Joint Associations of Device-Measured Sleep Duration and Efficiency With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study of 90 398 UK Biobank Participants.

BACKGROUND: Both sleep duration and efficiency are essential for health outcomes. However, few studies have considered the effects of both sleep duration and efficiency on predicting the risks of mortality. This study investigated the independent and joint associations of accelerometer-measured sleep duration and efficiency with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. METHODS: The UK Biobank is a cohort study of over 500 000 individuals recruited between 2006 and 2010. This study included participants wearing wrist accelerometers for 7 consecutive days between February 2013 and December 2015. Mortality was ascertained by the national death registries. RESULTS: Of the 90 398 participants (age, 62.4 [7.8] years, 43.5% male) who were included, 2 685 deaths were reported within a median follow-up duration of 6.4 years. Both accelerometer-measured short (adjusted hazard ratios, 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.45) and long sleep duration (adjusted hazard ratios, 1.16; 95% CI: 1.06-1.28) were positively associated with the risks of all-cause mortality. Lower sleep efficiency was associated with an increased risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Significant interaction existed between accelerometer-measured sleep duration and efficiency for the risk of all-cause mortality (Pinteraction = .001), participants with long sleep duration and lower sleep efficiency had a double mortality risk compared with those with higher sleep efficiency and normal sleep duration (adjusted hazard ratios = 2.11; 95% CI: 1.44-3.09). CONCLUSIONS: Accelerometer-measured short/long sleep duration and lower sleep efficiency were associated with increased risks of mortality. Sleep efficiency modified the effects of long sleep duration on survival.

Association of Social Isolation and Loneliness With Incident Heart Failure in a Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Social isolation and loneliness have emerged as important risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, particularly during the coronavirus disease pandemic. However, it is unclear whether social isolation and loneliness had independent and joint associations with incident heart failure (HF). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the association of social isolation, loneliness, and their combination with incident HF. METHODS: The UK Biobank study is a population-based cohort study. Social isolation and loneliness were assessed using self-reported questionnaires. HF cases were identified by linking hospital records and death registries. The weighted polygenic risk score associated with HF was calculated. RESULTS: Among the 464,773 participants (mean age: 56.5 ± 8.1 years, 45.3% male), 12,898 incident HF cases were documented during a median follow-up of 12.3 years. Social isolation (most vs least: adjusted HR: 1.17; 95% CI:1.11-1.23) and loneliness (yes vs no: adjusted HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.11-1.27) were significantly associated with an increased risk of incident HF. The association between an elevated risk of HF and social isolation was modified by loneliness (Pinteraction = 0.034). A gradient of association between social isolation and the risk of incident HF was found only among individuals without loneliness (Ptrend < 0.001), but not among those with loneliness (Ptrend = 0.829). These associations were independent of the genetic risk of HF. CONCLUSIONS: Social isolation and loneliness were independently associated with a higher likelihood of incident HF regardless of genetic risk. The association between social isolation and incident HF was potentially modified by loneliness status.

Associations of Childhood Maltreatment and Genetic Risks With Incident Heart Failure in Later Life.

Background We aimed to determine the associations of childhood maltreatment with incident heart failure in later life and explore the potentially modifying effects of genetic risk for heart failure on the associations. Methods and Results This cohort study included adults free of heart failure at baseline enrolled between 2006 and 2010 in the UK Biobank. Childhood maltreatment was retrospectively assessed with the online Childhood Trauma Screener in 2016. Five types of childhood maltreatment (range, 0-5), including physical abuse, physical neglect, emotional abuse, emotional neglect, and sexual abuse, were combined into a total score. A weighted polygenic risk score for heart failure was constructed. Incident all-cause heart failure was prospectively ascertained via hospital inpatient and death records, followed up to May 31, 2021. A total of 153 287 adults (mean [SD] age, 55.9 [7.7] years; 43.6% male) were included. Over a median of 12.2 years (interquartile range, 11.5-12.9 years) of follow-up, 2352 participants had incident heart failure. Childhood maltreatment was associated with a greater risk of incident heart failure in a dose-response manner. One additional type of childhood maltreatment was associated with a 15% increase in the risk of developing heart failure (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15 [95% CI, 1.07-1.23]). There was no statistically significant interaction between genetic risk and childhood maltreatment (Pinteraction=0.218). Among participants with high genetic risk, those with 3 to 5 types of childhood maltreatment had a double hazard (HR, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.43-2.80]) of developing heart failure when taking those without any childhood maltreatment as the reference. Conclusions Irrespective of genetic risk for heart failure, childhood maltreatment was associated with an increased risk of incident heart failure in a dose-dependent manner.