Serum Markers of Neurodegeneration Are Strongly Linked to Heart Failure Severity and Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is prevalent in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), affecting self-care and outcomes. Novel blood-based biomarkers have emerged as potential diagnostic tools for neurodegeneration. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess neurodegeneration in HFrEF by measuring neurofilament light chain (NfL), total tau (t-tau), amyloid beta 40 (Aß40), and amyloid beta 42 (Aß42) in a large, well-characterized cohort. METHODS: The study included 470 patients with HFrEF from a biobank-linked prospective registry at the Medical University of Vienna. High-sensitivity single-molecule assays were used for measurement. Unplanned heart failure (HF) hospitalization and all-cause death were recorded as outcome parameters. RESULTS: All markers, but not the Aß42:Aß40 ratio, correlated with HF severity, ie, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and NYHA functional class, and comorbidity burden and were significantly associated with all-cause death and HF hospitalization (crude HR: all-cause death: NfL: 4.44 [95% CI: 3.02-6.53], t-tau: 5.04 [95% CI: 2.97-8.58], Aß40: 3.90 [95% CI: 2.27-6.72], and Aß42: 5.14 [95% CI: 2.84-9.32]; HF hospitalization: NfL: 2.48 [95% CI: 1.60-3.85], t-tau: 3.44 [95% CI: 1.95-6.04], Aß40: 3.13 [95% CI: 1.84-5.34], and Aß42: 3.48 [95% CI: 1.93-6.27]; P < 0.001 for all). These associations remained statistically significant after multivariate adjustment including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. The discriminatory accuracy of NfL in predicting all-cause mortality was comparable to the well-established risk marker N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (C-index: 0.70 vs 0.72; P = 0.225), whereas the C-indices of t-tau, Aß40, Aß42, and the Aß42:Aß40 ratio were significantly lower (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Neurodegeneration is directly interwoven with the progression of HF. Biomarkers of neurodegeneration, particularly NfL, may help identify patients potentially profiting from a comprehensive neurological work-up. Further research is necessary to test whether early diagnosis or optimized HFrEF treatment can preserve cognitive function.

Excess renin is attributed to the combination of forward and backward failure in HFrEF.

AIMS: Regulation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) still raises questions, as a large proportion of patients show normal renin levels despite manifest disease. Experimental venous congestion results in reduced renal perfusion pressure and stimulates renin secretion. We hypothesized that excess renin levels are mainly a result of right ventricular failure as a sequalae of left ventricular dysfunction. The study aimed to link right ventricular function (RVF) with renin levels and to investigate further contributors to excess RAS activation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-two chronic HFrEF patients undergoing routine ambulatory care were consecutively enrolled in a prospective, registry-based, observational study. Laboratory parameters, including cardiac-specific markers renin, aldosterone, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), echocardiographic examination (n = 247), and right heart catheterization (n = 85), were documented. The relationship between renin and its respective parameters was analysed. Renin concentration was not associated with the New York Heart Association class or NT-proBNP. Systolic blood pressure, systemic vascular resistance, serum sodium, aldosterone, and lactate dehydrogenase were associated with increased renin levels (P < 0.035 for all). Renin levels similarly increased with worsening of RVF parameters such as fractional area change, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, tissue Doppler imaging, and inferior vena cava diameter (P < 0.011 for all), but not with pulmonary pressure. Excess renin levels were observed when worsening RVF was combined with reduced renal perfusion {625 µIU/mL [interquartile range (IQR): 182-1761] vs. 67 µIU/mL [IQR: 16-231], P < 0.001}, which was associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: While unrelated to classical indices of HF severity, circulating renin levels increase with the worsening of RVF, especially in the combined presence of forward and backward failure. This might explain normal renin levels in HFrEF patients but also excess renin levels in poor haemodynamic conditions.

Myocardial Oedema as a Consequence of Viral Infection and Persistence-A Narrative Review with Focus on COVID-19 and Post COVID Sequelae.

Microvascular integrity is a critical factor in myocardial fluid homeostasis. The subtle equilibrium between capillary filtration and lymphatic fluid removal is disturbed during pathological processes leading to inflammation, but also in hypoxia or due to alterations in vascular perfusion and coagulability. The degradation of the glycocalyx as the main component of the endothelial filtration barrier as well as pericyte disintegration results in the accumulation of interstitial and intracellular water. Moreover, lymphatic dysfunction evokes an increase in metabolic waste products, cytokines and inflammatory cells in the interstitial space contributing to myocardial oedema formation. This leads to myocardial stiffness and impaired contractility, eventually resulting in cardiomyocyte apoptosis, myocardial remodelling and fibrosis. The following article reviews pathophysiological inflammatory processes leading to myocardial oedema including myocarditis, ischaemia-reperfusion injury and viral infections with a special focus on the pathomechanisms evoked by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. In addition, clinical implications including potential long-term effects due to viral persistence (long COVID), as well as treatment options, are discussed.

CILP-1 Is a Biomarker for Backward Failure and Right Ventricular Dysfunction in HFrEF.

BACKGROUND: CILP-1 regulates myocardial fibrotic response and remodeling and was reported to indicate right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in pulmonary hypertension (PH) and heart failure (HF). This study examines CILP-1 as a potential biomarker for RVD and prognosis in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients on guideline-directed medical therapy. METHODS: CILP-1 levels were measured in 610 HFrEF patients from a prospective registry with biobanking (2016-2022). Correlations with echocardiographic and hemodynamic data and its association with RVD and prognosis were analyzed. RESULTS: The median age was 62 years (Q1-Q3: 52-72), 77.7% of patients were male, and the median NT-proBNP was 1810 pg/mL (Q1-Q3: 712-3962). CILP-1 levels increased with HF severity, as indicated by NT-proBNP and NYHA class (p < 0.0001, for both). CILP-1 showed a weak-moderate direct association with increased left ventricular filling pressures and its sequalae, i.e., backward failure (LA diameter rs = 0.15, p = 0.001; sPAP rs = 0.28, p = 0.010; RVF rs = 0.218, p < 0.0001), but not with cardiac index (CI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). CILP-1 trended as a risk factor for all-cause mortality (crude HR for 500 pg/mL increase: 1.03 (95%CI: 1.00-1.06), p = 0.053) but lost significance when it was adjusted for NT-proBNP (adj. HR: 1.00 (95%CI: 1.00-1.00), p = 0.770). No association with cardiovascular hospitalization was observed. CONCLUSIONS: CILP-1 correlates with HFrEF severity and may indicate an elevated risk for all-cause mortality, though it is not independent from NT-proBNP. Increased CILP-1 is associated with backward failure and RVD rather than forward failure. Whether CILP-1 release in this context is based on elevated pulmonary pressures or is specific to RVD needs to be further investigated.

Renin Trajectories and Outcome in Stable Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) on Contemporary Therapy: A Monocentric Study from an Austrian Tertiary Hospital Outpatient Clinic.

Introduction: The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is the main target of neurohumoral therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) effectively reducing mortality. Reasonably, renin might serve as a biomarker for risk prediction and therapy response. Renin indeed bears some additional value to clinical risk models, albeit the effect is not pronounced. Whether assessing renin trajectories can overcome the weaknesses of single renin measurements has not been reported. Methods: A total of 505 patients with stable HFrEF were enrolled prospectively and followed through routine clinical visits. Active plasma renin concentration was documented up to 5 years. Changes in renin were analyzed throughout the disease course, and survival was compared for different renin trajectories within the first year. Results: Baseline renin levels were not related to all-cause mortality (crude HR for an increase of 100 µiE/ml: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.99-1.02), p = 0.414) but associated with unplanned HF hospitalizations (crude HR: 1.01 (95% CI: 1.00-1.02), p = 0.015). Renin increased during the disease course from baseline to 1-year and 2-year FUP (122.7 vs. 185.6 µIU/ml, p = 0.039, and 122.7 vs. 258.5 µIU/ml, p = 0.001). Both survival and unplanned HF hospitalization rates were comparable for different renin trajectories at 1-year FUP (p = 0.546, p = 0.357). Conclusions: Intriguingly, renin is not a good biomarker to indicate prognosis in HF, while renin trajectories over a 1-year period do not have an additional value. Rapid physiologic plasma renin variations, but also opposing effects of angiotensinogen-derived metabolites under presence of RAS blockade, might obscure the predictive ability of renin.

Obesity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with and without diabetes: risk factor or innocent bystander?

AIMS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a condition that commonly coexists with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. Whether the obesity-related survival benefit generally observed in HFpEF extends to individuals with concomitant T2DM is unclear. This study sought to examine the prognostic role of overweight and obesity in a large cohort of HFpEF with and without T2DM. METHODS AND RESULTS: This large-scale cohort study included patients with HFpEF enrolled between 2010 and 2020. The relationship between body mass index (BMI), T2DM, and survival was assessed. A total of 6744 individuals with HFpEF were included, of which 1702 (25%) had T2DM. Patients with T2DM had higher BMI values (29.4 kg/m2 vs. 27.1 kg/m2, P < 0.001), higher N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide values (864 mg/dL vs. 724 mg/dL, P < 0.001), and a higher prevalence of numerous risk factors/comorbidities than those without T2DM. During a median follow-up time of 47 months (Q1-Q3: 20-80), 2014 (30%) patients died. Patients with T2DM had a higher incidence of fatal events compared with those without T2DM, with a mortality rate of 39.2% and 26.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the overall cohort, using the BMI category 22.5-24.9 kg/m2 as the reference group, the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause death was increased in patients with BMI <22.5 kg/m2 [HR: 1.27 (confidence interval 1.09-1.48), P = 0.003] and decreased in BMI categories ≥25 kg/m2. After multivariate adjustment, BMI remained significantly inversely associated with survival in non-T2DM, whereas survival was unaltered at a wide range of BMI in patients with T2DM. CONCLUSION: Among the various phenotypes of HFpEF, the T2DM phenotype is specifically associated with a greater disease burden. Higher BMI is linked to improved survival in HFpEF overall, while this effect neutralises in patients with concomitant T2DM. Advising BMI-based weight targets and weight loss may be pursued with different intensity in the management of HFpEF, particularly in the presence of T2DM.

Individuals with HFpEF and concomitant diabetes show a distinct phenotype particularly associated with a higher disease burden and worse outcome. The obesity paradox observed in individuals with heart failure may not be generalized to HFpEF patients with concomitant diabetes.

Spinal Cord Injury and Loss of Cortical Inhibition.

After spinal cord injury (SCI), the destruction of spinal parenchyma causes permanent deficits in motor functions, which correlates with the severity and location of the lesion. Despite being disconnected from their targets, most cortical motor neurons survive the acute phase of SCI, and these neurons can therefore be a resource for functional recovery, provided that they are properly reconnected and retuned to a physiological state. However, inappropriate re-integration of cortical neurons or aberrant activity of corticospinal networks may worsen the long-term outcomes of SCI. In this review, we revisit recent studies addressing the relation between cortical disinhibition and functional recovery after SCI. Evidence suggests that cortical disinhibition can be either beneficial or detrimental in a context-dependent manner. A careful examination of clinical data helps to resolve apparent paradoxes and explain the heterogeneity of treatment outcomes. Additionally, evidence gained from SCI animal models indicates probable mechanisms mediating cortical disinhibition. Understanding the mechanisms and dynamics of cortical disinhibition is a prerequisite to improve current interventions through targeted pharmacological and/or rehabilitative interventions following SCI.