Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 149
1.
Schizophr Res Cogn ; 37: 100310, 2024 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572271

Despite the functional impact of cognitive deficit in people with psychosis, objective cognitive assessment is not typically part of routine clinical care. This is partly due to the length of traditional assessments and the need for a highly trained administrator. Brief, automated computerised assessments could help to address this issue. We present data from an evaluation of PsyCog, a computerised, non-verbal, mini battery of cognitive tests. Healthy Control (HC) (N = 135), Clinical High Risk (CHR) (N = 233), and First Episode Psychosis (FEP) (N = 301) participants from a multi-centre prospective study were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. PsyCog was used to assess cognitive performance at baseline and at up to two follow-up timepoints. Mean total testing time was 35.95 min (SD = 2.87). Relative to HCs, effect sizes of performance impairments were medium to large in FEP patients (composite score G = 1.21, subtest range = 0.52-0.88) and small to medium in CHR patients (composite score G = 0.59, subtest range = 0.18-0.49). Site effects were minimal, and test-retest reliability of the PsyCog composite was good (ICC = 0.82-0.89), though some practice effects and differences in data completion between groups were found. The present implementation of PsyCog shows it to be a useful tool for assessing cognitive function in people with psychosis. Computerised cognitive assessments have the potential to facilitate the evaluation of cognition in psychosis in both research and in clinical care, though caution should still be taken in terms of implementation and study design.

2.
Schizophr Res ; 266: 237-248, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38431986

BACKGROUND: We examined the course of illness over a 12-month period in a large, international multi-center cohort of people with a first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder (FES) in a naturalistic, prospective study (PSYSCAN). METHOD: Patients with a first episode of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder (depressive type) or schizophreniform disorder were recruited at 16 institutions in Europe, Israel and Australia. Participants (N = 304) received clinical treatment as usual throughout the study. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 24.3 years (SD = 5.6), and 67 % were male. At baseline, participants presented with a range of intensities of psychotic symptoms, 80 % were taking antipsychotic medication, 68 % were receiving psychological treatment, with 46.5 % in symptomatic remission. The mean duration of untreated psychosis was 6.2 months (SD = 17.0). After one year, 67 % were in symptomatic remission and 61 % were in functional remission, but 31 % had been readmitted to hospital at some time after baseline. In the cohort as a whole, depressive symptoms remained stable over the follow-up period. In patients with a current depressive episode at baseline, depressive symptoms slightly improved. Alcohol, tobacco and cannabis were the most commonly used substances, with daily users of cannabis ranging between 9 and 11 % throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable insight into the early course of a broad range of clinical and functional aspects of illness in FES patients in routine clinical practice.


Antipsychotic Agents , Psychotic Disorders , Schizophrenia , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Adult , Female , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Schizophrenia/therapy , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Follow-Up Studies
4.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 11(1): 36-46, 2024 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38043562

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on defining relapse in schizophrenia, and scale-derived criteria with unclear clinical relevance are widely used. We aimed to develop an evidence-based scale-derived set of criteria to define relapse in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHODS: We searched the Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in clinically stable adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, and obtained individual participant data on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), and Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). Our main outcomes were PANSS-derived criteria based on worsening in PANSS total score. We examined their relevance using equipercentile linking with CGI-S and functioning scales, and their test-performance in defining relapse with diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis against CGI-S worsening (≥1-point increase together with a score ≥4 points) and psychiatric hospitalisation. FINDINGS: Based on data from seven RCTs (2354 participants; 1348 men [57·3%] and 1006 women [42·7%], mean age of 39·5 years [SD 12·0, range 17-89]; 303 Asian [12.9%], 255 Black [10.8%], 1665 White [70.7%], and other or unspecified 131 [5.6%]), an increase of 12 points or more in PANSS total (range 30-210 points) corresponded to clinically important deterioration in global severity of illness (≥1 point increase in CGI-S, range 1-7) and functioning (≥10 points decline in PSP or SOFAS, range 1-100). The interpretation of percentage changes varied importantly across different baseline scores. An increase of 12 points or more in PANSS total had good sensitivity and specificity using CGI-S as reference standard (sensitivity 82·1% [95% CI 77·1-86·4], specificity 86·9% [82·9-90·3]), as well as good sensitivity but lower specificity compared to hospitalisation (sensitivity 81·7% [74·1-87·7], specificity 69·2% [60·5-76·9]). Requiring either an increase in PANSS total or in specific items for positive and disorganization symptoms further improved test-performance. Cutoffs for situations where high sensitivity or specificity is needed are presented. INTERPRETATION: An increase of either 12 points or more in the PANSS total score, or worsening of specific positive and disorganisation symptom items could be a reasonable evidence-based definition of relapse in schizophrenia, potentially linking symptoms used to define remission and relapse. Percentage changes should not be used to define relapse because their interpretation depends on baseline scores. FUNDING: German Research Foundation (grant number: 428509362).


Antipsychotic Agents , Psychotic Disorders , Schizophrenia , Adult , Male , Female , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Diagnostic Tests, Routine
5.
Transl Psychiatry ; 13(1): 373, 2023 Dec 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38042835

There is currently no quantifiable method to predict long-term clinical outcomes in patients presenting with a first episode of psychosis. A major barrier to developing useful markers for this is biological heterogeneity, where many different pathological mechanisms may underly the same set of symptoms in different individuals. Normative modelling has been used to quantify this heterogeneity in established psychotic disorders by identifying regions of the cortex which are thinner than expected based on a normative healthy population range. These brain atypicalities are measured at the individual level and therefore potentially useful in a clinical setting. However, it is still unclear whether alterations in individual brain structure can be detected at the time of the first psychotic episode, and whether they are associated with subsequent clinical outcomes. We applied normative modelling of cortical thickness to a sample of first-episode psychosis patients, with the aim of quantifying heterogeneity and to use any pattern of cortical atypicality to predict symptoms and response to antipsychotic medication at timepoints from baseline up to 95 weeks (median follow-ups = 4). T1-weighted brain magnetic resonance images from the GAP and OPTiMiSE samples were processed with Freesurfer V6.0.0 yielding 148 cortical thickness features. An existing normative model of cortical thickness (n = 37,126) was adapted to integrate data from each clinical site and account for effects of gender and site. Our test sample consisted of control participants (n = 149, mean age = 26, SD = 6.7) and patient data (n = 295, mean age = 26, SD = 6.7), this sample was used for estimating deviations from the normative model and subsequent statistical analysis. For each individual, the 148 cortical thickness features were mapped to centiles of the normative distribution and converted to z-scores reflecting the distance from the population mean. Individual cortical thickness metrics of +/- 2.6 standard deviations from the mean were considered extreme deviations from the norm. We found that no more than 6.4% of psychosis patients had extreme deviations in a single brain region (regional overlap) demonstrating a high degree of heterogeneity. Mann-Whitney U tests were run on z-scores for each region and significantly lower z-scores were observed in FEP patients in the frontal, temporal, parietal and occipital lobes. Finally, linear mixed-effects modelling showed that negative deviations in cortical thickness in parietal and temporal regions at baseline are related to more severe negative symptoms over the medium-term. This study shows that even at the early stage of symptom onset normative modelling provides a framework to identify individualised cortical markers which can be used for early personalised intervention and stratification.


Antipsychotic Agents , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Adult , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Brain/pathology , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Temporal Lobe/pathology
7.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 10(12): 934-943, 2023 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37924833

BACKGROUND: TV-46000 is a long-acting, subcutaneous, antipsychotic agent that combines risperidone and an innovative, copolymer-based drug delivery technology in a suspension that was approved in April, 2023 for subcutaneous use. The aim of the phase 3 Risperidone Subcutaneous Extended-release (RISE) study was to evaluate the efficacy of TV­46000 in schizophrenia. METHODS: The RISE study consisted of two treatment stages: a 12-week, open-label stabilisation phase with oral risperidone (stage 1), and an open-ended, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, relapse-prevention phase with subcutaneous TV-46000 (stage 2) done at 69 clinical sites across the USA and Bulgaria. Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia more than 1 year before screening by DSM-5 criteria and confirmed at screening by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 and who had at least one relapse within 24 months before screening were eligible for enrolment. Patients who were outpatients and stabilised in stage 1 continued to stage 2 and were randomly assigned 1:1:1 by a computer-generated randomisation list to receive either subcutaneous TV-46000 once monthly, TV-46000 once every 2 months, or placebo until relapse, early discontinuation, or the study was stopped because the prespecified stopping criterion of at least 90 relapse events was met. The primary endpoint was time to impending relapse of the intention-to-treat patient population in stage 2. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03503318, and is complete. FINDINGS: The study enrolled the first patient on June 1, 2018, and the last patient completed on Dec 3, 2020. 1267 patients were screened, 863 enrolled, and 544 (male, n=332 [61%], female, n=212 [39%]; mean [SD] age, 49·3 [10·98] years; Black or African American, n=322 [59%]; White, n=206 [38%]; Asian, n=7 [1%]; Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, n=2 [<1%]; race not reported, n=3 [<1%]; other race, n=4 [<1%]; Hispanic or Latinx, n=117 [22%]) randomly assigned to subcutaneous TV-46000 once monthly (n=183), TV-46000 once every 2 months (n=180), or placebo (n=181). Time to impending relapse was significantly prolonged by 5·0 times with TV-46000 once monthly (hazard ratio, 0·200 [95% CI 0·109-0·367]; p<0·0001) and by 2·7 times with TV-46000 once every 2 months (0·375 [0·227-0·618]; p<0·0001) versus placebo. Most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events (ie, ≥5% of patients in either TV-46000 group) that occurred more often in patients receiving TV-46000 (once monthly or once every 2 months) versus placebo were injection site nodules (7% for TV-46000 once monthly, 7% for TV-46000 once every 2 months, 3% for placebo), weight increased (4%, 6%, 2%, respectively), and extrapyramidal disorder (5%, 3%, 0% respectively). Serious adverse events were reported for eight (4%) patients in the TV-46000 once-monthly group, ten (6%) patients in the TV-46000 once-every-2-months group, and 14 (8%) patients in the placebo group. The safety profile of TV-46000 was consistent with other approved formulations of risperidone. No new safety signals were identified. INTERPRETATION: In patients with schizophrenia, subcutaneous TV-46000 once monthly and once every 2 months significantly delayed impending relapse versus placebo. TV-46000 is an effective long-acting, subcutaneous, antipsychotic agent treatment option in adult patients with schizophrenia, with a favourable benefit-risk profile. FUNDING: Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D.


Antipsychotic Agents , Schizophrenia , Adult , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Risperidone/adverse effects , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Bulgaria , Treatment Outcome , Chronic Disease , Double-Blind Method , Recurrence
8.
Front Psychiatry ; 14: 1196748, 2023.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37575571

Introduction: In recent year, many attempts have been made to provide patients with alternatives to psychiatric hospitalization during acute distress. Although several hospitalization alternatives have been offered, most of them still require patients to be distanced from their families, friends, and the social environment. Methods: In this report we describe the implementation of a novel approach to psychiatric care termed "Technologically assisted Intensive Home Treatment", where patients arriving to emergency settings are directed to home care with technological aids that enable close monitoring and ongoing contact with their therapists. Results: We describe the rationale and treatment principles of the treatment, and provide an elaborative description of the implementation process during the first year of implementation. Discussion: Additional attention is given to factors associated with early dropout from the program, in order to inform readers of predictors to optimal care. Limitations and directions for future research and practice are discussed.Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered in the database of clinical trials (registration number SHEBA-19-6555-MW-CTIL) and in the Ministry of Health (registration number MOH_2022-08-22_011992).

9.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 211(6): 467-470, 2023 06 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37252883

ABSTRACT: Short-Term Acute Residential Treatment (START) homes, located in the community and operating in noninstitutional atmospheres, seek to reduce rehospitalization. This report investigates whether these homes reduced rates and duration of subsequent inpatient stays in psychiatric hospitals. For 107 patients treated in START homes after psychiatric hospitalization, we compared the number and duration of psychiatric hospitalizations before and after their START stay. We found that, compared with the year before the START stay, in the year after the START stay, patients had fewer episodes of rehospitalization (1.60 [SD = 1.23] vs. 0.63 [SD = 1.05], t[106] = 7.097, p < 0.001) and a briefer accumulative duration of inpatient stays (41.60 days [SD = 49.4] vs. 26.60 days [SD = 53.25], t[106] = -2.32, p < 0.03). This suggests that START homes can reduce rehospitalization rates and should be considered a valid alternative to psychiatric hospitalization.


Patient Readmission , Residential Treatment , Humans , Hospitalization , Length of Stay , Hospitals, Psychiatric
10.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 73: 65-74, 2023 Aug.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37126871

This large randomized controlled trial examined the effect of naproxen, simvastatin or both on patients with schizophrenia. This was a large multi-center, twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-arm clinical trial administering naproxen, simvastatin or both to 232 subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The primary outcome was change in PANSS total score. ANCOVA and mixed model analyses of the PANSS total score change showed no significant difference between naproxen and placebo (adjusted p = 0.78), simvastatin and placebo (adjusted p = 0.38) or the combination of naproxen and simvastatin compared to placebo (adjusted p = 0.72). No statistically significant drug-placebo differences were found in the PANSS subscales, CGI or BACS between all groups. There was a near significant improvement in negative symptoms (p = 0.06), and an analysis of the 5 factor PANSS factors analysis found a significant improvement in simvastatin above placebo in withdrawal (p = 0.03). These finding were not significant after correcting for multiple comparisons. A meta-analysis on changes in total PANSS scores in studies on statins in schizophrenia, including the present study together with six other studies showed a significant improvement for statins compared to placebo (Hedges' G of -0.245 (CI= -0.403, -0.086, p = 0.002). When one outlying study which showed particularly strong effects of statins was removed, part of the effect went away. In conclusion, in this study, naproxen and simvastatin alone or in combination were not efficacious in the treatment of symptoms in schizophrenia. However, the meta-analysis of all studies of simvastatin for schizophrenia indicates further research on this topic.


Antipsychotic Agents , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Psychotic Disorders , Schizophrenia , Humans , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Naproxen/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Simvastatin/therapeutic use , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Double-Blind Method , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Multicenter Studies as Topic
11.
Am J Psychiatry ; 180(5): 357-366, 2023 05 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36945823

OBJECTIVE: Social anxiety disorder is common and impairing. The efficacy of pharmacotherapy is moderate, highlighting the need for alternative therapies. This study compared the efficacy of gaze-contingent music reward therapy (GC-MRT), an eye-tracking-based attention bias modification treatment, with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment or a waiting list control condition in reducing social anxiety disorder symptoms. Superior clinical effects of similar magnitude were expected for the active treatments relative to the control condition. METHODS: Participants were 105 treatment-seeking adults with social anxiety disorder, randomly allocated to 12 weeks of GC-MRT, SSRI, or waiting list control. Mean changes in clinician-rated and self-reported social anxiety symptoms from baseline to mid- and posttreatment assessments were compared between groups using generalized estimating equations. Changes in attentional dwell time on threat were also examined. RESULTS: Analysis indicated a significant differential reduction in symptoms between groups. Patients in the GC-MRT and SSRI groups had lower social anxiety scores at the mid- and posttreatment assessments compared with patients in the waiting list group. The efficacy of the active treatments did not differ. Only patients in the GC-MRT group showed reduction in dwell time on threat from baseline to posttreatment assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Eye-tracking-based attention bias modification is an acceptable and effective treatment option for social anxiety disorder.


Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Phobia, Social , Adult , Humans , Phobia, Social/drug therapy , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Waiting Lists , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety
12.
Schizophr Res ; 255: 9-13, 2023 05.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36933291

Roluperidone has antagonist properties for 5-HT2A, sigma2, α1A- and α1B-adrenergic receptors, but no dopaminergic binding affinities. In 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT), treatment improved negative symptoms of schizophrenia and social functioning among patients with moderate to severe negative symptoms. We report results of the protocol specified analysis of 2 open-label extension studies of 24 and 40 weeks investigating whether improvement of negative symptoms was sustained without significant adverse effects or worsening of psychosis. Following 12-week double-blind phase of both RCTs, patients were eligible to receive monotherapy roluperidone 32 mg/day or 64 mg/day for 24 weeks (trial 1) or 40 weeks (trial 2) in open-label extension study. Trial 1 included 244 patients of whom 142 entered 24-week open-label extension and trial 2 included 513 patients of whom 341 entered 40-week open-label extension. Trial 1 had PANSS negative factor score of Pentagonal Structure Model as primary outcome. Trial 2 had Marder Negative Symptoms Factor Score as primary outcome measure and Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total score as secondary outcome. During open-label extensions, continued improvements in negative symptoms and on PSP were observed. Overall rate of symptomatic worsening requiring discontinuation of roluperidone and treatment with an antipsychotic was <10 %. Roluperidone was well tolerated with no meaningful changes in vital signs, laboratory values, weight gain, metabolic indices, or extrapyramidal symptoms. Results of 2 open-label extension trials support roluperidone as a treatment of negative symptoms and social functioning deficits in patients with moderate to severe negative symptoms of schizophrenia.


Antipsychotic Agents , Schizophrenia , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Indoles/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
13.
Schizophr Bull ; 49(4): 903-913, 2023 07 04.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36999551

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: This analysis examined the relationship between cannabis use, compliance with antipsychotics and risk for relapse in patients in remission following a first episode of schizophrenia, schizophreniform, or schizoaffective disorder. STUDY DESIGN: Analyses were performed on data from a large European study on first episode of schizophrenia, schizophreniform, or schizoaffective disorder (OPTiMiSE). After 10 weeks of antipsychotic treatment, 282/446 patients (63%) met criteria for symptomatic remission; of whom 134/282 (47.5%) then completed a 1-year follow-up. Cross-lagged models and mediation models investigated the temporal relationships between cannabis use, compliance with antipsychotics, social functioning, and symptomatic worsening/relapse. STUDY RESULTS: Compared to nonusers, cannabis use increased risk for relapse, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 3.03 (SE = 0.32), P < .001, even in patients who were compliant with antipsychotic medication, adjusted HR = 2.89, (SE = 0.32), P < .001. Cannabis use preceded symptomatic worsening and was followed by worsening of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score at the 1-year end-point (standardized ß = 0.62, SE = 0.19, P = .001) and by worsening of social functioning (coef = -0.66, P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients in remission from their first episode of schizophrenia, schizophreniform, or schizoaffective disorder, cannabis use increases the rate of relapse in both compliant and noncompliant individuals. Importantly, the temporal relationship between cannabis and relapse was that cannabis use preceded later relapse, noncompliance, and decrease in social functioning, and not that patients began to relapse, then used cannabis. Further research with a precision psychiatry approach might identify those patients in particular danger of relapse when using cannabis.


Antipsychotic Agents , Cannabis , Hallucinogens , Psychotic Disorders , Schizophrenia , Humans , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists , Recurrence
14.
Schizophr Bull ; 49(4): 893-902, 2023 07 04.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36916850

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Treatment response to specific antipsychotic medications is difficult to predict on clinical grounds alone. The current study hypothesizes that the baseline complement pathway activity predicts the treatment response and investigates the relationship between baseline plasma biomarkers with treatment response to antipsychotic medications. STUDY DESIGN: Baseline plasma samples were collected from first episode of psychosis patients (n = 243) from a multi-center clinical trial. The participants were treated with amisulpride for 4 weeks. Levels of complement and coagulation proteins at baseline were measured using both data-dependent and data-independent mass spectrometry approaches. The primary outcome was remission status at 4 weeks and the secondary outcomes included change in psychotic and functional symptoms over the period of treatment. In addition, immunoassays were performed at baseline for complement C1R, as well as for activation markers C4a and sC5b-9. STUDY RESULTS: The plasma level of complement variant C4A was significantly associated with remission at 4 weeks. Moreover, higher levels of several complement and coagulation pathway proteins were associated with a reduction in psychotic symptoms and an improvement in functioning. Immunoassays showed an association of baseline levels of C1R and C4a as well as complement activation marker sC5b-9 levels with treatment response. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that the response to antipsychotic treatment might be related to pre-treatment levels of plasma complement and coagulation pathway proteins. This is consistent with independent evidence associating immune dysfunction with the pathophysiology of psychosis. Moreover, these results inform the development of novel therapeutic approaches that target the complement system for psychosis.


Antipsychotic Agents , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacology , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis
15.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 10(3): 197-208, 2023 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36716759

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder with periods of remission and relapse. As discontinuation of antipsychotic medication is the most important reason for relapse, long-term maintenance treatment is key. Whether intramuscular long-acting (depot) antipsychotics are more efficacious than oral medication in preventing medication discontinuation is still unresolved. We aimed to compare time to all-cause discontinuation in patients randomly allocated to long-acting injectable (LAI) versus oral medication. METHODS: EULAST was a pragmatic, randomised, open-label trial conducted at 50 general hospitals and psychiatric specialty clinics in 15 European countries and Israel. Patients aged 18 years and older, with DSM-IV schizophrenia (as confirmed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 5 plus) and having experienced their first psychotic episode from 6 months to 7 years before screening, were randomly allocated (1:1:1:1) using block randomisation to LAI paliperidone, LAI aripiprazole, or the respective oral formulations of these antipsychotics. Randomisation was stratified by country and duration of illness (6 months up to 3 years vs 4 to 7 years). Patients were followed up for up to 19 months. The primary endpoint was discontinuation, regardless of the reason, during 19 months of treatment. We used survival analysis to assess the time until all-cause discontinuation in the intention-to-treat (ITT) group, and per protocol analyses were also done. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02146547, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Feb 24, 2015, and Dec 15, 2018, 533 individuals were recruited and assessed for eligibility. The ITT population included 511 participants, with 171 (33%) women and 340 (67%) men, and a mean age of 30·5 (SD 9·6) years. 410 (80%) of 511 participants were White, 35 (7%) were Black, 20 (4%) were Asian, and 46 (9%) were other ethnicity. In the combined oral antipsychotics treatment group of 247 patients, 72 (29%) patients completed the study and 175 (71%) met all-cause discontinuation criteria. In the combined LAI treatment arm of 264 patients, 95 (36%) completed the study and 169 (64%) met the all-cause discontinuation criteria. Cox regression analyses showed that treatment discontinuation for any cause did not differ between the two combined treatment groups (hazard ration [HR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·94-1·43, p=0·18). No significant difference was found in the time to all-cause discontinuation between the combined oral and combined LAI treatment groups (log rank test χ2=1·87 [df 1]; p=0·17). During the study, 121 psychiatric hospitalisations occurred in 103 patients, and one patient from each of the LAI groups died; the death of the patient assigned to paliperidone was assessed to be unrelated to the medication, but the cause of other patient's death was not shared with the study team. 86 (25%) of 350 participants with available data met akathisia criteria and 70 (20%) met parkinsonism criteria at some point during the study. INTERPRETATION: We found no substantial advantage for LAI antipsychotic treatment over oral treatment regarding time to discontinuation in patients with early-phase schizophrenia, indicating that there is no reason to prescribe LAIs instead of oral antipsychotics if the goal is to prevent discontinuation of antipsychotic medication in daily clinical practice. FUNDING: Lundbeck and Otsuka.


Antipsychotic Agents , Schizophrenia , Male , Humans , Female , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Paliperidone Palmitate/therapeutic use , Israel , Europe , Recurrence
16.
Psychol Med ; 53(7): 2878-2884, 2023 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34911593

BACKGROUND: Although the ICD and DSM differentiate between different psychiatric disorders, these often share symptoms, risk factors, and treatments. This was a population-based, case-control, sibling study examining familial clustering of all psychiatric disorders and low IQ, using data from the Israel Draft-Board Registry on all Jewish adolescents assessed between 1998 and 2014. METHODS: We identified all cases with autism spectrum disorder (ASD, N = 2128), severe intellectual disability (ID, N = 9572), attention-deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD) (N = 3272), psychotic (N = 7902), mood (N = 9704), anxiety (N = 10 606), personality (N = 24 816), or substance/alcohol abuse (N = 791) disorders, and low IQ (⩾2 SDs below the population mean, N = 31 186). Non-CNS control disorders were adolescents with Type-1 diabetes (N = 2427), hernia (N = 29 558) or hematological malignancies (N = 931). Each case was matched with 10 age-matched controls selected at random from the Draft-Board Registry, with replacement, and for each case and matched controls, we ascertained all full siblings. The main outcome measure was the relative recurrence risk (RRR) of the sibling of a case having the same (within-disorder RRR) or a different (across-disorder RRR) disorder. RESULTS: Within-disorder RRRs were increased for all diagnostic categories, ranging from 11.53 [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.23-14.40] for ASD to 2.93 (95% CI: 2.80-3.07) for personality disorders. The median across-disorder RRR between any pair of psychiatric disorders was 2.16 (95% CI: 1.45-2.43); the median RRR between low IQ and any psychiatric disorder was 1.37 (95% CI: 0.93-1.98). There was no consistent increase in across-disorder RRRs between the non-CNS disorders and psychiatric disorders and/or low IQ. CONCLUSION: These large population-based study findings suggest shared etiologies among most psychiatric disorders, and low IQ.


Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Autism Spectrum Disorder , Intellectual Disability , Adolescent , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/epidemiology , Intellectual Disability/epidemiology , Intellectual Disability/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Risk Factors , Case-Control Studies
18.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 83(5)2022 08 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35921506

Objective: Several small clinical trials have reported that the dopamine agonist pramipexole was beneficial in treating patients with schizophrenia. A confirmatory trial was conducted to test this hypothesis.Methods: This 16-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study included 200 subjects meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Patients were randomized to receive either pramipexole (0.75 mg twice daily, n = 100) or placebo (n = 100) as an add-on to their regular antipsychotic treatment. The primary outcome measure was the total score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS); secondary outcome measures included PANSS subscale and cognitive functioning scores. Recruitment was performed in 30 sites in Romania and 1 site in the Republic of Moldova between January and June 2011.Results: Analysis of covariance models showed no significant difference between pramipexole and placebo for total PANSS (P > .99) and PANSS positive (P > .99), negative (P = .73), and general psychopathology (P = .99) subscale scores. Changes in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale and Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia scores showed no significant difference between pramipexole and placebo.Conclusions: The results of this large randomized controlled trial indicated that pramipexole was not efficacious as an add-on to antipsychotic medications for schizophrenia.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01320982.


Antipsychotic Agents , Psychotic Disorders , Schizophrenia , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Pramipexole/therapeutic use , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
19.
Mol Psychiatry ; 27(7): 3107-3114, 2022 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35459901

Previous studies on psychiatric patients infected with COVID-19 have reported a more severe course of disease and higher rates of mortality compared with the general population. This cohort study linked Israeli national databases including all individuals ever hospitalized for a psychiatric disorder (cases), and COVID-19 testing, infection, hospitalization, mortality, and vaccinations, between March 1st 2020 and March 31st 2021. Cases were 125,273 individuals aged 18 and above ever hospitalized in a psychiatric facility (ICD-10 F10-F69 or F90-F99), compared to the total population, n = 6,143,802. Compared with the total population, cases were less likely to be tested for COVID-19, 51.2% (95% CI: 50.8-51.7) vs 62.3% (95% CI 62.2-62.4) and had lower rates of confirmed COVID infection, 5.9% (95% CI: 5.8-6.1) vs 8.9% (95% CI: 8.9-8.9). Among those infected, risks for COVID-19 hospitalization, COVID-19 attributed mortality and all-cause mortality were higher for cases than the total population, adjusted odds ratios were 2.10; (95% CI: 1.96-2.25), 1.76; (95% CI: 1.54-2.01) and 2.02; (95% CI: 1.80-2.28), respectively. These risks were even higher for cases with non-affective psychotic disorders and bipolar disorder. Age adjusted rates of vaccination were lower in cases, 60.4% (95% CI: 59.9-60.8) vs 74.9% (95% CI: 74.8-75.0) in the total population, and particularly low for cases with non-affective psychotic disorders, 56.9% (95% CI: 56.3-57.6). This study highlights the need to increase testing for COVID-19 in individuals ever hospitalized for a psychiatric disorder, closely monitor those found positive, and to reach out to encourage vaccination.


COVID-19 , Mental Disorders , COVID-19 Testing , Cohort Studies , Hospitalization , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Vaccination
...