Retrospective analysis of multi-institutional, patient-specific treatment planning results of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for gynecological cancer using V100.

The objective of this study was to clarify the usefuleness of the K parameters of the independent verification method using V100% (the volume of water receiving 100% of the prescription dose) for institutions implementing the high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy for gynecological cancer. The data of 249 plans of 11 institutions in Japan were used, and the constant K value obtained by a parameter fit for single-192Ir, two-192Ir, and three-192Ir systems was calculated. The predicted total dwell time calculated using the constant K value was defined as Tpr, and the total dwell time calculated using a radiation treatment planning system was defined as TRTP. The ratio of Tpr and TRTP for each plan was calculated. The constant K values (95% CI) obtained for each system outlined above were 1233 (1227-1240), 1205 (1199-1211), and 1171 (1167-1175), respectively. Regarding the Tpr/TRTP, the entire data were within 0.9-1.1. For accurate verification, it was clarified that constant K values should be calculated for each system. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission considers a difference of 20% between the prescribed total dose and the administered total dose as a reportable medical event. There is a need for a quick method to verify the accuracy with a minimum of 10% threshold of a plan. The constant K values in this study were obtained from multiple institutions, and the variation in the values among these institutions was small. The data obtained by this study may be used as a parameter of this verification method employed by numerous institutions, particularly those who have recently initiated HDR brachytherapy. In addition, for institutions already using this method, this data might be useful for the validation of the parameters which were used in such institutions.

Simple index for validity of the evaluation point for dosimetric verification results of intensity-modulated radiation therapy using a Farmer-type ionization chamber.

PURPOSE: Based on a retrospective analysis, this study aims to develop a simple index for validity of the evaluation point for the dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS: The results for the dosimetric verifications of a total of 69 IMRT plans were analyzed in this study. A Farmer-type ion chamber was used as a dose detector, and a solid water-equivalent phantom was used. Index values were obtained by dividing the difference between the maximum and minimum dosages by the mean dosage of the 69 plans, and the values were classified into five groups with index value <4, 4-8, 8-12, 12-16, and >16. A t-test was used to assess the statistical significance of the mean differences of the absolute values of the relative errors among these groups. RESULTS: We found that there was no significant difference between the groups with index value <4 and 4-8 (p = 0.152); however, there were significant differences between the other groups (p < 0.01). In addition, when the index values were smaller than 8, the pass ratio of 3% tolerance was 96.2% and the pass ratio of 5% tolerance was 99.9%. We observed that the smaller the index value, the smaller the uncertainty of the dose measurement. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in this study may prove to be useful for accurate dosimetric verifications of IMRTs when ion chambers are used.