2023 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: EU IVDR 2017/746 Implementation/Impact, IVD/CDx/CLIA Approved Assays, High Dimensional Cytometry, Multiplexing Technologies, LBA Tissue Analysis, Vaccine Study Endpoints, Cell-Based Assays for Biomarkers, Cell Therapy and Vaccines (PART 2 - Recommendations on Development & Validation of Biomarkers, IVD, CDx, Cell-Based, Flow Cytometry, Ligand-Binding and Enzyme Assays; Advanced Critical Reagents Strategies).

The 17th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (17th WRIB) took place in Orlando, FL, USA on 19-23 June 2023. Over 1000 professionals representing pharma/biotech companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 17th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week to allow an exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis of biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines.Moreover, in-depth workshops on "EU IVDR 2017/746 Implementation and impact for the Global Biomarker Community: How to Comply with these NEW Regulations" and on "US FDA/OSIS Remote Regulatory Assessments (RRAs)" were the special features of the 17th edition.As in previous years, WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international, industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules as well as gene, cell therapies and vaccines to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance, and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues.This 2023 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2023 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons.This publication (Part 2) covers the recommendations on Biomarkers, IVD/CDx, LBA and Cell-Based Assays. Part 1A (Mass Spectrometry Assays and Regulated Bioanalysis/BMV), P1B (Regulatory Inputs) and Part 3 (Gene Therapy, Cell therapy, Vaccines and Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity) are published in volume 16 of Bioanalysis, issues 9 and 7 (2024), respectively.

Development of a Prototype Immunohistochemistry Assay to Measure Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression in Tumor Tissue.

CONTEXT: - With the abundance of therapeutics targeted against programmed death receptor-1 and its ligand (PD-L1) that are currently approved or in clinical development, there is interest in identifying those patients most likely to respond to these drugs. Expression of PD-L1 may be an indicator of an initial and robust inflammatory response to the presence of tumor cells. Therefore, tumors that express PD-L1 may be the most likely to respond to therapies that interrupt the negative feedback mechanism that leads to PD-L1 upregulation. OBJECTIVE: - To develop a prototype immunohistochemistry assay using the anti-PD-L1 antibody clone 22C3. DESIGN: - The assay was developed and optimized using commercially available reagents and archival tumor-bank tissue. RESULTS: - The optimized immunohistochemistry method had high precision and reproducibility. Using the prototype assay in 142 non-small cell lung cancer and 79 melanoma archival tumor-bank tissue samples, PD-L1 staining was observed at the plasma membrane of nucleated tumor and nontumor cells and, in some cases, as a distinct lichenoid pattern at the tumor-stroma border. Using a preliminary scoring method, 56% (80 of 142) of non-small cell lung cancer and 53% (42 of 79) of melanoma samples were defined as PD-L1+ based on a modified H-score of 1 or more or the presence of a distinctive staining pattern at the tumor-stroma interface. CONCLUSIONS: - The immunohistochemistry assay using the anti-PD-L1 antibody 22C3 merits further investigation in clinical trials and prevalence assessments to further understand the prognostic and predictive value of PD-L1 expression in cancer.

Prognostic Significance of PD-L1 in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Large Cohort Study of Surgically Resected Cases.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the prognostic effect of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: PD-L1 expression among 1070 surgically resected NSCLC specimens was evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis. Data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, histologic type, stage, and performance status. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (6%) were strongly PD-L1 positive and 410 (38%) were weakly PD-L1 positive. A significantly higher prevalence of PD-L1 positivity was observed among patients with squamous cell carcinoma and among stage IIIB and IV patients. PD-L1 expression may be associated with poorer overall survival, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.56 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.26, p = 0.02) for strong PD-L1 positivity, 1.18 (95% CI: 0.96-1.46; p = 0.12) for weak PD-L1 positivity, and 1.23 (95% CI: 1.00-1.51; p = 0.05) for the combined strongly and weakly positive groups compared with PD-L1 negativity. Negative prognostic effect of PD-L1 expression was not statistically significant after adjustment for postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Similar results were observed for progression-free survival. Among stage I patients, the disease recurrence rate was higher in the PD-L1-positive versus in the PD-L1-negative group (48% versus 27%, p < 0.001), with an adjusted hazard ratio for disease-free survival of 2.01 (95% CI, 1.08-3.73; p = 0.03) for strong PD-L1 positivity and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.17-2.11; p = 0.003) for weak PD-L1 positivity compared with PD-L1 negativity. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor PD-L1 expression may be associated with poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC, although its significance weakens when postoperative therapy is considered.

A clinical biomarker assay to quantitate thymic stromal lymphopoietin in human plasma at sub-pg/ml level.

BACKGROUND: Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is an attractive therapeutic target for the treatment of allergic diseases, and plasma TSLP is a potential patient selection marker in the development of therapeutic agents. RESULTS: We developed and validated an ultrasensitive electrochemiluminescence assay for measurement of TSLP in plasma with a lower limit of quantitation of 0.12 pg/ml, which allowed the quantitation of TSLP in approximately 90% of human plasma samples tested. The assay demonstrated excellent performance characteristics, including precision, accuracy, sensitivity and dilution linearity. Stability and biological variability of TSLP in plasma were also assessed for clinical sample analysis and data interpretation. CONCLUSION: The validated TSLP assay enables assessment of circulating TSLP as a patient selection marker in the development of therapeutics to treat atopic diseases.

Workshop report: Crystal City V--quantitative bioanalytical method validation and implementation: the 2013 revised FDA guidance.

In September 2013, the FDA released a draft revision of the Bioanalytical Method Validation (BMV) Guidance, which included a number of changes to the expectations for bioanalysis, most notably the inclusion of biomarker assays and data. To provide a forum for an open, inclusive discussion of the revised draft BMV Guidance, the AAPS and FDA once again collaborated to convene a two-and-a-half day workshop during early December 2013 in Baltimore, MD, USA. The resulting format embodied extensive open discussion and each thematic session included only brief, concise descriptions by Agency and industry representatives prior to opening the floor discussion. The Workshop was built around four thematic sessions (Common Topics, Chromatographic, Ligand-Binding Assays, and Biomarkers) and a final session with international regulators, concluding with a review of the outcomes and recommendations from the thematic sessions. This Workshop report summarizes the outcomes and includes topics of agreement, those where the FDA will consider the Industry's perspective, and those where the workshop provided a first open dialogue. This article will be available to the bioanalytical community at http://www.aaps.org/BMV13 .

Influence of Pre-Analytical Factors on Thymus- and Activation-Regulated Chemokine Quantitation in Plasma.

Thymus- and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) in serum/plasma associates with the disease activity of atopic dermatitis (AD), and is a promising tool for assessing the response to the treatment of the disease. TARC also exists within platelets, with elevated levels detectable in AD patients. We examined the effects of pre-analytical factors on the quantitation of TARC in human EDTA plasma. TARC levels in platelet-free plasma were significantly lower than those in platelet-containing plasma. After freeze-thaw, TARC levels increased in platelet-containing plasma, but remained unchanged in platelet-free plasma, suggesting TARC was released from the platelets during the freeze-thaw process. In contrast, TARC levels were stable in serum independent of freeze-thaw. These findings underscore the importance of pre-analytical factors to TARC quantitation. Plasma TARC levels should be measured in platelet-free plasma for accurate quantitation. Pre-analytical factors influence the quantitation, interpretation, and implementation of circulating TARC as a biomarker for the development of AD therapeutics.

A candidate plasma protein classifier to identify Alzheimer's disease.

Biomarkers currently used in the aid for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein markers and brain neuroimaging markers. These biomarkers, however, either involve semi-invasive procedures or are costly to measure. Thus, AD biomarkers from more easily accessible body fluids, such as plasma, are very enticing. Using an aptamer-based proteomic technology, we profiled 1,129 plasma proteins of AD patients and non-demented control individuals. A 5-protein classifier for AD identification was constructed in the discovery study with excellent 10-fold cross-validation performance (90.1% sensitivity, 84.2% specificity, 87.9% accuracy, and AUC as 0.94). In an independent validation study, the classifier was applied and correctly predicted AD with 100.0% sensitivity, 80.0% specificity, and 90.0% accuracy, matching or outperforming the CSF Aß42 and tau biomarkers whose performance were assessed in individual-matched CSF samples obtained at the same visit as plasma sample collection. Moreover, the classifier also correctly predicted mild cognitive impairment, an early pre-dementia state of the disease, with 96.7% sensitivity, 80.0% specificity, and 92.5% accuracy. These studies demonstrate that plasma proteins could be used effectively and accurately to contribute to the clinical diagnosis of AD. Although additional and more diverse cohorts are needed for further validation of the robustness, including the support of postmortem diagnosis, the 5-protein classifier appears to be a promising blood test to contribute diagnosis of AD.

Development and fit-for-purpose validation of a LC-MS/MS assay for fibrinogen peptide A quantitation in human plasma.

BACKGROUND: Fibrinopeptide A (FPA) is a plasma peptide, formed by the action of thrombin on fibrinogen during clog formation. FPA represents a direct indicator of thrombin activity and could potentially be used as a biomarker for anti-thrombotic therapy development. Results/Methodology: A LC-MS/MS assay with a high throughput solid phase extraction procedure was developed and validated to measure FPA in plasma. The lower limit-of-quantitation (LLOQ) of this assay was determined to be 0.16 nM. The inter- and intra-day%CV was <15%. Freeze-thaw stability of FPA was ±30% up to 3 cycles and linear response of FPA was observed for plasma dilution up to 16-fold. CONCLUSION: The assay was validated and the biological variability of FPA in plasma was established (1-30 nM).

Navigating the rapids: the development of regulated next-generation sequencing-based clinical trial assays and companion diagnostics.

Over the past decade, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has experienced meteoric growth in the aspects of platform, technology, and supporting bioinformatics development allowing its widespread and rapid uptake in research settings. More recently, NGS-based genomic data have been exploited to better understand disease development and patient characteristics that influence response to a given therapeutic intervention. Cancer, as a disease characterized by and driven by the tumor genetic landscape, is particularly amenable to NGS-based diagnostic (Dx) approaches. NGS-based technologies are particularly well suited to studying cancer disease development, progression and emergence of resistance, all key factors in the development of next-generation cancer Dxs. Yet, to achieve the promise of NGS-based patient treatment, drug developers will need to overcome a number of operational, technical, regulatory, and strategic challenges. Here, we provide a succinct overview of the state of the clinical NGS field in terms of the available clinically targeted platforms and sequencing technologies. We discuss the various operational and practical aspects of clinical NGS testing that will facilitate or limit the uptake of such assays in routine clinical care. We examine the current strategies for analytical validation and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approval of NGS-based assays and ongoing efforts to standardize clinical NGS and build quality control standards for the same. The rapidly evolving companion diagnostic (CDx) landscape for NGS-based assays will be reviewed, highlighting the key areas of concern and suggesting strategies to mitigate risk. The review will conclude with a series of strategic questions that face drug developers and a discussion of the likely future course of NGS-based CDx development efforts.

An ultra-sensitive clinical biomarker assay: quantitation of thymus and activation-regulated chemokine in human plasma.

BACKGROUND: Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) is a Th2 type, pro-allergic secreted chemokine. TARC in plasma/serum has been proposed as a marker for disease activity of atopic dermatitis (AD) and as a pharmacodynamic readout in the clinical development of novel agents for the treatment of AD. RESULTS: An ultra-sensitive electrochemiluminescence assay for TARC in human plasma was developed and analytically validated. The assay demonstrated excellent performance characteristics, including precision, sensitivity, dilution linearity, accuracy and specificity. Stability and biological variability of TARC in plasma were also assessed for clinical sample analysis and data interpretation. CONCLUSION: The improved sensitivity allowed the measurement of approximately 90% TARC inhibition from baseline levels of healthy subjects and >90% TARC inhibition from baseline levels of AD patients after drug treatment. A validated TARC electrochemiluminescence assay enables pharmacodynamic assessment in the development of AD therapeutics.

Practical guidance for implementing predictive biomarkers into early phase clinical studies.

The recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) coapprovals of several therapeutic compounds and their companion diagnostic devices (FDA News Release, 2011, 2013) to identify patients who would benefit from treatment have led to considerable interest in incorporating predictive biomarkers in clinical studies. Yet, the translation of predictive biomarkers poses unique technical, logistic, and regulatory challenges that need to be addressed by a multidisciplinary team including discovery scientists, clinicians, biomarker experts, regulatory personnel, and assay developers. These issues can be placed into four broad categories: sample collection, assay validation, sample analysis, and regulatory requirements. In this paper, we provide a primer for drug development teams who are eager to implement a predictive patient segmentation marker into an early clinical trial in a way that facilitates subsequent development of a companion diagnostic. Using examples of nucleic acid-based assays, we briefly review common issues encountered when translating a biomarker to the clinic but focus primarily on key practical issues that should be considered by clinical teams when planning to use a biomarker to balance arms of a study or to determine eligibility for a clinical study.

Development and validation of a clinical trial patient stratification assay that interrogates 27 mutation sites in MAPK pathway genes.

Somatic mutations identified on genes related to the cancer-developing signaling pathways have drawn attention in the field of personalized medicine in recent years. Treatments developed to target a specific signaling pathway may not be effective when tumor activating mutations occur downstream of the target and bypass the targeted mechanism. For instance, mutations detected in KRAS/BRAF/NRAS genes can lead to EGFR-independent intracellular signaling pathway activation. Most patients with these mutations do not respond well to anti-EGFR treatment. In an effort to detect various mutations in FFPE tissue samples among multiple solid tumor types for patient stratification many mutation assays were evaluated. Since there were more than 30 specific mutations among three targeted RAS/RAF oncogenes that could activate MAPK pathway genes, a custom designed Single Nucleotide Primer Extension (SNPE) multiplexing mutation assay was developed and analytically validated as a clinical trial assay. Throughout the process of developing and validating the assay we overcame many technical challenges which include: the designing of PCR primers for FFPE tumor tissue samples versus normal blood samples, designing of probes for detecting consecutive nucleotide double mutations, the kinetics and thermodynamics aspects of probes competition among themselves and against target PCR templates, as well as validating an assay when positive control tumor tissue or cell lines with specific mutations are not available. We used Next Generation sequencing to resolve discordant calls between the SNPE mutation assay and Sanger sequencing. We also applied a triplicate rule to reduce potential false positives and false negatives, and proposed special considerations including pre-define a cut-off percentage for detecting very low mutant copies in the wild-type DNA background.

Development and validation of an ultra-sensitive method for the measurement of plasma renin activity in human plasma via LC-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: Renin catalyzes the conversion of angiotensinogen to angiotensin I (Ang I), the first and rate-limiting step in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Plasma renin activity (PRA) is an important target engagement biomarker in the clinical development of renin inhibitors. We have developed and validated an improved PRA assay that incorporates an Ang I trapping antibody followed by extraction and quantification of Ang I using a highly sensitive and specific LC-MS/MS method. RESULTS: The following assay performance characteristics were assessed as part of analytical validation: precision, LOQ, spike recovery, dilution linearity, stability, absolute recovery and biological variability. The assay demonstrated excellent performance characteristics. Notably, the sensitivity of the assay was increased 140-fold when compared with a previous enzyme immunoassay-based assay. CONCLUSION: The improved sensitivity allowed the measurement of >95% PRA inhibition from baseline levels. In addition, we compared the LC-MS/MS-based assay to an enzyme immunoassay-based assay.

2012 white paper on recent issues in bioanalysis and alignment of multiple guidelines.

Over 400 professionals representing pharmaceutical companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies participated in the 6th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (WRIB). Like the previous sessions, this event was in the format of a practical, focused, highly interactive and informative workshop aiming for high-quality, improved regulatory compliance and scientific excellence. Numerous 'hot' topics in bioanalysis of both small and large molecules were shared and discussed, leading to consensus and recommendations among panelists and attendees representing the bioanalytical community. The major outcome of this year's workshop was the noticeable alignment of multiple bioanalytical guidance/guidelines from different regulatory agencies. This represents a concrete step forward in the global harmonization of bioanalytical activities. The present 2012 White Paper acts as a practical and useful reference document that provides key information and solutions on several topics and issues in the constantly evolving world of bioanalysis.

Attribution of the discrepancy between ELISA and LC-MS/MS assay results of a PEGylated scaffold protein in post-dose monkey plasma samples due to the presence of anti-drug antibodies.

High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods were developed for the quantification of a PEGylated scaffold protein drug in monkey plasma samples. The LC-MS/MS method was based on the extraction of the therapeutic protein with a water-miscible organic solvent and the subsequent trypsin digestion of the extract followed by the detection of a surrogate peptide. The assay was linear over a range of 10-3,000 ng/mL. The ELISA method utilized a therapeutic target-binding format in which the recombinant target antigen was used to capture the drug in the sample, followed by detection with an anti-PEG monoclonal antibody. The assay range was 30-2,000 ng/mL. A correlation study between the two methods was performed by measuring the drug concentrations in plasma samples from a single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) study in cynomolgus monkeys following a 5-mg/kg subcutaneous administration (n = 4). In the early time points of the PK profile, the drug concentrations obtained by the LC-MS/MS method agreed very well with those obtained by the ELISA method. However, at later time points, the drug concentrations measured by the LC-MS/MS method were consistently higher than those measured by the ELISA method. The PK parameters calculated based on the concentration data showed that the two methods gave equivalent peak exposure (C(max)) at 24-48 h. However, the LC-MS/MS results exhibited about 1.53-fold higher total exposure (AUC(tot)) than the ELISA results. The discrepancy between the LC-MS/MS and ELISA results was investigated by conducting immunogenicity testing, anti-drug antibody (ADA) epitope mapping, and Western blot analysis of the drug concentrations coupled with Protein G separation. The results demonstrated the presence of ADA specific to the engineered antigen-binding region of the scaffold protein drug that interfered with the ability of the drug to bind to the target antigen used in the ELISA method. In the presence of the ADAs, the ELISA method measured only the active circulating drug (target-binding), while the LC-MS/MS method measured the total circulating drug. The work presented here indicates that the bioanalysis of protein drugs may be complicated owing to the presence of drug-binding endogenous components or ADAs in the post-dose (incurred) samples. The clear understanding of the behavior of different bioanalytical techniques vis-à-vis the potentially interfering components found in incurred samples is critical in selecting bioanalytical strategies for measuring protein drugs.

2011 White paper on recent issues in bioanalysis and regulatory findings from audits and inspections.

The 5th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (WRIB) was organized by the Calibration and Validation Group as a 2-day full immersion workshop for pharmaceutical companies, CROs and regulatory agencies to discuss, review, share perspectives, provide potential solutions and agree upon a consistent approach to recent issues in the bioanalysis of both small and large molecules. High quality, better compliance to regulations and scientific excellence are the foundation of this workshop. As in the previous editions of this significant event, recommendations were made and a consensus was reached among panelists and attendees, including industry leaders and regulatory experts representing the global bioanalytical community, on many 'hot' topics in bioanalysis. This 2011 White Paper is based on the conclusions from this workshop, and aims to provide a practical reference guide on those topics.

Translational biomarkers: from preclinical to clinical a report of 2009 AAPS/ACCP Biomarker Workshop.

There have been some successes in qualifying biomarkers and applying them to drug development and clinical treatment of various diseases. A recent success is illustrated by a collaborative effort among the US Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, and the pharmaceutical industry to provide a set of seven preclinical kidney toxicity biomarkers for drug development. Other successes include, but are not limited to, clinical biomarkers for cancer treatment and clinical management of heart transplant patients. The value of fully qualified surrogate endpoints in facilitating successful drug development is undisputed, especially for diseases in which the traditional clinical outcome can only be assessed in large, multi-year trials. Emerging biomarkers, including chemical genomic or imaging biomarkers, and measurement of circulating tumor cells hold great promise for early diagnosis of disease and as prognostic tests for managing treatment of chronic diseases such as osteoarthritis, Alzheimer disease, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. To advance the success of treating and managing these diseases, efforts are needed to establish the temporal relationship between changes in inflammatory or imaging biomarkers with the progression of the chronic disease, and in the case of cancer, between the extent of circulating cancer cells and tumor progression or remission.

Characterization and development of a Luminex(®)-based assay for the detection of human IL-23.

BACKGROUND: IL-23 is a cytokine produced by dendritic cells, T-cells and macrophages that plays a critical regulatory role in the inflammatory and autoimmune responses. We describe the development and preclinical validation of a highly sensitive Luminex(®) assay specific to IL-23 that is suitable for its measurement in support of early-phase clinical trials. RESULTS: Intra-assay precision for the BioSource™ ELISA was under 12.3%, and under 5.2% for the eBioscience(®) ELISA. In comparison, the Luminex assays provided an intra-assay precision under 6.2%. The measured inter-assay precision was less than 15.6% for the BioSource ELISA, under 33% for the eBioscience and less than 10% for the Luminex assays. CONCLUSIONS: The Luminex method described provides a way to measure IL-23 in clinical samples either as a single biomarker or as a panel of biomarkers. The assay should prove useful to scientists and clinicians investigating the biology of IL-23 and to those needing to monitor changes in IL-23 as part of a clinical study.

Immunoassay-based measurement of clinical biomarkers for monitoring changes in nasal cavity.

BACKGROUND: Many drugs for treatment of allergies, migraine headaches, inflammation, and other indications are administered into the nasal cavity providing access to the immune and central nervous systems. One of the concerns for using this route of administration is potential damage to the nasal epithelium and mucosal regions. We assembled a panel of clinical biomarkers that can be used to monitor changes in the nasal epithelium, mucosa, and olfactory regions in preparation for clinical trials involving drugs administered via intranasal route. These biomarkers included albumin, elastase, IL-6, IL-8, lactoferrin, myeloperoxidase and nerve growth factor. METHODS: Immunoassays were developed and used to measure changes in these biomarkers in nasal lavage samples collected twice daily from 30 assumed-healthy volunteers over a 2-day period. Various statistical methods including analysis of variance (ANOVA), paired t-test and Pearson's product-moment correlation were used to evaluate the data. RESULTS: Although the basal levels of these biomarkers were varied among subjects, the data show that the concentrations of albumin, elastase and IL-8 were significantly higher in samples collected in the morning compared to samples collected later during the day. Pre-washing nasal cavity prior to collecting nasal lavage samples did alter the measurement of elastase and albumin, but did not influence the levels of the other biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that this panel of biomarkers can be used to monitor changes in the nasal cavity including those affected by diurnal fluctuations. These results also provide useful baseline values and sources of variability for each biomarker that could be used to help design clinical trials.

Workshop report and follow-up--AAPS Workshop on current topics in GLP bioanalysis: Assay reproducibility for incurred samples--implications of Crystal City recommendations.

The Conference Report of the 3rd AAPS/FDA Bioanalytical Workshop (Crystal City III) endorsed the concept that assay methods supporting bioanalytical data in submissions must demonstrate assay reproducibility by using incurred samples. The present Workshop was convened to provide a forum for discussion and consensus building about incurred sample assay reproducibility for both nonclinical and clinical studies. Information about current regulatory perspectives on incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) was presented, implications of ISR for both large and small molecules were discussed, and the steering committee put forth recommendations for performing ISR. These recommendations from the Workshop, along with the subsequent evolution of approaches leading to a robust ISR program, may be used by scientists performing bioanalytical assays for regulated studies to provide additional confirmation of assay reproducibility for incurred samples.