Radical vaginal trachelectomy: long-term oncologic and fertility outcomes in patients with early cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Radical vaginal trachelectomy is a fertility-preserving treatment for patients with early cervical cancer. Despite encouraging oncologic and fertility outcomes, large studies on radical vaginal trachelectomy are lacking. METHOD: Demographic, histological, fertility, and follow-up data of consecutive patients who underwent radical vaginal trachelectomy between March 1995 and August 2021 were prospectively recorded and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 471 patients of median age 33 years (range 21-44) were included. 83% (n=390) were nulliparous women. Indications were International Federation of Gynecology and Oncology (FIGO, 2009) stages IA1 with lymphvascular space involvement (LVSI) in 43 (9%) patients, IA1 multifocal in 8 (2%), IA2 in 92 (20%), IB1 in 321 (68%), and IB2/IIA in 7 (1%) patients, respectively. LVSI was detected in 31% (n=146). Lymph node staging was performed in 151 patients (32%) by the sentinel node technique with a median of 7 (range 2-14) lymph nodes and in 320 (68%) by systematic lymphadenectomy with a median of 19 (range 10-59) lymph nodes harvested. Residual tumor was histologically confirmed in 29% (n=136). In total, 270 patients (62%) were seeking pregnancy of which 196 (73%) succeeded. There were 205 live births with a median fetal weight of 2345 g (range 680-4010 g). Pre-term delivery occurred in 94 pregnancies (46%). After a median follow-up of 159 months (range 2-312), recurrences were detected in 16 patients (3.4%) of which 43% occurred later than 5 years after radical vaginal trachelectomy. Ten patients (2.1%) died of disease (five more than 5 years after radical vaginal trachelectomy). Overall survival, disease-free survival, and cancer-specific survival were 97.5%, 96.2%, and 97.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms oncologic safety of radical vaginal trachelectomy associated with a high chance for childbearing. High rate of pre-term delivery may be due to cervical volume loss. Our long-term oncologic data can serve as a benchmark for future modifications of fertility-sparing surgery.

Phase II study of cetrorelix, a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this work was to study the anticancer activity of cetrorelix, a decapeptide with LHRH receptor antagonist properties in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. About 80% of primary ovarian cancers and cell lines bear LHRH receptors. Cetrorelix has anticancer activity in in vitro and in vivo ovarian cancer models. METHODS: Eligible patients with ovarian or mullerian carcinoma resistant to platinum chemotherapy received cetrorelix 10 mg subcutaneously every day. Eligibility criteria included age > or = 18, PS < or = 2, measurable disease, chemistries and blood counts in normal range, no estrogen replacement for at least 2 weeks, and no known allergic reactions to extrinsic peptide. In patients volunteering for a biopsy, tissue was taken to perform a LHRH receptor assay. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were treated. Median age was 58 years. Median performance status was 0. Median number of prior chemotherapies was 3. Three patients had partial remissions lasting 9, 16, and 17 weeks. Toxicities effects included grade 4 anaphylactoid reaction (one patient) controlled by cortisol and cimetidine, grade 2 histamine reaction (two patients), grade 2 arthralgia (one patient) 20% cholesterol increase (two patients, who did not require specific treatment), minor hot flushes, headache, and local skin reaction at the injection site. Six of seven samples were LHRH receptor positive for mRNA and/or ligand assay. Two responding patients were LHRH receptor positive. The patient who had no receptor did not respond. CONCLUSION: Cetrorelix has activity against ovarian cancer in this refractory population, and has minimal toxicity, except for potential anaphylactoid reactions. Activity may be mediated through the LHRH receptor.

Biology of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone system in gynecological cancers.

The expression of GnRH and its receptor as a part of an autocrine regulatory system of cell proliferation has been demonstrated in a number of human malignant tumors, including cancers of the breast, ovary and endometrium. Dose-dependent antiproliferative effects of GnRH agonists in cell lines derived from these cancers have been observed by various investigators. GnRH antagonists also have marked antiproliferative activity in most breast, ovarian and endometrial cancer cell lines tested, indicating that the dichotomy of GnRH agonists and antagonists might not apply to the GnRH system in cancer cells. The classical GnRH receptor signal-transduction mechanisms, known to operate in the pituitary, are not involved in the mediation of antiproliferative effects of GnRH analogs in cancer cells. Rather, the GnRH receptor interacts with the mitogenic signal transduction of growth factor receptors and related oncogene products associated with tyrosine kinase activity, via activation of a phosphotyrosine phosphatase, resulting in downregulation of cancer cell proliferation. In addition, GnRH activates nuclear factor kappaB and protects the cancer cells from apoptosis. Furthermore, GnRH induces activation of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase/activator protein-1 (AP-1) pathway independent of the known AP-1 activators, protein kinase or mitogen activated protein kinase.