Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
Mycoses ; 66(12): 1056-1063, 2023 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37592370

INTRODUCTION: Immunosuppression after chemotherapy, stem cell transplantation or solid organ transplantation are the main risk factors for invasive fungal infections in Austria. Here, we aim to describe the status of laboratory mycology and the access to antifungal treatment in Austria. METHODS: Between October and November 2021, hospitals were contacted to participate in our online survey: www.clinicalsurveys.net/uc/IFI_management_capacity/. Centres were required to provide information on their institutional profile; self-assessment of burden of invasive fungal infections; access to microscopy, culture, serology, antigen detection and molecular testing; and availability of antifungal agents and therapeutic drug monitoring. RESULTS: Responses were collected from university hospitals and laboratories in Graz, Innsbruck, Linz and Vienna. The four hospitals can provide tertiary care and were highly specialised, including management of patients with severe immunosuppression. All sites consider the incidence of invasive fungal infections to be moderate. Access to microscopy, culture, serology, antigen detection and molecular testing is provided regardless of laboratory. The maximum capacity to identify fungi varies from institution to institution. All currently marketed antifungal agents are available at the four sites. CONCLUSION: Austria is currently well equipped to deal with the emerging threat of invasive fungal infections. However, hospitals may consider preparing for the potential endemicity of certain infections in the near future.


Antifungal Agents , Invasive Fungal Infections , Humans , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Austria/epidemiology , Invasive Fungal Infections/diagnosis , Invasive Fungal Infections/drug therapy , Invasive Fungal Infections/epidemiology , Fungi , Health Services Accessibility
2.
J Pers Med ; 13(6)2023 May 28.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37373894

In post-mortem analyses, SARS-CoV-2 was found in the middle ear of some, but not all, patients with COVID-19. It is not clear whether SARS-CoV-2 penetrated the ear passively post mortem, or existed in the middle ear of living patients during, and perhaps also after, infection. This study investigated whether SARS-CoV-2 can be found in the middle ear of living patients during ear surgery. Swabs from the nasopharynx, the filter connected to the tracheal tube and secretions from the middle ear were collected during middle ear surgery. All samples were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 using PCR. History of vaccination, COVID-19 history and contact with SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals were recorded preoperatively. Postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection was noted at the follow-up visit. Overall, 63 participants (62%) were children and 39 (38%) were adults. SARS-CoV-2 was found in the middle ear and in the nasopharynx of two and four CovEar study participants, respectively. The filter connected to the tracheal tube was sterile in all cases. Cycle threshold (ct) values of the PCR test were between 25.94 and 37.06. SARS-CoV-2 penetrated the middle ear of living patients and was found in asymptomatic patients. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the middle ear may have implications for ear surgery and can pose a risk of infection for operating room staff. It may also directly affect the audio-vestibular system.

...