Risk factors of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy and central retinal artery occlusion.

AIM: To investigate the difference in risk factors between non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) and central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) and develop a predictive diagnostic nomogram. METHODS: The study included 37 patients with monocular NAION, 20 with monocular CRAO, and 24 with hypertension. Gender, age, and systemic diseases were recorded. Blood routine, lipids, hemorheology, carotid and brachial artery doppler ultrasound, and echocardiography were collected. The optic disc area, cup area, and cup-to-disc ratio (C/D) of the unaffected eye in the NAION and CRAO group and the right eye in the hypertension group were measured. RESULTS: The carotid artery intimal medial thickness (C-IMT) of the affected side of the CRAO group was thicker (P=0.039) and its flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was lower (P=0.049) than the NAION group. Compared with hypertension patients, NAION patients had higher whole blood reduced viscosity low-shear (WBRV-L) and erythrocyte aggregation index (EAI; P=0.045, 0.037), and CRAO patients had higher index of rigidity of erythrocyte (IR) and erythrocyte deformation index (EDI; P=0.004, 0.001). The optic cup and the C/D of the NAION group were smaller than the other two groups (P<0.0001). The diagnostic prediction model showed high diagnostic specificity (83.7%) and sensitivity (85.6%), which was highly related to hypertension, the C-IMT of the affected side, FMD, platelet (PLT), EAI, and C/D. CONCLUSION: CRAO patients show thicker C-IMT and worse endothelial function than NAION. NAION and CRAO may be related to abnormal hemorheology. A small cup and small C/D may be involved in NAION. The diagnostic nomogram can be used to preliminarily identify NAION and CRAO.

Risk factors for persistent epiphora following successful canalicular laceration repair.

AIM: To identify the risk factors of epiphora in patients with anatomical patency after surgical repair of canalicular laceration. METHODS: This retrospective case series included 178 cases of canalicular laceration repair from 2005 to 2012. Demographic data collected from each patient included age, sex, type of injury, distance from the distal lacerated end of the canaliculus to the punctum, the severity score for the structural abnormity of the medial canthus, the duration of stent placement, and the timing of surgery. The risk factors for epiphora were evaluated using Logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among the 178 cases, 45 (25.3%) with lacrimal patency after irrigation had symptomatic epiphora at the final follow-up. Patients' sex, age, type of injury, duration of stent placement, timing of surgery, and concurrent trauma were not found to be significantly associated with symptomatic epiphora after surgical repair of the lacerated canaliculus (P>0.05). A distance of more than 5 mm from the distal cut end to the punctum was closely and significantly associated with symptomatic epiphora after surgical repair of the lacerated canaliculus (P<0.01). Symptomatic epiphora was significantly more frequent in patients with higher severity scores for structural abnormities of the medial canthus (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the risk factors for postoperative symptomatic epiphora include a further distance between the distal cut end and the lacrimal punctum and a higher severity score for structural abnormities of the medial canthus. These findings could be used to prognosticate postoperative symptomatic epiphora.