Performance comparison of two commercial BGO-based PET/CT scanners using NEMA NU 2-2001.

Combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) scanners play a major role in medicine for in vivo imaging in an increasing number of diseases in oncology, cardiology, neurology, and psychiatry. With the advent of short-lived radioisotopes other than 18F and newer scanners, there is a need to optimize radioisotope activity and acquisition protocols, as well as to compare scanner performances on an objective basis. The Discovery-LS (D-LS) was among the first clinical PET/CT scanners to be developed and has been extensively characterized with older National Electrical Manufacturer Association (NEMA) NU 2-1994 standards. At the time of publication of the latest version of the standards (NU 2-2001) that have been adapted for whole-body imaging under clinical conditions, more recent models from the same manufacturer, i.e., Discovery-ST (D-ST) and Discovery-STE (D-STE), were commercially available. We report on the full characterization both in the two- and three-dimensional acquisition mode of the D-LS according to latest NEMA NU 2-2001 standards (spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate performance, accuracy of count losses, and random coincidence correction and image quality), as well as a detailed comparison with the newer D-ST widely used and whose characteristics are already published.

Intercomparison of activity measurements for beta-emitters in Swiss nuclear medicine laboratories.

OBJECTIVE: The activity of injected radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine, including beta-emitters used for pain palliation, has to be monitored systematically. The objective of the present work was to evaluate the situation and precision of activity monitoring for beta-emitters in Swiss nuclear medicine laboratories. METHODS: A questionnaire about the monitoring methods used was sent to 50 centers. On the basis of the questionnaire results, an intercomparison of activity measurements with 90Y and 169Er sources was organized. RESULTS: This study showed that most laboratories check beta-emitter activity with a dose calibrator measurement in the original vial provided by the producer or in the injection syringe. They therefore need to have calibration factors for the corresponding measurement geometries. The results of the intercomparison were disappointing overall. Sixteen of 27 90Y measurements and 17 of 22 169Er measurements in the original vial deviated from the reference activity by more than 20%. The situation was similar for the syringe. These discrepancies did not stem from the intrinsic limitation of the measuring method but were mainly attributable to the poor quality of the calibration factors provided by the manufacturers, in addition to lack of follow-up and incorrect background subtraction, particularly for 169Er, by the nuclear medicine laboratories. Manufacturers are being contacted to discuss possible improvements for the situation. CONCLUSION: This study showed that commercial dose calibrators are generally adequate for measurement of the activities of beta-emitters. However, in some cases, the measurement of 90Y can lead to errors reaching +/-50%. For 169Er, with its much lower beta-energy, the situation is even worse; the observed differences can be higher than 1 order of magnitude.

Determination of the efficiency of commercially available dose calibrators for beta-emitters.

OBJECTIVES: The goals of this investigation are to determine whether commercially available dose calibrators can be used to measure the activity of beta-emitting radionuclides used in pain palliation and to establish whether manufacturer-supplied calibration factors are appropriate for this purpose. METHODS: Six types of commercially available dose calibrators were studied. Dose calibrator response was controlled for 5 gamma-emitters used for calibration or typically encountered in routine use. For the 4 most commonly used beta-emitters ((32)P, (90)Sr, (90)Y, and (169)Er) dose calibrator efficiency was determined in the syringe geometry used for clinical applications. Efficiency of the calibrators was also measured for (153)Sm and (186)Re, 2 beta-emitters with significant gamma-contributions. Source activities were traceable to national standards. RESULTS: All calibrators measured gamma-emitters with a precision of +/-10%, in compliance with Swiss regulatory requirements. For beta-emitters, dose calibrator intrinsic efficiency depends strongly on the maximal energy of the beta-spectrum and is notably low for (169)Er. Manufacturer-supplied calibration factors give accurate results for beta-emitters with maximal beta-energy in the middle-energy range (1 MeV) but are not appropriate for use with low-energy ((169)Er) or high-energy ((90)Y) beta-emitters. beta-emitters with significant gamma-contributions behave like gamma-emitters. CONCLUSION: Commercially available dose calibrators have an intrinsic efficiency that is sufficient for the measurement of beta-emitters, including beta-emitters with a low maximum beta-energy. Manufacturer-supplied calibration factors are reliable for gamma-emitters and beta-emitters in the middle-energy range. For low- and high-energy beta-emitters, the use of manufacturer-supplied calibration factors introduces significant measurement inaccuracy.