Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37949333
3.
Dig Dis Sci ; 68(9): 3569-3572, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37540390

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Patients with comorbid chronic pain and mood disorders have more severe gastrointestinal disease and higher healthcare expenses than their peers. We sought to determine whether management under our innovative Collaborative Co-Managed Care (C3) general gastroenterology care model improved outcomes. METHODS: Patient questionnaires completed by outpatients at our GI Motility Center were analyzed alongside demographic information to determine predictors of response to treatment based on adequate relief of gastrointestinal symptoms and improvement in quality of life. RESULTS: These comorbidities did not significantly impair response and may be associated with improved response under our model. CONCLUSIONS: The C3 general gastroenterology care model anchors on setting expectations and team-based communication and improves outcomes of, and access to, care.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Humanos , Trastornos del Humor/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Humor/epidemiología , Trastornos del Humor/terapia , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Comorbilidad , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/diagnóstico , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud
4.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 21(11): 2985-2986, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36914144
5.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 21(11): 2987-2988, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36967103
6.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 21(12): 3195-3196, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37001711
7.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 21(9): 2378-2388.e28, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36646234

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Practice guidelines promote a routine noninvasive, non-endoscopic initial approach to investigating dyspepsia without alarm features in young patients, yet many patients undergo prompt upper endoscopy. We aimed to assess tradeoffs among costs, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes to inform discrepancy between guidelines and practice. METHODS: We constructed a decision-analytic model and performed cost-effectiveness/cost-satisfaction analysis over a 1-year time horizon on patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia without alarm features referred to gastroenterology. A RAND/UCLA expert panel informed model design. Four competing diagnostic/management strategies were evaluated: prompt endoscopy, testing for Helicobacter pylori and eradicating if present (test-and-treat), testing for H pylori and performing endoscopy if present (test-and-scope), and empiric acid suppression. Outcomes were derived from systematic reviews of clinical trials. Costs were informed by prospective observational cohort studies and national commercial/federal cost databases. Health gains were represented using quality-adjusted life years. RESULTS: From the patient perspective, costs and outcomes were similar for all strategies (maximum out-of-pocket difference of $30 and <0.01 quality-adjusted life years gained/year regardless of strategy). Prompt endoscopy maximized cost-satisfaction and health system reimbursement. Test-and-scope maximized cost-effectiveness from insurer and patient perspectives. Results remained robust on multiple one-way sensitivity analyses on model inputs and across most willingness-to-pay thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive management strategies appear to result in inferior cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction outcomes compared with strategies promoting up-front endoscopy. Therefore, additional studies are needed to evaluate the drivers of patient satisfaction to facilitate inclusion in value-based healthcare transformation efforts.


Asunto(s)
Dispepsia , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Humanos , Dispepsia/diagnóstico , Dispepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Satisfacción del Paciente
9.
Drugs ; 81(17): 1953-1968, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34727333

RESUMEN

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a heterogenous disease with a variety of therapeutic options, including eight prescription drugs approved for use in IBS in the USA. Choosing among the myriad treatment options requires attention to patient preferences both on clinical outcomes and costs associated with treatment. We performed a narrative review of the literature to summarize these important determinants of treatment choice including: labeled indications; clinical profiles of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prescription drugs; and cost-effectiveness for diarrhea-predominant IBS drugs (IBS-D: alosetron, eluxadoline, and rifaximin) and constipation-predominant IBS drugs (IBS-C: linaclotide, lubiprostone, plecanatide, tegaserod, and tenapanor). We then review the standard model of shared decision-making aimed at guiding an informed, patient-centered discussion to integrate comparative clinical and cost outcomes toward choosing an IBS treatment in practice.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Diarrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Estreñimiento/etiología , Estreñimiento/terapia , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Diarrea/etiología , Diarrea/terapia , Dieta , Dieta Saludable , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/efectos adversos , Humanos , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/complicaciones , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/dietoterapia , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30984918

RESUMEN

Sarcopenia is defined as an age-related loss of muscle mass and strength which impairs physical function leading to disability and frailty. Resistance exercises are effective treatments for sarcopenia and are critical in mitigating weight-loss induced sarcopenia in older adults attempting to lose weight. Yet, adherence to home-based regimens, which is a cornerstone to lifestyle therapies, is poor and cannot be ascertained by clinicians as no objective methods exist to determine patient compliance outside of a supervised setting. Our group developed a Bluetooth connected resistance band that tests the ability to detect exercise repetitions. We recruited 6 patients aged 65 years and older and recorded 4 specific, physical therapist-led exercises. Three blinded reviewers examined the findings and we also applied a peak Ending algorithm to the data. There were 16.6 repetitions per exercise across reviewers, with an intraclass correlation of 0.912 (95%CI: 0.853-0.953, p<0.001) between reviewers and the algorithm. Using this novel resistance band, we feasibly detected repetition of exercises in older adults.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA