Predictors of Chronic Pain 6 Months and 1 Year After Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Obesity and chronic pain (CP) represent serious, interrelated global public health concerns that have a profound impact on individuals and society. Bariatric surgery is increasing in popularity and has been proven safe and efficacious, providing long-term weight loss and improvements in many obesity-related co-morbidities. A decrease in CP is often a motivation for bariatric surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in CP postoperatively and to examine the relationship between psychosocial measures and pain. METHODS: A total of 155 adult bariatric surgery patients were recruited and completed self-report measures for CP severity and interference, neuropathic pain, anxiety, depression, emotion regulation and perceived social support at three timepoints preoperative and 6 and 12 months postoperative. RESULTS: Pain significantly decreased between preoperative and postoperative timepoints, and preoperative pain was the most significant predictor of postoperative pain. Preoperative CP was correlated with anxiety (p < 0.05) and depression (p < 0.01) at 6 months postoperatively and perceived social support (p < 0.01) at 1 year postoperatively. However, regression analyses with psychological variables were not significant. CONCLUSION: CP decreases after bariatric surgery, but further research with larger sample sizes is needed to establish whether psychosocial characteristics impact this outcome.

A longitudinal approach to evaluating therapist and client contributions to alliance on outcomes in borderline personality disorder.

Methods for studying therapeutic alliance have primarily examined the impact of the early alliance on outcomes. This does not allow for an understanding of the contributions of client, therapist, and dyadic factors to the alliance. Also, the alliance may change over time, highlighting the need for longitudinal methods. Efforts have been made to develop approaches that decompose the contributing factors and their impact on outcomes, but these findings may not apply to clients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Our study extends previous research by replicating Baldwin et al.'s (2007) approach to disentangling therapist versus client-therapist dyad effects while using a time-varying framework. Participants (n = 156) were individuals diagnosed with BPD randomized to 1 year of dialectical behavior therapy or general psychiatric management. Outcomes were general psychiatric severity and interpersonal functioning measured at baseline and every 4 months. Client-rated alliance was measured at these time points. Early alliance predicted interpersonal functioning (p = .0132) with a significant contribution from clients (p = .0248) but not therapists (p = .2854). In the time-varying analysis, client contribution to the alliance was significant (p = .0022). For general psychiatric severity, client contributions to the alliance were significant (p < .0001) but not therapist contributions (p = .6779). Client contribution to the alliance was significant (p = .0168) in the time-varying model. Results suggest that in a BPD sample, time-varying alliance is a better predictor of rate of change in outcomes compared with the alliance measured at a single time point. In contrast to other studies, client, not therapist, contributions to alliance were significant in predicting outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Emotion-focused group therapy for women with symptoms of bulimia nervosa.

This study provides outcome pilot data for an outpatient emotion-focused therapy group for 12 women with DSM-IV diagnoses of binge-eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, or eating disorder not otherwise specified. The emotion-focused therapy group involved 16 weekly sessions that targeted problematic emotions connected to eating disorder symptoms. Semi-structured clinical interviews were conducted pre- and post-treatment and self-report questionnaires were administered. From pre- to post-treatment, changes in binge eating and scores on self-report measures were statistically significant. Participants reported a decrease in the frequency of binge episodes, improvements in mood, and improvements in emotion regulation and self-efficacy.