Moderate-intensity aerobic exercise vs desmopressin in adolescent males with mild hemophilia A: a randomized trial.

Persons with mild hemophilia A (HA) may use intranasal desmopressin prior to sports participation. Desmopressin is expensive and can cause vomiting, headache, palpitation, and occasionally seizures. Our group has previously documented a 2.3-fold increase in factor VIII activity (FVIII:C) in adolescents with mild HA after moderate-intensity aerobic exercise. Herein, we report principal findings of a randomized trial of intranasal desmopressin vs a standardized, moderate-intensity aerobic exercise regimen in adolescents with mild HA. Our primary objective was to compare the change in FVIII:C associated with these 2 interventions. We also examined changes in hemostatic parameters arising from their sequential administration. The study was conducted simultaneously at the Hospital for Sick Children, Canada, and Nationwide Children's Hospital, USA. Thirty-two eligible male adolescents (mean age ± standard deviation: 16.1 ± 2.6 years) with mild HA (mean baseline FVIII:C: 27.9% ± 18.4%) were randomized to 1 of 4 study arms (desmopressin followed by exercise, desmopressin alone, exercise followed by desmopressin, and exercise alone). Blood work was obtained at baseline and at 3 subsequent time-points. Participants randomized to exercise cycled on an ergometer for approximately 12 minutes, with the final 3 minutes at 85% of their predicted maximum heart rate. Standard weight-based dosing of desmopressin was used. Mean immediate increase in FVIII:C was 1.7-fold with exercise compared with 1.9-fold with desmopressin (noninferiority, P = .04). Exercise-induced improvement in hemostatic parameters including FVIII:C was brief compared with more sustained improvements seen with desmopressin. More than 60% of participants randomized to receive both exercise and desmopressin achieved normal (>50%) FVIII:C, 75 and 135 minutes into the study protocol.

Optimizing patient flow in a multidisciplinary haemophilia clinic using quality improvement methodology.

INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary clinics in academic settings are often inefficient and can lead to lengthy clinic visits for patients and staff. AIM: We aimed to use quality improvement (QI) methodology and a multidisciplinary approach to optimize outpatient comprehensive haemophilia clinic flow. METHODS: At baseline, a multidisciplinary QI team created a key driver diagram to identify drivers of haemophilia clinic flow. Identified drivers included patient needs/scheduling, provider flow and laboratory/research requirements. From December 2016 to August 2017, value stream mapping (VSM) was used to identify barriers to clinic flow, and plan-do-study-act cycles were used to address these barriers. Interventions included (a) standardizing the order in which providers saw patients to enable time-sensitive laboratories, (b) improving HTC team meeting functionality, (c) optimizing a visual management board and implementing a flow coordinator, (d) initiating a team huddle prior to clinic start and (e) modifying the clinic appointment template. Timely laboratory draw was used as a surrogate marker of clinic flow, and VSM utilization percentage was used as an objective measure of efficiency. RESULTS: We did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in timed laboratory draws; however, clinic utilization percentage increased by 30%, which resulted in adding point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound services without lengthening clinic duration. CONCLUSION: Quality improvement methodology is an effective means of improving clinic utilization in a multidisciplinary clinic.