Influence of Socioeconomic Gender Inequality on Sex Disparities in Prevention and Outcome of Cardiovascular Disease: Data From a Nationwide Population Cohort in China.

Background Knowledge gaps remain in how gender-related socioeconomic inequality affects sex disparities in cardiovascular diseases (CVD) prevention and outcome. Methods and Results Based on a nationwide population cohort, we enrolled 3 737 036 residents aged 35 to 75 years (2014-2021). Age-standardized sex differences and the effect of gender-related socioeconomic inequality (Gender Inequality Index) on sex disparities were explored in 9 CVD prevention indicators. Compared with men, women had seemingly better primary prevention (aspirin usage: relative risk [RR], 1.24 [95% CI, 1.18-1.31] and statin usage: RR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.39-1.57]); however, women's status became insignificant or even worse when adjusted for metabolic factors. In secondary prevention, the sex disparities in usage of aspirin (RR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.63-0.68]) and statin (RR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.61-0.66]) were explicitly larger than disparities in usage of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (RR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.91]) or ß blockers (RR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.63-0.71]). Nevertheless, women had better hypertension awareness (RR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.09-1.10]), similar hypertension control (RR, 1.01 [95% CI, 1.00-1.02]), and lower CVD mortality (hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.45-0.47]). Heterogeneities of sex disparities existed across all subgroups. Significant correlations existed between regional Gender Inequality Index values and sex disparities in usage of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (Spearman correlation coefficient, r=-0.57, P=0.0013), hypertension control (r=-0.62, P=0.0007), and CVD mortality (r=0.45, P=0.014), which remained significant after adjusting for economic factors. Conclusions Notable sex disparities remain in CVD prevention and outcomes, with large subgroup heterogeneities. Gendered socioeconomic factors could reinforce such disparities. A sex-specific perspective factoring in socioeconomic disadvantages could facilitate more targeted prevention policy making.

Cardiovascular disease prevention and mortality across 1 million urban populations in China: data from a nationwide population-based study.

BACKGROUND: China has been undergoing a rapid urbanisation. There are substantial disparities between old and new urban citizens in access to health care. We aimed to compare cardiovascular disease prevention and death risks among four distinct urban groups. METHODS: Urban residents aged 35-75 years living in 96 prefecture-level cities from 31 provinces in mainland China were enrolled in the national population-based cohort China Patient-centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events Million Persons Project. They were categorised into four groups by their former and current places of residence as follows: old-urban in situ residents (local residents in established urban areas since birth), new-urban in situ residents (local residents in newly urbanised areas established during urbanisation), urban-to-urban migrants (migrants from other urban areas), and rural-to-urban migrants (migrants from rural areas). We excluded participants with missing data for former and current places of residence, medical history, socioeconomic status, or lifestyle information. After adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, relative risks (RRs) of cardiovascular disease prevention indicators and hazard ratios (HRs) of cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality of the other three population groups were estimated by modified log-Poisson models with robust standard error and Cox proportional hazard models, with old-urban in situ residents as the reference group. FINDINGS: From Sept 1, 2015, to Aug 17, 2020, 1 339 329 residents were enrolled, 270 606 were excluded for missing data in key variables, and 1 068 723 were subsequnetly included in the study. Compared with old-urban in situ residents, new-urban in situ residents were less likely to adhere to a healthy diet (RR 0·72 [95% CI 0·62-0·83]), while no significant results were observed in rural-to-urban migrants; new-urban in situ residents were less likely to use statins as primary prevention (RR 0·60 [0·46-0·79]), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs; RR 0·78 [0·65-0·93]) and ß-blockers (RR 0·68 [0·53-0·88]) as secondary prevention; and rural-to-urban migrants were less likely to use aspirin as a primary (RR 0·67 [0·46-0·96]) and secondary (RR 0·71 [0·54-0·94]) prevention and statins (RR 0·70 [0·51-0·97]) and ACEIs or ARBs (RR 0·68 [0·50-0·93]) as secondary prevention. Furthermore, in people diagnosed with hypertension, new-urban in situ residents were less likely to have their blood pressure controlled (RR 0·79 [95% CI 0·72-0·87]), while no significant results were observed in rural-to-urban migrants. New-urban in situ residents had higher risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR 1·16 [95% CI 1·05-1·29]; p=0·005) than did old-urban in situ residents, after a median follow-up of 2·7 years (IQR 2·0-4·2). INTERPRETATION: New-urban in situ residents and rural-to-urban migrants both showed poorer utilisation of primary and secondary prevention medications than did old-urban in situ residents, while new-urban in situ residents also had lower adherence to healthy lifestyles and higher death risks. Comprehensive measures should be taken to strengthen the primary health-care system in newly urbanised areas, and promote interprovincial medical insurance reimbursement. FUNDING: Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Science and the National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.