns of patients with advanced lung cancer are disturbed. These are accompanied by marked disruption of QoL and function. These data argue for investigating how much of this poor functioning and QoL are actually caused by this circadian disruption, and, whether behavioural, light-based, and or pharmacologic strategies to correct the circadian/sleep activity patterns can improve function and QoL.