Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neuropsychopharmacology: Update 2017.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is the quantification and interpretation of drug concentrations in blood to optimize pharmacotherapy. It considers the interindividual variability of pharmacokinetics and thus enables personalized pharmacotherapy. In psychiatry and neurology, patient populations that may particularly benefit from TDM are children and adolescents, pregnant women, elderly patients, individuals with intellectual disabilities, patients with substance abuse disorders, forensic psychiatric patients or patients with known or suspected pharmacokinetic abnormalities. Non-response at therapeutic doses, uncertain drug adherence, suboptimal tolerability, or pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are typical indications for TDM. However, the potential benefits of TDM to optimize pharmacotherapy can only be obtained if the method is adequately integrated in the clinical treatment process. To supply treating physicians and laboratories with valid information on TDM, the TDM task force of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP) issued their first guidelines for TDM in psychiatry in 2004. After an update in 2011, it was time for the next update. Following the new guidelines holds the potential to improve neuropsychopharmacotherapy, accelerate the recovery of many patients, and reduce health care costs.

AGNP consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatry: update 2011.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), i. e., the quantification of serum or plasma concentrations of medications for dose optimization, has proven a valuable tool for the patient-matched psychopharmacotherapy. Uncertain drug adherence, suboptimal tolerability, non-response at therapeutic doses, or pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are typical situations when measurement of medication concentrations is helpful. Patient populations that may predominantly benefit from TDM in psychiatry are children, pregnant women, elderly patients, individuals with intelligence disabilities, forensic patients, patients with known or suspected genetically determined pharmacokinetic abnormalities or individuals with pharmacokinetically relevant comorbidities. However, the potential benefits of TDM for optimization of pharmacotherapy can only be obtained if the method is adequately integrated into the clinical treatment process. To promote an appropriate use of TDM, the TDM expert group of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP) issued guidelines for TDM in psychiatry in 2004. Since then, knowledge has advanced significantly, and new psychopharmacologic agents have been introduced that are also candidates for TDM. Therefore the TDM consensus guidelines were updated and extended to 128 neuropsychiatric drugs. 4 levels of recommendation for using TDM were defined ranging from "strongly recommended" to "potentially useful". Evidence-based "therapeutic reference ranges" and "dose related reference ranges" were elaborated after an extensive literature search and a structured internal review process. A "laboratory alert level" was introduced, i. e., a plasma level at or above which the laboratory should immediately inform the treating physician. Supportive information such as cytochrome P450 substrate and inhibitor properties of medications, normal ranges of ratios of concentrations of drug metabolite to parent drug and recommendations for the interpretative services are given. Recommendations when to combine TDM with pharmacogenetic tests are also provided. Following the guidelines will help to improve the outcomes of psychopharmacotherapy of many patients especially in case of pharmacokinetic problems. Thereby, one should never forget that TDM is an interdisciplinary task that sometimes requires the respectful discussion of apparently discrepant data so that, ultimately, the patient can profit from such a joint eff ort.

AGNP Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Psychiatry: Update 2011.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), i. e., the quantification of serum or plasma concentrations of medications for dose optimization, has proven a valuable tool for the patient-matched psychopharmacotherapy. Uncertain drug adherence, suboptimal tolerability, non-response at therapeutic doses, or pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are typical situations when measurement of medication concentrations is helpful. Patient populations that may predominantly benefit from TDM in psychiatry are children, pregnant women, elderly patients, individuals with intelligence disabilities, forensic patients, patients with known or suspected genetically determined pharmacokinetic abnormalities or individuals with pharmacokinetically relevant comorbidities. However, the potential benefits of TDM for optimization of pharmacotherapy can only be obtained if the method is adequately integrated into the clinical treatment process. To promote an appropriate use of TDM, the TDM expert group of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP) issued guidelines for TDM in psychiatry in 2004. Since then, knowledge has advanced significantly, and new psychopharmacologic agents have been introduced that are also candidates for TDM. Therefore the TDM consensus guidelines were updated and extended to 128 neuropsychiatric drugs. 4 levels of recommendation for using TDM were defined ranging from "strongly recommended" to "potentially useful". Evidence-based "therapeutic reference ranges" and "dose related reference ranges" were elaborated after an extensive literature search and a structured internal review process. A "laboratory alert level" was introduced, i. e., a plasma level at or above which the laboratory should immediately inform the treating physician. Supportive information such as cytochrome P450 substrate- and inhibitor properties of medications, normal ranges of ratios of concentrations of drug metabolite to parent drug and recommendations for the interpretative services are given. Recommendations when to combine TDM with pharmacogenetic tests are also provided. Following the guidelines will help to improve the outcomes of psychopharmacotherapy of many patients especially in case of pharmacokinetic problems. Thereby, one should never forget that TDM is an interdisciplinary task that sometimes requires the respectful discussion of apparently discrepant data so that, ultimately, the patient can profit from such a joint effort.

Quantification of venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine in human serum using HPLC analysis.

We describe an isocratic reversed-phase liquid chromatographic method for the determination of venlafaxine (VLX) and its main active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV) in serum, using haloperidol as internal standard and liquid/liquid extraction for sample preparation. VLX and ODV were separated on a C18 column with a mobile phase of acetonitrile/buffer (30/70, v:v) at 60 degrees C and a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min. The measurement of the native fluorescence signals of the eluted compounds were carried out at 227/300 nm (excitation/emission) without interference from endogenous components in serum. High linearities for VLX and ODV for concentrations between 20 and 500 microg/l were obtained (r = 0.9997). A large spectrum of routinely prescribed drugs did not interfere in the assay. The coefficients of variation for repeatability varied between 5.40% and 5.99% and for reproducibility between 9.43% and 21.63%. Absolute recoveries were more than 52% for both substances.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of trazodone: are there pharmacokinetic interactions involving citalopram and fluoxetine?

OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the new generation antidepressants is subject of controversial discussion. Nonetheless, TDM may safeguard against drug-drug interactions, can be used to control compliance and is valuable in the investigation of overdose. METHOD: The aim of this prospective study was to investigate serum levels of trazodone when prescribed as monotherapy or when used in combination with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors citalopram and fluoxetine in a simultaneous assay using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Over a 1-year period, we studied 97 patients (63 females) with depressive syndrome who were subdivided into 3 main diagnostic groups. Fifty-two patients were smokers, the mean age was 39.9 years and the mean weight was 72.4 kg; 40 patients were taking trazodone alone, 41 trazodone in combination with citalopram and 16 patients trazodone in combination with fluoxetine. RESULTS: The use of citalopram and fluoxetine in combination with trazodone had no significant impact on trazodone serum levels, and the same was true for differences in body weight and smoking behavior. On the other hand, age and sex had a significant influence on the pharmacokinetic pattern of trazodone, causing higher concentrations in females and in older patients. Since the polypharmacy investigated did not change the serum levels of trazodone, we assume that there is no metabolic interaction between trazodone and citalopram and trazodone and fluoxetine. We observed none of the adverse effects which might have been expected, including dizziness, severe headache, daytime sedation, fatigue or the serotonin syndrome even in a mild form. CONCLUSION: A "double-tracked" antidepressive treatment using trazodone and the SSRIs citalopram and fluoxetine is associated with a wide safety margin.

Zuclopenthixol-acetate treatment in catatonic patients: the implication of iron metabolism.

There is some evidence of ferropenia correlating with neuroleptic malignant syndrome and catatonic symptoms. The aim of this prospective and naturalistic study was to investigate the implications of ferremia in patients undergoing an intramuscular injection treatment of Zuclopenthixol-acetate in Visceolo. We recruited 59 catatonic patients (33 females). Age, sex, psychiatric and somatic diagnoses, body mass index (BMI), dosage and duration of Zuclopenthixol-acetate medication and the timing of the changeover from intramuscular to oral prescription, the single dosage of Clopenthixol if initially coadministered, incidence, onset and duration of transient benign hyperthermia, iron, ferritin, transferrin and saturation values, and white and red blood cell counts as well as liver function and electrolytes were registered. A transient and benign hyperthermic reaction (mean degrees: 37.5 + 0.3 degrees C) lasting for an average of 3.0 + 1.9 d was shown by 72.9% patients (N = 43, 22 females), during a mean treatment period of 5.8 + 3.1 d. These patients were medicated with significant different mean doses of Zuclopenthixol-acetate and compared to the patients with normal body temperature (ANOVA P < 0.01). The duration of Zuclopenthixol-acetate application did not vary between these patients groups. Furthermore, significant differences of iron (59.5 + 30.6 micromol/dl vs. 87.8 + 40.8 micromol/dl; ANOVA P < 0.006) and transferrin saturation values (18.3 + 10.4% vs. 27.2 + 17.0%; ANOVA P < 0.02) were found. Ferritin and transferrin were not implicated in the episode of hyperthermia. Diagnoses, sex, white and red blood cell counts also did not vary between these groups. Our findings indicate a possible involvement of ferropenia in catatonic patients, regardless of the diagnoses, and in the development of benign transient hyperthermia, also known as drug fever.

Simultaneous quantification of citalopram, clozapine, fluoxetine, norfluoxetine, maprotiline, desmethylmaprotiline and trazodone in human serum by HPLC analysis.

We describe an analytical procedure for the simultaneous quantification of citalopram (seropram), clozapine (leponex), fluoxetine (fluctine), norfluoxetine, maprotiline (ludiomil), desmethylmaprotiline and trazodone (trittico) in human serum within a period of 11.5 minutes using reversed phase HPLC. After 2 liquid/liquid extractions in the sample preparation phase, the drugs and metabolites were separated on a C18 column using a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile/buffer (30/70, v:v) at 70 degrees C, a flow rate of 1.5 m/min and haloperidol as internal standard. Absorption and native fluorescence signals of the eluted compounds were detected simultaneously at 260 nm and 227/300 nm (excitation/emission), respectively. The calibration ranges for citalopram, clozapine, fluoxetine, norfluoxetine, maprotiline, and desmethylmaprotiline ranged from 50-400 microg/l and for trazodone from 50-3,200 microg/l. The CVs varied between 0.6% and 5.5% (within-run) and between 3.2% and 7.1% (between-run). Recoveries were > 90% for all pharmaceuticals. We noticed no interferences from several commonly used drugs.

A case of pharmacokinetic interference in comedication of clozapine and valproic acid.

In 4-6% of treatment histories, clozapine induces generalized seizures by reducing the seizure threshold. Despite the knowledge of high risks combined therapy (such as bone marrow suppression, pathological EEG changes), some authors even suggest the prophylactic combination with anticonvulsants in high dose treatment of clozapine. We report a case of a 33-year-old female patient, a heavy smoker, suffering from mixed schizoaffective disorder from 1989 onwards. At her 8th admission in 1998, she was rehospitalized after experiencing her first generalized seizure under clozapine treatment, although no seizure phenomenon or other relevant side-effects under several previous clozapine therapies had been observed. Therefore, she received a valproic acid co-medication during her clozapine therapy. Based on therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine (weekly) under compliance-controlled conditions, the serum levels of clozapine significantly decreased, probably induced by valproic acid. According to the literature, this case report might support the clinical relevance of therapeutic drug monitoring when clozapine therapy is combined with valproic acid as co-medication.