RESUMEN
Botulinum toxin type-A (BoNT-A) has emerged as a key therapeutic agent for the management of spasticity. This paper presents a comprehensive bibliometric and visual analysis of research concerning BoNT-A treatment of spasticity to elucidate current trends and future directions in this research area. A search was conducted in the Web of Science database for articles focused on the use of BoNT-A in spasticity published between 2000 and 2022. We extracted various metrics, including counts of publications and contributions from different countries, institutions, authors, and journals. Analytical methods in CiteSpace were employed for the examination of co-citations, collaborations, and the co-occurrence of keywords. Our search yielded 1489 publications. Analysis revealed a consistent annual increase in research output. The United States, United Kingdom, and Italy were the leading contributors. The top institution in this research was Assistance Publique Hopitaux, Paris. The journal containing the highest number of relevant publications was Toxins. Key frequently occurring keywords were 'stroke', 'cerebral palsy', 'adult spasticity', and 'upper extremity'. This study identified 12 clusters of keywords and 15 clusters of co-cited references, indicating the main focus areas and emerging themes in this field. This study comprehensively analyzed and summarized trends in BoNT-A research in the field of spasticity over the past 22 years.
Asunto(s)
Bibliometría , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Espasticidad Muscular , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spastic movement disorder (SMD) develops in up to 43% of cases as a sequela of stroke. In the event of a functionally relevant or daily life impairing SMD or to avoid an impending complication, the medicinal treatment of a focal, multifocal and segmental increase in muscle tone with botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) is recommended; however, treatment data reveal a lack of guideline-conform treatment with BoNTA in Germany. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the reported expert meeting was to discuss solutions to the incorrect treatment and undertreatment of patients with SMD and to formulate consensus recommendations to improve the care situation. METHODS: At a consensus meeting held in April 2022, eight experts from the fields of neurology, physical medicine and rehabilitation discussed the causes for the incorrect treatment and undertreatment and formulated consensus solution approaches. RESULTS: Possible reasons for the current incorrect treatment and undertreatment in SMD management in Germany include insufficient awareness of SMD among physicians, a lack of treatment capacities, a lack of information transfer in discharge management as well as staff shortages in the specialized inpatient and outpatient SMD treatment centers. The committee therefore recommended a patient pathway in which affected patients with SMD are provided with correctly implemented BoNTA treatment in combination with physical measures. CONCLUSION: The recommended treatment pathway for use in stroke patients is intended to close gaps in care and thus ensure guideline-conform treatment of post-stroke SMD.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Fármacos Neuromusculares , Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Espasticidad Muscular , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Atención AmbulatoriaRESUMEN
Post-stroke spastic movement disorder (PS-SMD) develops in up to 40% of stroke survivors after a first ever stroke within the first year. Chronic PS-SMD is often associated with severe disabilities and complications, emphasizing the importance of its early recognition and early adequate management. Extensive research has aimed to accurately predict and sensitively detect a PS-SMD. Symptomatic therapies include conventional rehabilitation and local intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A). The latter is widely used, but primarily in the chronic phase of stroke. However, recent studies have shown the safety and efficacy of BoNT-A therapy even in the acute phase and early sub-acute phase after stroke, i.e., within three months post-stroke, leading to an improved long-term outcome in stroke rehabilitation. Local BoNT-A injections evolve as the primary approach in focal, multifocal, and segmental chronic or acute/subacute PS-SMD. Patients at high risk for or manifest PS-SMD should be identified by an early spasticity risk assessment. By doing so, PS-SMD can be integral part of the patient-centered goal-setting process of a multiprofessional spasticity-experienced team. The benefit of an early PS-SMD treatment by BoNT-A should predominate putative degenerative muscle changes due to long-term BoNT-A therapy by far. This, as early treatment effectively avoids complications typically associated with a PS-SMD, i.e., contractures, pain, skin lesions. The management of PS-SMD requires a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach. Early assessment, patient-centered goal setting, early intervention, and early use of BoNT-A therapy prevents from PS-SMD complications and may improve rehabilitation outcome after stroke.
RESUMEN
This analysis pooled pain severity data from four phase 3 and 4 studies of incobotulinumtoxinA (incoBoNT-A) for the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD) in adults. CD-related pain severity was assessed at baseline, each injection visit, and 4 weeks after each injection of incoBoNT-A using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale pain severity subscale or a pain visual analog scale. Both were analyzed using a score range of 0-10 and pain was categorized as mild, moderate, or severe. Data for 678 patients with pain at baseline were assessed and sensitivity analyses evaluated pain responses in the subgroup not taking concomitant pain medication (n = 384 at baseline). At Week 4 after the first injection, there was a mean change of -1.25 (standard deviation 2.04) points from baseline pain severity (p < 0.0001), with 48.1% showing ≥ 30% pain reduction from baseline, 34.4% showing ≥50% pain reduction from baseline, and 10.3% becoming pain free. Pain responses were sustained over five injection cycles with a trend to incremental improvements with each successive cycle. Pain responses in the subgroup not taking concomitant pain medication demonstrated the lack of confounding effects of pain medications. These results confirmed the pain relief benefits of long-term treatment with incoBoNT-A.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Fármacos Neuromusculares , Tortícolis , Adulto , Humanos , Tortícolis/tratamiento farmacológico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/efectos adversos , Manejo del Dolor , Dimensión del Dolor , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Post-stroke spastic movement disorder (PS-SMD) is one of the main causes of severe disability in the chronic phase after stroke. The prevalence of SMD goes up with time after stroke to more than 28% in the chronic phase., Its secondary complications such as contracture, abnormal postures and/or movement patterns, spasticity-associated pain also increase with time after stroke when physical and medical management of PS-SMD have been delayed in the early stroke phase. It has been published by several controlled studies that the earlier physical and medical measures, such as botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) therapy are included in rehabilitative strategies for the SMD, the fewer secondary complications, especially soft tissue contractures and pain occurred. Several studies showed that goal-orientated management of PS-SMD including BoNT-A therapy, applied within a few weeks and three months - in the early subacute phase after stroke onset - prevented or reduced the development of severe or disabling SMD and its secondary complications, more effective than late application of BoNT-A therapy - in the chronic phase after stroke. In multiple prospective cohort studies, various predictors and predictive approaches for detection of patients on risk to development PS-SMD were found. Based on that information and the controlled studies that showed reduction in PS-SMD complications following early treatment with BoNT-A nowadays, early treatment of PS-SMD in the early subacute phase following stroke is recommended to avoid or reduce the development of post-stroke disability and to improve the outcome of rehabilitation. In this review, we discuss the optimal timing to apply BoNT-A therapy in patients with already present as well as those at high risk of severe PS-SMD.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Trastornos del Movimiento , Fármacos Neuromusculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Espasticidad Muscular/etiología , Espasticidad Muscular/complicaciones , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/complicaciones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
A strong correlation has been reported between patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and the investigator-rated Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) in patients with spasticity. The current analysis evaluates the effect of incobotulinumtoxinA on QoL-related outcomes (limb position abnormality, as well as dressing- and hygiene-related disability, measured with the DAS) in adults with upper limb spasticity, using pooled data from six studies. Separate analyses for each DAS domain were performed using data from patients with disabilities for that domain (DAS score ≥1). Results showed that a significantly greater proportion of incobotulinumtoxinA-treated compared with placebo-treated patients achieved a ≥1-point reduction from baseline in each of the DAS domains (improvement) 4 weeks after the first injection. The benefits of incobotulinumtoxinA were observed regardless of the baseline severity of DAS impairment and of the time elapsed since stroke. The effects of incobotulinumtoxinA 4 weeks after injection were maintained or enhanced over multiple injection cycles for all three DAS domains, supporting the use of repeated injection cycles to provide sustained QoL benefit. IncobotulinumtoxinA represents an important treatment option to achieve better QoL-related outcomes for patients with upper limb spasticity, irrespective of the duration of their condition.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Deformidades Congénitas de las Extremidades , Adulto , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Introduction: Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) is a first-line treatment option for post-stroke spasticity, reducing pain and involuntary movements and helping to restore function. BoNT-A is frequently injected into the arm, the wrist, the hand, and/or the finger muscles but less often into the shoulder muscles, despite clinical trials demonstrating improvements in pain and function after shoulder BoNT-A injection. Methods: In part 2 of this two-part practical guide, we present an experts' consensus on the choice of outcome measurement scales and goal-setting recommendations for BoNT-A in the treatment of shoulder spasticity to increase awareness of shoulder muscle injection with BoNT-A, alongside the more commonly injected upper limb muscles. Expert consensus was obtained from five European experts with a cumulative experience of more than 100 years of BoNT-A use in post-stroke spasticity. Case studies are included as examples of approaches taken in the treatment of shoulder spasticity. Results: Although the velocity-dependent increase in muscle tone is often a focus of patient assessment, it is only one component of spasticity and should be assessed as part of a wider range of measurements. For outcome measurement following BoNT-A injection in shoulder muscles, shoulder-specific scales are recommended. Other scales to be considered include Pain Numerical Rating and/or global functioning, as well as the quality of life and global perception of benefit scores.Goal setting is an essential part of the multidisciplinary management process for spasticity; goals should be patient-centric, realistic, and achievable; functional-focused goal statements and a mixture of short- (3-6 month) and long-term (9-18 month) goals are recommended. These can be grouped into symptomatic, passive function, active function, involuntary movement, and global mobility.Clinical evaluation tools, goal setting, and outcome expectations for the multipattern treatment of shoulder spasticity with BoNT-A should be defined by the whole multidisciplinary team, ensuring patient and caregiver involvement. Discussion: These recommendations will be of benefit to clinicians who may not be experienced in evaluating and treating spastic shoulders.
RESUMEN
Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) is a first-line treatment option for post-stroke spasticity, reducing pain and involuntary movements and helping to restore function. BoNT-A is frequently injected into the arm, wrist, hand and/or finger muscles, but less often into the shoulder muscles, despite clinical trials demonstrating improvements in pain and function after shoulder BoNT-A injection. In part 1 of this two-part practical guide, we present an experts' consensus on the use of BoNT-A injections in the multi-pattern treatment of shoulder spasticity to increase awareness of shoulder muscle injection with BoNT-A, alongside the more commonly injected upper limb muscles. Expert consensus was obtained from five European experts with a cumulative experience of more than 100 years of BoNT-A use in post-stroke spasticity. A patient-centered approach was proposed by the expert consensus: to identify which activities are limited by the spastic shoulder and consider treating the muscles that are involved in hindering those activities. Two patterns of shoulder spasticity were identified: for Pattern A (adduction, elevation, flexion and internal rotation of the shoulder), the expert panel recommended injecting the pectoralis major, teres major and subscapularis muscles; in most cases injecting only the pectoralis major and the teres major is sufficient for the first injection cycle; for Pattern B (abduction or adduction, extension and internal rotation of the shoulder), the panel recommended injecting the posterior part of the deltoid, the teres major and the latissimus dorsi in most cases. It is important to consider the local guidelines and product labels, as well as discussions within the multidisciplinary, multiprofessional team when deciding to inject shoulder muscles with BoNT-A. The choice of shoulder muscles for BoNT-A injection can be based on spastic pattern, but ideally should also firstly consider the functional limitation and patient expectations in order to establish better patient-centered treatment goals. These recommendations will be of benefit for clinicians who may not be experienced in evaluating and treating spastic shoulders.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Post-stroke spastic movement disorder (PS-SMD) appears up to 20% in the first week following stroke and 40% in the chronic phase. It may create major hurdles to overcome in early stroke rehabilitation and as one relevant factor that reduces quality of life to a major degree in the chronic phase. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we discuss predictors,early identification, clinical assessments, goal setting, and management in multiprofessional team, including Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injection for early and chronic management of PS-SMD. EXPERT OPINION: The earlier PS-SMD is recognized and managed, the better the outcome will be. The comprehensive management in the subacute or chronic phase of PS-SMD with BoNT-A injections requires detailed assessment, patient-centered goal setting, technical-guided injection, effective dosing of BoNT-A per site, muscle, and session and timed adjunctive treatment, delivered in a multi-professional team approach in conjunction with physical treatment. Evidence-based data showed BoNT-A injections are safe and effective in managing focal, multifocal, segmental PS-SMD and its complications. If indicated, BoNT-A therapy should be accompanied with adjunctive treatment in adequate time slots. BoNT-A could be added to oral, intrathecal, and surgical treatment in severe multisegmental or generalized PS-SMD to reach patient/caregiver's goals, especially in chronic PS-SMD.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Trastornos del Movimiento , Fármacos Neuromusculares , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Objetivos , Humanos , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Espasticidad Muscular/etiología , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To map spasticity-related goals using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) linking rules, and review goal syntax to direct future goal setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1633 treatment goals, set during the TOWER study, were linked to the ICF framework and EQ-5D domains. Goals were mapped independently by two investigators with expertise in ICF linking rules. RESULTS: In total, 1630 (99.8%) goals could be mapped to the ICF (inter-rater agreement on the main ICF category 96.1%). Most goals (80.2%) were mapped to a single ICF category and were related to activities/participation (54.9%). 170 (10.4%) goals were related to general tasks and activities, such as positioning, stretching, and strengthening. In total, 1072 goals (65.6%) mapped to the EQ-5D domains (inter-rater agreement 90.8%). Analysis of the goal syntax highlighted the need to include a verb in patient-centered goals to direct active behavior. CONCLUSIONS: The ICF offers a broad framework for setting patient-centered, easily understandable goals for patients with spasticity, including goals related to (guided) self-management activities. This analysis sheds new light on patient needs and could direct future goal-driven botulinum toxin spasticity treatment focused on enabling patients to better manage activity limitations imposed by their body function impairments.Trial registration: NCT01603459 registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01603459).Implications for RehabilitationThe ICF offers a broad framework for setting patient-centered, easily understandable goals for patients with spasticity.ICF domains that include general tasks and demands can be used to establish goals relating to (guided) self-management of spasticity.An ICF-based goal-setting framework may increase the comparability of clinical data across studies.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Personas con Discapacidad , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Objetivos , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de la Salud , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Some studies have shown that incobotulinumtoxinA reduces spasticity-associated pain, but further evidence is needed. This exploratory analysis pooled pain-relief data from six Phase 2 or 3 studies of incobotulinumtoxinA (four placebo-controlled studies) for treating upper limb spasticity in adults. Spasticity-associated pain was assessed at baseline and 4 weeks post incobotulinumtoxinA injection using the disability assessment scale (DAS) for pain. Only data for patients with pain at baseline were analysed. Overall, 544 (incobotulinumtoxinA, N = 415; placebo, N = 129) of 937 patients (58.1%) experienced pain at baseline. At Week 4, a significantly greater proportion of incobotulinumtoxinA- (52.1%) than placebo-treated patients (28.7%; Chi-square p < 0.0001) showed a response (≥1-point improvement in DAS pain score). In logistic regression analysis, incobotulinumtoxinA-treated patients were 2.6 times more likely to achieve this endpoint than placebo-treated patients. A significant difference between incobotulinumtoxinA and placebo was observed regardless of baseline pain severity. Additionally, 27.1% of incobotulinumtoxinA- versus 12.4% of placebo-treated patients reported complete pain relief at Week 4 (p = 0.0006). Pain relief increased with multiple injection cycles. To achieve patient-centred care, pain relief may be considered a treatment goal in adults with spasticity-associated pain regardless of pain severity. This study contributes to understanding the benefits of incobotulinumtoxinA in treating limb spasticity-associated pain.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Mialgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
There are few reports on the safety and effectiveness of long-term botulinumtoxin A (BoNT A) therapy in severe chronic pain of post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). The literature was searched with the term "neuropathic pain" and "botulinum" on PubMed (up to 29 February 2020). Pain was assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) before and after BoNT A therapy. A total of 10 clinical trials and six case reports including 251 patients with PHN were presented. They showed that BoNT A therapy had significant pain reduction (up to 30-50%) and improvement in quality of life. The effect duration seems to be correlated with BoNT A doses injected per injection site. Intervals between BoNT A injections were 10-14 weeks. No adverse events were reported in cases and clinical studies, even in the two pregnant women, whose babies were healthy. The repeated (≥6 times) intra/subcutaneous injections of incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin®, Merz Pharmaceuticals, Germany) over the two years of our three cases showed marked pain reduction and no adverse events. Adjunctive local BoNT A injection is a promising option for severe PHN, as a safe and effective therapy in long-term management for chronic neuropathic pain. Its effect size and -duration seem to be depended on the dose of BoNT A injected per each point.
RESUMEN
The visualization of the human body has frequently been groundbreaking in medicine. In the last few years, the use of ultrasound (US) imaging has become a well-established procedure for botulinum toxin therapy in people with cervical dystonia (CD). It is now undisputed among experts that some of the most relevant muscles in this indication can be safely injected under visual US guidance. This review will explore the method from basic technical considerations, current evidence to conceptual developments of the phenomenology of cervical dystonia. We will review the implications of introducing US to our understanding of muscle function and anatomy of common cervical dystonic patterns. We suggest a flow chart for the use of US to achieve a personalized treatment of people with CD. Thus, we hope to contribute a resource that is useful in clinical practice and that stimulates the ongoing development of this valuable technique.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas/administración & dosificación , Tortícolis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Humanos , Fármacos Neuromusculares/administración & dosificación , Medicina de Precisión , Tortícolis/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Ultrasound (US)-guided botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections are becoming a mainstay in the treatment of muscle spasticity in upper motor neuron syndromes. As a result, there has been a commensurate increase in US-guided BoNT injection for spasticity training courses. However, many of these courses do not emphasize the importance of ergonomics. This paper aims to highlight the importance of ultrasound ergonomics and presents ergonomic recommendations to optimize US-guided BoNT injection techniques in spasticity management. Expert consensus opinion of 11 physicians (4 different continents; representing 8 countries, with an average of 12.6 years of practice using US guidance for BoNT chemodenervation (range 3 to 22 years)). A search using PubMed, College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia database, EMbase was conducted and found no publications relating the importance of ergonomics in US-guided chemodenervation. Therefore, recommendations and consensus discussions were generated from the distribution of a 20-question survey to a panel of 11 ultrasound experts. All 11 surveyed physicians considered ergonomics to be important in reducing physician injury. There was complete agreement that physician positioning was important; 91% agreement that patient positioning was important; and 82% that ultrasound machine positioning was important. Factors that did not reach our 80% threshold for consensus were further discussed. Four categories were identified as being important when implementing ultrasound ergonomics for BoNT chemodenervation for spasticity; workstation, physician, patient and visual ergonomics. Optimizing ergonomics is paramount when performing US-guided BoNT chemodenervation for spasticity management. This includes proper preparation of the workspace and allowing for sufficient pre-injection time to optimally position both the patient and the physician. Lack of awareness of ergonomics for US-guided BoNT chemodenervation for spasticity may lead to suboptimal patient outcomes, increase work-related injuries, and patient discomfort. We propose key elements for optimal positioning of physicians and patients, as well as the optimal setup of the workspace and provide clinical pearls in visual identification of spastic muscles for chemodenervation.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Liberación de Acetilcolina/administración & dosificación , Toxinas Botulínicas/administración & dosificación , Ergonomía , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Músculo Esquelético/inervación , Bloqueo Nervioso , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Postura , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Inhibidores de la Liberación de Acetilcolina/efectos adversos , Toxinas Botulínicas/efectos adversos , Consenso , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Espasticidad Muscular/diagnóstico , Espasticidad Muscular/fisiopatología , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagen , Salud Laboral , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/etiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/prevención & control , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Post-stroke spasticity is a major factor disturbing rehabilitation and functional recovery in stroke survivors. Clinical predictors of post-stroke spasticity have often been discussed, but brain image predictors for spasticity have been insufficiently researched. The aim of this study was to use magnetic resonance imaging data to identify early brain imaging predictors for potential development of spasticity after stroke. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted to a stroke unit were screened prospectively over 22 months. Patients with first-ever supratentorial ischaemic stroke were included in the study. Standardized clinical assessments for post-stroke spasticity were prospectively performed within 7 days and at 3 months. Brain imaging data (3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3T MRI)) were collected at the baseline and evaluated. RESULTS: Brain imaging data from 103 stroke patients were collected in the hyperacute phase (< 7 days after stroke onset). A total of 23 patients developed post-stroke spasticity. The volumes of brain lesions involving motor network areas were significantly larger in patients with post-stroke spasticity compared with those without post-stroke spasticity (p < 0.01). Supratentorial lesion of < 0.5 cm3 were not associated with risk of post-stroke spasticity, except when the internal capsule and striatum was affected. CONCLUSION: Lesions involving motor network areas are considered to be a precondition of post-stroke spasticity. There is, however, a low risk of developing post-stroke spasticity with < 0.5 cm3 volumes of supratentorial brain lesions involving motor network areas. Larger volume brain lesions involving motor network areas, e.g. > 3 cm3, were significantly more common in patients with post-stroke spasticity. Pure cortical lesions has no risk of post-stroke spasticity in stroke survivors.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Espasticidad Muscular/etiología , Neuroimagen/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoAsunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Trastornos del Movimiento , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Humanos , Trastornos del Movimiento/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Movimiento/etiología , Espasticidad Muscular/diagnóstico , Espasticidad Muscular/etiología , Espasticidad Muscular/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lower-limb spasticity can impair ambulation and gait, impacting quality of life. OBJECTIVES: This ancillary analysis of the TOWER study (NCT01603459) assessed the efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA for lower-limb post-stroke spasticity including pes equinovarus. METHODS: Participants received escalating incobotulinumtoxinA doses (400-800U) across 3 injection cycles. Changes were compared for those treated in the lower limb (with/without upper-limb treatment) or the upper limb only or for participants treated or untreated for pes equinovarus. Outcome measures were those used in the seminal study: resistance to passive movement scale (REPAS), Ashworth Scale (AS), functional ambulation and lower-limb goal attainment. RESULTS: Among 132/155 (85%) participants with post-stroke spasticity, in cycles 1, 2 and 3, 99, 119 and 121 participants received lower-limb treatment with mean (SD) total limb incobotulinumtoxinA doses of 189.2 (99.2), 257.1 (115.0) and 321.3 (129.2) U, respectively. Of these, 80, 105 and 107, respectively, were treated for pes equinovarus. The mean (SD) improvement in REPAS lower-limb score was greater with treatment in the lower limb versus the upper limb only: -1.6 (2.1) versus-0.4 (1.4); -1.9 (1.9) versus -0.6 (1.6); -2.2 (2.2) versus -1.0 (0.0) (P=0.0005, P=0.0133 and P=0.3581; analysis of covariance [ANCOVA], between-group differences) in cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively. For all cycles, the mean improvement in ankle joint AS score from injection to 4 weeks post-treatment was greater for participants treated versus not treated for pes equinovarus, with a significant between-group difference in cycle 1 (P=0.0099; ANCOVA). At the end of cycle 3, 42% of participants walked independently and 63% achieved 2 of 2 lower-limb treatment goals (baseline 23% and 34%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA for treatment of pes equinovarus and other patterns of lower-limb post-stroke spasticity.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Pie Equinovaro , Espasticidad Muscular , Fármacos Neuromusculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Adulto , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Pie Equinovaro/tratamiento farmacológico , Pie Equinovaro/etiología , Humanos , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Espasticidad Muscular/etiología , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
This consensus paper is derived from a meeting of an international group of 19 neurological rehabilitation specialists with a combined experience of more than 250 years (range 4-25 years; mean 14.1 years) in treating post-stroke spasticity with botulinum toxin A. The group undertook critical assessments of some recurring practical challenges, not yet addressed in guidelines, through an exten-sive literature search. They then discussed the results in the light of their individual clinical experience and developed consensus statements to present to the wider community who treat such patients. The analysis provides a comprehensive overview of treatment with botulinum toxin A, including the use of adjunctive therapies, within a multidisciplinary context, and is aimed at practicing clinicians who treat patients with post-stroke spasticity and require further practical guidance on the use of botulinum toxin A. This paper does not replicate information published elsewhere, but instead aims to provide practical advice to help optimize the use of botulinum toxin A and maximize clinical outcomes. The recommendations for each topic are summarized in a series of statements. Where published high-quality evidence exists, the recommendations reflect this. However, where evidence is not yet conclusive, the group members issued statements and, in some cas-es, made recommendations based on their clinical experience.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Consenso , Humanos , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Background and Purpose: Up to 40% of stroke patients with paresis develop post-stroke spasticity (PSS), which induces difficult complications including pain, contracture, posture disorder. The most important factor for PSS management is its early initiation, so that early recognition of PSS is required in clinical practice.Methods: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted with a high standard of PSS assessment and a comprehensive protocol investigating possible predictive factors to identify early predictors of PSS already in the acute phase following stroke (<7 days). PSS was assessed with the Resistance to Passive movement Scale (REPAS) for major joint movements in upper- and lower limbs, based on Ashworth scale, within 7 days following stroke and after 3 months. Binary logistic regression analysis with significant clinical parameters was applied with 95% of confidence intervals (CI) to find predictors of PSS.Results: Of 145 consecutive first-ever stroke patients, 34 patients (23.4%) exhibited PSS. The Modified Rankin Scale (MRS), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were revealed as strong clinical predictors of PSS. The combination of an MRS >2 (Odds Ratio (OR): 56.538, 95% CI: 17.150-186.394), NIHSS >2 (OR: 57.137, 95% CI:15.685-208.142) and MMSE <27 (OR: 6.133, 95% CI:2.653-14.178) showed positive predictive (95.2%) value for prediction of PSS (sensitivity 94.4%, specificity 93.3%).Conclusions: Besides evaluating PSS itself with a reliable and valid rating scale the common clinical scales in stroke units practice (NIHSS, MRS, MMSE) allow early identification of patients at high risk for PSS.
Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Espasticidad Muscular/diagnóstico , Espasticidad Muscular/etiología , Paresia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicacionesRESUMEN
COVID-19 pandemic is rapidly spreading all over the world, creating the risk for a healthcare collapse. While acute care and intensive care units are the main pillars of the early response to the disease, rehabilitative medicine should play an important part in allowing COVID-19 survivors to reduce disability and optimize the function of acute hospital setting. The aim of this study was to share the experience and the international perspective of different rehabilitation centers, treating COVID-19 survivors. A group of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation specialists from eleven different countries in Europe and North America have shared their clinical experience in dealing with COVID-19 survivors and how they have managed the re-organization of rehabilitation services. In our experience the most important sequelae of severe and critical forms of COVID-19 are: 1) respiratory; 2) cognitive, central and peripheral nervous system; 3) deconditioning; 4) critical illness related myopathy and neuropathy; 5) dysphagia; 6) joint stiffness and pain; 7) psychiatric. We analyze all these consequences and propose some practical treatment options, based on current evidence and clinical experience, as well as several suggestions for management of rehabilitation services and patients with suspected or confirmed infection by SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 survivors have some specific rehabilitation needs. Experience from other centers may help colleagues in organizing their services and providing better care to their patients.