Managing Acute Ankle and Hindfoot Fracture in Diabetic Patients.

The management of ankle fractures in the diabetic population requires special attention as the risks of injury or treatment-related complications are high. Thorough review of clinical history and detailed assessment provide the treating surgeons with key information to guide treatment pathway. Vigilance is required when opting for nonoperative treatment in undisplaced stable ankle fractures in patients with peripheral neuropathy. The presence of critical ischemia in injured limb demands vascular consultation and ultimately, an intervention before surgical fixation of ankle fracture. An extended period of immobilization is one of the key principles in the management of ankle fracture patients with diabetes.

Ankle fractures in diabetic patients.

Surgical complications are more common in patients with complicated diabetes (presence of inner organ failure, neuropathy).Of all patients undergoing ankle fracture fixation, approximately 13% are diabetic and 2% have complicated diabetes mellitus.Non-operative management of ankle fractures in patients with complicated diabetes results in an even higher rate of complications.Insufficient stability of ankle fractures (treated operatively, or non-operatively) can trigger Charcot neuroarthropathy, and result in bone loss, deformity, ulceration, and the need for amputation.Rigid fixation is recommended. Hindfoot arthrodesis (as primary procedure or after failed ankle fracture management) can salvage the limb in approximately 80% of patients.Early protected weight bearing can be allowed, provided rigid fixation without deformity has been achieved. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:457-463. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200025.

Adjuvant antibiotic loaded bio composite in the management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis - A multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers are associated with a high morbidity and are common cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputations. The effect of debridement and the use of an adjuvant local antibiotic carrier in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers with osteomyelitis was evaluated. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with diabetic foot ulceration and osteomyelitis treated by debridement with adjuvant local antibiotic was performed. Seventy patients with Texas Grade 3B & 3D lesions were included, with a mean age of 68 years. Cerament G, an antibiotic-loaded absorbable calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite bio-composite was used along with intraoperative multiple bone sampling and culture-specific systemic antibiotics. RESULTS: Patients were followed up until infection eradication or ulcer healing. Mean follow up was 10 months (4-28months). Nine patients had Charcot foot deformity, 14 had peripheral vascular disease. 62% of patients had forefoot, 5% midfoot and 33% hind foot involvement. Fifty-three patients (87%) had polymicrobial infection. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common microorganism isolated. Infection was eradicated in 63 patients (90%) with mean time to ulcer healing of 12 weeks. Seven patients were not cured and required further treatment. Five patients had below knee amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant, local antibiotic therapy with an absorbable bio-composite can help achieve up to 90% cure rates in diabetic foot ulceration with osteomyelitis. Cerament G can act as effective void filler allowing dead space management after excision and preventing reinfection and the need for multiple surgical procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV- case series.

The effect of different methods of stability assessment on fixation rate and complications in supination external rotation (SER) 2/4 ankle fractures.

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing stable supination-external rotation (SER) 2 from unstable SER 4 ankle fractures, using standard radiographs, is controversial. Examination under anaesthesia (EUA), gravity-stress (GS) and weight-bearing (WB) radiographs can aid surgical decision-making. We evaluated the effect of three methods of fracture stability assessment. METHODS: Radiographs and case-notes of 312 consecutive patients with SER 2/4 fractures were reviewed. We recorded ankle stability assessment (plain film (PF) and EUA vs. GS vs. WB radiographs), management (conservative vs. operative), unplanned surgery and complications. RESULTS: Forty five percent assessed with GS underwent surgery (6% for PF/EUA, 4% for WB; P=0.0001). Amongst GS patients, 11% underwent additional surgery (0.1% PF/EUA, 0% WB; P=0.0001). Complications occurred in 2% of the WB group (8% for PF/EUA, 22% for GS; P=0.007). CONCLUSION: This study associates GS assessment with higher rates of surgery and complications. Subsequent studies may determine the longer term effect stability assessments have on post-traumatic arthritis.

Ankle arthroscopy to manage sequelae after ankle fractures.

PURPOSE: The role of ankle arthroscopy in managing the consequences of ankle fractures is yet to be fully established. This study aims to assess this procedure in terms of the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis, re-operation rate and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Sixty-six patients were identified [mean age 40 years (SD 13 years)] who had undergone ankle arthroscopy following a fracture of the distal tibia or fibula. Medical case notes were reviewed to ascertain details of the index injury, intra-operative findings and identify any further procedures. Patients were then contacted using a standardized questionnaire to assess satisfaction and return to normal function. RESULTS: Injury occurred in a mean of 2 years 10 months before arthroscopy (SD 13 months, min 6 months). Forty-nine of 66 fractures (74 %) had been managed operatively. The commonest indication for arthroscopy was anterior impingement (45 %) followed by degenerative change (30 %) and osteochondral lesions (OCL) (18 %). Intra-operative findings revealed an unexpected OCL or frank degenerative change in 20 % of patients. Using a Kaplan-Meier estimate 1 year after arthroscopy, 10 % of patients had undergone further surgery. This had increased to 34 % by 4 years after arthroscopy. Four patients underwent ankle fusion. Questionnaires were completed by 55/66 patients (84 %). Only 28 patients (50 %) felt surgery allowed them to return to normal activity. Thirty-nine patients reported a benefit from surgery (75 %) whilst 43 were satisfied (77 %) and 48 (86 %) would recommend the procedure to a friend. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular pathology was significantly underestimated preoperatively for one patient in five. Arthroscopy improved symptoms in 75 % of patients who complain of ankle symptoms after fracture of the ankle or distal tibia. However, further procedures were required in 34 % of patients. The findings of this study help guide patient counselling and operative decision-making in this challenging group of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Successful arthroscopic decompression and synthetic grafting of a posterior talar cyst: a case report.

We describe the endoscopic management of a large talar cyst using synthetic allograft gel. Three and a half years later the patient has returned to sport and repeat MRI demonstrates no further collapse of the cyst.