Exploring the role of FBXO5 in gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common lethal malignancies in the world, especially in China. Due to the ineffective screening of early gastric cancer and drug resistance of the advanced, the prognosis of gastric cancer remains dismal. Based on bioinformatics and tissue microarray analyses, FBXO5 was selected for analysis in this study. Here, we report the function of FBXO5 in gastric cancer, showing for the first time that it contributes to tumor cell proliferation, clone formation, invasion and migration. In these preliminary findings, FBXO5 promoted the transition of the cell cycle from the G0/G1 to the G2/M phase, which likely resulted from FBXO5 interacting with CDK1 and NCAPG proteins. The relevant mechanism needs to be explored. In addition, FBXO5 participated in the tumor microenvironment and was negatively related to immune activation. FBXO5, an oncogene, plays a role in tumor initiation and progression, and is expected to be a potential target for gastric cancer treatment.

Targeting UBE2T Potentiates Gemcitabine Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer by Regulating Pyrimidine Metabolism and Replication Stress.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although small patient subsets benefit from current targeted strategies or immunotherapy, gemcitabine remains the first-line drug for pancreatic cancer (PC) treatment. However, gemcitabine resistance is widespread and compromises long-term survival. Here, we identified ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2T (UBE2T) as a potential therapeutic target to combat gemcitabine resistance in PC. METHODS: Proteomics and metabolomics were combined to examine the effect of UBE2T on pyrimidine metabolism remodeling. Spontaneous PC mice (LSL-KrasG12D/+, LSL-Trp53R172H/+, Pdx1-Cre; KPC) with Ube2t-conditional knockout, organoids, and large-scale clinical samples were used to determine the effect of UBE2T on gemcitabine efficacy. Organoids, patient-derived xenografts (PDX), and KPC mice were used to examine the efficacy of the combination of a UBE2T inhibitor and gemcitabine. RESULTS: Spontaneous PC mice with Ube2t deletion had a marked survival advantage after gemcitabine treatment, and UBE2T levels were positively correlated with gemcitabine resistance in clinical patients. Mechanistically, UBE2T catalyzes ring finger protein 1 (RING1)-mediated ubiquitination of p53 and relieves the transcriptional repression of ribonucleotide reductase subunits M1 and M2, resulting in unrestrained pyrimidine biosynthesis and alleviation of replication stress. Additionally, high-throughput compound library screening using organoids identified pentagalloylglucose (PGG) as a potent UBE2T inhibitor and gemcitabine sensitizer. The combination of gemcitabine and PGG diminished tumor growth in PDX models and prolonged long-term survival in spontaneous PC mice. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, UBE2T-mediated p53 degradation confers PC gemcitabine resistance by promoting pyrimidine biosynthesis and alleviating replication stress. This study offers an opportunity to improve PC survival by targeting UBE2T and develop a promising gemcitabine sensitizer in clinical translation setting.

The role of long non-coding RNA FGD5-AS1 in cancer.

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) refers to a class of RNAs that have at least 200 nucleotides and do not encode proteins, and the relationship between lncRNA and cancer has recently attracted considerable research attention. The lncRNA FGD5-AS1 is a newly discovered lncRNA with a length of 3772 nucleotides. Studies have found that FGD5-AS1 is abnormally highly expressed in many cancer tissues and was closely related to the lymph node metastasis, tumor invasion, survival time, and recurrence rate of various cancers. Mechanistic analyses show that FGD5-AS1 can stabilize mRNA expression by sponging miRNA, which not only induces cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, invasion, and chemoresistance in vitro, but also promotes tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. In addition, FGD5-AS1 can serve as a diagnostic or prognostic marker for a variety of cancers. This review demonstrates the clinical significance of FGD5-AS1 in human cancer and its role in tumorigenesis and tumor progression.

The significance of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in the prediction of lymph node metastasis and prognosis in locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to investigate the preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the diagnosis of positive lymph node metastasis (LNM), and to evaluated the relationship between CEA and survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). METHODS: The significance of the preoperative serum CEA level for the diagnose of LAGC and prediction of LNM was determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The areas under the ROC of CEA were compared with those of other tumor markers or imaging examination including CT and MRI. Logistic regression was utilized to identify the risk factors predicting positive LNM. Independent prognosis factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses. RESULTS: The ROC curves showed that the AUCs of CEA, CA199, and CA125 for diagnosing LAGC were 0.727, 0.594, and 0.566. When used to predict LNM, the AUC of CEA, CA199 and CA125 were 0.696, 0.531, and 0.588. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that preoperative serum CEA were significantly associated with positive LNM. On combining imaging examination with CEA, the sensitivity and specificity were 85.3 and 79.4%, respectively, with the AUC equal to 0.853. The combination of CEA and imaging examination preformed the highest levels of AUC and sensitivity for diagnosing LNM, which is significantly higher than using either of them alone. Although patients with abnormal CEA have a poor prognosis, two models of multivariate analysis showed that CEA was not the independent prognosis factor for survival. CONCLUSIONS: CEA can be used to diagnose gastric cancer and determine whether it has LNM. Moreover, combined with CEA could improve the diagnostic sensitivity of imaging examination for lymph node involvement.

Primary synovial sarcoma of the duodenal bulb: a case report and review of the literature.

Primary synovial sarcoma of the duodenal bulb is a rare mesenchymal tumor with special morphological features. It usually originates from the major joints or tendon sheaths of the extremities and mostly seen in young population, but rarely found in gastrointestinal tract. In this manuscript, we reported the first case of synovial sarcoma arising between the intestinal wall of the duodenal bulb with a concomitant SYT/SSX type of the t(X;18) translocation. A 49-year-old male presented to our hospital with a 2-month history of upper abdominal pain along with a 4-day amply jaundice. Tumor marker testing showed only a slight increase of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). A computed tomography scan of his abdomen showed that indeterminate tissue occupied the duodenal bulb wall, compressed the surrounding tissues, and measured roughly 5.0 cm × 7.7 cm × 8.7 cm. Since the sarcoma grows between the intestinal wall, which cannot be detected by endoscopy, an initial diagnosis of duodenal wall stromal tumor was made at that time. Postoperative Immunohistochemistry results showed that the tumor was positive for the expression of transducin-like enhancer of split 1, B-cell lymphoma 2, and Vimentin. These pathological findings were indicative of the diagnosis of synovial sarcoma, but still did not provide sufficient diagnostic evidence. Finally we confirmed the diagnosis by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with detection of the t(X;18) (SYT-SSX) translocation. No such lesions were found on preoperative examination, so a diagnosis of primary duodenal synovial sarcoma was made. After literature review, we found four reports of duodenal synovial sarcomas, all of which could be detected endoscopically, but there were no results of long-term follow-up. This case is the first reported case of synovial sarcoma arising between the intestinal walls of the duodenal bulb treated twice with ifosfamide and followed up for 13 months without recurrence.

Docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (FLOT) as preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy compared with surgery followed by chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-based analysis.

Introduction: Docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (FLOT) may improve overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC); however, evidence for its use as a standard treatment has not been established in China. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of the FLOT regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Chinese patients with resectable LAGC. Methods: We conducted an observational study to compare the effectiveness of FLOT regimen consisting of docetaxel (60 mg/m2), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2), leucovorin (200 mg/m2), and 5-fluorouracil (2,600 mg/m2 as a 24 hr infusion), all given on day 1 and administered every 2 weeks versus initial surgery followed by chemotherapy in patients with clinical T3-4 LAGC. OS was compared by using the Cox proportional hazards regression model and the Kaplan-Meier curve adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. In addition, we performed subgroup analyses to determine the effectiveness of the FLOT regimen in clinically relevant patient subsets. Results: Overall, 47 patients who received initial FLOT chemotherapy and 269 patients who received initial surgery were enrolled in this study. In the PSM analysis, the FLOT-first group showed favorable OS compared with the surgery-first group (41 vs 41 [HR, 0.416; 95% CI, 0.218-0.794; P=0.008]), and 3-year survival rates were 58.7% and 30.9% in the FLOT-first group and surgery-first group, respectively. IPTW analysis showed similar results. However, the effect of FLOT was low (HR, 0.868; 95 CI%, 0.215-3.504) in patients without lymph node metastasis. Conclusion: Our study suggests that preoperative FLOT chemotherapy is safe and feasible. In terms of OS, FLOT may be superior to initial surgery followed by chemotherapy in reducing morbidity with resectable LAGC.

[Research advance in gastric neuroendocrine tumors].

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors are rarely seen in the gastric tumors, because there are few case reports and the clinical diagnosis rate is low. There is no consensus treatment method in the world. However, with the benefit of esophagogastrodenoscopy and widespread use of proton pump inhibitors, the diagnostic rate of gastric neuroendocrine tumors is on the increase, which gives us an updated understanding for the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of the disease. By studying its pathogenesis, scholars have found that hypergastrinemia caused by various causes is closely related to its occurrence. Gastric neuroendocrine tumors are classified into different types or pathological grades depending on the state of progression of the disease and the unique clinical manifestations. Clinically used diagnostic methods include gastroscopy, medical imageology, nuclear medicine, gastrin, CgA, etc. There are also differences in treatments depending on the clinical classification. If the disease progresses rapidly and the grade is high, surgical resection of the lesion plus postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy should be actively performed. Other better treatments are still being explored.

[Progress in study on the treatment of gastric cancer with docetaxel].

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant gastrointestinal tumors. Docetaxel alone or combination with other drugs can attenuate the progress of disease, prolong the overall response rate and the median overall survival rate in advanced gastric cancer. However, the incidence of toxicities is high. Moreover, there is no uniform standard for dosage and course for docetaxel treatment. Currently, its efficacy is not definite.

Pharmacokinetics of the combined preparation of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide on Chinese healthy volunteers.

The aim of the present study, performed on two different groups of volunteers, is to characterize the pharmacokinetics of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide combined tablet. After administration of high, medium and low doses of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide combined tablets, AUC and C(max) of two compounds both increase significantly with increase of dose. Neither normalized AUC/Dose nor C(max)/Dose has significant difference between every two tested dose groups. The similar results can be observed as for the parameters of t(max). Lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide are both eliminated with linear characteristics. After repeated administration of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide combined tablets, AUC, C(max) and C(min) of lisinopril in the steady state increase. AUC and C(min) increase significantly. As for hydrochlorothiazide, AUC, C(max), C(min), and t(max) also increase in steady state. AUC and C(min) increase significantly. Administered with the test medication, lisinopril has an fluctuation index (FI) value of 2.29 and reaches a relative steady concentration. But hydrochlorothiazide has an FI value of 4.09 with relatively large fluctuating concentrations.

Inhibition of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in guinea pig kidney by three bioflavonoids and their interactions with gossypol.

AIM: To study the effects of some bioflavonoids on the gossypol-induced hypokalemia. METHODS: The 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11beta-OHSD) protein was prepared from guinea pig kidney. The activity of 11beta-OHSD with NAD as the coenzyme was measured by HPLC. The drug interaction was analysed by isobolographic method. RESULTS: The 11beta-OHSD can be inhibited by some bioflavonoids. The IC50 (95 % confidence limits) values were: quercetin 164 (79 - 341) micromol/L, morin 913 (385 - 2173) micromol/L, and naringenin 2193 (1114 - 4315) micromol/L. When the 11beta-OHSD was treated with quercetin, tangeretin, morin, naringenin plus gossypol, the combination index (CI) values were 0.92, 0.85, 0.98, and 1.01 respectively. CONCLUSION: The interaction of some bioflavonoids with gossypol might be one of the factors for gossypol-induced hypokalemia.