Interobserver variation in the classification of thymic lesions including biopsies and resection specimens in an international digital microscopy panel.

AIMS: Thymic tumours are rare in routine pathology practice. Although the World Health Organization (WHO) classification describes a number of well-defined categories, the classification remains challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of the WHO classification among a large group of international pathologists with expertise in thymic pathology and by using whole slide imaging to facilitate rapid diagnostic turnover. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and five tumours, consisting of 90 biopsies and 215 resection specimens, were reviewed with a panel-based virtual microscopy approach by a group of 13 pathologists with expertise in thymic tumours over a period of 6 years. The specimens were classified according to the WHO 2015 classification. The data were subjected to statistical analysis, and interobserver concordance (Fleiss kappa) was calculated. All cases were diagnosed within a time frame of 2 weeks. The overall level of agreement was substantial (κ = 0.6762), and differed slightly between resection specimens (κ = 0.7281) and biopsies (κ = 0.5955). When analysis was limited to thymomas only, and they were grouped according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines into B2, B3 versus A, AB, B1 and B3 versus A, AB, B1, B2, the level of agreement decreased slightly (κ = 0.5506 and κ = 0.4929, respectively). Difficulties arose in distinguishing thymoma from thymic carcinoma. Within the thymoma subgroup, difficulties in distinction were seen within the B group. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement in diagnosing thymic lesions is substantial when they are assessed by pathologists with experience of these rare tumours. Digital pathology decreases the turnaround time and facilitates access to what is essentially a multinational resource. This platform provides a template for dealing with rare tumours for which expertise is sparse.

Difficulties in differentiating between checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis and lung metastasis in a patient with melanoma.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is associated with significant toxicities such as pneumonitis; the clinical presentation of the latter can be misleading and may mimic metastasis. We report the case of a melanoma patient who developed late-onset pneumonitis after discontinuation of treatment with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) (patient had a complete response). The patient was asymptomatic, however, surveillance computed tomography (CT) scan showed a growing lung nodule and several new-onset, small lung lesions highly suspicious for recurrence. A biopsy of the lesions revealed organizing pneumonia with absence of malignant cells. The lung lesions completely resolved after 6 months without any intervention. The patient is still in complete remission 2 years after the initial diagnosis of melanoma.

Immunohistochemical and Image Analysis-Based Study Shows That Several Immune Checkpoints are Co-expressed in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Tumors.

INTRODUCTION: The understanding of immune checkpoint molecules' co-expression in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NCLC) is important to potentially design combinatorial immunotherapy approaches. METHODS: We studied 225 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues from stage I-III NCLCs - 142 adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and 83 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) - placed in tissue microarrays. Nine immune checkpoint markers were evaluated; four (programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1], B7-H3, B7-H4, and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 [IDO-1]) expressed predominantly in malignant cells (MCs) and five (inducible T cell costimulator, V-set immunoregulatory receptor, T-cell immunoglobulin mucin family member 3, lymphocyte activating 3, and OX40) expressed mostly in stromal tumor-associated inflammatory cells (TAICs). All markers were examined using a quantitative image analysis and correlated with clinicopathologic features, TAICs, and molecular characteristics. RESULTS: Using above the median value as positive expression in MCs and high density of TAICs expressing those markers, we identified higher expression of immune checkpoints in SCC than ADC. Common simultaneous expression by MCs was PD-L1 + B7-H3 + IDO-1 in ADC and PD-L1 + B7-H3, or B7-H3 + B7-H4, in SCC. TAICs expressing checkpoint were significantly higher in current smokers than in never smokers. Almost all the immune checkpoint markers showed positive correlation with TAICs expressing inflammatory cell markers. KRAS-mutant ADC specimens showed higher expression of PD-L1 in MCs and of B7-H3, T-cell immunoglobulin mucin family member 3, and IDO-1 in TAICs than wild type. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed worse prognosis in ADC patients with higher B7-H4 expression by MCs. CONCLUSIONS: We found frequent immunohistochemical co-expression of immune checkpoints in surgically resected NCLC tumors and correlated with tumor histology, smoking history, tumor size, and the density of inflammatory cells and tumor mutational status.