Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 43(18): E1069-E1076, 2018 09 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29557926

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Real time in vivo measurement of forces in the cervical spine of goats following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). OBJECTIVE: To measure interbody forces in the cervical spine during the time course of fusion following ACDF with plates of different stiffnesses. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Following ACDF, the biomechanics of the arthrodesis is largely dictated by the plate. The properties of the plate prescribe the extent of load-sharing through the disc space versus the extent of stress-shielding. Load-sharing promotes interbody bone formation and stress-shielding can inhibit maturation of bone. However, these principles have never been validated in vivo. Measuring in vivo biomechanics of the cervical spine is critical to understanding the complex relationships between implant design, interbody loading, load-sharing, and the progression of fusion. METHODS: Anterior cervical plates of distinct bending stiffnesses were placed surgically following ACDF in goats. A validated custom force-sensing interbody implant was placed in the disc space to measure load-sharing in the spine. Interbody loads were measured in vivo in real time during the course of fusion for each plate. RESULTS: Interbody forces during flexion/extension were highly dynamic. In animals that received high stiffness plates, maximum forces were in extension whereas in animals that received lower stiffness plates, maximum forces were in flexion. As fusion progressed, interbody load magnitude decreased. CONCLUSION: The magnitude of interbody forces in the cervical spine is dynamic and correlates to activity and posture of the head and neck. The magnitude and consistency of forces in the interbody space correlates to plate stiffness with more compliant plates resulting in more consistent load-sharing. The magnitude of interbody forces decreases as fusion matures suggesting that smart interbody implants may be used as a diagnostic tool to indicate the progression of interbody fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.


Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas/tendencias , Vértebras Cervicales/fisiología , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Discectomía/tendencias , Fusión Vertebral/tendencias , Animales , Fenómenos Biomecánicos/fisiología , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Discectomía/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo/tendencias , Cabras , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Soporte de Peso/fisiología
2.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 43(18): E1061-E1068, 2018 09 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29547464

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical testing of human cadaveric cervical and goat cervical motion segments. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the effects of plate stiffness on load-sharing, instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR), and posterior element loading after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ACDF is intended to create an environment, which facilitates sufficient stability and biomechanical conditions to promote bone formation. The relationship between cervical plate stiffness, load-sharing, and the IAR is complex. The ideal cervical plate is sufficiently stiff to limit interbody motion but is compliant enough to facilitate load-sharing rather than stress-shielding. METHODS: Anterior cervical plates of distinct bending stiffnesses were applied to human and goat cervical motion segments following ACDF. A validated custom force-sensing interbody implant was placed in the disc space to measure load-sharing in the spine. Interbody loads, posterior element strain, and the IAR were measured during flexion/extension for each plate. RESULTS: Load-sharing in the interbody space, posterior element strain, and the location of the IAR were all significantly affected by plate stiffness. More compliant plates resulted in more load sharing, less posterior element strain, and a more dorsally located IAR relative to stiffer plates. CONCLUSION: A more compliant plate fosters more consistent load-sharing through the entire range of flexion/extension, which may promote faster bone formation and better fusion. A more compliant plate causes less posterior element strain, which may reduce facet joint loads and in turn reduce facet joint arthrosis. An ideal plate may be one that is stiff enough to minimize interbody motion and yet compliant enough to allow consistent load-sharing and minimal increase in posterior element strain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.


Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Discectomía/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo/métodos , Ensayo de Materiales/métodos , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Animales , Fenómenos Biomecánicos/fisiología , Vértebras Cervicales/patología , Discectomía/métodos , Cabras , Humanos , Prótesis e Implantes , Fusión Vertebral/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA