Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 311
1.
Mod Pathol ; 37(1): 100372, 2024 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37914089

Adenocarcinomas of the nasal/paranasal sinuses are uncommon, but intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (ITACs) are important. Due to the rarity of these tumors, their molecular profile is not well known. To further investigate the molecular profile and find potential oncogenic drivers, we compared the whole transcriptome and exome of ITACs at different anatomic locations in the head and neck. Twenty-one head and neck adenocarcinomas were used in this study, divided into 10 sinonasal adenocarcinomas (SNT) and 11 extrasinonasal (T) head and neck adenocarcinomas according to anatomic location and histology. Tumor samples along with normal mucosa were microdissected from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples, and RNA and DNA were subjected to whole-transcriptome and -exome shotgun sequencing. Analysis of ITACs at sinonasal locations showed 410 subtype-specific differentially expressed (DE) genes and noncoding transcripts compared with the group of other anatomic locations, with 2909 subtype-specific DE genes. The groups shared 872 genes, with 17 highly different or opposing DE genes. Whole-exome mutation analysis revealed the gene MLL3 (KMT2C) to be exhibiting the most frequent loss-of-function mutations in all adenocarcinomas investigated. The results suggest that the head and neck ITACs investigated were mainly caused by loss-of-function mutations in MLL3 that disabled chromatin methylation and remodeling of all MLL3-targeted enhancers in the tumors. This changed the activity of multiple genes/gene clusters, supporting oncogenicity mostly via pathways of signaling, dedifferentiation, proliferation, migration, and immune and inflammatory deregulation, indicating a truly epigenetic event as the root cause for the heterogenous diversity of these enteric types of cancer. The data of this study form the basis for understanding cell fate determination and cellular homeostasis in the normal respiratory mucosa at different anatomic sites and show the contribution of different mucosal components to the etiology/molecular pathology of ITAC.


Adenocarcinoma , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms , Humans , Exome , Transcriptome , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/pathology
2.
Palliat Support Care ; : 1-8, 2023 Mar 30.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36994832

OBJECTIVES: Body image adjustment is a crucial issue for patients with facial cancer, but body image-specific interventions are scarce. We report results of a novel psychotherapeutic intervention to address body image concerns during acute postoperative recovery following facial reconstructive surgery. Our primary aims were to evaluate the intervention's feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy on body image concerns, psychological distress, and quality of life (QOL). METHODS: Adults with facial cancers who endorsed body image concerns were recruited to participate in a randomized controlled trial. The intervention group participated in 4 in-person counseling sessions. The control group received an educational booklet and a brief phone call. Participants completed measures of body image, distress, and QOL at baseline and at the 4-week follow-up to assess the impact of the intervention. Intervention outcomes were assessed with 2 sample t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Twenty-nine participants completed both the baseline and follow-up assessments. The intervention demonstrated good feasibility with a high retention rate (79%), visit completion rate (81%), and high satisfaction scores (75% reported mean satisfaction score of >3). Intervention did not result in an observed statistically significant difference in reduction in body image dissatisfaction and disturbance, psychological distress, or improvement in QOL compared with the control group. However, intervention resulted in statistically significant difference in perceived social impact (-1 vs. -8.3, p = 0.033) compared to control group. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Our study highlights the potential clinical benefits of a novel psychotherapeutic intervention that targets body image concerns and suggests the need for further evaluation.

4.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 116(3): 533-543, 2023 07 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36549347

PURPOSE: The combination of cisplatin and radiation or cetuximab and radiation improves overall survival of patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck carcinoma. NRG Oncology conducted a phase 3 trial to test the hypothesis that adding cetuximab to radiation and cisplatin would improve progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition stage T2 N2a-3 M0 or T3-4 N0-3 M0 were accrued from November 2005 to March 2009 and randomized to receive radiation and cisplatin without (arm A) or with (arm B) cetuximab. Outcomes were correlated with patient and tumor features. Late reactions were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3). RESULTS: Of 891 analyzed patients, 452 with a median follow-up of 10.1 years were alive at analysis. The addition of cetuximab did not improve PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-1.26; P = .74), with 10-year estimates of 43.6% (95% CI, 38.8- 48.4) for arm A and 40.2% (95% CI, 35.4-45.0) for arm B. Cetuximab did not reduce locoregional failure (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.95-1.53; P = .94) or distant metastasis (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.54-1.14; P = .10) or improve overall survival (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80-1.16; P = .36). Cetuximab did not appear to improve PFS in either p16-positive oropharynx (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.87-1.93) or p16-negative oropharynx or nonoropharyngeal primary (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.73-1.21). Grade 3 to 4 late toxicity rates were 57.4% in arm A and 61.3% in arm B (P = .26). CONCLUSIONS: With a median follow-up of more than 10 years, this updated report confirms the addition of cetuximab to radiation therapy and cisplatin did not improve any measured outcome in the entire cohort or when stratifying by p16 status.


Cisplatin , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Cetuximab/adverse effects , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy
5.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 30(4): 2331-2338, 2023 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36581726

BACKGROUND: Cancer centers are regionalizing care to expand patient access, but the effects on patient volume are unknown. This study aimed to compare patient volumes before and after the establishment of head and neck regional care centers (HNRCCs). METHODS: This study analyzed 35,394 unique new patient visits at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) before and after the creation of HNRCCs. Univariate regression estimated the rate of increase in new patient appointments. Geospatial analysis evaluated patient origin and distribution. RESULTS: The mean new patients per year in 2006-2011 versus 2012-2017 was 2735 ± 156 patients versus 3155 ± 207 patients, including 464 ± 78 patients at HNRCCs, reflecting a 38.4 % increase in overall patient volumes. The rate of increase in new patient appointments did not differ significantly before and after HNRCCs (121.9 vs 95.8 patients/year; P = 0.519). The patients from counties near HNRCCs, showed a 210.8 % increase in appointments overall, 33.8 % of which were at an HNRCC. At the main campus exclusively, the shift in regional patients to HNRCCs coincided with a lower rate of increase in patients from the MDACC service area (33.7 vs. 11.0 patients/year; P = 0.035), but the trend was toward a greater increase in out-of-state patients (25.7 vs. 40.3 patients/year; P = 0.299). CONCLUSIONS: The creation of HNRCCs coincided with stable increases in new patient volume, and a sizeable minority of patients sought care at regional centers. Regional patients shifted to the HNRCCs, and out-of-state patient volume increased at the main campus, optimizing access for both local and out-of-state patients.


Cancer Care Facilities , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Health Services Accessibility
6.
Oral Oncol ; 134: 106127, 2022 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36155359

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine overall survival (OS), prognostic factors, cost, and functional outcomes after surgery for locally recurrent oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 399 cases of locally recurrent OCSCC from 1997 to 2011, of which 259 patients were treated with salvage surgery. Survival and prognostic factors were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression, the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test. RESULTS: The 5-year OS for patients undergoing surgical salvage, nonsurgical therapy, or supportive care was 44.2%, 1.5%, and 0%, respectively. For patients who underwent surgical salvage, 133 (51%) patients experienced a second recurrence at a median of 17 months. Factors associated with OS included disease-free interval ≤ 6 months (P =.0001), recurrent stage III-IV disease (P <.0001), and prior radiation (P =.0001). Patients with both advanced stage and prior radiation had a 23% 5-year OS, compared with 70% for those with neither risk (P <.001). Functionally, 85% of patients had > 80% speech intelligibility and 81% were able to eat by mouth following salvage surgery. Of the patients who required tracheostomy, 78% were decannulated. The adjusted median hospital and professional charges for patients were $129,696 (range $9,238-$956,818). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with recurrent OCSCC who underwent salvage surgery have favorable functional outcomes with half of alive at 5 years but poorer OS for advanced disease, disease-free interval ≤ 6 months, and prior radiation. Additionally, treatment is associated with high cost, and about half of patients ultimately develop another recurrence.


Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Humans , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Salvage Therapy/methods , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Survival Rate
7.
Surg Oncol ; 44: 101804, 2022 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35932620

OBJECTIVES: Map regional lymph node metastases for lateralized oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) and evaluate factors associated with regional metastases and recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 715 patients with lateralized OCSCC surgically treated in 1997-2011. Analysis was performed using log-rank, Kaplan-Meier, and multivariable logistic and Cox regression. RESULTS: Regional metastases were identified in ipsilateral levels IIA (24%), IB (18%), III (13%), V (9%), IV (7%), IA (2%) and IIB (1%) and the contralateral neck (3%). Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (Hazard Ratio [HR] 2.2, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.2-3.9) and T category (T3 vs. T1: HR 4.1, 95% CI 1.9-9.3; T4 vs. T1: HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.3) were associated with regional metastases. Most (71%) isolated regional metastatic recurrences were in undissected levels of the neck, including 58% in levels IV and V. Tumors of the hard palate (HR 4.3, 95% CI 1.2-16.1), upper alveolus (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.7) or with LVI (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.0-3.9) were associated with isolated regional recurrence. For upper alveolar/hard palate tumors, depth of invasion (DOI) ≥4 mm (P = .003) and LVI (P = .04) were associated with regional metastases. CONCLUSIONS: For lateralized OCSCC, elective neck dissection of level IIB or the contralateral neck may rarely be needed, but additional surgical or radiation treatment of levels IV and V may be considered based on patient risk factors, including T category 3-4 or LVI. For upper alveolar/hard palate tumors, DOI ≥4 mm is an appropriate threshold for elective neck dissection.


Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Neck Dissection , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/surgery
8.
Oral Oncol ; 130: 105906, 2022 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35594776

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways in head and neck cancer (HNC) have shown to improve perioperative outcomes and reduce complications. The longer term implications on adjuvant treatment and survival have not been studied. We hereby report the first study on the impact of an ERAS pathway on return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT) and overall survival (OS) in HNC. METHODS: 200 patients undergoing head and neck oncologic surgery on an ERAS pathway between March 1, 2016 and March 31, 2019 were matched to controls over the same interval. Demographic, tumor and adjuvant therapy-related data were collected, including time to adjuvant therapy(TAT) and treatment package time(TPT). Risk factors for TAT > 42 days and TPT ≥ 85 days were assessed. OS was compared and risk factors for inferior OS determined. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics including co-morbidities and tumor stage were similar. Of 179 patients planned for adjuvant treatment, there was no difference in RIOT rate (89.0% vs 87.5%, p = 0.753), proportion of TAT > 42 days of surgery (55.6% vs 59.7%, p = 0.642), or TPT ≥ 85 days (48.1% vs 57.1, p = 0.258), for the ERAS and control groups, respectively. On multivariate analysis, alcohol use (OR 3.58; 95 %CI 1.11-11.52) and recurrent disease status (OR 2.88; 95 %CI 1.40-5.93) were independently associated with prolonged TAT. Three-year OS was similar between the ERAS and control groups (73% vs 76%, p = 0.521). CONCLUSION: ERAS has not shown to improve RIOT or OS in the current study. However, its benefit for perioperative outcomes is undeniable and further studies are required on longer term quality and survival outcomes.


Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Length of Stay , Postoperative Complications , Riots , Risk Factors
10.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 20(3): 224-234, 2022 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35276673

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses. Occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM) are also addressed. The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's most recent recommendations regarding management of HPV-positive oropharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.


Head and Neck Neoplasms , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Humans
11.
Head Neck ; 44(6): 1313-1323, 2022 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35238096

OBJECTIVES: To analyze charges, complications, survival, and functional outcomes for definitive surgery of mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 76 patients who underwent segmental mandibulectomy with reconstruction from 2000 to 2009. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 49 (65%) patients and were associated with preoperative drainage (odds ratio [OR] 4.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-19.27). The adjusted median charge was $343 000, and higher charges were associated with double flap reconstruction (OR 8.15, 95% CI 2.19-30.29) and smoking (OR 5.91, 95% CI 1.69-20.72). Improved swallow was associated with age <67 years (OR 3.76, 95% CI 1.16-12.17) and preoperative swallow (OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.23-9.51). Five-year ORN-recurrence-free survival was 93% while overall survival was 63% and associated with pulmonary disease (HR [hazard ratio] 3.57, 95% CI 1.43-8.94). CONCLUSIONS: Although recurrence of ORN is rare, surgical complications are common and charges are high. Poorer outcomes and higher charges are associated with preoperative factors.


Osteoradionecrosis , Aged , Drainage , Humans , Mandible , Mandibular Osteotomy , Osteoradionecrosis/surgery , Retrospective Studies
12.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 153: 111012, 2022 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34990925

BACKGROUND: While the majority of pediatric tracheostomies are performed in the setting of chronic and complex medical comorbidities, perioperative tracheostomies following head and neck tumor ablation are generally short-term. Deliberate planning is required for decannulation in this setting and no published protocols currently exist. Our study outlines a management strategy for short-term tracheostomy in pediatric patients following head and neck surgery. METHODS: A retrospective study of pediatric head and neck tumor patients undergoing tracheostomy was performed at a quaternary children's hospital from February 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. Charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical operation, relevant tracheostomy-related complications, and time to decannulation. RESULTS: Eleven patients with a mean age of 10.4 years (st.dev. 6.7, range: 0.5-23) underwent tracheostomy during their primary ablative/reconstructive surgery. Trans-tracheal pressure monitoring helped direct the need for tracheostomy downsizing and readiness for capping trials. All patients were decannulated before hospital discharge after a mean of 12.8 days (st.dev. 2.5, range: 9-18) and were discharged after a mean of 14.8 days (st.dev. 2.5, range: 11-20). CONCLUSION: Pediatric head and neck surgery patients can be quickly and safely decannulated with an instructive protocol and multidisciplinary care.


Head and Neck Neoplasms , Tracheostomy , Child , Device Removal , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Retrospective Studies
13.
Cancer ; 127(23): 4413-4420, 2021 12 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34358340

BACKGROUND: The survival benefit of elective neck dissection (END) for patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) of the head and neck and no evidence of regional metastasis (cN0) has never been reported. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of END on patient survival. METHODS: The authors included patients with head and neck cSCC who had undergone primary surgery from 1995 to 2017. The primary end point was survival, and the secondary end points were the incidence of occult regional disease and regional disease control. To assess the impact of END on survival, the authors used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with propensity score and matching techniques for internal validation. RESULTS: A total of 1111 patients presented with no evidence of nodal disease; 173 had END, and 938 were observed. Adjuvant radiotherapy to the neck was administered to 101 patients (9%). END resulted in a 5-year overall survival rate of 52%, whereas the rate was 63% in the observation group (P = .003 [log-rank]). The 5-year disease-free survival rate for patients undergoing END was similar to that for the observation group (73% vs 75%; P = .429). A multivariate regression model showed that the performance of END was not associated with improved rates of overall, disease-specific, or disease-free survival; similarly, among patients with advanced disease (T3-4), those who underwent END did not have improved survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with cSCC of the head and neck, observation of the neck nodes resulted in noninferior survival rates in comparison with END at the time of primary surgery. Further studies are required to elucidate the role of END in patients with advanced disease.


Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Skin Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neck Dissection/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery
14.
Clin Cancer Res ; 27(16): 4557-4565, 2021 08 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34187851

PURPOSE: In locoregionally advanced, resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CSCC-HN), surgery followed by radiotherapy is standard but can be cosmetically and functionally devastating, and many patients will have recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Newly diagnosed or recurrent stage III-IVA CSCC-HN patients amenable to curative-intent surgery received two cycles of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibition. The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included pathologic response [pathologic complete response (pCR) or major pathologic response (MPR; ≤10% viable tumor)], safety, DSS, DFS, and OS. Exploratory endpoints included immune biomarkers of response. RESULTS: Of 20 patients enrolled, 7 had recurrent disease. While only 6 patients [30%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 11.9-54.3] had partial responses by RECIST, 14 patients (70%; 95% CI, 45.7-88.1) had a pCR (n = 11) or MPR (n = 3). No SAEs ocurred during or after the neoadjuvant treatment. At a median follow-up of 22.6 months (95% CI, 21.7-26.1), one patient progressed and died, one died without disease, and two developed recurrence. The 12-month DSS, DFS, and OS rates were 95% (95% CI, 85.9-100), 89.5% (95% CI, 76.7-100), and 95% (95% CI, 85.9-100), respectively. Gene expression studies revealed an inflamed tumor microenvironment in patients with pCR or MPR, and CyTOF analyses demonstrated a memory CD8+ T-cell cluster enriched in patients with pCR. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in locoregionally advanced, resectable CSCC-HN is safe and induces a high pathologic response rate. Pathologic responses were associated with an inflamed tumor microenvironment.


Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy , Aged , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Pilot Projects , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/surgery
15.
BMC Oral Health ; 21(1): 270, 2021 05 17.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34001080

BACKGROUND: To assess variations in adherence to guideline-recommended processes of care for oral cavity cancer patients. METHODS: Retrospective study using a U.S. healthcare research database (MarketScan). Index diagnoses were considered from 2010 to 2012 with follow-up from 2013 to 2014. Diagnostic and procedure codes were utilized to identify oral cavity patients with a defined treatment modality. Compliance with guideline-recommended processes of care, which included pre-treatment imaging, thyroid-function testing (TFTs), multidisciplinary consultation and gastrostomy-tube insertion rates, were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 2752 patients were identified. Surgery alone was the most common treatment (60.8%), followed by surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (20.4%) and surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy (18.8%). Head/neck and chest imaging were obtained in 60% and 62.5% of patients respectively. Significant geographical differences in head and neck imaging were observed between North-central (64%), South (58.4%) and West (56.1%) regions (p = 0.026). Differences in chest imaging were also present between North-east (65%) and West (56.8%; p = 0.007). TFTs were obtained in 54.4% of the patients after radiation treatment, and 18.6% of patients had multidisciplinary consultation during the 6 months before and 3 months after initiation of treatment. During the year after treatment initiation, 21.2% of patients underwent G-tube placement, with significantly higher rates in patients receiving triple modality treatment (58%) when compared to surgery plus radiation (27%) and surgery alone (15%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Adherence to evidence-based practices was low based on the database coding. These data suggest a potential to improve adherence and increase the routine use of practices delineated in national clinical practice guidelines. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study reflects a suboptimal adherence to guidelines based on the database employed. This study should be considered by healthcare providers and efforts should be maximized to follow the processes of care which have proven to impact on patient's outcomes.


Guideline Adherence , Mouth Neoplasms , Databases, Factual , Humans , Mouth Neoplasms/therapy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies
16.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 12(6): 937-944, 2021 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33814339

PURPOSE: To examine the role age plays in the treatment and prognosis of locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) treated definitively with radiation alone or combined modality therapy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of three NRG/RTOG trials examining either radiation alone or combined radiation and systemic therapy for LAHNC. The effect of age (≥70 yrs.) on cause-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 2688 patients were analyzed, of whom 309 patients (11.5%) were ≥ 70. For all studies combined, the hazard ratio (HR) for CSS for patients age ≥ 70 vs. those <70 was 1.33 (95%CI: 1.14-1.55, p < 0.001). For OS, the HR for patients age ≥ 70 vs. those <70 for all studies combined was 1.55 (95% CI 1.35-1.77, p < 0.001). After adjustment for all covariates, age ≥ 70 was associated with worse OS regardless of adjustment for smoking and p16 status. The survival difference was more pronounced in those receiving combined radiation and systemic therapy. Hematologic and renal toxicities were increased in combined modality trials in patients ≥70 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Patients age ≥ 70 with LAHNC were underrepresented in these clinical trials. Their CSS and OS proved inferior to patients <70 years old.


Chemoradiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Aged , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies
17.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 17(8): e1181-e1188, 2021 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33760627

PURPOSE: Patients have been increasingly using physician-rating websites (PRWs); however, few studies have analyzed the validity of star ratings on PRWs. We aimed to compare PRW patient satisfaction scores with internally generated patient satisfaction scores (internal scores) of physicians at a large quaternary cancer center. METHODS: We collected internal scores and PRW scores for physicians at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Internal scores were based on patient responses to the Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems patient experience (CG-CAHPS) survey. Only physicians with an internal score on the basis of ≥ 30 patient reviews were included. The median numbers of reviews and median scores were compared between internal data and four PRWs (Google, HealthGrades, Vitals, and WebMD). Both internally and on PRWs, possible scores ranged from 1 (least satisfied) to 5 (most satisfied). RESULTS: Of 640 physicians with an internal score, 510 (79.7%) met the inclusion criteria. For these 510 physicians, the median (IQR) number of internal reviews was 49.5 (30-93) and the median (IQR) internal score was 4.89 (4.81-4.93); the median number of reviews on PRWs ranged from 2 to 7, and the median score on PRWs ranged from 4.40 to 5.00. No physician had an internal score < 4, but the proportions with score < 4 on PRWs ranged from 16% to 30%. CONCLUSION: Internal patient satisfaction scores were higher and calculated from more reviews than PRW patient satisfaction scores and correlated weakly with PRW scores. Given that patients rely on PRWs when evaluating potential physicians, we recommend publishing internal scores online to give patients more complete information regarding physician performance.


Neoplasms , Physicians , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Satisfaction , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Cancer ; 127(12): 1984-1992, 2021 06 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33631040

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is used in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) for downstaging advanced disease and decreasing distant metastasis (DM). To the authors' knowledge, no study has specifically examined the impact of a delayed time to surgery (TTS) after NAC on oncologic outcomes. They thus aimed to identify a cutoff for TTS after NAC and its effect on survival indices. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all patients with HNSCC receiving NAC followed by surgery with curative intent between March 2016 and March 2019 at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to identify a cutoff for TTS, and this cutoff was used to analyze the overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence rate, DM-free rate, and disease-free survival (DFS). A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: One hundred one patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 24.7 months. The 3-year OS and locoregional recurrence rates did not differ with a TTS ≥ 34 days. However, the 3-year DM-free rate was significantly worse (56% vs 90%; P = .001) in the group with a TTS ≥ 34 days, and the 3-year DFS was significantly lower (26% vs 64%; P = .006). In a multivariate analysis, a TTS ≥ 34 days (hazard ratio [HR], 4.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84-13.13) and extracapsular extension (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.13-8.00) were significant independent predictors of a poorer DM-free rate. Weight loss > 10% (HR, 5.53; 95% CI, 1.02-30.24) was the only independent predictor for a TTS ≥ 34 days. CONCLUSIONS: Emphasis should be placed on early definitive locoregional treatment after NAC, particularly in patients who do not respond to NAC. There is a need to validate these findings and establish new benchmarks for the interval between NAC and surgery.


Head and Neck Neoplasms , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/surgery
19.
Head Neck ; 43(4): 1213-1219, 2021 04.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33576119

BACKGROUND: Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy. Recently, biomarker studies found promising targetable alterations. In this study, we provide a descriptive analysis of tumor and immune biomarkers and survival associations. METHODS: We extracted clinical data and performed immunohistochemistry for AR, AR-V7, HER-2, PD-L1, LAG-3, and tumor-infiltrating immune cells. RESULTS: We included 17 patients. Age ranged from 42 to 85 years old; HER-2 was overexpressed or amplified in 65%. AR was positive in 88% of patients, while AR-V7 was positive in 13% by IHC. We found low scores of immune infiltration and a PD-L1 expression in 53%. We found no clinically significant association between biomarkers and survival outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this small series of SDC, biomarkers do not seem to correlate with disease biology, although they provide additional treatment options. SDC may harbor a different immune profile compared to other subtypes, with an indication of T-cell dysfunction.


Carcinoma, Ductal , Salivary Gland Neoplasms , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor , Humans , Middle Aged , Receptors, Androgen , Salivary Ducts
20.
Head Neck ; 43(5): 1592-1603, 2021 05.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33522021

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of patients treated with cytotoxic or targeted systemic therapy is not well defined for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (cSCCHN). METHODS: Patients with cSCCHN treated with cytotoxic or targeted systemic therapy were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of distant metastasis (M1 vs. M0) at presentation. A proportional hazards model was used to assess for independent predictors of overall survival. RESULTS: Of 129 patients with cSCCHN, 20 (16%) were M1 and 109 (84%) were M0. Independent predictors of improved survival were M0 status, treatment of locally advanced disease with radiotherapy, and lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score. CONCLUSIONS: Survival was worse in M1 patients treated with cytotoxic or targeted systemic therapy and poor baseline performance status but improved in those receiving radiotherapy. These data can serve as historical controls for future systemic therapy trials, including immunotherapy.


Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Skin Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy
...