This analysis investigates whether solidarity is an appropriate concept for thinking about justifications for a just distribution of bioethical goods in the international arena. This will be explored by looking at the national origins of the idea of justifying solidarity in the form of the health care that welfare states offer. Following that, 'life' and 'health' will be placed within a philosophical context by focusing on the main arguments of John Rawls and Amartya Sen and the role of solidarity in these two theories of justice will be analysed. It will be shown that these theories assume that solidarity is not a prerequisite for just international structures. Finally, the possibility will be discussed, that there is a degree of uncertainty surrounding justifications for fair distribution in the international context that can result when the concepts of solidarity and justice are handled imprecisely.
Social Justice , Social Welfare , Humans
Objective: Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and poor insight show higher symptom severity, lower quality of life (QoL), and a reduced treatment response compared to patients with good insight. Little is known about changes in insight. This study explored the course of insight and its association with OCD severity and QoL among 253 patients with OCD participating in the prospective naturalistic Netherlands Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Association (NOCDA) Study. Results: In 70% of the participants with available insight data, the level of insight changed during the four-year course. Insight was most variable in participants with poor insight. Improvement of insight scores was statistically significantly associated with improvement of Y-BOCS scores (r = 0.19), but not with changes in QoL scores. Change in insight in the first 2 years was not statistically significantly predictive of OCD severity or QoL at four-year follow-up. Conclusion: These findings suggest that patients' levels of insight may change during the natural four-year course of OCD and that improvement in the level of insight have a positive association with improvement in OCD severity.
BACKGROUND: Poor insight in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is associated with higher symptom severity, more comorbidities, and worse response to treatment. This study aimed to elucidate underlying mechanisms of poor insight in OCD by exploring its neurobiological correlates. METHODS: Using a symptom provocation task during functional magnetic resonance imaging, we compared brain activation of patients with poor insight (n = 19; 14 female, 5 male), good/fair insight (n = 63; 31 female, 32 male), and healthy control participants (n = 42; 22 female, 20 male) using a Bayesian region-of-interest and a general linear model whole-brain approach. Insight was assessed using the Overvalued Ideas Scale. RESULTS: Compared with patients with good/fair insight and healthy control participants, patients with OCD and poor insight showed widespread lower task-related activation in frontal areas (subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, supplementary motor area, precentral gyrus), parietal areas (posterior parietal cortex, precuneus), and the middle temporal gyrus and insula. Results were not driven by interindividual differences in OCD symptom severity, medication usage, age of disorder onset, or state distress levels. CONCLUSIONS: During symptom provocation, patients with OCD and poor insight show altered activation in brain circuits that are involved in emotional processing, sensory processing, and cognitive control. Future research should focus on longitudinal correlates of insight and/or use tasks that probe emotional and sensory processing and cognitive control.
Brain , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Humans , Male , Female , Bayes Theorem , Prefrontal Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Emotions/physiology
Objective: Therapeutic alliance has consistently been found to predict treatment outcomes across various psychotherapies and patient diagnosis. However, the relationship between therapeutic alliance and outcome in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) has shown mixed results. This study investigated the impact of different aspects of therapeutic alliance in CBT for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Method: Data from two previously completed randomized controlled trials of 208 patients with OCD and their therapists were analyzed. Therapeutic alliance was assessed at week 4 of treatment with the patient-rated and therapist-rated Working Alliance Inventory (WAI), which includes three subscales to measure alliance domains (Goal, Task and Bond). Higher WAI score reflects a better therapeutic relationship. OCD severity was rated by independent assessors at baseline and post-treatment using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Linear regression analyses were used to examine the effects of the different aspects of therapeutic alliance on treatment outcome, adjusted for baseline symptom severity. Results: A higher total WAI score as rated by therapists significantly predicted a lower post-treatment Y-BOCS. Further, higher scores on the Goal and Task subscales of the WAI were associated with lower post-treatment severity. However, these significant outcomes reflected only small effect sizes. Conclusions: In the treatment of OCD, the strength of the therapeutic alliance contributes to outcomes, though to a limited extent. Effective OCD treatment involves the delivery of specific therapy interventions, in the context of a strong therapeutic alliance.
