Medical error analysis in dermatology according to the reports of the North Rhine Medical Association from 2004-2013.

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a central issue of health care provision. There are various approaches geared towards improving health care provision and patient safety. By conducting a systematic retrospective error analysis, the present article aims to identify the most common complaints brought forth within the field of dermatology over a period of ten years. METHODS: The reports of the Expert Committee for Medical Malpractice Claims of the North Rhine Medical Association (from 2004 to 2013) on dermatological procedures were analyzed (n =  247 reports in the field of dermatology). RESULTS: Expert medical assessments in the field of dermatology are most frequently commissioned for nonsurgical therapies (e.g. laser therapy, phototherapy). While suspected diagnostic errors constitute the second most common reason for complaints, presumed dermatosurgery-related errors represent the least common reason for commissioning expert medical assessments. CONCLUSIONS: The most common and easily avoidable sources of medical errors include failure to take a biopsy despite suspicious clinical findings, or incorrect clinicopathological correlations resulting in deleterious effects for the patient. Furthermore, given the potential for incorrect indications and the inadequate selection of devices to be used as well as their parameter settings, laser and phototherapies harbor an increased risk in the treatment of dermatological patients. The fourth major source of error leading to complaints relates to incorrect indications as well as incorrect dosage and administration of drugs. Analysis of expert medical assessment reports on treatment errors in dermatology as well as other medical specialties is helpful and provides an opportunity to identify common sources of error and error-prone structures.

Progressive nodular histiocytosis.

Progressive nodular histiocytosis (PNH) represents a very rare type of non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis (NLCH). It can be distinguished from other types by the occurrence of yellow to red-brown papules and nodules measuring a few centimeters in size. Histologically the nodules represent spindle-cell xanthogranulomas. We report on two new cases of PNH with novel clinical symptoms. In the first case, the patient had microcytic anemia due to massive iron deposition in the nodules and a progressively worsening limp due to involvement of the soles. The complex therapeutic challenge was effectively managed by successive surgical ablation of all visible lesions. The second patient had epibulbar infiltrates. The clinical variability of PNH leads to considerable overlap with other forms of NLCH.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization, a diagnostic aid in ambiguous melanocytic tumors: European study of 113 cases.

Some melanocytic tumors are ambiguous, so the reproducible histopathological diagnosis of benign or malignant lesion is difficult. This study evaluated the contribution of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) first in 43 non-equivocal melanomas and nevi, and then in 113 ambiguous melanocytic tumors selected by expert pathologists from six different European institutions. We included two groups of ambiguous tumors: patients without recurrence (5-year minimal follow-up) and with metastases. An independent triple-blind histopathological review was performed to classify tumors as 'favor benign' (A-) or 'favor malignant' (A+). A four-color probe set targeting 6p25, 6q23, 11q13 and CEP6 was used for FISH. In the 43 non-equivocal melanomas and nevi, sensitivity was 85% and specificity 90%. Ninety out of 95 ambiguous melanocytic tumors included were FISH interpretable (67 FISH negative and 23 FISH positive). Of the 90 patients, 69 presented no recurrence and 21/90 exhibited metastases. These ambiguous tumors were mostly spitzoid tumors (45/90). Histopathological reviewers classified these tumors as favor malignant (49/90) and favor benign (32/90), whereas nine cases had a discordant diagnosis. By comparison with outcome, the sensitivity and specificity of histopathological review were 95 and 52%, and the sensitivity and specificity of FISH were 43 and 80%. Compared with histopathological review, the sensitivity and specificity of FISH were 34.5 and 91%. Interestingly, by combining the histopathological diagnosis with FISH results, the diagnosis was optimized, especially by increasing specificity (76% instead of 52% for expert diagnosis alone) and by improving sensitivity compared with FISH alone (90 vs 43% for FISH result alone). The value of this FISH test is to add a reproducible demonstration of malignancy to the histopathological diagnosis, especially in doubtful/ambiguous melanocytic tumors. A positive FISH test reinforces the diagnosis of melanoma, allowing such tumors (particularly thick tumors) to be managed as melanomas.

Histopathology of anti-laminin 5 mucous membrane pemphigoid.

BACKGROUND: Anti-laminin 5 mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is an autoimmune blistering disease characterized by autoantibodies against the major basement membrane component laminin 5 (laminin 332, epiligrin). OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: We reviewed 17 biopsy specimens from 9 patients with anti-laminin 5 MMP in an attempt to define typical histopathologic features of the disease. RESULTS: Fifteen specimens showed subepidermal blister formation, while two biopsy specimens revealed an epithelial ulcer. In 11 biopsies a sparse to moderate inflammatory infiltrate composed of lymphocytes and neutrophils with some eosinophils was observed. Four biopsies showed a dense infiltrate dominated by neutrophils in two cases and by eosinophils in one case. The remaining biopsy revealed a dense lymphoplasmacellular infiltrate without granulocytes. Scarring of the upper dermis was present only in 5 specimens. Immunohistochemical analysis localized type IV collagen to the dermal side of the blister, suggesting that split formation occurred within the lamina lucida of the cutaneous basement membrane. LIMITATIONS: The number of patients studied was relatively small. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathology of anti-laminin 5 MMP is characterized by subepidermal blistering and a sparse to moderate superficial lymphohistiocytic infiltrate with neutrophils and/or eosinophils. Both infiltrate density and composition may vary, making anti-laminin 5 MMP indistinguishable from other autoimmune subepidermal blistering diseases by histopathology alone. Scarring is present only in a minority of cases and is not a sensitive clue to the diagnosis of anti-laminin 5 MMP.

Gorham-Stout disease--stabilization during bisphosphonate treatment.

A 45-year-old woman presented with recent onset of left-sided chest pain. On clinical examination, these symptoms seemed to be strictly localized to a region that was marked by a long-standing cutaneous erythematous lesion. Laboratory results showed no gross abnormalities. Radiological imaging including conventional X-ray, MRI scans, and 3D CT reconstruction of the rib cage revealed circumscript destruction of the left lateral ribs 9-11. Histological analysis of a rib biopsy showed angiomatous hypervascularization and intracortical fibrosis. In keeping with these findings, the patient's condition was diagnosed as Gorham-Stout disease, a rare condition with localized, often unilateral, bone destruction. Monotherapy with bisphosphonates (pamidronate 30 mg i.v. every 3 months) was initiated, leading to rapid disappearance of local pain. Follow-up over 24 months documented a stable clinical and radiological picture without evidence of progressive bone destruction.

Subacute prurigo variant of bullous pemphigoid: autoantibodies show the same specificity compared with classic bullous pemphigoid.

We describe a 76-year-old white woman with a 6-month history of intensive pruritus and excoriated papules resembling subacute prurigo. Histopathology showed signs of chronic dermatitis, whereas findings by direct and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy were compatible with bullous pemphigoid (BP). The patient's serum contained IgG autoantibodies that recognized epitopes on both BP180 and BP230 by Western blot analysis of epidermal extracts. In addition, we found strong reactivity with recombinant NC16A, an immunodominant region of BP180 targeted in the majority of BP sera, whereas no antibodies against the keratinocyte-derived soluble BP180 ectodomain (LAD-1) or the recombinant intracellular domain of BP180 were detected. The patient's disease responded well to oral methylprednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil. Disease activity correlated with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reactivity of antibodies to BP180 but not with titers of antibodies to the dermoepidermal junction as determined by indirect immunofluorescence on salt-split skin. Our findings suggest that the subacute prurigo form of BP is a true variant of BP.