Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 48(3): 100159, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38924953

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the use of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing of COVID-19 contacts in New South Wales schools to determine return to in-person school attendance instead of home quarantine, between 6 November and 21 December 2021. METHODS: COVID-19 school contacts were required to quarantine for two weeks postexposure to the case. Students who opted into daily rapid antigen testing logged their results in a database, prior to school attendance, and obtained SARS-CoV-2 nucleic amplification acid testing on day 12-16. Secondary attack rates (SARs) in schools utilising rapid antigen testing (Test-to-Stay schools) and those not utilising rapid antigen testing (non-Test-to-Stay school) were calculated. RESULTS: We identified 9,887 people in 293 schools who reported performing at least one rapid antigen test (RAT). The SAR in RAT schools was 3.4% (95% confidence interval: 2.7-4.1) and non-RAT schools was 2.8% (95% confidence interval: 2.4-3.3). A total of 30,535 school days were preserved through this program. CONCLUSIONS: The use of RATs preserved in-person learning without a significant increase to SAR. IMPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Disruptions in face-to-face learning have long-term detrimental impacts on children and adolescents. Rapid antigen testing has been shown to be beneficial to maintain face-to-face learning in Australian schools and may be a useful method to safeguard from school disruptions in future pandemics.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Instituciones Académicas , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Masculino , Niño , Adolescente , Nueva Gales del Sur , Femenino , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19/métodos , Cuarentena , Australia , Antígenos Virales , Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , Prueba de COVID-19/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Med J Aust ; 220(11): 566-572, 2024 Jun 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38803004

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the distribution and prevalence of Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) antibody (as evidence of past infection) in northern Victoria following the 2022 Japanese encephalitis outbreak, seeking to identify groups of people at particular risk of infection; to investigate the distribution and prevalence of antibodies to two related flaviviruses, Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVEV) and West Nile virus Kunjin subtype (KUNV). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional serosurvey (part of a national JEV serosurveillance program). SETTING: Three northern Victorian local public health units (Ovens Murray, Goulburn Valley, Loddon Mallee), 8 August - 1 December 2022. PARTICIPANTS: People opportunistically recruited at pathology collection centres and by targeted recruitment through community outreach and advertisements. People vaccinated against or who had been diagnosed with Japanese encephalitis were ineligible for participation, as were those born in countries where JEV is endemic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Seroprevalence of JEV IgG antibody, overall and by selected factors of interest (occupations, water body exposure, recreational activities and locations, exposure to animals, protective measures). RESULTS: 813 participants were recruited (median age, 59 years [interquartile range, 42-69 years]; 496 female [61%]); 27 were JEV IgG-seropositive (3.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-4.8%) (median age, 73 years [interquartile range, 63-78 years]; 13 female [48%]); none were IgM-seropositive. JEV IgG-seropositive participants were identified at all recruitment locations, including those without identified cases of Japanese encephalitis. The only risk factors associated with JEV IgG-seropositivity were age (per year: prevalence odds ratio [POR], 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.10) and exposure to feral pigs (POR, 21; 95% CI, 1.7-190). The seroprevalence of antibody to MVEV was 3.0% (95% CI, 1.9-4.5%; 23 of 760 participants), and of KUNV antibody 3.3% (95% CI, 2.1-4.8%; 25 of 761). CONCLUSIONS: People living in northern Victoria are vulnerable to future JEV infection, but few risk factors are consistently associated with infection. Additional prevention strategies, including expanding vaccine eligibility, may be required to protect people in this region from Japanese encephalitis.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , Brotes de Enfermedades , Virus de la Encefalitis Japonesa (Especie) , Encefalitis Japonesa , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Virus de la Encefalitis Japonesa (Especie)/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Encefalitis Japonesa/epidemiología , Encefalitis Japonesa/inmunología , Adulto , Femenino , Masculino , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anciano , Victoria/epidemiología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Adulto Joven , Virus de la Encefalitis del Valle Murray/inmunología , Adolescente , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Med J Aust ; 220(11): 561-565, 2024 Jun 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38815982

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of people in New South Wales towns at high risk of Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) infections during the 2022 outbreak; to identify risk factors for JEV infection. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional serosurvey study of the seroprevalence of JEV-specific antibodies in NSW. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of people (all ages) from five regional NSW towns deemed to be at high risk of JEV infections after first outbreak of Japanese encephalitis in southeastern Australia in early 2022 (Balranald, Corowa, Dubbo, Griffith, Temora), 21 June - 22 July 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of people seropositive for JEV total antibody, assayed by defined epitope-blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; prevalence odds ratios for exposure risk factors and protective behaviours. RESULTS: Eighty of 917 eligible participants (559 girls or women, 61%; 42 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, 4.6%; median age, 52 years [IQR, 37-62 years]) were seropositive for JEV-specific total antibody (8.7%); the median age of seropositive people was 61 years (IQR, 48-70 years). The seropositivity proportion was largest for people aged 65 years or more (30 of 192; weighted proportion, 13.7%) and larger for male than female participants (30 of 358, 10.6% v 50 of 559, 7.5%). Five of 42 samples from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants were seropositive (12%). We found mixed associations with a range of potential risk factors. CONCLUSION: We found evidence for a substantial number of JEV infections in five regional NSW towns during a single arbovirus season in 2022. Public health responses, including effective surveillance, vaccination against JEV, and mosquito management, are critical for controlling outbreaks. Promoting behaviours that reduce exposure to mosquitoes is a core component of prevention, particularly when the vaccine supply is limited.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , Virus de la Encefalitis Japonesa (Especie) , Encefalitis Japonesa , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Estudios Transversales , Brotes de Enfermedades , Virus de la Encefalitis Japonesa (Especie)/inmunología , Encefalitis Japonesa/epidemiología , Encefalitis Japonesa/inmunología , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos
4.
BMJ Open ; 14(2): e075569, 2024 02 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38326269

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that causes encephalitis and other morbidity in Southeast Asia. Since February 2022, geographically dispersed JEV human, animal and vector detections occurred on the Australian mainland for the first time. This study will determine the prevalence of JEV-specific antibodies in human blood with a focus on populations at high risk of JEV exposure and determine risk factors associated with JEV seropositivity by location, age, occupation and other factors. METHOD: Samples are collected using two approaches: from routine blood donors (4153 samples), and active collections targeting high-risk populations (convenience sampling). Consent-based sampling for the latter includes a participant questionnaire on demographic, vaccination and exposure data. Samples are tested for JEV-specific total antibody using a defined epitope-blocking ELISA, and total antibody to Australian endemic flaviviruses Murray Valley encephalitis and Kunjin viruses. ANALYSIS: Two analytic approaches will occur: descriptive estimates of seroprevalence and multivariable logistic regression using Bayesian hierarchical models. Descriptive analyses will include unadjusted analysis of raw data with exclusions for JEV-endemic country of birth, travel to JEV-endemic countries, prior JEV-vaccination, and sex-standardised and age-standardised analyses. Multivariable logistic regression will determine which risk factors are associated with JEV seropositivity likely due to recent transmission within Australia and the relative contribution of each factor when accounting for effects within the model. ETHICS: National Mutual Acceptance ethical approval was obtained from the Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC). Local approvals were sought in each jurisdiction. Ethical approval was also obtained from the Australian Red Cross Lifeblood HREC. DISSEMINATION: Findings will be communicated to participants and their communities, and human and animal health stakeholders and policy-makers iteratively and after final analyses. Understanding human infection rates will inform procurement and targeted allocation of limited JEV vaccine, and public health strategies and communication campaigns, to at-risk populations.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Encefalitis Japonesa (Especie) , Encefalitis Japonesa , Humanos , Animales , Niño , Encefalitis Japonesa/epidemiología , Encefalitis Japonesa/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Teorema de Bayes , Australia/epidemiología , Anticuerpos Antivirales
5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35860872

RESUMEN

Background: Diphtheria is rare in Australia, but an increasing number of cases have been notified in recent years. Alongside notifications from 1999 to 2019, we analysed other relevant national data sources to evaluate trends over the past two decades. Methods: Diphtheria notifications (National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System [NNDSS]), hospitalisations (National Hospital Morbidity Database [NHMD]) and deaths (Australian Bureau of Statistics and the Australian Coordinating Registry) were separately analysed by site of infection, age group, sex, state/territory, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status, and vaccination status. Results: During the study period, eight (0.002 per 100,000 population per year) cases of respiratory diphtheria and 38 (0.008 per 100,000 population per year) cases of cutaneous diphtheria were recorded in the NNDSS, with 45/46 reported in the nine years since 2011. Corynebacterium diphtheriae accounted for 87% of notified cases, who had a median age of 31.5 years (respiratory diphtheria) and 52.5 years (cutaneous diphtheria); no respiratory diphtheria was notified in those under 15 years of age. A majority of the cutaneous diphtheria cases (27/38; 71%) were acquired overseas, as were 3/8 (38%) of the respiratory diphtheria cases. Rates of both presentation types were higher in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (respiratory: 0.007 per 100,000 population per year; cutaneous: 0.021 per 100,000 population per year) than were rates in the overall population. Queensland had the highest rate of notified respiratory cases (0.007 per 100,000 population per year), and the Northern Territory the highest rate of cutaneous notifications (0.043 per 100,000 population per year). There were 29 hospitalisations with a principal-diagnosis diphtheria code in the NHMD between 2002 and 2018, of which eight were designated as respiratory (0.002 per 100,000 population per year), eight as cutaneous (0.002 per 100,000 population per year), and 13 with an unknown site of infection. Among notified cases, two deaths were reported in unvaccinated people in Queensland. Conclusions: Although diphtheria remains rare in Australia, 45 cases were notified in the years 2011-2019, compared with one case between 1999 and 2010. Robust surveillance remains important to detect all cases. High immunity will need to be maintained across all age groups to prevent outbreaks, and travel and adult booster doses should be encouraged.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Prevenibles por Vacunación , Adulto , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Hospitalización , Humanos , Northern Territory , Queensland
6.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35760563

RESUMEN

Background: Data sources, relevant to measles epidemiology from 2012 to 2019, were reviewed in the context of Australia's certification, by the World Health Organization in 2014, of the elimination of measles. Methods: Data on measles notifications, hospitalisations, and deaths were obtained from the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System, the National Hospital Morbidity Database, and the Australian Coordinating Registry. Data were analysed by age group, state/territory, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status, genotype, place of acquisition, source of infection (importation status), and vaccination status. Results: Between 2012 and 2019, there were 1,337 measles notifications (average annual notifications 0.7 per 100,000 population per year) and 425 hospitalisations with measles as principal diagnosis (0.3 per 100,000 population per year) were recorded. The highest annual notification rate was in 2014, when the rate in the Northern Territory was 21.4 per 100,000 population per year. Although notification and hospitalisation rates were highest in infants < 12 months (respectively 5.8 and 2.1 per 100,000 population per year), people aged 10 to 39 years (10-19y: 272 notifications; 20-29y: 347; 30-39y: 266) accounted for 66% of notified cases. Of cases with a known vaccination status, only 20/169 (11.8%) of those aged 1-9 years had received at least one dose of measles-containing vaccine, compared with 215/571 (37.7%) of those aged 10-39 years. Persons born before 1966 (at least 47 years of age during the study period) are likely to have immunity from wild-type measles infection and had the lowest notification rates in each year. Of notified cases, 98.1% were imported or import related, and of the 900 measles viruses genotyped, D8 and B3 accounted for 89.1%. Conclusion: This review's findings of low measles incidence, in the presence of robust surveillance and high two-dose measles vaccination coverage, provide evidence of continued elimination of endemic measles in Australia, with almost all cases imported or epidemiologically linked to an imported case. Most cases eligible for vaccination are unvaccinated, which should remain the primary focus for prevention. Potential waning immunity in older age groups requires monitoring. Continued high population immunity and high-quality public health response to cases will be needed to maintain Australia's elimination status, particularly once international borders reopen.


Asunto(s)
Sarampión , Enfermedades Prevenibles por Vacunación , Anciano , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Sarampión/epidemiología , Sarampión/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Northern Territory , Vacunación
7.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 57(9): 1362-1369, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34101922

RESUMEN

In 2020, school and early childhood educational centre (ECEC) closures affected over 1.5 billion school-aged children globally as part of the COVID-19 pandemic response. Attendance at school and access to ECEC is critical to a child's learning, well-being and health. School closures increase inequities by disproportionately affecting vulnerable children. Here, we summarise the role of children and adolescents in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission and that of schools and ECECs in community transmission and describe the Australian experience. In Australia, most SARS-CoV-2 cases in schools were solitary (77% in NSW and 67% in Victoria); of those that did progress to an outbreak, >90% involved fewer than 10 cases. Australian and global experience has demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 is predominantly introduced into schools and ECECs during periods of heightened community transmission. Implementation of public health mitigation strategies, including effective testing, tracing and isolation of contacts, means schools and ECECs can be safe, not drivers of transmission. Schools and ECEC are essential services and so they should be prioritised to stay open for face-to-face learning. This is particularly critical as we continue to manage the next phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Instituciones Académicas , Victoria
8.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health ; 4(11): 807-816, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32758454

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: School closures have occurred globally during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, empiric data on transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among children and in educational settings are scarce. In Australia, most schools have remained open during the first epidemic wave, albeit with reduced student physical attendance at the epidemic peak. We examined SARS-CoV-2 transmission among children and staff in schools and early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings in the Australian state of New South Wales (NSW). METHODS: Laboratory-confirmed paediatric (aged ≤18 years) and adult COVID-19 cases who attended a school or ECEC setting while considered infectious (defined as 24 h before symptom onset based on national guidelines during the study period) in NSW from Jan 25 to April 10, 2020, were investigated for onward transmission. All identified school and ECEC settings close contacts were required to home quarantine for 14 days, and were monitored and offered SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing if symptomatic. Enhanced investigations in selected educational settings included nucleic acid testing and SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing in symptomatic and asymptomatic contacts. Secondary attack rates were calculated and compared with state-wide COVID-19 rates. FINDINGS: 15 schools and ten ECEC settings had children (n=12) or adults (n=15) attend while infectious, with 1448 contacts monitored. Of these, 633 (43·7%) of 1448 had nucleic acid testing, or antibody testing, or both, with 18 secondary cases identified (attack rate 1·2%). Five secondary cases (three children; two adults) were identified (attack rate 0·5%; 5/914) in three schools. No secondary transmission occurred in nine of ten ECEC settings among 497 contacts. However, one outbreak in an ECEC setting involved transmission to six adults and seven children (attack rate 35·1%; 13/37). Across all settings, five (28·0%) of 18 secondary infections were asymptomatic (three infants [all aged 1 year], one adolescent [age 15 years], and one adult). INTERPRETATION: SARS-CoV-2 transmission rates were low in NSW educational settings during the first COVID-19 epidemic wave, consistent with mild infrequent disease in the 1·8 million child population. With effective case-contact testing and epidemic management strategies and associated small numbers of attendances while infected, children and teachers did not contribute significantly to COVID-19 transmission via attendance in educational settings. These findings could be used to inform modelling and public health policy regarding school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. FUNDING: NSW Government Department of Health.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Cuarentena , Servicios de Salud Escolar , Adolescente , Australia/epidemiología , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Niño , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/organización & administración , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación a Distancia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Población , Cuarentena/organización & administración , Cuarentena/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Servicios de Salud Escolar/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Escolar/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...