Select drug-drug interactions with colchicine and cardiovascular medications: A review.

Several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the clinical utility of colchicine in the prevention and management of various cardiovascular conditions, including secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, acute and chronic pericarditis, and atrial fibrillation. As a result, it is reasonable to anticipate increased use of colchicine within the cardiovascular specialty. However, colchicine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and a substrate of the efflux transporter, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), creating the potential for clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Therefore, when colchicine is administered concomitantly with other cardiovascular agents that inhibit CYP3A4 or P-gp, there is an increased risk of significant DDIs, potentially leading to negative sequelae. This article summarizes the evidence supporting the use of colchicine for cardiovascular disease, describes the mechanisms behind DDIs with select cardiovascular medications, and provides suggestions regarding colchicine dosing and management of DDIs to minimize the risk of poor tolerability and colchicine toxicity.

Statin-associated muscle symptoms-A review: Individualizing the approach to optimize care.

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, also known as "statins" are considered first-line pharmacologic therapy for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). They have been demonstrated efficacy in a variety of patients populations to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Like any pharmacologic therapy, however, they are not without possible adverse effects that can lead to discontinuation, thus leading to a loss of benefit. The most common side effect related to statin therapy impacting compliance is musculoskeletal related, commonly referred to as statin-associated muscle systems (SAMS). While the overall incidence is relatively low, the consequences of nonadherence to statin therapy can have a negative impact on patient care. Therefore, it is important for healthcare providers to understand risk factors, how to diagnose, and how to manage this unfortunate adverse effect in order to optimize care.

Human Angiopoietin-like Protein 3/ANGPTL3 Antibodies: Adding to the Armamentarium in the Management of Dyslipidemia.

ABSTRACT: Cardiovascular (CV) disease remains the leading cause of death in the United States. In addition to lifestyle modifications, current guidelines primarily focus on lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to reduce atherosclerotic CV disease risk. However, despite aggressive management, a degree of residual risk remains, suggesting that focusing on lowering LDL-C alone may be inadequate and that other lipid parameters may need to be targeted. In patients who remain at high risk despite current pharmacologic options either because of inadequate response, elevated levels of other lipoproteins, or those who have genetic variants predisposing them to atherosclerotic CV disease, additional treatment strategies continue to be sought. One such group is the homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia population, especially those patients carrying the null low-density lipoprotein receptor mutation as they often fail to derive the same benefit from traditional LDL-C lower strategies such as statins and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors that work by upregulating the LDL receptor. Emerging data also suggest that patients with increased levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins are also at increased risk as elevated levels are proposed to have a role in various pathways promoting atherogenesis. Angiopoietin-life protein 3 (ANGLTPL3) has recently become a target of interest because of the discovery that inhibiting its action leads to reductions in lipid parameters. Although the mechanism of action of ANGLTPL3 inhibitors is independent of the LDL receptor, their ability to significantly lower triglycerides and LDL-C make them an attractive option particularly in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. The efficacy and safety of 2 ANGLTPL3 inhibitor agents have been evaluated in clinical trials. In this review, the lipid lowering, metabolic effects, and safety are reported. Ongoing trials assessing CV outcomes as well as long-term safety data are still needed to provide a more definitive role for these agents in the overall management in these populations.

Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Weighing ≥ 120 Kilograms versus 60-120 Kilograms.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become favorable choices for anticoagulation due to their fixed-dose schedule, limited need for monitoring, and non-inferiority or superiority to warfarin. DOACs are currently not recommended in patients with a body weight ≥ 120 kg or body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2 due to limited data regarding safety and efficacy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of DOACs in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and weighing ≥ 120 kg with those weighing < 120 kg. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study was conducted in patients weighing ≥ 120 kg who received either apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban for stroke risk reduction in NVAF, and matched to patients who weighed < 120 kg. The primary outcome was the incidence of stroke, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or myocardial infarction, while the safety outcome was the incidence of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding based on the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) definitions. RESULTS: A total of 318 patients weighing ≥ 120 kg with NVAF and meeting the inclusion criteria were evaluated and matched with 318 patients weighing < 120 kg. The primary outcome occurred in 2.5% of patients in the ≥ 120 kg group and in 3.1% of patients in the < 120 kg group (p = 0.632). The safety outcome occurred in 5.3% and 6.6% of patients in these respective groups (p = 0.503). CONCLUSION: Apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban may be well-tolerated and effective anticoagulant options in patients with NVAF weighing ≥ 120 kg.

Select Drug-Drug Interactions With Direct Oral Anticoagulants: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Millions of individuals in the United States require long-term treatment with an oral anticoagulant. For decades, vitamin K antagonists were the only oral option available; however, they have a number of well-known limitations. Introduction of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has long been considered a major therapeutic advance, largely because they lack the need for therapeutic monitoring. Despite this, DOACs, like vitamin K antagonists, can still cause major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, even when used appropriately. Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving the DOACs represent an important contributor to increased bleeding risk. Awareness of these DDIs and how best to address them is of critical importance in optimizing management while mitigating bleeding risk. This review provides an overview of DOAC metabolism, the most common drugs likely to contribute to DOAC DDIs, their underlying mechanisms, and how best to address them.

Critical Differences Between Dietary Supplement and Prescription Omega-3 Fatty Acids: A Narrative Review.

INTRODUCTION: Currently available omega-3 (OM-3) fatty acid products in the US are either nonprescription dietary supplements (e.g., fish oils) or prescription (Rx) medications. As such, we aimed to describe critical therapeutic differences among the OM-3 fatty acids, focusing on differences between fish oil supplements and Rx OM-3s. METHODS: A narrative review of known papers salient to this topic was conducted. RESULTS: Despite the multiple purported clinical benefits, the published evidence for OM-3 dietary supplements is generally insufficient, inconsistent, or negative. Rx OM-3 products are indicated as an adjunct to diet to reduce triglycerides (TG) in adults with severe hypertriglyceridemia (TG ≥ 500 mg/dl). Recently, the Rx eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)-only OM-3, icosapent ethyl, demonstrated cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction among statin-treated patients at high risk of CV disease in a large CV outcomes trial (CVOT), and is now also indicated as an adjunct to maximally tolerated statin therapy to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, and unstable angina requiring hospitalization in adult patients with elevated TG (≥ 150 mg/dL) and established CVD or diabetes mellitus and ≥ 2 additional risk factors for CVD. In contrast to the rigorous regulatory standards for safety, efficacy, and manufacturing of medications (whether Rx or over the counter), the Food and Drug Administration manages dietary supplements as food. Issues specific to OM-3 dietary supplements include variable content, labeling inconsistencies, and poor product quality/impurity. Given these issues, OM-3 dietary supplements should not be substituted for Rx OM-3 products. The efficacy of the EPA-only Rx OM-3 product in a large CVOT cannot be extrapolated to other OM-3 products. CONCLUSION: Consumers and health care providers need to recognize critical differences between Rx and OM-3 dietary supplements to ensure appropriate use of each OM-3 product.

Key Articles and Guidelines in the Management of Dyslipidemia: 2019 Update.

Although the mortality from cardiovascular disease has declined, it remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Dyslipidemia is a modifiable risk factor that plays a significant role in the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Treating dyslipidemia by lowering cholesterol, predominately low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events. The first article that provided dyslipidemia bibliographies was published in 2006. Since this time, new therapies have become available and older therapies that were once thought to provide benefit have since been shown to lack positive outcomes and have therefore fallen out of favor for routine use. As the body of evidence continues to expand, clinicians are faced with reevaluating their treatment strategies to ensure optimal outcomes and appropriate use of lipid-lowering therapies. Therefore, this compilation was created to serve as a resource for clinicians. This publication provides an update of key articles in dyslipidemia management including various guidelines and practice-changing randomized controlled trials.

Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis Following Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Placement.

Infections related to cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) placement are associated with poor clinical outcomes. As such, preprocedural prophylactic antibiotic therapy is indicated for all patients prior to device insertion. However, the available data are less clear on the impact of postprocedural antibiotic therapy on rates of CIED infection when used in addition to preprocedural therapy. This is single-center, retrospective cohort study of 913 patients who underwent CIED-related procedures between October 2010 and August 2014 sought to compare the rate of CIED infections in patients receiving only preprocedural antibiotics with those receiving both preprocedural and postprocedural antibiotics. Univariate analysis was used to detect independent risk factors for CIED infection. After excluding patients receiving concomitant antibiotics for other conditions, those undergoing CIED extraction alone, and those with a lack of follow-up data and/or adequate documentation of clinical encounters, 569 patients were identified for inclusion in the final analysis. The majority of patients who received postprocedural antibiotics received three to five days of therapy, with the most common antibiotic used being cephalexin. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of infection between patients who did and did not receive postoperative antibiotics (4.5% versus 6.1%; p = 0.398). In a multivariate analysis, the use of postprocedural antibiotic therapy was not a significant risk factor for infection (adjusted odds ratio: 0.692; 95% confidence interval: 0.314-1.525; p = 0.361). It is therefore reasonable to withhold prescribing postoperative antibiotics in patients following CIED implantation. Individualized risk factor evaluation of patient comorbidities and procedural characteristics may be needed to aid in determining whether postoperative antibiotics are reasonable in different patients. The validity of these findings is contingent on further confirmation via a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT Expert Consensus Document on Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging-Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness, Part 2: Radiological Equipment Operation, Dose-Sparing Methodologies, Patient and Medical Personnel Protection.

The stimulus to create this document was the recognition that ionizing radiation-guided cardiovascular procedures are being performed with increasing frequency, leading to greater patient radiation exposure and, potentially, to greater exposure to clinical personnel. While the clinical benefit of these procedures is substantial, there is concern about the implications of medical radiation exposure. ACC leadership concluded that it is important to provide practitioners with an educational resource that assembles and interprets the current radiation knowledge base relevant to cardiovascular procedures. By applying this knowledge base, cardiovascular practitioners will be able to select procedures optimally, and minimize radiation exposure to patients and to clinical personnel. "Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging - Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness" is a comprehensive overview of ionizing radiation use in cardiovascular procedures and is published online. To provide the most value to our members, we divided the print version of this document into 2 focused parts. "Part I: Radiation Physics and Radiation Biology" addresses radiation physics, dosimetry and detrimental biologic effects. "Part II: Radiologic Equipment Operation, Dose-Sparing Methodologies, Patient and Medical Personnel Protection" covers the basics of operation and radiation delivery for the 3 cardiovascular imaging modalities (x-ray fluoroscopy, x-ray computed tomography, and nuclear scintigraphy). For each modality, it includes the determinants of radiation exposure and techniques to minimize exposure to both patients and to medical personnel.

2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT Expert Consensus Document on Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging-Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness, Part 1: Radiation Physics and Radiation Biology: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways Developed in Collaboration With Mended Hearts.

The stimulus to create this document was the recognition that ionizing radiation-guided cardiovascular procedures are being performed with increasing frequency, leading to greater patient radiation exposure and, potentially, to greater exposure for clinical personnel. Although the clinical benefit of these procedures is substantial, there is concern about the implications of medical radiation exposure. The American College of Cardiology leadership concluded that it is important to provide practitioners with an educational resource that assembles and interprets the current radiation knowledge base relevant to cardiovascular procedures. By applying this knowledge base, cardiovascular practitioners will be able to select procedures optimally, and minimize radiation exposure to patients and to clinical personnel. Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging: Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness is a comprehensive overview of ionizing radiation use in cardiovascular procedures and is published online. To provide the most value to our members, we divided the print version of this document into 2 focused parts. Part I: Radiation Physics and Radiation Biology addresses the issue of medical radiation exposure, the basics of radiation physics and dosimetry, and the basics of radiation biology and radiation-induced adverse effects. Part II: Radiological Equipment Operation, Dose-Sparing Methodologies, Patient and Medical Personnel Protection covers the basics of operation and radiation delivery for the 3 cardiovascular imaging modalities (x-ray fluoroscopy, x-ray computed tomography, and nuclear scintigraphy) and will be published in the next issue of the Journal.

Evolocumab: Considerations for the Management of Hyperlipidemia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the efficacy, safety, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics of evolocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor. RECENT FINDINGS: PCSK9 inhibitors are a class of lipid-lowering agents that significantly reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and hyperlipidemia. Evolocumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits PCSK9 and has been evaluated in phase II and III studies as monotherapy, in combination with statins and other lipid-lowering therapies, in patients who are statin intolerant, and in patients with heterozygous and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Data from these studies show that evolocumab significantly reduces LDL-C levels. Treatment with evolocumab also significantly improves levels of other lipid parameters (e.g., apolipoproteins A1 and B, lipoprotein(a), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides). Recent results indicate that LDL-C reduction with evolocumab significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular events and is also associated with atherosclerotic plaque regression. From a safety standpoint, rates of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation were similar between evolocumab and controls in clinical trials, and no increase in AEs was observed when evolocumab was used in combination with statins. Patients with elevated LDL-C benefit from evolocumab treatment, suggesting that evolocumab could help meet an unmet medical need in high-risk patient populations with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and hyperlipidemia that are unable to reduce LDL-C levels sufficiently with statin therapy alone.

Recommendations for Managing Drug-Drug Interactions with Statins and HIV Medications.

The discovery of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has enabled individuals to live longer. As a result, HIV is now often considered a chronic condition. However, as a result of the increase in longevity or the HIV treatment modalities themselves, individuals with HIV are at high risk for the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Therefore, these patients should be optimized with pharmacologic therapy to lower their cardiovascular risk through the addition of statin therapy to their regimen. Unfortunately, many medications utilized to treat HIV interact with this class of agents, making prescribing of statin therapy in these patients challenging. While several classes of ARTs do not pose an increased risk of drug-drug interactions with statins, HIV treatment often requires several combinations of medications, enhancing the complexity and drug-drug interaction risk. Clinicians should be aware of interactions with statins and ART and carefully review the degree and clinical significance of each particular medication. With this understanding, the appropriate statin as well as statin dose can be selected in order to optimize the treatment of this patient population, while minimizing the potential risk of adverse effects.

Higher Maximum Doses and Infusion Rates Compared with Standard Unfractionated Heparin Therapy Are Associated with Adequate Anticoagulation without Increased Bleeding in Both Obese and Nonobese Patients with Cardiovascular Indications.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time to achieve therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values and occurrence of bleeding based on standard unfractionated heparin (UFH) weight-based dosing recommendations compared with an aggressive weight-based UFH dosing strategy using higher maximum doses and infusion rates in both obese and nonobese patients who presented with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina (NSTEMI/UA) or atrial fibrillation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 197 adults were included who were admitted for NSTEMI/UA, atrial fibrillation, or other cardiac indications and received at least 6 hours of a continuous UFH infusion. Of those patients, 71 were treated with standard UFH dosing (60-unit/kg bolus [or maximum 4000 units] followed by an infusion of 12 units/kg/hour [or maximum 1000 units/hr]) between September 2013 and February 2014, and 126 patients received an aggressive UFH dosing strategy (60-unit/kg bolus [or maximum 10,000 units] followed by an infusion of 12 units/kg/hr [or maximum 2250 units/hr]) between October 2014 and March 2015. Patients in the standard dosing and aggressive strategy cohorts were further classified by body mass index status (normal, overweight, obese, and morbidly obese) and weight status. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A time-to-event analysis for achievement of therapeutic aPTT range (60-80 sec) was assessed. A significantly higher proportion of patients treated with the aggressive strategy achieved a therapeutic aPTT within 6 hours (23% vs 11%, p=0.043). The delay or failure to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation was particularly evident in obese patients in the standard dosing group. The mean ± SD initial infusion rate was 10.8 ± 1.4 units/kg/hour in the standard dosing group versus 12 ± 0.02 units/kg/hour in the aggressive strategy group (p=<0.0005). The occurrence of supratherapeutic aPTT values and the highest aPTT achieved were similar between the two dosing groups (p=0.817 and p=0.348, respectively). No bleeding events were reported in either group. CONCLUSION: Patients who had higher UFH maximum bolus doses and infusion rates achieved therapeutic anticoagulation more rapidly, without increased bleeding, and these doses can be adjusted for obese as well as nonobese patients. However, despite use of the higher doses, only 23% of patients achieved therapeutic aPTT values within 6 hours, suggesting that an even higher bolus dose and infusion rate may still be warranted.