Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Chemosphere ; 312(Pt 1): 137210, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36368544

RESUMEN

Manure is widely used as a fertilizer and applied to agricultural land. It may contain highly active chemicals like veterinary medicinal products or biocides, which enter into the environment by this pathway. This is recognized by several regulatory frameworks, however, a detailed method for examining the transformation of chemicals in manure was lacking. This article describes the validation of a method for studying the anaerobic transformation of chemicals in pig and cattle liquid manure. Different steps are covered with an emphasis on the validation ring test and the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) process that led to the recent adoption of the method as OECD Test Guideline (TG) 320.


Asunto(s)
Estiércol , Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico , Animales , Bovinos , Porcinos , Anaerobiosis , Fertilizantes , Agricultura
2.
ALTEX ; 38(1): 20-32, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32970822

RESUMEN

Information about acute fish toxicity is routinely required in many jurisdictions for environmental risk assessment of chem­icals. This information is typically obtained using a 96-hour juvenile fish test for lethality according to OECD test guideline (TG) 203 or equivalent regional guidelines. However, TG 203 has never been validated using the criteria currently required for new test methods including alternative methods. Characterization of the practicality and validity of TG 203 is important to provide a benchmark for alternative methods. This contribution systematically summarizes the available knowledge on limitations and uncertainties of TG 203, based on methodological, statistical, and biological consider­ations. Uncertainties stem from the historic flexibility (e.g., use of a broad range of species) and constraints of the basic test design (e.g., no replication). Other sources of uncertainty arise from environmental safety extrapolation based on TG 203 data. Environmental extrapolation models, combined with data from alternative methods, including mechanistic indicators of toxicity, may provide at least the same level of environmental protection. Yet, most importantly, the 3R advan­tages of alternative methods allow a better standardization, characterization, and an improved basic study design. This can enhance data reliability and thus facilitate the comparison of chemical toxicity, as well as the environmental classifi­cations and prediction of no-effect concentrations of chemicals. Combined with the 3R gains and the potential for higher throughput, a reliable assessment of more chemicals can be achieved, leading to improved environmental protection.


Asunto(s)
Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales/métodos , Pruebas de Toxicidad/métodos , Pruebas de Toxicidad/normas , Animales , Peces , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
3.
Environ Int ; 99: 97-106, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27939949

RESUMEN

The exposome encompasses an individual's exposure to exogenous chemicals, as well as endogenous chemicals that are produced or altered in response to external stressors. While the exposome concept has been established for human health, its principles can be extended to include broader ecological issues. The assessment of exposure is tightly interlinked with hazard assessment. Here, we explore if mechanistic understanding of the causal links between exposure and adverse effects on human health and the environment can be improved by integrating the exposome approach with the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) concept that structures and organizes the sequence of biological events from an initial molecular interaction of a chemical with a biological target to an adverse outcome. Complementing exposome research with the AOP concept may facilitate a mechanistic understanding of stress-induced adverse effects, examine the relative contributions from various components of the exposome, determine the primary risk drivers in complex mixtures, and promote an integrative assessment of chemical risks for both human and environmental health.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Contaminantes Ambientales/toxicidad , Animales , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo
4.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 69(3): 496-511, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24874798

RESUMEN

The OECD validation study of the zebrafish embryo acute toxicity test (ZFET) for acute aquatic toxicity testing evaluated the ZFET reproducibility by testing 20 chemicals at 5 different concentrations in 3 independent runs in at least 3 laboratories. Stock solutions and test concentrations were analytically confirmed for 11 chemicals. Newly fertilised zebrafish eggs (20/concentration and control) were exposed for 96h to chemicals. Four apical endpoints were recorded daily as indicators of acute lethality: coagulation of the embryo, lack of somite formation, non-detachment of the tail bud from the yolk sac and lack of heartbeat. Results (LC50 values for 48/96h exposure) show that the ZFET is a robust method with a good intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility (CV<30%) for most chemicals and laboratories. The reproducibility was lower (CV>30%) for some very toxic or volatile chemicals, and chemicals tested close to their limit of solubility. The ZFET is now available as OECD Test Guideline 236. Considering the high predictive capacity of the ZFET demonstrated by Belanger et al. (2013) in their retrospective analysis of acute fish toxicity and fish embryo acute toxicity data, the ZFET is ready to be considered for acute fish toxicity for regulatory purposes.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Toxicidad Aguda/métodos , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/toxicidad , Animales , Laboratorios , Dosificación Letal Mediana , Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Pez Cebra
5.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 67(3): 506-30, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24161465

RESUMEN

Tests with vertebrates are an integral part of environmental hazard identification and risk assessment of chemicals, plant protection products, pharmaceuticals, biocides, feed additives and effluents. These tests raise ethical and economic concerns and are considered as inappropriate for assessing all of the substances and effluents that require regulatory testing. Hence, there is a strong demand for replacement, reduction and refinement strategies and methods. However, until now alternative approaches have only rarely been used in regulatory settings. This review provides an overview on current regulations of chemicals and the requirements for animal tests in environmental hazard and risk assessment. It aims to highlight the potential areas for alternative approaches in environmental hazard identification and risk assessment. Perspectives and limitations of alternative approaches to animal tests using vertebrates in environmental toxicology, i.e. mainly fish and amphibians, are discussed. Free access to existing (proprietary) animal test data, availability of validated alternative methods and a practical implementation of conceptual approaches such as the Adverse Outcome Pathways and Integrated Testing Strategies were identified as major requirements towards the successful development and implementation of alternative approaches. Although this article focusses on European regulations, its considerations and conclusions are of global relevance.


Asunto(s)
Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales , Contaminantes Ambientales/toxicidad , Sustancias Peligrosas/toxicidad , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales/métodos , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales/tendencias , Animales , Contaminantes Ambientales/química , Unión Europea , Regulación Gubernamental , Guías como Asunto , Sustancias Peligrosas/química , Proyectos de Investigación , Medición de Riesgo
6.
Toxicol Lett ; 223(3): 306-9, 2013 Dec 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23500481

RESUMEN

A discussion paper was developed by a panel of experts of the German Federal Environment Agency (UBA) contributing to the on-going debate on the identification, assessment and management of endocrine disruptors with a view to protect wildlife according to the EU substance legislation (plant protection products, biocides, industrial chemicals). Based on a critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art regarding regulatory requirements, testing methods, assessment schemes, decision-making criteria and risk management options, we advise an appropriate and consistent implementation of this important subject into existing chemicals legislation in Europe. Our proposal for a balanced risk management of endocrine disruptors essentially advocates transparent regulatory decision making based on a scientifically robust weight of evidence approach and an adequate risk management consistent across different legislations. With respect to the latter, a more explicit consideration of the principle of proportionality of regulatory decision making and socio-economic benefits in the on-going debate is further encouraged.


Asunto(s)
Animales Salvajes , Ecotoxicología/métodos , Disruptores Endocrinos/toxicidad , Contaminantes Ambientales/toxicidad , Plaguicidas/toxicidad , Animales , Ecotoxicología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Ecotoxicología/tendencias , Disruptores Endocrinos/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Contaminantes Ambientales/análisis , Contaminación Ambiental/prevención & control , Unión Europea , Alemania , Agencias Gubernamentales , Guías como Asunto , Legislación de Medicamentos , Plaguicidas/análisis , Plaguicidas/normas , Medición de Riesgo , Gestión de Riesgos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...